"I'm sorry I didn't tell you about the world!"
Little David (Haley Joel Osment) is the perfect child,
affectionate, selfless, and docile. This perfection,
according to the logic of Steven Spielberg and Stanley
Kubrick's A.I.: Artificial Intelligence, is
precisely his problem. David the robot boy is so
unbelievably wonderful -- indeed, so "artificial," as
announced by the movie's title -- that he just can't
be "real." Still, he wants desperately to be "real."
Here, as in most science fiction, "real" is code for
something else, actually, a lot of something elses,
like flesh-and-blood, sentient, emotional, whole,
worthy, valuable, endowed with civil rights, in a
word, human. Pretty to think so.
It's not surprising that David would believe in this
imaginary hierarchy, given that he's designed to
embody that very principle, by the ominously named
Professor Hobby (William Hurt), for a near-future
corporation called Cybertronics of New Jersey (of all
places). In fact, David's a prototype for a consumer
product, for parents who want no-trouble-no-mess kids.
Hobby first comes on screen before a boardroom full of
mucho-impressed civilians, extolling his invention, a
"mecha [short for "mechanical"] of a qualitatively
different order." Hobby's David (creepily modeled
after his own dead son) exists solely to make human
parents feel good about themselves, to love those
humans absolutely and forever, to be the perfect,
forever-and-ever child, the unreal child. Hobby
convinces his boardroom audience of the moral and
commercial soundness of his project, but it's pretty
clearly a bad idea.
The movie sets up this bad idea as if it's a serious,
occasionally ponderous philosophical dilemma, which is
to say, the space where Spielberg and the ghost of
Kubrick seem to be tussling for control of A.I. Its
route to the screen has surely been circuitous, with
the script credited to Spielberg (whose last
screenplay was 1977's Close Encounters of the Third Kind, which might account for some of the rustiness
in A.I.s structure), based on a screen story by Ian
Watson, and suggested by Brian Aldiss's 1969 short
story, "Supertoys Last All Summer Long." In itself,
the roundaboutness of the route is of little concern,
but the sheer length of time that the project took to
come to the screen seems relevant, given that
Kubrick's last film, Eyes Wide Shut, was perhaps
most notable for its conceptual datedness.
Still, A.I.'s convoluted origin story doesn't quite
explain the film's emotional roller-coastering and
narrative chasms. Take the start of David's own
travails among the humans. Hobby sends him home with a
Cybertronics employee, Henry (Sam Robards), and his
wife Monica (Frances O'Connor), grieving the loss of
their own son, terminally ill and cryogenically frozen
until a cure might be found. At first, Monica resists
David's charms, which are certainly strange but also
kind of grow on you (and have plenty of time to do so,
as the film is 2 and a half hours long). His initial
interactions with the woman he calls "Monica" are
stiff and incoherent: he follows her around her house
as she does what housewives do in Spielbergland,
always underfoot and beaming up at her, unblinking and
not quite comprehending activities like "doing
laundry" or "eating dinner," but content to watch her.
That said, he's an adept mimic, and sits at the table
with his humans, forking imaginary spaghetti toward
his mouth as if this means something.
But if David comes readymade to eat air and love his
mother, he has to be programmed to want love in
return. This "imprinting" process, which Monica must
initiate by reciting a series of code words,
culminates in a golden-toned mother-son embrace, awash
with a beatifying filtered light. It's painful to see,
actually, because, for all the ostensible tenderness
exchanged, Monica here incarnates the film's initial
bad idea, but in a way that exposes all the emotional
manipulating that Spielberg either does very well or
very inelegantly, depending on how much slack you're
cutting him (Jaws manipulates rather expertly,
Saving Private Ryan, on the other hand, does so
cloyingly). It appears Monica is so sad and lonely
without her own son (distressingly, her husband is
never around, except at the dinner table), that she
accepts David not because he's needy, but because she
is.
It's not clear if Monica's alarming selfishness is
supposed to be a plausible character development (some
terms-changing plot trickery occurs at film's end,
suggesting she's not as entirely horrific as she seems
here, but a dupe in a larger scheme), but it is
apparently necessary for the plot. That is, as soon as
David calls Monica "Mommy!" his fate is horrifyingly
sealed. His devotion to her is relentless, even when
her own "real" son, Martin (Jake Thomas), miraculously
returns home and the whole nuclear unit situation
implodes. Martin is such a demonically jealous brother
(the anti-perfect child?) that he actually convinces
Monica (the stupidest mom alive?) to read Pinocchio
to them aloud. Bingo: the real-boy-wannabe's story
provides the film with a narrative structure for its
second half, namely, David's journeys into darkness
and squalor, as he seeks a "Blue Fairy" to turn him
into a real boy (in the vain hope that being "real"
will make his mommy love him). He gets a little
jumpstart here when Monica literally abandons him in
the very scary woods, leaving him alone and afraid,
with only the ridiculous lament, "I'm sorry I didn't
tell you about the world!"
From here the movie picks up speed, launching into
some standard science-fictiony action and effects.
David meets a fairy godfather of sorts (but not the
Blue Fairy) named Gigolo Joe (Jude Law), an earlier
model mecha designed to service human women, complete
with his own built-in soundtrack: he cricks his neck
and on comes Fred Astaire singing "Cheek to Cheek,"
maybe not exactly what you'd imagine will be turning
on futuristic-type women-on-the-go, but, okay,
whatever. Even less convincing is Joe's
heterosexuality, but then again, perhaps the sensitive
gay boy with shiny face and poofy hair is the next
wave in omni-sex.
However you might read Joe's social role, his
narrative one couldn't be plainer. He and David bond
at a "Flesh Fair," a Thunderdome meets the WWF-ish
extravaganza where humans (also known as "orgas")
thrill to the grisly dismemberment and demolition of
mechas. The emcee (Brendan Gleeson) helpfully
announces that they are "only destroying
artificiality," making an ethical crusade out of
rabble-rousing entertainment. This scene and those
immediately preceding it (when David and his fellow
robots are chased by chopper-like crafts, complete
with searchlights, nets, and high-tech weapons) form
the film's references to its most palpable theme.
While most viewers have cited A.I.'s explicit
similarities to E.T. and Close Encounters, the
film also recalls Amistad's memorably awkward
argument against institutionalized racism -- the poor
mechas cannot formulate arguments in their own
defense, not only because they lack the necessary
language, but because they have been designed to lack
such language, as well as the will to fight back.
Ironically, if you believe Dr. Hobby's
self-justifications, it's David's desire to be loved
and valued that throws a wrench into this design
system.
David's palpable terror at the Flesh Fair --
surrounded by screaming spectators, laced to a rack
where he's about to be doused with acid -- only
cements his resolve to find the Fairy who will make
him "real" enough to earn Monica's love. He convinces
the exceptionally amiable Joe to help him toward that
end, and so, the hapless duo escapes to Rouge City, a
haven favored by Joe and his fellow love-mechas and
prostitutes (cutely, one of the sites of ill repute is
called "Strangelove's"). As bizarre as the very idea
of this place is in a Spielberg movie, A.I. doesn't
pause to contemplate its harsh mechanics of sex or the
social and political brutalities that it represents,
for the film's interests are becoming exponentially
Spielbergian, that is to say, sentimental and soggy.
As if to underline this point, when David finally does
find a version of the Blue Fairy, she is located at
the End of the World (that would be Manhattan), now
underwater due to some post-global-warming ice cap
melting. This Fairy, actually a conveniently "real"
statue at some Pinocchio theme park, looks like a
combination Virgin Mary and Supermom (and she
resembles Monica in ways that are not a little creepy
-- again). While this awesome discovery does not
actually end the film (a coda set "2000 years later"
makes David's search for the Fairy/Mom even more
excruciating to watch), it does clarify a few things.
In particular, it reveals that the film's thematic
disjointedness and narrative meandering has come to an
uncomfortable, reductively Oedipal point. The nuclear family has never looked so perverse.