Call for Essays About Any Aspect of Popular Culture, Present or Past


Latest Posts

Bookmark and Share
Thursday, Feb 22, 2007

Why must we dream in metaphors? Try to hold on to something we couldn’t understand. Couldn’t understand.

Seal sings that provocative line in a haunting song that otherwise—lyrically, at least—is pedestrian, if not wholly unintelligible.

But there is in that one statement, a kernel of something; a thought worth considering. Although, for me it isn’t Seal’s dreams of sleep—the peripatetic ventures of the mind locked in slumber—rather, it is or collective, yet dissimilar dreams accompanying daily travail—the constant associative ramblings of our brains that can’t sit still—that this peripatetic pauses to ponder.

Not really sure (if you care to learn) what I’m talking about? Well, try this . . .

Bookmark and Share
Thursday, Feb 22, 2007
by Harlem Shakes

Harlem Shakes w/ Deerhoof
Diary #6

The van smelt funny today.

When last we spoke, the subject of our discontent was THE NOISE. The noise is the total lack of silence on tour, and its result is mild insanity. But today we couldn’t help but shout over the constant chattin’ and iPod shufflin’ that something smelt awful—not funny… awful. Thevandra has become a moving dungeon, a pit of sounds and smells that puts Hades, or CBGB‘s for that matter, to shame.

But, at last, we arrived in Athens.

Bookmark and Share
Thursday, Feb 22, 2007
by PopMatters Staff

Future Clouds and Radar —"Drugstore Bust"
From Future Clouds and Radar: Self-Titled

Listen to “Drugstore Bust”

Heavily influenced by cameras, the asterisk (*), loss of any kind and Bill Monroe’s falsetto, Future Clouds and Radar is the latest creation of Robert Harrison, best known as the leader of Austin cult-garage-heroes, Cotton Mather. Harrison and Cotton Mather were the sleepy underground pioneers of the late ‘90s, having toured with Oasis (during the band’s heyday) they were hailed by NME as perhaps “the best guitar band since Supergrass”, and were most recently featured on Little Steven Van Zandt’s Coolest Songs in the World Vol. 1.

Radical Face —"Glory"
From Ghost on Morr Music

Listen to “Glory”

This record started with a simple idea: What if houses had memories? What if, when we lived in them, our stories bled into the walls and became a part of the house? What if our ghosts were always going to haunt the places we’ve lived, along with everyone else who’s lived there? In comparison to the very song-oriented debut by Electric President, 24-year-old Ben Cooper’s alter ego (Radical Face) and second musical affair of the heart, Ghost, has become a songwriter-album. Or rather a song-writing album, the tracks as carefully arranged interiors, chamber folk, pocket symphonies, passionate

The Go Find —"Dictionary"
From Stars on the Wall on Morr Music

Listen to “Dictionary”

When Dieter Sermeus set out to write a follow-up for his 2004 The Go-Find debut Miami, he felt he wanted to move away from solitary song-writing and recording, and involved his live band from a very early stage. Together, they crafted a collection of (quote) “good-sounding danceable pop tunes” in a studio in his Antwerp home-town, which provided a warm and friendly environment, full of ancient keyboards and rare Moogs.

Willy Mason —"When The River Moves On"
From If the Ocean Gets Rough on Astralwerks

Listen to “The River Moves On”

If the Ocean Gets Rough is filled with 11 of Willy’s best songs to date, some immediately direct, others more subtle and evocative. With more developed and ambitious songwriting and instrumentation, Mason joins personal tales with socio-cultural commentary, effortlessly expressing his own experiences while making them our own.

Bookmark and Share
Thursday, Feb 22, 2007

Laura Sessions Stepp’s Unhooked seems like a ludicrous book (it’s about the shocking fact that girls these days seem to enjoy sex rather than using it as relationship bait), and it’s good to see scorn being heaped on it appropriately. Zuzu at Feministe parses some of the book’s repugnant imagery. Stepp writes: “Your body is your property. . . . Think about the first home you hope to own. You wouldn’t want someone to throw a rock through the front window, would you?” To which Zuzu responds, “I dunno about you, but if someone throws a rock through my window, it’s a safe bet I didn’t give them permission. I let my guests in through the door. And it’s not going to fall off the hinges if I let more than one person through (even at once!).”

Julian Sanchez is skeptical about the insistence that sex and love always be joined:

“Is it excessively cynical of me to think that the first casualty of an insistence on love and sex always going together might be your criteria for being “in love?” As in: “Holy hell, I’m 25 and have never had sex… You! SOUL MATE! NOW!”

Matt Yglesias links to a Washington Post review that makes the fair and self-evident point that “Both males and females should work hard to gain another’s affection and trust. And one’s sexuality is not a commodity that, given away too readily and too often, will exhaust or devalue itself.” At Slate Meghan O’Rourke suggests the problem isn’t that girls are hooking up but that they have such a joyless approach to it:

The hookup culture is part of a wider ethos of status-seeking achievement. As one girl puts it: “Dating is a drain on energy and intellect, and we are overwhelmed, overprogrammed and overcommitted just trying to get into grad school.” So they throw themselves into erotic liaisons with the same competitive zeal they bring to résumé-building: “If you mention you think a guy is hot, your friend may be, ‘Oh, he is hot. I’m gonna go get with him,’ ” Anna, a high-school student, reveals. The combination of postfeminist liberation and pressure from parents to “do it all”—as one kid puts it—has led girls to confuse the need to be independent (which they associate with success) with the need to be invulnerable. Thus, they frame their seemingly explorative sex lives in rigid, instrumental terms, believing that vulnerability of any sort signals a confusing dependence. The result? Shying away from relationships that can hurt them—which includes even fleeting obsessions that can knock them off balance.

I’m a little skeptical of that analysis, if only because it’s not only girls but adolescents in general who confuse independence with invulnerability. (That’s why my auto insurance rates were so high when I was 18.) Not that teenage girls are not under unique pressures—just look what society does to celebrity teenagers (aka the Lindsey Lohans of the world) as they verge closer to adulthood. Female sexuality obviously evokes all sorts of hysterical responses among those who want to lock it down and control it. I think Echidne is more on the right track with this: “Session Step does have a point in worrying about the increasingly early sexualization of girls, a sexualization that comes from outside and has very little to do with what ten-year old girls, say, actually think about or want to do, and much more to do with the popular culture and the porn world. I also think that it is hard for women to understand their own sexual needs in a world which blasts them with messages about how best to service men for the pleasure of the men, and I think that the real sexual liberation of women is a very unfinished business.” For much more on how sexualization harms girls, here’s a comprehensive report from the American Psychological Association—it’s obviously a problem, but it seems the Session Stepps of the world draw the wrong conclusion and think girls must be convinced to be nonsexual, or to treat their own sexuality like a precious valuable commodity, as was mentioned above. Perhaps superficializing sexuality may be a way of retaining control over it as the problem it poses for every one else becomes more apparent. But ultimately the point is that whatever young women choose to do sexually needn’t be pathologized automatically; it seems that the search for explanations for whatever sexual behavior a woman exhibits is ultimately an attempt to wrest it from her.

Echidne also notes that “Session Stepp’s point is naturally that it is the women who are supposed to do the relationship-work. Men can just do whatever they always have done in the past, and if that happens to be exactly what the author worries about, well, who cares. It’s not a guy thing.” This sounds a lot like sociologist Arlie Hochschild’s analysis of the extra burden of emotional work women are expected to assume. This work is alleged to come naturally for women, but it is really one of the more insidious patriarchal exploitations, to keep women performing this arduous and self-abnegating work of relationship preservation with no reciprocity.

UPDATE: Tyler Cowen reprocesses Unhooked into a rational-choice model here.

Bookmark and Share
Thursday, Feb 22, 2007

Interesting documentary on PBS this month: Hip-Hop: Beyond Beats and Rhymes.  In it, film-maker, hip-hop fan and ex-footballer Byron Hurt examines issues of misogyny and homophobia in rap.  The website above also has more information including a rap time-line and articles about the industry.  Though he included a critique of popular film culture that also promotes a hyper-masculine ideal, it would have interesting to also hear a comparison of other types of music and how they deal with these issues.

Also instructive is this article from the Tennessean: Music Row Says Grammys Snubbed Country, Like Always.  Though I didn’t realize it after watching them, in retrospect, it did seem that this genre was pushed aside during awards night, especially considering its ongoing strong sales.  The article notes that the two big features were Carrie Underwood toasting Bob Wills and then later joining Rascal Flatts to toast the Eagles- they didn’t get to perform any of their own material.  That got some industry people pretty upset and going as far as suggesting that country acts should boycott the ceremony in the future.  And though they brush it aside, you also can’t help but feel that Music Row wasn’t happy to see that the act that was honored the most happened to be the one that they themselves had snubbed and was slapped back on the band’s next release- the Dixie Chicks.

Now on PopMatters
PM Picks

© 1999-2014 All rights reserved.™ and PopMatters™ are trademarks
of PopMatters Media, Inc.

PopMatters is wholly independently owned and operated.