+ another review of Hamlet by Beth Armitage
+ Interview with Michael Almereyda, writer-director of Hamlet
Too Too Solid Flesh
I confess to feeling a certain dread when I first heard that
Ethan ("I have this planet of regret") Hawke was starring in
Michael Almereyda's updated-and-abbreviated Hamlet. But after a
few minutes of watching Hawke's scruffy, way-too-weary face, you
get the feeling that he is not just a good choice for the part,
but an ideal one. His very lack of polish and overt skills make
him a particular kind of tragic hero, that is, not heroic or even
very compelling. And so, perversely, he becomes compelling:
Shakespeare's exalted language spills from his lips, and you
begin to feel like you can't look away from this car-wreckish
paradox. Small, sad, and fretful, Hawke's Hamlet is by turns
gloomy, restless, and distrustful, a corporate scion and rich
latchkey kid turned aspiring filmmaker, with insomniac-red eyes
and a persistent feeling that someone's watching him.
But are you paranoid when someone's really after you? Poor Hamlet
is living in 21st-century Manhattan, where video and electronic
surveillance is the norm: cameras find you on sidewalks, stores,
offices, elevators. There's no place where you're not on screen,
performing consciously or unconsciously for someone's leering and
likely profit-minded benefit. "Reality TV" rules: The Real World, Making the Band, Letterman's hijacky street-interviews,
Cops, and the upcoming, much-discussed-already Big Brother.
There are cameras everywhere.
And so, Hamlet slouches. Shuffling and shifting, unconvincingly
hipster-cool in his Peruvian knit cap and baggy jacket, this
perpetual college student sullenly recites those requisite famous
soliloquies in voice-over, hunkered down in his bedroom while
peering at computer screens and TV monitors, or most
appropriately in the neighborhood Blockbusters Video.
Searching the "Action" stacks for what might prove at least a
brief distraction, Hamlet is suddenly struck as if by thunder.
There's no way out of this performance called sentience. "To die,
to sleep; To sleep: perchance to dream: ay, there's the rub."
He's contemplating his limited options suicide or homicide?
just as the shot cuts to the store's TV screen, where Eric Draven
(Vincent Perez) contemplates one of his own vengeful murders in
The Crow Part 2. This reference could not be more astute, not
only because the movie features a pissed off dead guy
assassinating his own killers, but because this sequel in
particular following Brandon Lee's terrible on-set death in the
original Crow is all about burdens, of history, consumption,
and youthful angst, you know, exactly the issues troubling our
boy Hamlet.
The film opens as he's making yet another of his many
confessional video "documents," the kind that film students make
when they're trying to find their subjects and themselves. You're
not even seeing him, per se, but his onscreen close-up. His
grainy black-and-white but mostly gray features seem as out of
joint as the time he's supposed to be putting right.
Specifically, he's vexed by his father's vengeful ghost (Sam
Shepard, craggy and glum), who appears on surveillance monitors,
through windows, drifting into Pepsi machines. Despondent and
theatrical, Hamlet's taken to wandering the nighttime streets or
the Guggenheim Museum: he's threatened by architecture, grim,
glassy erections and white, bleak roundness. Several of the
buildings are now owned by his family's global enterprise, the
Denmark Corporation, now run by his Uncle Claudius (a suitably
stiff Kyle MacLachlan), new husband to Hamlet's widowed mom
Gertrude (Diane Venora, who played Hamlet in Joe Papp's NY
Shakespeare Festival). It's not a little upsetting that this
arrangement has turned her all cooey and sexed up; clearly,
uncle's taking care of her in ways that dad didn't quite. Read:
too much information.
And of course, all this domestic drama is piled on top of
Hamlet's own boy-into-man self-image issues, not least of which
is what to do about the fair Ophelia (Julia Stiles), who's been
hanging around. In this speedy Hamlet, she dresses club-kid
style, in huge-wide jeans and cute little tops, and has a
penchant for gazing into fountains and swimming pools. Besides
being adorable and a bit moony, Ophelia is also beguilingly
intelligent, poetic, and naive, all of which makes her the
exemplary muse for a wannabe artist. Though, as she puts it, she
"was the more deceived" by Hamlet's elaborate neediness, she
still wants to believe that both he and her father the suck-up
Polonius (Bill Murray) mean well. And it doesn't help matters
that her upright/uptight brother Laertes (Liev Schreiber) is
telling her to steer clear of her maybe-beau Hamlet, as this only
makes him seem more enticing (and truth be told, who can resist
his pouting and pacing?). No one is more horrified than she is
when Hamlet discovers the wire Polonius has affixed to her body,
in order to discover and record Hamlet's plot against the bossman
Claudius. In this moment, as Ophelia's face twists and her body
seems to be collapsing in on itself, the film's interest in
abusive fathers (and father-figures, if you're counting wily
Claudius) is all too plain. These kids are screwed, and not just
because Hamlet's not making a decision he can stick with.
Selfish parents are always wrecking their children's lives in
Shakespeare. The adults demand unreasonable loyalties and arrange
just awful liaisons for the sake of shoring up property.
Traditionally, high school classrooms are the tedious forums for
initiating kids into these complicated themes and exquisite
poetry: it's a good thing when mass media can accelerate and
enhance this introduction. Certainly, this is the most emphatic
point made by Baz Luhrmann's William Shakespeare's Romeo + Juliet: the Bard speaks as clearly to teens as to their stuffy
elders. Almereyda's movie makes a similar pitch, but with less
hysterical visuals and more accent on the protagonist's angsty
internal life. This would be where his inability to articulate
despite his incredible access to poetry, which spews
uncontrolled, rushing, as if from deep inside his wack psyche
makes sense, and Hawke's reading of the character as crude rather
than elegant, also makes sense. Hamlet is always and forever, of
course, in dire turmoil, all hepped up about the corruption he
sees embodied by the folks around him, the increasing visibility
of ambition, paranoia, responsibility, and fearfulness that
attends growing up and dealing with adults who've forgotten what
it's like to be young and full of hope and anguish at the same
time.
This film is not so grandly explosive or entertainingly cartoony
as Luhrmann's, and it's certainly not so narcissistic or literal
as Kenneth Branagh's Hamlet. Instead, Almereyda and DP John de
Borman focus on the play's relentless interiority in a way that
makes it all about surfaces: the raging lustrousness of office
buildings, the creepy shadows in board rooms, the click-clacking
of high heels on polished floors, the claustrophobic familiarity
of dorm rooms. in these spaces, the characters can't help but be
strange and annoying. "To thine own self be true," says Polonius
most famously. And yet, as uttered by Bill Murray, the line is
almost alarming, funny and insightful and ugly: what selves exist
here, to which anyone might be "true"? Claudius is most obviously
concerned with appearances: watching Hamlet's experimenty and
accusatory student-film, "The Mousetrap," sends him into an
evident panic in the back of the theater, while Hamlet and
Ophelia nuzzle and fuss in the foreground.
But Claudius is not the exception, only the most extreme.
Everyone in this mercenary universe believes in the power of
images and the righteousness of paranoia: the Ghost makes
theatrical entrances and exits (using Pepsi machines and smoky
effects), the gravedigger (Jeffrey Wright) sings a few bars of
"All Along the Watchtower," and consummate corporate wife
Gertrude is ever ready for public displays, her face always on.
The film is populated by bad readers: characters who don't
understand the surfaces that surround them: Hamlet's friends
the usually male Horatio (Karl Geary) and the unusually female
Marcella (Paula Malcomson) pop in occasionally with updates on
the surveillance cameras that originally spot the Ghost, and
worry that Hamlet isn't looking well but don't grasp the depth of
his floundering or his stepfather's (their employer's)
deviousness. Likewise Rosencrantz (Steve Zahn, goofy as ever) and
Guildenstern (Dechen Thurman), busy themselves with spying on
Hamlet for Claudius, imagining that they're doing the right thing
but misperceiving circumstances so badly that they bring on
tragedy in spite of themselves (the film occasionally reduces
their appearances to phone calls and faxes, such that their
mediations become characters and vice versa).
The hyperself-conscious Hamlet will never fathom the survival
strategies that allow his friends to go on about their business,
the performance of everyday life. The clues are all around him
his own video confessionals articulate the point perfectly, as do
the various TV images that show up in backgrounds: James Dean
looking profound and surly, a monk who offers this zen-nugget,
"To be therefore means to inter-be." This mopey Hamlet's tragedy
is transformed into watching too much, consuming too much, and
not being able to see anywhere near inside, until it's too late:
"I know not 'seems,'" he rails against Gertrude's satisfaction
with veneers and self-displays. But the film is about his
inability to figure out any other way of being, he can neither
rid himself of his "too too solid flesh" nor comprehend and use
it like the action hero he might imagine himself. BY the time he
reaches the anti-climatic duel finale on a rooftop, fencing in
an electrified suit with the grieving and crazed Laertes
Hamlet's self-indulgence is all played out. The film refuses the
nobility of the moment: news anchor Robin MacNeil signs off as
the Player King, commenting of course from a TV set. The
whole business ends without resolving a thing.
It's true, the movie is not the play, leaving out some two and a
half hours worth of action and speech, but the essential plot yet
swirls around Hamlet, available only in a kind of bare bones
version, speeded up and out-of-focus-fuzzy. While such
economizing loses some linguistic detail, it also dense-packs
other, visual detail, urging you to read the reflecting surfaces
and commercial excesses that so perplex Hamlet. The movie remains
incongruous, at once skeptical and respectful of the contemporary
pop culture that shapes it.