Call for Feature Essays About Any Aspect of Popular Culture, Present or Past

Music

Do you regard drums, or rhythm, as a language as complex and communicative as any spoken aloud?

Bookmark and Share
Text:AAA

Well, rhythm acts on a different part of the brain than speech. So the neurologic function of music is quite different than language. […] We’re coded to scan for music, for sound; but two different parts of the brain process them. So you’re dealing with a spiritual side when you’re dealing with music as opposed to speech. Now sometimes speech can take you to a spiritual place, but it’s a completely different kind of vibratory stimulation. It’s a different kind of emotional payload. So, you’re talking about two different things. That’s the neural science of sound. There’s quite a bit of difference between sound and music.


Yet both are communicative, and collaborative.


But [sound] is communication on a whole different level. I look at things in these terms: there are things you can say in vibration, and understand in vibration, that cannot be said in speech. Speech is a very poor substitute for sound. It’s very limited. Our vocabularies are quite small compared to the possibilities of sounds and vibrations. I mean, we have found out that vibration can be used in the healing process. Sure, you could read the great texts, and find some kind of extasis, some ecstasy in reading beautiful prose. It certainly illuminates you. But, auditory driving is what we’re talking about. And rhythmic entrainment, which happens through music. You can’t have that in speech. It’s not part of that; it’s a different world. It functions on a different level, and it feeds a different sensibility in the human consciousness.


As a matter of fact, not all musicians can play with other music. Music is not a universal language. I have met musicians that couldn’t play with me because they were so culturally bound by their music. They could not step out of their traditions because they were so steeped in them. So, music is a universal, but it is not a universal language. Every culture on earth has a music, so it’s universal that way, but not every music works together.


You’ve noted so many times in your books that although language may divide humans, rhythm is a uniting force.


Well, rhythm, harmony and melody is the trilogy of what we call music. The reason that rhythm is so much more powerful as a trance inducer is because it has a short sound bite, it denotes time, and it’s redundant. And redundancy is the basis of trance. So that’s the supreme power of rhythm. A drum is a tool which is used to lay down a rhythm, which is a groove, and a groove is what establishes the trace. That’s where real true auditory driving comes from. That’s what the science says. It’s not just me talking. If you look at EEGs and MRIs before during and after an auditory driving exercise, you’ll see that rhythm is the key to altered states. That’s why drumming is becoming very prevalent in therapy and remedies for autism, Alzheimer’s, dementia, motor impairments. Gabby Giffords, the congresswoman who was shot, one of her main therapies is rhythm therapy, music therapy. There are a lot of institutes now that focus on music as a legitimate science and therapy. You can get prescriptions written for music in many states and have HMOs and the insurance companies pay for it!  So it’s becoming a very significant player in therapy.


That’s the most exciting thing happening in music.
It’s now going back to its roots in the archaic world, when it wasn’t used for entertainment, it was used strictly for healing. But then it moved into this phase where it got concertized. This was fairly recent. […] But, music is not just meant to dance to, to get your ya-ya-s out. It was meant for other things. And now science is showing the way that these hidden energies can be unleashed on the people who need them like children with motor problems, the elderly, people who need to have their consciousness raised. Now there are facilitators, music therapists, who are skilled in how to deal music, as opposed to a performer who learns a performance skill. Good musicians don’t have a clue how to work with someone with Alzheimer’s and dementia, necessarily.


Genres are a funny thing, and they confound a lot of people who would prefer to think about music more generally, without artificial or marketing categories around different sounds. But, for better or worse, you will be remembered as a foundational figure in the rise of world music.


Ugh.


Well, what, finally, is world music?


There’s no such thing as world music. Let me put it to you this way: if you’re in the Philippines, Appalachian music is world music. World music is usually what is not here, it’s what is out there. It’s electric, it’s acoustic… I’ve won two Grammies in world music and I don’t know what it is. I won the first ever Grammy in world music [laughs] and I don’t know what it is!
What I think they’re trying to say is that most music is fused now. There’s only one pure form of music that I know of left on the planet and that’s the Gyuto Tantric Choir, the Tibetan monks. For thousands of years they’ve kept their chants behind monastery walls, and only since 1965 have released it to the outside. So, that’s un-fused. I mean nothing has changed in that. I mean, even the music from New Guinea, they’re playing guitars now. Radio waves have completely fused everything. You know, records. We’ve been recording music since the 1890s – March 18th 1890 was the first field recording. It’s a little over 100 years of recording, and it has changed the whole soundscape. So, I mean… if you’re a Pygmy in the Ituri rainforest, and you hear a radio playing Elvis Presley, or Beyoncé, that’s world music. You understand? So, world music is a misnomer. There is no such thing as world music. It all depends on where there is. It all depends on where you are!


Look, I was in Egypt in the 70s, and I was on caravans, and people were listening to, you know, Kiss on the radio. They’re on their camels, and they’re listening to radio stations from Cairo. We’re out in the middle of the desert and we’re listening to American pop music.


You also brought the Dead there, in 1978…


Yeah, but. It’s all over the world. Not just there. Since the advent of recordings, and now with the internet, I mean forget it. Radio waves encircle the whole globe now. Everywhere. And, so, when an Eskimo hears something, maybe, it’s like when the Grateful Dead first heard the blues. It turned us into a blues band. You know? You base your knowledge on something that turns you on, that comes before you. We were coded to make music, for all these reasons, survival reasons, procreative reasons, so when you hear music that’s meaningful and your light goes on, you try to make it, you try to sound like that. Eventually you find your own music. Once you get a skill, like playing the blues, maybe it turns into Grateful Dead music. Or jazz, big band, country. All music has its roots in something that preceded it. So, I called up Neil Portnow [President of the National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences] when I got that last Grammy a few years ago. I said, “First of all we don’t make albums anymore, and second, there’s no such thing as world music. So, I appreciate the Grammy, but….” And we had a laugh about that.


Wait, listen, I’ve just been raving here. [laughs.] What do you wanna… do you have any questions?


Well, you’ve sort of answered my questions before I even asked most of them. But…


I know what we need to talk about! The Smithsonian!


Well, sure. So, here’s this list of a couple dozen records spanning a few decades, and which will for better or worse be described as a goldmine of “world music”. These are your records, though you don’t even appear on many of them.


No, some of them I don’t even appear on. It’s not about me. I mean, some of it is, but some of it is just the best music in the world, music that I believed was worthy of being recorded at the highest level, the highest resolution. Giving it its moment. Giving it the care and respect that you’d give pop music that might be commercially viable. Each one of these I thought might sell a million records. I treated them like I did Grateful Dead records. But I wasn’t thinking about money. I was thinking of turning people on to… Actually, it started with me just wanting great sounding recordings. Before I thought about releasing this stuff, I recorded it just for myself and for the artists. I made these artists an offer they couldn’t refuse. I said, “Look: if we record you, I’ll give you the tape and you can do what you want with it. If you want to do business with it, cool, we’ll do business. But either way, I get to keep a copy of it, take it back to my studio, have a cup of cognac [pronounced con-yak], sit back in my green chair, and listen to some of the best music on the planet.” You know? That was the deal.


But, at first, I couldn’t even give it away. What I did was… somebody would have a birthday, or somebody would get married, or one of my great friends was having a baby, and I would give them a cassette of it, as the most precious gift I could give anyone. Most of the time they’d just leave it on the kitchen table. You know? Even my best friends. They didn’t even realize… except, you know, except Jerry [Garcia]. And a few of my friends that were really understanding of what it was. But, yeah, I couldn’t even give it away. So, selling? I don’t think so.


But then what happened was [I got a call from] Don Rose from a little company called Rykodisc, who at the time had an ad in the paper saying “CDs only”. CDs were less than 1% of the market then. Imagine: a company that was only making CDs, no records no cassettes. And I knew that CDs weren’t making anything. But, he called me up and said he’d heard my recordings somehow, someone had given him a copy. He said, “I’d really like to release some of this.” He came over and made me an offer I couldn’t refuse. He said: “I’ll release anything that you do. You want to go in the studio, I’ll pay for it, and release anything. But only on CD.” I said, “Cool. Wow.”


So, that’s how it all got started. I never thought of ever selling it. I didn’t think there was any market for it! This was in the early 1980s.


And then, how is it that you got hooked up with the Smithsonian?


Well, when they inherited the Folkways Collection, the Mo Asch collection [of field recordings and folk music], they called me up because of my specialty with digital transfer and they asked me to supervise the transfer of the collection into the digital domain from albums. So, I worked with them, did the Lead Belly, the Woody Guthrie… And we started our relationship there. Then I went to the Library of Congress, spent like ten or so odd years there, and then they brought me back to the Smithsonian, and I thought, well maybe it’s time to put the whole collection together. You know from the Library, and from the old Rykodisc (which went out of print when they went out of business), and put it all together and put it in a place that will be forever, and people can download it. So this is the first 25, but I have a lot more, hundreds and hundreds of recordings of the world’s music. This is the first 25 and I donated it to the Smithsonian.


It’s about as big as it gets, the Smithsonian. It must be a thrill. 


This is kind of like a round trip for me. Because I… the very beginning, the recording that turned me on was the Ituri Rainforest Pygmies, when I was a kid. And now, my recording [of the Pygmies] is appearing in this, the most amazing collection of indigenous music in the world. I mean, Mo Asch had I think 2600 LPs! You know? By the greatest songcatchers in the world. So it is a great honour to be able to appear here. […] This is my life’s work, of recording, you know, since 1967, ‘68. So, yeah, it’s a real thing for me. I appreciate you asking.


The question that has kept popping up in my mind as we’ve been talking is… Look, on the one hand you’ve got this preservationist, archivist approach to this music. You travel the world cataloguing it. Yet, you’re clearly all the while celebrating the fact that music is evolving, fusing (to use your term), and the traditional (or pure) musics are disappearing. How do you reconcile these sides of your project?


Very easy. Very easy. There will always be music. But it is only when music serves the community that it can be viable. When the community changes, the music has to change. A community needs its music, and a music needs to serve its community. They are both linked forever. Now, music will never stay the same, no matter what. No music can stay the same and still survive, because there’s different needs for the community, and the community always changes.


But, there’re two kinds of endangerment. This is important. The reason that I preserve music is that, first of all, the medium on which it is recorded can start to decompose. Anything you recorded on (wax, tin, acetate, wire) had its gremlins, you know, mold, diseases, parasites and so forth. So, that history, our history, is being destroyed. The other part is that the actual music is disappearing just like language. So, in order for us to be able to appreciate our history, our musical history… See, in these songs is thousands of years of evolution of culture. If you wipe that out, you won’t be able to tell how all the music got here and what the music stood for then. So, they’re not just songs. They’re Talking Books. They’re the contents of the hopes the dreams the fears, the belief systems of these cultures all rolled into one. That’s how I look at the recording. I see preservation and access as a very important part of being a lover of music.


And you are a lover of music. You have such a positive view of its role on earth.


I’m totally entranced by its power, and I’m totally in love with music. Because I know it is powerful.  I know it’s one of basic elements that could possibly save the species from killing itself. You know, I really do believe that. Pete Seeger says that. I’m not the only one who believes this. You know, ask anyone who can articulate, they’ll say that the energy given off by music is perhaps the one thing that could save humanity. The uplifting of the spirit, the rearranging of the priorities, allowing people to think clearly. You can say things through music that you can’t say other ways. I believe that. I do believe that its energy is so powerful that it can mediate situations that nothing else can. Call me a wide-eyed optimist, or whatever you want to call me. A “music lover”, you know? Call me what you will.

Stuart Henderson is a culture critic and historian. He is the author of Making the Scene: Yorkville and Hip Toronto in the 1960s (University of Toronto Press, 2011). All of this is fun, but he'd rather be camping. Twitter: @henderstu


Media
Related Articles
16 Jul 2013
Fans of the Grateful Dead all have their favorite era, but in 1987 and 1990, the San Francisco outfit was playing some of the best shows of its career. These two volumes are proof positive of that.
8 Jul 2013
The '90s may not have marked the Grateful Dead's creative peak, but these two DVDs, from 1990 and 1991, show that the group's continued popularity was justified.
13 Mar 2013
Download a new song by the Mickey Hart Band and help raise money for people affected by Hurricane Sandy.
12 Feb 2013
Divorced from the energy of the room, the careening tidal wave of dancing heads surrounding you while the band plunged into another extended jam, the visual experience of the band onstage is remarkably flat.
Comments
Now on PopMatters
PM Picks
Announcements

© 1999-2014 PopMatters.com. All rights reserved.
PopMatters.com™ and PopMatters™ are trademarks
of PopMatters Media, Inc.

PopMatters is wholly independently owned and operated.