+ Interview with Errol Morris, director of Mr. Death: The Rise and Fall of Fred A. Leuchter, Jr.
Weird Science
We are first introduced to Mr. Death in his
laboratory, surrounded by the accouterments necessary
for and befitting a mad scientist. Lightning flashes
around him while test tubes bubble ominously. Anyone
with a even a passing familiarity with horror movies
knows that this is the sort of place referred to by
men sounding like Boris Karloff as a "la-bore-atory,"
the scene of dark experiments that go horribly awry
while the evil genius cackles madly into the
storm-ravaged night.
Mr. Death: The Rise and Fall of Fred A. Leuchter, Jr. is and isn't a horror movie at the same time. The
documentary details a story more bizarre and troubling
than anything concocted on a Hollywood sound stage but
refuses to demonize or even sensationalize its
would-be "evil genius," Fred Leuchter. This man, also
known as "Mr. Death," is the author of "The Leuchter
Report," a highly controversial study concluding that
buildings in Poland believed to gas chambers in Nazi
concentration camps do not, in fact, bear any chemical
evidence of such activity. The findings are prime
ammunition for neo-Nazis and revisionist historians
who claim the Holocaust to be an elaborate hoax -- and
indeed, Leuchter's report was used for that purpose
exactly. Certainly, anyone who would actively
discredit the Holocaust can be and has been seen as an
evil man. But Errol Morris' film chooses instead to
depict the strange and contradictory complexities of
Leuchter's disturbing life's work.
The rise of Fred A. Leuchter, Jr. begins with his
success as an equipment salesman and repairman. His
specialty is execution equipment. The son of a
Massachusetts Penitentiary employee, Leuchter's morbid
interest in executions began at an early age (home
video shows him as a teenager clowning around with
prison guards at his father's place of work). In
speaking of his interest, Leuchter considers himself a
die-hard humanitarian, so to speak. Though a proponent
of the death penalty, Leuchter decries the inefficient
and inhumane technology employed around the country in
criminal executions. He sees himself restoring dignity
to those who are given the death penalty, by making
theirs a less painful, less lengthy, and less messy
execution than it might typically be. (In one scene,
he goes so far as to suggest that execution room
designers place pictures on the ceilings, so those
waiting to be executed by lethal injection, laid out
on gurneys, might have something to look at.)
Leuchter's passionate advocacy for those executed by
the state, however, is tempered by his detached
attitudes about his involvement in the taking of human
life. Though he strongly asserts his interest in
preserving the self-respect of the condemned, he also
takes several opportunities -- both for Morris' camera
and in earlier, still photographs Morris includes in
the film -- to pose in various electric chairs. While
he's strapped in, Leuchter's silly grin becomes almost
ghoulish, so happy is he to have improved on this
deadly device. It may be that he finds satisfaction in
helping to kill convicted felons, or it may simply be
his pride in a job well done.
The progression of Mr. Death suggests the latter.
Though he is in the killing business, Leuchter -- with
his receding hairline, oversized glasses, bad teeth,
and even worse polyester suit -- seems nerdishly
attracted to the "pure" science of his work and
blissfully unaware of its macabre moral or political
ramifications. This attitude might also explain his
involvement in defending Ernst Zündel, a neo-Nazi
brought to trial in Canada for publishing a pamphlet
claiming the Holocaust to be a hoax (the specific
charge was for publishing a document he knew to be
false). Leuchter's familiarity with all things related
to human execution, including the gas chamber, made
him an "expert" witness for the defense, who paid for
his expedition to former concentration camps in
Poland. His findings, published in his infamous
report, make Leuchter, as he says, "a reluctant
revisionist." After a lab failed to detect cyanide in
the samples he clandestinely gathered and smuggled out
of Poland, Leuchter testified on Zündel's behalf and
set off on a speaking tour. which happened to be
funded by neo-Nazis.
Leuchter's association with revisionists and
anti-Semites precipitates his fall. His contracts with
state prisons dwindle, his marriage falls apart, and
his credibility is destroyed. While it may be hard to
find sympathy for a man with such repugnant beliefs,
the film does not damn Leuchter completely. Morris
presents a wealth of documentation to support the
presence of gas chambers in the camps and interviews a
lab worker who rejects the initial findings as totally
inaccurate, but he never confronts Leuchter directly
with any of this information. Instead, Leuchter is
shown to be rather pathetic, trapped within his
relentlessly scientific frame of mind, thinking the
gas chambers inconceivable because they would have
been too inefficient. "Why didn't they use bullets? Or
blow them all up?" he wonders aloud about the Nazi
executioners. "It just doesn't make sense." The sheer
horror of the Holocaust cannot find a purchase in the
cut-and-dried scientific efficiency that characterizes
Leuchter's thinking. A few rocks and a flawed test are
all he needs to disbelieve.
Morris' documentary, while clearly against
anti-Semitism and historical revisionism, reveals
Leuchter as existing in his own misconceived world.
Though his findings defended Ernst Zündel and he is
takes part in the neo-Nazi speaking tour, in his
interviews, Leuchter appears to be unforgivably
insensitive to the cultural climate surrounding the
death penalty and the Holocaust. When he places an ad
in the local paper to sell a used lethal injection
machine, Leuchter seems genuinely surprised to learn
the ad has been pulled and banned from publication. To
say the least, Leuchter appears out of touch with
reality.
In telling Leuchter's story, Mr. Death addresses
both the death penalty and the Holocaust, without
becoming overly polemical. Its complicated but
balanced treatment of Leuchter shows the international
controversy and personal damage he caused
(specifically, in his marriage). It would be too easy,
though, to simply demonize Fred Leuchter as an evil
scientist or a Nazi in disguise. Such characters,
Morris' film remind us, only exist in movies.