Piloting Skills
The more deft cinema becomes these days at creating
spectacle through computer graphics and the like, the
more preoccupied it seems to get with archival film at
its most hazy and incomplete. Maybe JFK's
three-hour-long infatuation with the Zapruder film
kicked off this trend but it reached its pinnacle (or
nadir, depending on what you think of it) with Saving Private Ryan's twenty-minute restaging of the D-Day
landings. This sequence's unfocused, dizzying
cinematography presumably jars the viewer into
experiencing some of the dislocation of combat but
does so by evoking the prize-winning photographs
Robert Capa took on Omaha beach. The distinctive
fuzziness of these images has long since become
associated with the experience of D-Day but had more
to do with an error in the film's development than
with any aesthetic decision on Capa's part. Even,
maybe particularly, when cinema lays claim to some
heightened sense of realism, it is likely to have
taken another image as its referent.
This is particularly true of the latest spate of
movies about World War II, a phenomenon that is
probably due to a confluence of factors. The
unparalleled horrors of the war would seem to mandate
that movies about them be particularly visceral and
immediate; at the same time, the passing of the
generation that fought the war brings with it a myth
that narrative accounts of the war are, or will soon
be, largely unavailable; and, finally, in the place of
these narratives, a large archive of war footage is
available for Hollywood to remold into feature films.
Much of this archive -- such as the Capa photographs,
or the brief 16mm film of the listing, burning USS
Arizona at Pearl Harbor -- is powerful and iconic
largely because of its incompleteness.
You're almost certain to have seen the footage of the
Arizona -- wholly engulfed in flame, the battleship
slowly keels onto its side, so consumed in smoke that
only its twin masts are visible. For all its attempts
at sweeping and epic scope, Pearl Harbor's main
energies seem directed toward recreating this scrap of
footage from all conceivable angles and perspectives.
Where the single shot of the Arizona doesn't provide
the information director Michael Bay needs -- what the
deck of the Arizona looked like during the sinking,
for example; in the original film, the deck is covered
in smoke -- Bay simply borrows ideas from other films,
most notably Titanic, to fill in the gaps.
Pearl Harbor's preference for image over narrative
in constructing its account of the attack probably
explains its hackneyed script and posterboard
characters. Its central conflict -- a love triangle
involving Rafe (Ben Affleck) and Danny (Josh
Hartnett), two gifted young military pilots who love
the same woman, Evelyn (Kate Beckinsale) -- is far too
flimsy to support the overlong movie. Still, for the
first half of the film we are treated to Rafe and
Danny's entire lives. This begins with their budding
childhood friendship as they play war on Rafe's farm.
They glue wooden sticks and draw extra controls on the
family crop-dusting plane to better simulate the
experience of combat flying, but while doing so young
Rafe accidentally starts the plane and sends it
taxiing
down the field.
The scene establishes Rafe and Danny's God-given
piloting skills as the movie lurches forward to the
early 1940s via a scrap of newsreel describing the
Nazi advance across Europe. Danny and Rafe are now
aspiring Army pilots itching for America to enter the
war so they can realize their childhood dream of
combat flying. Rafe is so anxious to fight that he
joins the Eagle Squadron, a cadre of British pilots
helping defend London from Luftwaffe bombers, but
before he's shipped out to the English countryside, he
meets and falls in love with Evelyn, a Navy nurse.
Theirs is the brief but passionate affair so
characteristic of Hollywood at its schmaltziest, and
when Rafe is shot down over the English Channel and
presumed dead, Evelyn waits a few months before
hooking up with Danny. Of course, Rafe subsequently
turns up alive after being plucked out of the water
and hiding for several months in occupied France,
whereupon he and Danny must fight over the same woman,
and Evelyn, for her part, must decide which of the two
she'd rather be with.
Having established this central conflict, such as it
is, the movie proceeds to pin down its audience under a withering crossfire of propaganda. "Don't tell me
about duty," Rafe tells Danny as they debate Rafe's
decision to join the Eagle Squadron, "I wear the same
uniform you do." Later, a stern, patriotic Colonel
Doolittle (Alec Baldwin), in a patriotic reverie,
tells a nodding aide that "victory belongs to those
who believe in it the most, and believe in it the
longest." The newsreels that transition the movie from
one time period to the next berate the U.S. for its
isolationism, then extol America's industrial machine
after the nation's entry into the war. Danny, Rafe,
Evelyn, and their fellow freedom-warriors appear on
screen to the invariable accompaniment of triumphal
music while the treacherous Japanese conspire to
destroy democracy over the leitmotif of a minor-key,
ominous dirge. In the wake of Pearl Harbor, an Army
chaplain administers last rites to a dying soldier,
assuring him that "pain is temporary, but glory is
eternal."
Anyone at all familiar with the general trajectory of
recent war movies -- from Saving Private Ryan to
U-571 and Rules of Engagement -- won't be
surprised at Pearl Harbor's hoo-rah, uncritical
celebration of American righteousness, although Pearl Harbor probably takes the award for sheer quantity.
The movie's endorsement of military ideals and barely
submerged nostalgia for the war's anti-Japanese racism
only abates for a half hour of stunningly rendered
shoot-em-up as the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and
its surrounding airfields takes place. Although even
here, as the movie becomes entranced with its own
spectacle, it still reminds us who the good guys and
the bad guys are, in case we've forgotten: "How do you
like it when someone's shooting back at you?" Danny
shouts as he sights a Japanese Zero from his fighter
plane. The Hollywood lexicon has a puzzling view of
the Japanese at war; they are alternately cowardly,
such as during the Pearl Harbor attack, or fanatical
and other-than-human, such as during the kamikaze
attacks on the advancing Pacific fleet later in the
war.
This protracted thrill-ride action sequence, which one
suspects is the sole reason for the movie's existence,
is where Pearl Harbor's debts to the USS Arizona
footage and Titanic become most obvious. The few
grainy, black-and-white frames of the archival footage
are endlessly embellished and restated as the Arizona
burns and lazily rolls into the ocean. These
embellishments alternate with a shameless imitation of
Titanic's scenes of helpless passengers and crew
falling to their deaths along the side of a ship deck
that has suddenly become a sheer cliff. This visual
derivativeness casts the bankruptcy of Hollywood's
remembrance of World War II into clear relief: each
time the war's pictures are represented in a different
order they are further
diluted with unrelated images (such as those from
Titanic); in the meantime, the stories of those who
actually served move that much further into obscurity.