Suspicious Minds
"Take that boy and put him in a mansion,
Paint the windows black,
Give him all the women that he wants,
Put a monkey on his back . . .
God please save his soul --
He was the King of Rock and Roll . . ."
Robbie Robertson, "American Roulette"
Not to get all Joseph Campbell-ish here, but as we look at the figures
who populate postmodern American myth -- that pantheon of movie stars,
musicians, artists, and politicians we have consensually elevated to
demi-godhood -- we see a number of recurring motifs. The American
myth-figure comes from a humble background, receives a stroke of extreme good
fortune, creates a number of defining moments, burns out young, and
dies tragically, robbing the world of what would surely have been his or
her finest work. This last motif, the masterpiece that will forever be
unrealized, is the glue that holds the whole motif-complex together: the
"if-only" factor. If only Jim Morrison hadn't ODed he'd have become
our greatest poet. If only Marilyn Monroe had been taken seriously as
an actress, she would have realized the promise she showed in her last
film, The Misfits. If only Kennedy hadn't gone to Dallas, or James
Dean hadn't the need for speed, or Kurt Cobain hadn't eaten the
shotgun . . .
The life and times of Elvis Presley contain a barrage of if-onlies,
as befits perhaps the largest of our latter-day myths. Fans and scholars
of the King will forever argue the effects of the often bizarre curves
in his career -- whether going into the Army helped or hurt him,
whether the movies gave him longevity or consigned him to mediocrity, whether
his drug use and profligate spending were the result of deep depression
or the compulsive behavior of the child of white trash suddenly become
nouveau riche. One thing, however, meets with general agreement:
whatever Elvis's other problems may have been, his biggest failing was his
utter dependence upon his manager, Colonel Tom Parker. When they inked
their first contract, Parker took an unusual 25% commission; by the
time of the King's death, three-fourths of Elvis's income went into
Parker's pocket, seemingly without Elvis's knowledge. If Elvis was Faust,
selling his soul for the riches of the earth, Parker will always be
Mephistopheles, paying with a mess of pottage.
And like Mephistopheles, Parker is a mystery. He was born Andreas van
Kuijk, a Dutch immigrant who changed his name the moment he stepped off
the boat in Tampa Bay harbor but never applied for a green card. He
worked as a carny for Royal Amusement Shows. He briefly managed the
careers of country legends Eddy Arnold and Hank Snow. He was a friend of
country star and twice Louisiana Governor Jimmie Davis ("You Are My
Sunshine"), who bestowed the honorary rank of Colonel upon him in exchange for
services rendered during Davis's campaign. And of course he managed
Elvis Presley for virtually the singer's entire career. But that is pretty
much all we know about the man, despite his tight relationship with the
world's most famous client.
Tennessee historian and biographer James L. Dickerson makes a valiant
attempt to change that in his book Colonel Tom Parker: The Curious Life
of Elvis Presley's Eccentric Manager, but he never really succeeds.
Dickerson talked with dozens of people who were acquainted with Parker
and dug up a great many documents pertaining in one way or another to
him, but whereas most people who wish to hide their secrets bury the
evidence, Parker simply worked it so that evidence never existed in the
first place. Without birth records, registration papers, marriage
certificate, military records, or even (apparently) close friends, it's next to
impossible to get a handle on the man. Dickerson thus resorts to a
great deal of speculation and virtual lunges at conclusions. For example,
Dickerson's explanation for the reason Parker was not drafted during
World War II runs roughly along these lines: Parker's draft rating
indicated someone who was either physically or "morally" unfit; Parker could
not possibly have been physically unfit, as he lived for another 58
years, so the reason for his failure to pass muster had to be on moral
grounds; at that time, the "turn-your-head-and-cough" test was used not
only to detect hernias but also to filter out any draftee who got an
erection; if the healthy Parker failed the physical, it could only be
because a certain part of his body stood up and saluted the doctor.
Even if we ignore the other glaring logical fallacies in the
preceding argument, we cannot ignore the primary problem: it's all rank
conjecture, based upon a single possibility among infinite others in the
vacuum of real evidence. For all Dickerson knows, Parker could have paid off
the doctor, or actually had a hernia (I hear they're non-lethal), or
even used the Jedi mind trick. This kind of blind extrapolation runs
throughout the book, as Dickerson takes the handful of things he knows
about Parker -- he was an illegal immigrant, he was a carny, he had a
gambling problem -- and attempts to fit all of the other questions
surrounding him and his relationship with Elvis into a decidedly Procrustean
bed. The reason why Elvis never toured outside the U.S. is the same
reason why he always overpaid his taxes -- because Parker wanted to avoid
government background checks. The reason why Elvis enlisted in the Army
ahead of the draft is the same reason he fired his original band --
because Parker the old carny wanted to keep Elvis isolated from anyone who
might convince his prize attraction that he could get a better deal
with another manager. Dickerson manages to hang every unanswered question
about Elvis's career, from a missing footstone on Gladys Presley's
grave to Elvis's failure to grow as an actor, squarely around Parker's
neck. Like Schroedinger's experiment with the cat, even contradicting
possibilities are equally true in the lack of empirical evidence.
As for the evidence that Dickerson does have, much of it is severely
tainted, relying as it does on the testimony of people with assorted
axes to grind. Scotty Moore, Elvis's original guitar player and the
subject of an earlier biography by Dickerson, provides a lot of the insights
here, but he is hardly an objective source, blaming Parker for drawing
up a number of bad contracts that relegated him to mere session-player
status. Other testimony comes from Elvis's ex-wife Priscilla Presley,
who discovered after the King's death that the Presley estate was deeply
in the red and blamed Parker's insanely unfair cut of Elvis's earnings.
Still more evidence is provided by people who either felt cheated by
Parker, just plain didn't like him, or met him once. Conspicuously absent
is any word from people who actually knew Parker, resulting in a
two-dimensional portrait of a cigar-chomping Disney villain with the ethics
of a hyena and the powers of Rasputin. This is not to say that Parker
has been misrepresented or abused. He could very well have been the
low-rent Machiavelli he is depicted as. We just don't know, and Dickerson
fails to convince us that he knows any more than we do.
What is even more disturbing, however, is that the oversimplification
of Colonel Tom Parker leads inevitably to the oversimplification of
Elvis Presley. To Dickerson's credit, this is always Parker's biography,
the well-trod ground of Elvis's life given just enough ink to clarify
Dickerson's points about Parker, but the fact remains that if Parker is a
cartoonish villain, then Elvis is someone who was taken in by a
cartoonish villain -- he becomes Johnny Bravo. Meanwhile, the biggest
questions, the ones this biography should have been able to address, remain
unanswered. Why was Elvis never aware of just how much money Parker was
taking out of his pocket? Why, when Elvis was constantly surrounded by
people because he hated to be alone, was no one ever able to make the
case for tax shelters to him? Why did Elvis accept the Colonel's continual
quashing of his acting and musical ambitions? Why in all the vastness
of the Presley money-making machine did so much power remain in the
hands of one man with so obviously little regard for Elvis? What was the
mysterious power the Colonel had over him? There has to be more to this
-- it's just too hard to accept the idea that, with all the money, fame,
power, and attendant tragedy, in the end the Elvis myth hinges
entirely on the fact that the King of Rock and Roll was either a spineless
neurotic or a grade-A doofus.
But accept it we must, until someone is able to undertake a deeper
exploration of Colonel Tom Parker than Dickerson has. Given the elusive,
shadowy nature of Parker's life, that may be impossible, but as it stands
we're no closer now to answering all the if-onlies than we were
before.