Now You See It, Now You Don't
When motion picture technology was first introduced at the
end of the 19th century, the pioneers of the medium,
particularly those at work in France, faced a contrasting
set of opportunities. They could either reproduce the world
as they found it (more or less) or create an autonomous
universe that existed only in their imaginations. The
former path was taken by the Lumière brothers, Louis
(1864-1948) and August (1862-1954). They made their
audiences gasp in fear at a train headed directly for the
camera or smile in recognition at images of workers leaving
a factory. The Lumières grasped the remarkable truth that
images, however homely or shopworn, moving at twenty-four
frames per second provide access to some hint of what lies
behind the elementary details of everyday life.
George Méliès (1861-1938) embarked upon the other path of
visual invention. A stage conjurer and manager-director of
the popular Théâtre Robert-Houdin, he initially assumed
that films like those produced by the Lumières could
provide a breather between the fantastic exhibitions of his
performers. Following the lead of the Lumières and other
early innovators, he constructed a camera and took to the
streets to capture the world about him. However, when
Méliès' camera unexpectedly jammed, it caused a kind of
visual hiccup in the action committed to film. Upon
developing the footage, Méliès discovered that the
pedestrians and carriages he began to shoot would suddenly
and inexplicably disappear. As he formerly did with his
magic wand, Méliès now vigorously used his camera to make
objects appear and disappear, with a speed and fluidity
that the stage could not permit. Thus was born the trick
shot, along with a host of other special visual effects
that allow filmmakers to show imaginary worlds that a more
resolute dedication to realism could never achieve.
Méliès capitalized upon his discovery and became one of the
first movie moguls, as well as a virtual one-man cinematic
band -- the primal auteur, so to speak. He built
what can be considered the first major film studio, housed
at Montreuil-sous-Bois. And, much as he oversaw all aspects
of the Théâtre Robert-Houdin, Méliès took on any number of
tasks at this facility: he was writer, director, designer,
cinematographer, and actor. Between 1896 and 1914, he
turned out as many as a thousand films, ranging in length
from three-minutes to twenty-minutes.
Until now, most of this work was available only in the form
of worn-out public domain dupes or appeared as but brief
segments in documentaries on early silent film. The release
of Méliès The Magician/The Magic of Méliès by Facets
Multimedia provides access not only to valuable information
about Méliès' career in the documentary portion of the DVD,
but also, archive-quality examples of some of his most
important works. The set includes Jacques Meny's
documentary The Magic of Méliès, originally produced
for French television, and fifteen of Méliès' works, in
Méliès' Magic Show.
Visual conjuring and fantastic scenarios dominate Méliès'
repertoire. He sought to make imagery plastic in a manner
that physical nature is not. For instance, a man's head
could be inflated with a pump, and even exploded as a
climactic gag (The Man With the Rubber Head [1900]),
or images on printed posters could become animated
(Hilarious Posters [1905]).
Méliès would go on to expand these short skits into
full-blown narratives, as in the film with which
contemporary viewers are most likely familiar, the 1902
A Voyage to the Moon. Drawn from the writings of
Jules Verne, Méliès' film showed how cinema could
complement the writer's imagination, turning science
fiction narrative into exciting, nearly unbelievable visual
images, like a trip to the moon would have been in 1902.
Méliès was also fascinated by the imaginative possibilities
of fairy tales and legends, and made films based on
Cinderella, Bluebeard, and the Arabian Nights.
Yet, even while we tend to associate Méliès with the
fantastic rather than the everyday, a significant number of
his films were drawn from contemporary events and focused
on the observable world. He depicted the eruption of Mont
Pelé and recreated the interior of the submarine Maine.
Most famously, in 1902, an English company commissioned him
to re-stage the coronation of Edward VII. Méliès built a
facsimile of Westminster Abbey and captured the ceremony in
such detail that the monarch himself felt the film to be a
virtual documentary. An even more striking element of this
stage in Méliès' career is that he was quite likely the
progenitor of the filmed commercial. He created brief
advertising vignettes that were projected on the streets of
Paris, and turned the urban metropolis a theater for public
promotions.
Despite the breadth of styles and modes he employed, the
more films by Méliès that one watches, the more one notices
a curious quality to them. They are all flatfootedly
stagebound as they are wildly animated. From start to
finish, Méliès was man of the theater: he anchored his
camera in a single position and did not modify that angle
from first shot to last. The frame is treated, in effect,
as if it was a proscenium arch, and the audience sees only
the perspective that someone in the best seat in the house
would have of the action. He compensates for this unvarying
point of view with a high degree of physical action within
the frame. He delights in crowding the image with a variety
of diversions. Few of his performers move at other than a
breakneck pace; they scamper, leap, and race about the
scene. Ever the showman, Méliès could not resist playing
upon an audience's appetite for theatrical excess. One of
the delightful, if incongruous, details in A Voyage to
the Moon is that the lunar capsule is moved into place
by a line of scantily dressed chorus girls, and famously,
when the capsule lands upon its target, its hits the man in
the moon smack in the eye.
Méliès' conflation of stage and screen was ultimately his
commercial downfall. It wasn't long before audiences became
accustomed to other filmmakers' use of a variety of visual
perspectives impossible in theater, and began to expect
this of their screen entertainments. For the most part,
Méliès avoided these devices and stuck to his stylistic
guns, while much of the film world passed him by.
It was not solely the changes in audience expectations and
the demands of technological innovation that brought an end
to Méliès' career. WWI would intrude and irrevocably upset
the European economy. Moreover, Méliès the auteur was
unable to compete with the mass production techniques of
the emerging film studios, who churned out product at a
speed he could not match. Even though Méliès abandoned his
independence and joined Pathé in 1923, his creditors forced
him to sell his own studio and urban planners tore down his
beloved Théâtre Robert-Houdin. Anguished by these losses,
Méliès destroyed the negatives of his many films.
Since his death in 1938, devotees of his work have promoted
the sense that, like Erich von Stroheim or Orson Welles,
Méliès martyred himself for his art and was at the same
time a true cinema pioneer. In fact, he witnessed the
resurrection of his fame in his own lifetime. Just a few
years after he destroyed his negatives, young cineastes
recognized his innovations, sought him out, and located
surviving prints of his works, culminating in an elegant
gala that reintroduced him to the public in 1929.
Meny's absorbing documentary dramatizes such events in the
director's life, incorporating commentary from a variety of
film scholars, most notably Paolo Cherchi Usai, a leading
historian of silent cinema and director of the Eastman
Archives in Rochester, New York. The compilation of Méliès'
works, nicely evoking Méliès' own cinematic style, is
framed as a screening before a live audience, featuring
piano accompaniment and commentary by his granddaughter,
Madeleine Malthête-Méliès.
While these two well-constructed and informative films
emphasize the romantic dimensions of Méliès' career, the
set provides a more opportunity, that is, to watch a body
of his work and reassess its longevity. And, as fascinating
and fantastic as these films remain, there is something a
bit exhausting in watching one spectacular image after
another. While this is due in part to the fact that this
DVD features his most effects-driven narratives, one after
another, and few of the features drawn from everyday life,
one feels at times that Méliès' desire to please an
audience is disturbingly compulsive. A comment by French
film historian Georges Sadoul bears contemplation: "Méliès
invents the syllables of a future language, but still
prefers 'abracadabra' to words." The rapidity of action and
the incessant segues from effect to effect draw attention
to Méliès' technical mastery and little more. One cannot
help but admire the work, yet wish at the same time that
the director were not as steadfastly committed merely to
astonishment. No matter how hard he tried, Méliès could not
put aside the role of conjurer. A top hat could never be
simply a top hat. It had to contain rabbits, birds, colored
ribbons, and chorus girls.