Regrets
Robin Wright Penn appears in The Last Castle
for about four minutes. She plays Rosalie, the
beautiful, angry daughter of 3-star General and mostly
absent father Eugene Irwin (Robert Redford). He is, as
the film will be reminding you repeatedly, a
much-medalled and respected veteran of Vietnam, the
Gulf War, Bosnia, etc., now imprisoned and stripped of
his rank, following his conviction for misconduct in
Burundi (you find out later that he countermanded an
order from the President). Because Irwin is such a
hero -- such a born leader, in the film's pretentious
discourse -- you also need to know that he has
misfortunes and imperfections, even some regrets.
He doesn't exactly voice these regrets. They just
sort of show up in the form of his daughter (mom
doesn't even merit a mention). Their scene together is
short but memorable (in large part because these two
performers are equally matched, quite brilliant
underplayers): "Look dad," she says, "I can't do this
small talk thing with you." Irwin still doesn't get
it, asking if he "intimidates" her. Rosalie's brief
look of exasperation tells you all you need to know.
They embrace stiffly, she leaves, and so Rosalie
serves her purpose, embodying the military's domestic,
emotional costs. And poor Irwin. He's inspired his men
and defended his country, but his kid is still mad at
him. But he's a good man, really, and keeps a picture
of his grandson on his cell wall.
At the same time, The Last Castle suggests,
Irwin also embodies his own costs, too, not the least
being that he's in prison for what is vaguely
suggested to be an unfair judgment. You know this must
be so because his former mentee, now fellow general,
Wheeler (Delroy Lindo), insists that no one say
anything mean about him. And when Irwin arrives at the
prison (nicknamed the "castle"), all the inmates
whisper about his Awesome Reputation. Then again, the
fact that the great leader is treated badly by the
system lends credence to their own similar
allegations, and almost immediately, Irwin recognizes
that his new yard-mates are not just criminals (or
even guys who fight over basketballs, accompanied by a
hiphop track, which the film uses to annoying
stereotypical effect), but soldiers who had momentary
lapses (into anger or confusion) and who can rise to
that hardy masculine potential once again.
This is the film's conceit, that leadership means
being able to see the best in your men. Irwin is the
perfect born leader, because he's cool and steady,
reasonable and a solid chess player, and mostly,
because he's Robert Redford as Cool Hand Luke.
Irwin's counterpart -- the villain of the piece -- is
the castle's murderous, sniveling warden, the odiously
named Colonel Winter (James Gandolfini). The other
inmates immediately approach Irwin with stories of the
Colonel's perfidies, including murders, asking Irwin
to lead their revolt. At first Irwin resists -- he's a
reluctant hero, you know -- but eventually he comes
around. First clue that Irwin will have to fight back
is Winter's lack of combat experience and penchant for
collecting military artifacts. On inspecting the
warden's super-well-polished glass cases full of
perfectly arranged old bullets and ribbons, Irwin
observes, "Any man with a collection like this is a
man who's never set foot on a battlefield." In other
words, not a real man.
Winter, whom Tony Soprano acts with a decidedly
"unmanly" affect -- prissy, impotent, and
mean-spirited, not to say "feminine," at least not
exactly -- overhears this comment, deciding then and
there that he hates Irwin's guts (the decision is
summed up in girly-man gesture: in a huff, he takes
Irwin's book, which he was about to get autographed,
and tosses it to the back of the bookshelf). For the
rest of the film, Winter will work overtime to
demonstrate his power, mainly by making other, more
lowly prisoners suffer consequences merely for hanging
around with the General in the yard. When he picks on
the very weakest guy, the stuttering Corporal Aguilar
(Clifton Collins, Jr.), well then, he's gone too far.
Irwin wins the men's confidence by accomplishing a
mighty physical deed. No, he doesn't eat a passle of
eggs, he carries a passle of stones, for the warden's
"wall," actually, a pile of stones left over from a
crumbled wall first erected in the 1870s. Winter
claims. "The men seem to enjoy" rebuilding this thing,
but of course they don't: they despise the wall, the
chain-gang aspect of working on it, and especially,
the warden's affection for it. But they're prisoners,
so they build it. When Irwin makes it through a
blazingly hot afternoon of moving rocks back and
forth, from one pile to another, as some arbitrary
punishment handed down by Winter, the men decide that
he's fabulous (and admittedly, when he takes off his
shirt to reveal not only his electric burn scars, from
his 6 years in Hanoi's famous POW prison, as well as
his strikingly muscled physique, well, it is pretty
impressive). From then on, the men's hatred for Winter
is matched by their love for Irwin.
At this point, the fight is on. It's about
reputation, it's about winning, it's about turf and
pride, and all of these abstractions are dumped into
the convenient, all-purpose material emblem, the U.S.
flag. You will already have noticed that the flag is
prominent in tv commercials for The Last
Castle, and sadly, this is not just creepy
opportunism concerning the current rage for U.S.
flags. In fact, the film is built on this premise of
the flag as symbol of power, and the conflict between
the General and the Colonel staged as an elaborate
game of capture the flag.
The flag also stands for worthiness, of course. And
this is The Last Castle's ostensible interest,
especially when considered alongside director Rod
Lurie's previous two films, Deterrence and
The Contender. All three films take up the
question of what it means to be a leader, and all
three do it in a preachy, contrived way. Here the
explicit anxiety over masculinity and the
Rambo-meets-MacGuyver finale make the whole question
look pretty silly (the prisoners secretly build a
weapon that recalls the days when armies assaulted
castles, for sure). Irwin rallies the men, the Colonel
becomes increasingly hysterical, the battle includes
explosions shot from multiple angles.
As if all these cliches aren't enough -- for what,
I'm not sure -- the film also includes the young,
cynical guy, here, the prison bookie, named Yates
(Mark Ruffalo, definitely not parlaying his phenomenal
turn in You Can Count on Me into something
special). This kid is mad because he also had an
absent dad, and, conveniently, his served with Irwin
in the Nam, even spent time with him in the Hanoi
Hilton. As grudges go, Yates' is fairly big, but Irwin
figures out that the kid really does want to be a good
soldier, and also gives him the opportunity to blow up
some shit. And so, the son forgives the father, once
removed.
That Rosalie (remember her?) is left out of this
finale is entirely appropriate, because the values
that The Last Castle celebrates have everything
to do with defining men, per se. The movie rah-rahs
the military system (rank, conformity, loyalty to a
set code of conduct) and hates on the individual
deviant, rather than, oh, considering their
interdependence. It can't get past the charisma
factor: the real leader in this movie has it and the
false leader, the insecure Colonel who lords his power
over his underlings, does not. (What if the
charismatic leader is the bad guy?) And though
Rosalie's momentary appearance opens up all kinds of
complications in the "hero" -- his role and
expectations and potential failings -- the movie
buries them completely, under that big old wall the
men rebuild and rebuild.
Before 11 September, The Last Castle's
flag-waving and probably seemed like so much
action-flick business. Now, however, it roused my
fellow viewers to applaud the most ridiculous and
alarming events (for example, a suicide pilot, who
happened to be fighting for the "good guys"). But the
timing of its release doesn't change its essential
triteness. And besides, I think Sylvester Stallone
already made this movie a few years ago...