If Words Could Kill
“Bump and Run” and William Butler Yeats’ “The Second Coming”
In the gloomy ‘60s UK series Callan (1967-1972), Edward Woodward was a tough spy with a working class demeanour and a cynical, downbeat attitude. When Woodward hit American screens in the ‘80s as a seeming extension of the same character in The Equalizer (1985-1989) he was a little more refined and cultured. So, while Callan probably knew his poetry as part of a standard British education (and was usually more interested in his model soldier collection), Robert McCall in The Equalizer was a US-TV “British” person, and thus classy, cultured, and a little bemused at, well, everything.
The Equalizer is a guilty(ish) pleasure of grimy ‘80s street-crime drama, offering the same joys as a Death Wish marathon, but without the ugliness and idiocy that permeates the sequels (the original is quite unfairly maligned!). A little too “neat”, there’s still an odd thrill in seeing debonair Woodward pull out an uzi and take it to some street thugs, and his “you are scum!” rant at a villain is a still a classic moment.
In one of the better entries of the first season, McCall discovers that a somewhat less-compassionate vigilante is hitting the streets and using his M.O. (creating the usual bad-vigilante/nice-vigilante contrast that modern Batman stories and the like generally use as a smokescreen to cover their hero’s questionable behaviour). Sophisticated and frustrated like McCall, the faux-Equalizer is a public defender played by Brian Bedford who has seen a few too many of his guilty clients let off. Though fitting a standard reactionary depiction of “revolving door justice”, the episode – thanks in large part to Bedford’s performance – suggests a more honest and authentic human conflict in response to a legal system that is complex and carries unavoidable contradictions and compromises even when working effectively. The conflict between one man as both defence attorney and vigilante (as in the best “Daredevil” comics – but not the movie…) is never fully explored, but the hint of an interesting underlying conflict remains.
The delicate synchronicity between the two “Equalizers” is nicely demonstrated as they recite William Butler Yeats’ “The Second Coming”, the recitation acting almost as a bemused shrug at the moans of gloom and despair at a system “falling apart”; and yet, in a nice piece of understatement, we are also left to find in it their tacit agreement, even as they recognise the ultimate futility and state of impasse of the world described.
Bleak, gloomy, and full or foreboding, “The Second Coming” also found a place in Staczynski’s Babylon 5, as G’kar (the excellent Andreas Katsulas) found some traces of wisdom in human culture:
“Comanche” and Edwin Markham’s “Lincoln, the Man of the People”
Retro Remote’s unapologetic nomination for The Greatest TV Show of All Time, Have Gun – Will Travel featured the urbane, witty and literate cowboy Paladin (played by Richard Boone) righting wrongs (for a fee) and quoting literature, theatre, and poems (usually for free) all over the old West (McCall in The Equalizer was something of a modern-day version, replacing Paladin’s for-hire calling card with a newspaper ad).
Retro Remote has already written about the tough and confronting tone of Have Gun – Will Travel, and this toughness was always tied to a literary awareness that seemed to contextualise the stories in a larger historical, social and cultural context. Paladin’s literary characteristics seemed to serve as a way to promlematise the stories that, according to the usual understanding of generic conventions, would usually end up deproblematised by the time the last bullet was fired. Where other cowboy heroes would take a victory and ride back into a stable and coherent society, Paladin would usually find a line of verse or two to make it clear that any simple resolution we might find in the doing away of a villain was illusory, and that cheap victories often came at a greater cost.
Though the episodes usually end with a killing, it’s rarely the kind of clean ending that leaves all questions answered and problems solved: despite the “have gun” emphasis, Paladin’s main weapon is almost always logic and language, and their failure always seems to be our failure as much as his. Far from delivering ideological enclosure (as is often said of episodic genre television), Have Gun – Will Travel used Paladin’s literacy as a way to question the simplicity of generic conventions, even while delivering the expected thrills.
An epic quoter, there’s no shortage of Paladin’s literary quotations to choose from: Robert Browning, John Milton, John Keats, John Webster, John Donne, John Greenleaf Whittier, and, of course, Shakespeare and the King James Bible. Overwhelmed by the amount of literary quotation, I eventually started keeping a list: there’s also a handful of other “quotes” I haven’t been able to find sources for – no doubt writers disguising their own best stuff as great historical quotes! With quotes flying in just about every episode, who can say which is the best? But any scene in which Boone gets to recite at (relative) length is an extra bonus. Boone’s brief recitation from Edwin Markham’s “Lincoln, the Man of the People” is as good as any, even if it involves Paladin changing the words a little – something we can presumably forgive, given that Paladin recites it shortly after the Battle of Little Bighorn, some 25years before the poem would actually be written!
“Rumpole and the Age for Retirement” and Alfred, Lord Tennyson’s “Ulysses”
Paladin’s literary clout in Have Gun – Will Travel wouldn’t be matched by a regular TV character for another 20 years or so, when Horace Rumpole, John Mortimer’s crumpled and crass Old Bailey barrister, stepped up to defend all kinds of petty crims and working class “villains”. Luckily, unlike Have Gun – Will Travel, someone online has already taken care of the cataloguing task, compiling a partial (in progress) list of Rumpole’s poetic quotations.
British TV like Rumpole was standard viewing growing up in Australia, and Rumpole still seems to provide a perfectly balanced viewing experience, transcending the sense of enclosure and meandering aimlessness that fills so much generic British television of the time without launching into the sensationalism and ideological expansionism of the US equivalents (yes, I’m generalising horribly). Rumpole shows a world of dour – perhaps archaic – institutions and small-time tussles, without sacrificing the idea that there might still be higher ideas and ideals lurking behind the conventional constraints and street-level griminess. Rumpole fights without being a crusader, undercuts without being an iconoclast, and returns home to relative comfort (and claret) leaving the problems of the day behind him without being a sell-out.
As such, Rumpole is also an important antidote to the divisiveness and sensationalism of most legal dramas. Rumpole knowingly defends all kinds of career criminals, an (all too rare) example of a TV defence lawyer who’s simply there to get the best results for his clients – guilty or innocent. It also juggles a mix of whimsical irresponsibility and social commentary, with Rumpole functioning happily within the confines of his profession, but never becoming blind to its deviations, contradictions, and injustices. While shows like Law & Order resort to vein-popping sensationalism to produce tabloid-style nonsense, the real tensions and conflicts in Rumpole play out quietly, easily and naturally underneath the everyday processes of law – something that makes Rumpole of the Bailey one of the great joys of television, and the perfect mix of popular and poetic realities.
As with Have Gun – Will Travel, scarcely an episode goes by without Rumpole delving into his Oxford Book of English Verse, so let’s stay with the tried and true, and see Tennyson’s “Ulysses” expertly woven into Rumpole’s retirement speech:
* * *
For more poetry and pop culture, be sure to take a look at the online video conference “The Poetry and Poetics of Popular Culture”, taking place November 11-12.
In the meantime, remember: tough guys recite, but they don’t bank at the Union Bank of Switzerland.
We all know how critical it is to keep independent voices alive and strong on the Internet. Please consider a donation to support our work as independent cultural critics and historians. Your donation will help PopMatters stay viable through these changing and challenging times where costs have risen and advertising has dropped precipitously. We need your help to keep PopMatters strong and growing. Thank you.
"PopMatters (est. 1999) is a respected source for smart long-form reading on a wide range of topics in culture. PopMatters serves as…READ the article