Struggles
I like to think that Leelee Sobieski is an
intelligent person as well as a talented actor. While
the latter point is obvious, the former is a matter of
me hoping for the best, because even intelligent
people, we all know, can be sucked up in the
entertainment biz. Still, it seems that maybe,
intelligence might be helpful in the struggle.
Why do I care about Leelee Sobieski's struggle?
Probably because she's done very good work (and a lot
of it for someone so young), including a couple of
high school romances (though, to be fair, she was the
mean girl in Never Been Kissed and the dead
girl in Here on Earth, so that, in both cases,
she avoided turning into the glowing prom date), a
couple of interesting chances (Mimi Leder's Deep
Impact and John Dahl's upcoming Joy Ride),
as well as a very famous lulu (Stanley Kubrick's
Eyes Wide Shut). Not to mention the fact that
she's been compared to Helen Hunt more than once. And
yet, she appears to be riding out the usual
teen-movie-star silliness with a modicum of dignity
and some manifest respect for what she does -- her
performances are consistently complicated, so that her
characters are young, hopeful, and ready to be
dazzled, but also, at some level, too experienced and
weary already, the way that a lot of young people feel
these days.
I guess this is what I like most about Leelee
Sobieski -- she looks like she can hold more than one
idea in her head at one time. And so, despite the
thundering bad buzz for The Glass House, I went
to see it on opening day, hoping that Leelee would
pull it out.
Alas, she doesn't. But she is really up
against it. The Glass House is a painfully
predictable non-thriller, where rebellious high
schooler Ruby (Sobieski) is subjected to some mighty
harsh behavior modification. But unlike, say,
Disturbing Behavior, where the point of the
kids' abuses by their parents is made so very
outrageously that you can root for the kids who are
being so tortured and maimed, The Glass House
pretends to be "realistic," a thriller of the type
that Hitchcock might make, or perhaps more accurately,
that Hitchcock wannabes like Brian De Palma or Robert
Zemeckis might make. It adopts a faux-elegance like
What Lies Beneath, and unsurprisingly, comes up
with equally tortured plotting and characterization.
You keep wondering why no one in the movie is paying
attention to what is perfectly evident to you.
From jump, Ruby and her brother Rhett (Jurassic
Park III's very able Trevor Morgan) are in for
trouble. He's pretty much a nonentity, a plot device
so she has someone to save in order to become a better
person. But she starts off as a bad girl, lying to her
parents so she can go out cruising, drinking, and
smoking dope with her girlfriends. After one of these
excursions, Ruby comes home to learn that her really
nice, really lenient parents have been killed in a car
wreck (a wreck that, very strangely, Ruby then goes on
to see in flashbacks whenever tensions rise: just how
she knows what happened is never addressed, though
it's possible she's just imagining the crash and the
chaos and the fear on her mom's face). The scene where
the cops tell her about the accident is grim,
capturing the emotional hell she's in -- the camera
swims around, taking her point of view, then fades to
white as the cops hover over Ruby's passed out body.
When she wakes, it's funeral time.
It couldn't be clearer that the girl is suffering
from all kinds of guilt and anxiety, but what do the
well-intentioned adults in the film do? They send Ruby
and Rhett off to live with the smarmy "guardians"
designated by her parents' will, a will that they
apparently wrote a long time ago, when said guardians
lived next door and everyone was feeling peachy-close.
Now Erin and Terry Glass (Diane Lane and Stellan
Skarsgard), look very suspicious: they might as well
be wearing white-and-blue nametags that say, "Hello,
I'm the villain." Though the kids do have a perfectly
pleasant and apparently concerned Uncle Jack (Chris
Noth), they're sent to live in Malibu with the
wealthy-seeming Glasses, and guess what? They live in
a glass house.
Within days, the observant Ruby notices that her
foster parents have all kinds of problems, exacerbated
because the walls inside the house are windows. So,
when she hears them fighting late at night, she can
also look up from her floor below to see the scene
too. It works both ways. Because she and Rhett are
sharing a bedroom, when Ruby steps out into the
hallway to change into her pajamas (apparently a
bathroom is not handy), she's suddenly aware of Terry
staring down on her, observing. Later on, Terry takes
her out to dinner and then reaches across her chest,
to put on her seatbelt -- or so he says. Ruby knows
better. The icing on the cake is Erin's drug
addiction, which Ruby spots when she finds her foster
mom looking pretty "cooked" on the sofa, a needle
sticking out of her arm.
All this yucky stuff understandably perturbs Ruby.
And the film invites you to worry for her, giving you
glimpses of Terry and Erin when they're acting jumpy
or seedy. He's got some big money deal that's gone
south, and the kids have some large inheritance... the
pieces are coming together. Finally scared enough to
act, Ruby calls her dad's lawyer for help, never
suspecting that Mr. Begleiter (Bruce Dern, as creepy
and snuffly as he's ever been, and distinctly
untrustworthy) might be in cahoots with the Glasses.
Meanwhile, Rhett's been bought off, now content to
play with his cool new video games till all hours,
oblivious to everything that's going on. So, when Ruby
musters up the gumption to talk to a counselor (Kathy
Baker, in the movie for about four minutes), Rhett
pretends everything's fine, and so Ruby's back at
square one.
Blah blah blah. Ruby figures out that the adults who
are supposed to look after her are useless at best,
actually plotting to kill her at worst. At first
glance, this makes a lot of sense as the basis for a
teen horror movie: adults who aren't your wonderful,
always laughing, and permissive parents, are the
enemy. Okay, so this simplifies the parent-child
relationship, but so did Hansel and Gretel. But
if the theme is primal, the symbols are hammering: the
house, the knife that plays a crucial role at film's
end, Terry's Ferrari, are all over-the-top, making it
increasingly hard for Sobieski to do what she does
well, which is to act like a real person in a real
situation. It's distressing to see her in this film,
because you know she has better things to do with her
time.
In the end, The Glass House can't manage its
own metaphors, and ends up tripping all over itself in
order to give them a coherent context. What would make
Terry so dastardly? Gangsters! He owes money to the
wrong people and they show up occasionally, slamming
him against walls (glass, of course) and murdering his
associates in cold blood. And what would make Ruby sit
still long enough for the movie to run at feature
length? Ah, yes! Drug her, so that she lolls about in
bed for days, like a dame in a 1940s noiry melodrama,
until finally she pulls herself together just in time
to foil the bad guys. By that time, however, you may
be snoozing yourself.