+ interview with Ed Harris, starring in Pollock
+ another review of Pollock by Todd R. Ramlow
Ordinary Brilliance and Self-Destruction
There's a great scene about halfway through Ed Harris'
fiercely unsentimental and brutally beautiful
Pollock that sums up the painter's lifelong
emotional storm. Relaxing in his suburban Long Island
home, listening to lazy jazz while holding a cold beer
in his right hand, Pollock (played by Harris) tells
his wife and fellow artist Lee Krasner (Marcia Gay
Harden) that he wants a child. When she says no, he
explodes spectacularly in a bipolar flash, smashing
the bottle on the floor, shouting and seething in
red-faced anger. In the time it takes to flip on a
light switch, his entire demeanor has changed
completely, a transformation as shocking to the
audience as it is dispiriting to Krasner.
This is the tragedy and romanticized allure of Jackson
Pollock, the man: he grew physically, he grew
creatively, but he never grew up emotionally. Harris'
double-duty here, as first-time director and
finely-tuned actor, captures that stunted life in all
its ugliness, just as he captures Pollock's inventive
and influential drip method in all its profound
simplicity.
While the film is shot from a screenplay co-written by
Barbara Turner and Susan J. Emshwiller, it's been
Harris' baby for more than a decade, and his
fingerprints are all over every creative decision,
even those not directly credited to him. It focuses on
ten years of Pollock's life, chronicling his rise from
obscure New York painter to omnipresent modern art
luminary and, ultimately, his end as a bitter, lonely
alcoholic. To the writers' credit, the script avoids
the numerous cliches typically associated with movies
about artists: there's little effort to wrap up
Pollock's wild oscillations with tidy explanations or
to psychoanalyze his motives. Instead, Pollock
observes its subject, presenting him more or less
objectively. It's this cool, almost journalistic
approach that keeps the movie fresh and its
characters' emotional struggles realistic
and involving.
Harris directs shrewdly and economically -- nothing on
screen is gratuitous. Of particular note are his
intelligent choices during scenes where we see the
artist painting, the only time he is ever entirely
comfortable and in his element. Harris nails it; the
camera dips and weaves unobtrusively, without flash
but not without personality, and catches the
scattershot purity of Pollock's drip method in a way
that seems entirely organic, a kind of planned
arbitrariness, much like the paintings themselves.
His surprising maturity as a first-time director is
the perfect complement to his not-at-all-surprising
maturity as a veteran actor. He has built a solid
career by doing his work and keeping all external
celebrity noise quiet. This is one of his finest
performances, an exercise in range that demands both
understatement and fireworks, and throughout the film,
he delivers on both ends.
It's right that the Academy had the good sense to
reward him with a Best Actor nomination. Harris plays
Jackson Pollock the way he would play a stock clerk in
your local supermarket: as a normal person with some
extraordinary personality traits and talents, because
Harris understands that's pretty much what most people
are actually like. His Pollock is a guy with a knack
for painting that is (over)matched only by his
incredibly self-destructive knack for drinking and
worrying, a "man's man" who is destined to tear down
everything he builds. Pollock is feral, sweet,
dangerous, innocent, bright, and thickheaded beyond
belief, often all at the same time. A lesser actor
might get lost in the mythology of the man, overdoing
the alcoholism or the wounded, distanced elements of
Pollock's personality. Harris shrewdly avoids
caricature, condemnation, and hero-worship.
Marcia Gay Harden rivals his performance with her own
remarkable turn as Krasner. Harden understands that
Krasner was Pollock's backbone; his rapid
disintegration after she leaves him to his drinking
and his mistress stands as irrefutable proof of that.
The actor also understands
that Krasner was smarter, more responsible, and far
more deserving of our sympathy, and that Pollock owed
much of his success to her tireless efforts and
shameless boosting. Like Harris,
Harden wastes no time getting at Krasner's humanity,
and never stoops to martyring the character to get us
feeling sorry for her.
There would be no room for that here anyway. Pollock
is, above all, a film about people's insecurities,
regardless of social stature, and how those
insecurities can completely derail lives. There's no
space for martyrs in a story like that, just for the
complex shadings of everyday toilers, even the ones
whose toils revolutionize the art world and profoundly
imprint pop culture. Jackson Pollock was an abundantly
conflicted and talented man, stuck in neutral when it
came to emotional development -- Peter Pan without the
pretty ending or the pixie dust. Ed Harris'
movie is every bit as vivid and textured as its
subject's finest work.