+ another review of Chuck & Buck by Lucas Hilderbrand
The Anti-Gump
Buck O'Brien (Mike White) sucks on lollipops. A lot of
lollipops. At age 27, pale, pop-eyed, and soft-bodied,
Buck behaves childishly, almost as if he's willfully
immature, living with his mom and ducking so-called
adult responsibilities. Buck's immaturity shows up
right away in Chuck and Buck. Under the opening
credits, the camera pans over his bedroom in that
revealing-the-character kind of way. You see graceless
collages and too-bright posters, model cars, and other
little boy toys everywhere, all made slightly unreal
by Chuy Chavez's hyperrealish digital-video
cinematography. As endearing as it all looks, though,
there's also something disquieting about the room, as
it signals Buck's emotional retardation. When his
gnarly, chain-smoking mother dies on her sofa, in
mid-hack and with TV remote in hand, back in his room,
Buck doesn't register much of a response. The one
thing he does is handwrite his old pal Chuck Sitter
(Chris Weitz) an invitation to the funeral.
Arriving from LA and accompanied by his fiancée Carlyn
(Beth Colt), Chuck is totally unprepared for Buck's
awkward attempt at a bathroom come-on. At first it
appears that Chuck is upset at his friend's
inappropriate groping, but the film soon reveals that
Buck is only reenacting the sexual play that was part
of their childhood routine. Chuck now a record
executive who calls himself Charlie would rather
forget this particular aspect of his past. But it's
integral to Buck's ongoing sense of himself as
unchanged, as a fixed and stable identity. Stuck
somewhere around age eleven, Buck has never "moved
on." Rather, he remains needy and self-centered,
afraid to give up the sense of trust he felt when he
was young and alarmingly resilient in his abilities to
act out his fears. His unusual, unsocialized conduct
threatens Chuck's allegedly mature world, as this is
structured by good manners and, above all, the film
points out, artifice.
The fact that Chuck is working in the entertainment
industry underscores the duplicity of this world. At
the wake, he and Carlyn extend to Buck a polite
invitation to visit them in L.A., which Buck takes
seriously. Cashing out his bank account, he tries
clumsily to insinuate himself into Chuck and Carlyn's
lives, hanging around outside his office or a
restaurant where they're having dinner. Taking pity on
him, Carlyn invites Buck to a party at their house,
where he encounters both insiders and wannabes. One
small-talking woman asks what he "does," and the
guileless Buck answers, "Nothing." She smiles, as if
they're sharing a joke: "I know lots of people who
have that job." Throughout the film, Buck speaks a
kind of truth that other characters cannot; this
capacity makes him both annoying and completely
unnerving to Chuck, who has a regular grown-up's
investment in keeping up appearances. Late one night,
after Carlyn has gone upstairs to bed, Buck hopefully
asks Chuck if he wants to resume one of their long-ago
games, the "suck and fuck." Startled and worried that
Carlyn perfectly nice person and emblem of his new
straight-in-all-ways life might hear, Chuck tells
his old friend to go away and never come back.
Buck's response to this rebuff is both naïve and
calculating, much the way that kids' actions can
appear to grown-ups. He writes a play, called "Hank
and Frank," which recreates some of their youthful
indiscretions, and miraculously gets a local
theater group to put it on, for one night only. The
circumstances of this production include two key
figures, Beverly (Lupe Ontiveros), the manager of a
children's theater company whom Buck hires to direct,
and Sam (played by Chris's brother Paul Weitz, with
whom he made last year's superpopular American Pie),
whom Buck hires to play Chuck, despite Beverly's
objections that he's a terrible actor. Though Beverly
sees Buck's project and intensity as somewhat
eccentric (but this is only a matter of degree in
Hollywood), she also sees a chance to get a directing
credit on her resume, and eventually comes to
sympathize, in a protective, almost maternal way, with
Buck's obvious struggle. This struggle has to do with
the film's central themes, identity and perception,
performance and self-expression, the ways that people
comprehend, invent, and represent themselves. For
Buck, the play has a specific purpose, to remind his
friend of their better times, to the point that he
will get over this swank new lifestyle and recollect
who he is, that is, Buck's friend to the end.
Contradictory, at once charismatic and creepy, Buck is
the anti-Gump. Many films about children and childlike
grown-ups Forrest Gump and Disney's The Kid
included celebrate the young and innocent self,
reimagining childhood as a time before self-knowledge
and before sexuality. But Chuck and Buck written
by White, son of former Jerry Falwell ghostwriter Mel
White and a former writer-producer for Dawson's Creek and Freaks and Geeks remembers childhood
more acutely and painfully, as a time when experiences
are confusing and desires are unfulfilled. Still
unformed and uncertain, Buck is a walking reminder to
Chuck of everything he doesn't want to be anymore.
Chuck is age-appropriately perplexed by his own
feelings and apprehensive about how everyone else
adults and peers see him. What Chuck doesn't get is
that even when he's grown up, he's as anxious about
his image as he was when he was young: the stakes are
changed, but cultural conditioning has done its work.
Some viewers call Buck a "stalker" (and Time
magazine goes so far as to call the film immoral for
"sentimentalizing" his pursuit of Chuck). But such a
reading overlooks the film's complex insights into
standard childhood angsts and the difficulties of
socialization. While the movie certainly sympathizes
with Chuck's distress imagine someone from your own
past arriving on your doorstep asking to reclaim you
to a past you think you've left behind it also
allows for other perspectives, most significantly,
Beverly's and Carlyn's. Perhaps, in a
gender-simplified dynamic, it is because they are
women that neither feels threatened by Buck's juvenile
sexuality or his homosexuality. (Though, to be fair,
Chuck's female assistant is quite understandably
frightened by Buck's stubbornness and aggressiveness,
his repeated phone calls and the fact that he
confronts her on the street to demand Chuck's
whereabouts. In other words, Buck is not responding
properly the way adults who "take a hint" might
to Chuck's own immature avoidance strategies, and
eventually, Chuck takes a grudging responsibility for
putting her in this terrible position.) Carlyn is the
ideal girlfriend, reasonably recognizing Chuck's past
as just that, not some lasting mark against him or
stamp of fixed identity; and Beverly sees Buck as a
generous and creative soul, irresponsible and
unconventional, but also sensitive and deserving of
basic human considerations (she works with kids, which
may have trained her to have more patience than
someone who doesn't).
Like Arteta's intelligent and lively first feature,
Star Maps, Chuck and Buck takes emotional risks
and poses questions about children and adults,
responsibility and sexuality that other films will
not. Its resolution, in which the three protagonists
Chuck, Buck, and Carlyn appear to find happy
coupledom, looks pretty typical, movie-style fakey.
But the route to this contrived "closure" is
unexpected and uneasy, which makes it all look just a
little suspicious. And that's all to the good.