Because You Were Born That Way
I walked in on a pair of older women in the editing
room at the office a few weeks ago, and decided, in
retrospect unwisely, to insert myself into a
conversation they were having on the joys of
grandmotherhood. "I know this isn't a popular point of
view these days," one of the women was saying, "but
still I'm convinced that boy and girls are
different, really from the second they're born. You
can see it in the crib, even. Boys are just more
aggressive."
This mildly annoyed me and I objected pretty firmly,
although in doing so I imagine I only made my
coworker's point for her. By having this attitude, I
said, particularly with regard to children you're
helping to raise, you're saddling the little whelps
with a negative stereotype long before they're
cognizant enough to make decisions on their own. If
you've ever felt that peculiar, helpless frustration
when something you do or say is dismissed as being
because "you're a boy" or "you're a girl," then you
might know why such attitudes are less than popular.
They disregard the substance of your statements and
actions, and at the same time undermine your sense of
agency: you act not because you decide to, but because
of a 50/50 fluke in the way you happened to come into
this world.
Unpopular though these attitudes may be, Robert
Altman's latest movie, Dr. T & The Women, sustains
them pretty well. This even though the movie's opening
frames are ostensibly about men and women learning
about each other or, at least, about a man who has
learned much about women (in one area where there is
an indisputable biological difference) and used that
knowledge to everyone's mutual benefit. Which is to
say that the movie begins with a gynecological exam.
The house lights fall to the probing of an onscreen
speculum, while a sheet draped discreetly over the
examinee's lap obscures both the examination and the
doctor performing it. The visibly uncomfortable woman
tries to distract herself by asking the as-yet-unseen
doctor what it's like to live in a house full of
women. "I wouldn't have it any other way," he answers
as he reveals his face: it's Richard Gere as Dr.
Travis, heartthrob gynecologist!
In the scene that follows, Robert Altman fans may
recognize one of the director's recent trademarks.
Popularized in 1992's The Player, it is a
minutes-long continuous shot that tracks disconnected
conversations and exchanges in a public place. In The Player, this place is a movie lot. Dr. T & The Women substitutes a doctor's office waiting room, but
the basic idea is the same. The credits roll pink
for the girls, blue for the boys as female patients
haggle with the receptionist or with each other over
who is next in line. As in The Player, no one
exchange, character, or group of characters is ever
preferred, which gives the impression that the movie
is going to be more about the place and the rituals
surrounding it, less about the individuals who
populate it. It also makes the waiting room's
atmosphere a univocal cacophony of haggling and
frenzy.
The blue and pink titles prepare us for a movie about
the differences between the sexes. True to form, the
movie's waiting room shenanigans are symptomatic of an
impulse that, in Dr. T's logic, only females seem to
have. Not long after the opening credits, Dr. T meets
a comely assistant golf pro named Bree (Helen Hunt) on
the course and regales her with tales of the 22 sets
of twins he has delivered during his practice. He
generalizes his newborns straight from the first
breath. "If one's a boy, there's a game plan," he
assures her. But if they're "both girls," it's a "race
to the finish line." It's an ambiguous comment. It
could mean that male and female infants leave the womb
in different ways, or that boys and girls interact to
form a "game plan" and that girls in the sole company
of other girls do not. (Dr. T has no wisdom to offer
about the birthing tendencies of twins who are both
boys.) Or it could refer to Dr. T's own approach to
delivery. In any case, the comment presages some
sweeping generalizations about gender. In these
boy/girl, girl/girl configurations, the outcome is
always the same, at least according to the good
doctor.
Presumably, Dr. T's willingness to indulge in these
kinds of generalizations has something to do with his
tendency to idolize women. He describes them as
"sacred" and says to Bree that "there are no two
alike," meaning that each is wonderful in her own way.
This is a nice enough sentiment, I suppose, and he
says it with such conviction that Bree defers to him,
choosing not to invoke the authority that is naturally
hers she being, after all, a member of the gender
Dr. T is struggling to describe. "A gynecologist says
there's no two alike," she concedes, "I guess there's
no two alike."
Dr. T's excessive veneration of females as a gender
causes problems in his romantic life, though; his
wife, Kate (Farrah Fawcett), lapses into a regressive
fugue state her psychiatrist describes as "Hystia
complex" which is a disease that only affects
women, primarily those who "love too much." When Dr. T
sparks up a romance with Bree, he offers to care for
her so completely that she will never have to work
again. "Why would I want that?" she says, genuinely
puzzled, and we get a sense of where Kate's "Hystia
complex" may have come from: Dr. T, with the best of
intentions, has smothered her with love.
Since Dr. T's idolization of women and his related
habit of smothering them have turned out to be
obviously harmful, maybe the movie doesn't quite
endorse his generalizations about gender. But it still
bears out Dr. T's prize preconception: the one about
boys at birth having a game plan, girls racing to the
finish line. This difference is naturalized and
essential, being present in people before they even
develop free will. And although the women in Dr. T,
as often as not, scramble hither and yon as though
there were no finish line in sight, they do
nevertheless behave as though improvising every step
of the way, favoring frenzied, impulsive behavior to
any kind of deliberation as witnessed in the
chaotic babble of Dr. T's waiting room.
Dr. T's men, on the other hand, are characterized by
stoicism in the interest of achieving a goal. Hunting
in the woods, Dr. T and his male cohorts mostly the
husbands of his patients wait for hours for a deer
to come by, while they talk quietly about their family
troubles. If, like me and many of the people I know,
you've occasionally wanted to cast off assumptions
based blindly on your gender, Dr. T won't offer up
much for you in the way of hope. What chance is there
of transcending this difference if it is so essential
to human nature as to be reiterated, in various ways
and various places, from the cradle to the grave? It
can be undermined symbolically (the hunters who name
their guns after women enact what Dr. T would see as a
mostly male ritual). Or it can be struggled against
fruitlessly, as Dr. T's secretly gay daughter, DeeDee
(Kate Hudson), does by harboring a lesbian lover even
as her wedding day approaches. Though she tries to
cast herself free of these separate-sphere gender
roles and the enforced heterosexuality implicit in
them DeeDee winds up reaffirming Dr. T's
preconception, even in the process of fighting it. She
has no game plan, stringing both her fiance and her
gay lover along because she simply can't make up her
mind.
We're stuck, the movie seems to say. Men and women:
this is simply how we are.
Altman fans may recognize the ethos behind Dr. T's
establishing shot, since The Player was also largely
about being stuck in your own skin, and being stuck in
the systems around you. And like Dr. T, The Player
is largely content with this. By nesting its
conclusion in a cleverly composed self-reflection on
the film industry, it saves itself the need to examine
the fall from grace of its protagonist, Hollywood
executive Griffin Mill (Tim Robbins). Mill spends the
movie trying to extract himself from Tinseltown's
corruption. His attempts to escape form the basis for
a screenplay he purchases at the movie's end, though,
a purchase that signals his surrender to the Hollywood
system, with all its wealth and all its spiritual
compromise. The movie's witty, Back to the Future-style self-reflection (the script Mill buys is
presumably to be made into The Player, the movie
you're watching) gives us yet another suffocating
system that cycles endlessly, without any hope of real
escape or transcendence. And like Dr. T, The Player never asks its audience to react to this with
outrage or despair. Only a fleeting, ironic laugh that
will be long gone before the final credits roll.