Time Traveler: In Search of Dinosaurs and Ancient Mammals from Montana to Mongolia
Author: Michael Novacek
Farrar, Straus and Giroux
February, 2002, x+368 pages, $26.00 (hardcover)
The Future of Life
Author: Edward O. Wilson
Alfred A. Knopf (Borzoi Books)
January 2002, xxiv+230 pages, $22.00 (hardcover)
by Wes Burnett
e-mail this article
Dreams of Electric Sheep
Michael Novacek's
dad
was a jazz guitarist and that rubbed off on him. Much of his youth, most of it spent in Los
Angeles,
culminates in dodging the draft and aspiring to be a rock 'n' roll guitarist. If some of the folks
he hung out with are any indication, he must have been good. Had he persisted, he might have made
it. But he made a mistake. He went on a god-awful summer field trip and decided to become a Senior
Vice President and Provost of Science at the American Museum of Natural History instead.
This book is about Novacek's journey from a child with a precocious interest in rocks and fossils
to
a wannabe rocker to one of science's leading paleontologists. It's a wonderful story, but if it's
another book about dinosaurs you want, this probably isn't it. To begin with, Novacek's first love
and real specialty is mammals, and it shows. For every index entry to dinosaurs in the book, there
is 1.6 to mammals. Mammals' earliest evolution coincides with the rise and fall of dinosaurs so
dinosaurs figure in Novacek's narrative, mostly, only as they relate to mammals. During the age of
dinosaurs, mammals left behind tons of bones that vary in size from small to really small. Much of
their paleontology is done with microscopes. Once dinosaurs got out of the way, mammals got bigger
and the techniques become more familiar to us, but with or without dinosaurs, mammalian taxonomy
and
paleogeography are a mess – an important mess since they become us.
Novacek's book, however, is not really about either dinosaurs or mammals. It is about becoming a
scientist, generally, and a field scientist, particularly. Novacek's awakening as a scientist he
attributes to his teachers. Foremost among these are his parents, whose freedom of thought
encouraged the child's inquisitive whims. Then there were the professors, those at UCLA, San Diego
and Berkeley, who opened doors and tolerated the conflicting demands placed on him by his guitar,
an
ugly war and his own sense inquiry, independence and adventure. His testimonial is genuine and
loving.
His serious inquiry into paleontology began, not with the textbooks or in the laboratory, but with
an almost accidental, and apparently undeserved, opportunity to do field work as an undergraduate.
And here is the book's true story, the development of a field scientist. He's a city slicker with
no
qualifications, not so much as a driver's license, much less the wilderness skills of a Boy Scout
dropout. Well, no qualification except an attitude. He writes of a childhood memory of the Grand
Canyon, of an aspiration to know '...its gullies, crevices and caves, never returning to the same
spot. I was cast adrift on a great sandstone sea. I was lost in the rocks and lost in time.' And
of
the first summer's field work on 'chain gang in the service of science', he writes that it was
good
to get away from normal people to the 'empty places, like the Caballo Mountains, with a few other
eccentrics.'
As a writer, Novacek has several remarkable traits. The first is his ability to write about the
most
godforsaken places, from Eastern Montana to Mongolia, with a sublime gracefulness that makes the
reader almost taste the sand and smell the dust. I actually got a sunburn between pages 135 and
150.
Without indulging in silliness or romanticism, his pen brings reality to today's world, and life
to
the world of a couple of hundred million years ago. Second, he describes painfully difficult
methodologies and the structure of complex theories with a simplicity that is enviable. Without
even
noticing it, the reader comes to understand how a CAT scan works and is applied in paleontology,
why
the Eocene mammalian assemblage is important, and why continental drift is such a stunningly
important idea.
Lastly, Novacek has an uncommon ability to write about himself naturally and honestly. He makes
mistakes, serious ones. His judgment is often poor, very poor. He gets sick, sometimes through his
own foolishness. Scorpions sting him. A horse nearly does him in. He has accidents. Diarrhea lays
him low and just at the wrong time. He has stupid confrontations with drunken caballeros
over
cigarettes. He has run-ins with bandits. But his modesty and his sense of humor makes all this
part
of the adventure, what one simply comes to expect while working on a chain gang in the service of
science. This book creates the feeling of a genuine conversation with a dear friend, and one
regrets
when it is over.
Besides this being a wonderful collection of essays about mammals and dinosaurs, about doing
science
and fieldwork in some very strange places, the book itself is physically charming. The printing is
beautiful, and it is abundantly illustrated with line drawings, some of them among science's
classics, that are well integrated into the text. The maps are almost stupendous and do what they
are supposed to do, let the reader know where all those places in the text are. The index works.
The
endnotes are useful but there is a catch. They are not referenced in the text so the reader has
continually to remind himself to check on the notes for each chapter. It is worth the effort,
since
Novacek includes references, among other things, to useful, and he hopes, enduring, web pages.
In his last chapter, Novacek reflects on the lessons we learn from paleontology. Among them, the
most significant is that the biosphere, that thin shell of living matter that covers virtually the
entirety of Earth, is far from being durable. It is, in fact, very delicate and has gone through
at
least 5 episodes of marked depletion, some so serious that life's escape from virtual extinction
is
a miracle. We are now in the sixth period of extinction, the one caused by us.
The consequences of this sixth period of extinction is the topic that Wilson takes up in The
Future of Life. Wilson, now 72, is arguably America's leading ecologist, a student of insects,
particularly ants, and his intellectual history includes articulation of the theories of island
biogeography and an advocacy of sociobiology, a controversial, emotional topic. Like Novacek, he
has
done his time on a chain gang in the service of science.
Wilson begins his discussion by noting that economists and ecologists have the same intellectual
concern, production and consumption, but the data and time reference of the two professions are
substantially different. Economists worry about increasing, or at least sustaining, production and
consumption. Ecologists worry about the natural limits of both production and consumption. Human
population growth is the key to understanding our limits of production and consumption, and our
present population growth, more like bacteria than mammals, is bringing us dangerously close to
Earth's limits. Though different models produce different results, the best bet is the human
population will reach a zenith at 9 to 10 billion sometime in the second half of the 21st century
and then begin a slow decline.
We've a chance of making it through this transition but the place to watch is China. With a fifth
of
Earth's population crammed into two well-beaten river valleys, China is approaching its final
population crisis decades before the rest of us will get there. If China makes it, it will provide
important lessons for us all. If China fails, we'll all probably go down in the sinking ship.
Starting with Hawaii, the earth's most isolated archipelago, Wilson examines what happens to
species
in this transition. Basically, big habitats, or islands, are cut into small habitats that act in
accord with island bio-geographic theory. Species go extinct a lot faster than their loss of
habitat
alone would suggest. Cut a habitat in half and more than half the species disappear. In the
process,
endemic and specialist species take an awful beating while a limited number of generalist and
exotics prosper. Cockroaches make it, rufous crowned rollers don't. As predators, we go for the
big,
slow and tasty, first. Then, we turn to the rest with a patient viciousness. Some folks kill
rhinos
because they can make 10 years salary in one afternoon. Others kill through their fads: it took
yuppies only about 8 years to virtually extinguish white abalone just because eating white abalone
was the thing to do.
One way to value nature is to examine what it would cost to replace the free goods it gives us
with
manufactured goods. For example, in the South 'maw nature' gave us lots of free water. With
urbanization, water is no longer free. It has to be cleaned and piped which costs money as our
water
bills reflect. Were we to substitute all of nature's freebies for manufactured goods, the global
GNP
would have to increase by a factor of three. Obviously, we can't do this, we'd go extinct first.
But
right now, it is exactly what we are trying to do. The inflationary pressures associated with
environmental depletion and the substitution of the manufactured for the natural will drive us all
back into the caves before the end of the century.
Wilson is cautiously hopeful about the future. He thinks the world has awakened to its
environmental
crisis, and that it has the will and tools to do battle. The tools, maybe. The awakening, much
less
the will, is another matter. The United States, a nation that doesn't even have a population
policy
and seems convinced that short-term market economics is alone the solution to every problem, is
willfully recalcitrant. Rather than gird our loins for the environmental struggle, we avoid
thinking
about it, preferring instead a Hundred Years War against terrorists that is supposed to protect
the
American way of life, going shopping in our SUVs. Ironically, the religious conservatives of a
variety of flavors are beginning to take a stand on God's creation, and it is one that scares the
political conservatives pea green. It's a long shot, but the environment may yet ally Islamic
fundamentalists, the Christian Right and Orthodox Judaism.
We may survive this century's demographic transition, but Wilson makes it clear that many species
won't make it with us. By the 22nd century, humankind will enter a new age, one Wilson calls the
Age
of Loneliness.
Phillip Dick anticipated Wilson and drew a picture of that Age of Loneliness in Do Androids
Dream
of Electric Sheep?, a sad story about a dystopia where we can't tell the difference between
ourselves and our machines, and where we are so desperate for the fellowship of other critters
that
we pay dearly for robot surrogates. Seeing a real toad in the desert drives us to ecstatic
euphoria.
Dick's important allegory was lost as pop culture converted it into Blade Runner, first a
dumbed-down cop-hunts-renegade-robots story, and finally just another awful computer game.
Possibly it is time to think about electric sheep again. In Wilson's coming Age of Loneliness,
they
and a few cockroaches may be the only friends we have.