Survivors
Shinji Aoyama's astonishing new film is all about
violence, but it provides none of the usual adrenalin
kick. Instead, Eureka probes effects, the ways that
a physically and emotionally traumatic experience
changes your sense of self and of the world's rhythms.
Harshly beautiful, the movie is also contrary and
strange: intertwining subjects as sensational as
serial killing and as mundane as life on the road in a
Winnebago, it never quite takes you where you think it
will.
Eureka introduces its protagonists as they are
unexpectedly sucked into irrevocably life-changing
trauma. Kozue (16-year-old Aoi Miyazaki, whose face is
one of the more exquisitely affecting images I've seen
on screen in years) and her brother Naoki (Masaru
Miyazaki) board a bus and sit in the very back seat,
facing forward as the bus follows its daily route, in
a small town in southwest Japan. Suddenly, the scene
is changed: a hijacker (Go Riju) has boarded the bus,
which is now parked in a lot. Rather than taking you
immediately inside, to the action, with acrobatic
crane shots, the camera hunkers down at a distance.
You gaze across the parking lot, over a crumpled dead
body, at the bus, where the hijacker is barely
visible, moving about.
The cut inside reveals that this fellow has no
dastardly plan, no plan at all. He's fumbling with his
cell phone and his gun, messing with the cops, for
whom the scene is out of control (they pace and point
their guns, but they're left to watch and wait). Kozue
sits dead-still, Naoki leans forward, his face
glistening with sweat. After some tension-making
minutes, during which very little happens, the bus
driver, Makoto (Koji Yakusho), figures a way to give
the police snipers a shot at their target. The episode
ends abruptly and horribly, when a lanky young
detective shoots the villain dead, right in front of
the kids. They continue to sit, eyes wide. The film
cuts again, to a newspaper factory, the new editions
spit out by machines, the event reduced to headlines:
"Tragedy at Noon," "Two Middle School Children, One
Bus-driver Rescued."
The rest of Eureka's three hours and forty minutes
follows the unending aftermath of this single event,
as the three survivors struggle to live, to understand
their own sense of guilt, fearfulness, and
hopelessness. The trick is that Kozue, Naoki, and, to
a lesser extent, Makoto, are unable to articulate
their feelings. Utterly alone and visibly undone, they
withdraw into a kind of functional catatonia, refusing
to go to school, watching television and playing games
with one another. Eventually -- the film is unclear
when -- they stop speaking, even to one another. Their
mother abandons the family and their father dies in a
car wreck. And not one person from town comes to their
home to help.
During this same period, Makoto is undergoing his own
transformation, most of it offscreen. After the
tragedy, he leaves town. When he returns two years
later -- on a bus -- he's unkempt and despondent, but
goes home to his brother, sister-in-law, and father:
they inform him that his wife has left him. He starts
work at a construction company, where the manual labor
and daily ritual of washing shovels seem to bring
Makoto back to life. Still, he's unable to converse
with his family. And so, the film turns again: Makoto
goes to live with Kozue and Naoki, nurturing them,
finding his own generosity, cleaning up after them,
feeding them regular meals, hauling them outside for
bike riding and shopping expeditions, filling in the
silences with encouraging chatter.
There are any number of scenes in Eureka that
articulate this threesome's peculiar but somehow
necessary relationship, as well as their incapacity to
make connections with anyone else. Makoto's brief
reunion with his wife, Yumiko (Sayuri Kokusho), is one
of the more striking and exemplary, subtly and
increasingly uncomfortable, as they timidly test what
cannot be said and what cannot be ignored. Shot as a
series of one-shots as they chat in a restaurant,
surrounded by crisp white tablecloths, the
conversation turns taut as they stand to leave: at
this point, their very different pains are almost
palpable. His eyes search hers, he wonders whether
they might try again. She smiles, her eyes too bright,
but can hardly maintain the charade. She hits him
playfully, calls him a "monster," and accuses him -- a
little too nicely -- of not "taking care of her." He
says he's sorry, as he tells most everyone he meets
now. But it's too late.
And so, the three survivors find solace -- and
importantly, respect for their separate griefs -- in
each other, as well as the kids' free-spirited cousin
(Yoichiro Saito), who comes to stay with them. You see
very little of their interactions, but know they are
all better off as a crew, at least temporarily. For of
course, their idyll is fragile and short-lived. When a
determined detective (not incidentally, the same one
who shot the bus-jacker as the kids looked on) becomes
convinced that Makoto is a serial killer stalking
young women in town, the foursome hits the road in a
camper. Once in motion, they cannot turn back, and
must learn to communicate -- even if only by tapping
on the walls between them -- rather than living in
devastating isolation.
The film reflects this arduous emotional process in
detail, but the route to redemption, or at least to
continued endurance, is circuitous. Some of it is even
a bit too obvious: as a sign that Makoto is coming to
terms with his own mortality (an issue all three
survivors confront daily), he begins coughing,
occasionally at first, then more often, and more
achingly. But even this clunky cue doesn't really pan
out; the film changes up, offers hope instead of
death. Always, violence remains inescapable, shaping
all of their lives -- it's in the air they breathe, as
it is, really, for all of us, to varying degrees. And
yet, despite and because of their anguish, they can
find and then, against every expectation, struggle to
save each other.
Perfectly composed and shot in elegant black and white
by Masaki Tamra, the film spends long -- very long --
moments contemplating the emotional truths so often
unseen but still visible in surfaces, in stark
interiors and vast landscapes, subtle gestures and
revealing postures. The film's great strength is its
stunning indirection: events and characters point in
familiar directions, but Eureka is rarely familiar.