Violent tendencies
"She thinks I have violent tendencies." As far as
Vince (Ethan Hawke) can make out -- or as far as he
wants to make out -- this is the reason that his
girlfriend left him. It's not anything he's proud of,
and not anything he wants to discuss with Johnny
(Robert Sean Leonard), his best friend from high
school, ten years ago. Yet, Vince does bring it up,
when the two get together in Lansing, Michigan, where
Johnny has his first film screening in the local film
fest, in order to jumpstart a conversation about their
shared past, now ten years gone, and more
specifically, about a girl they both knew, wanted, and
lost, Amy (Uma Thurman).
When you first see Vince, in Richard Linklater's
Tape (adapted from Stephen Belber's play), he
does look like he has some of these tendencies. Alone
in a motel room, he indulges in some familiar guy-like
rituals, with a couple of strange twists: he drinks a
couple of beers, while dumping a similar number down
the sink. He tosses the cans about the room. He strips
to his boxers and t-shirt. He does a few push-ups. And
then he waits for Johnny's arrival.
At this point, the pieces of Vince's preparation
routine come together -- he's been getting ready to
meet Johnny, who both intimidates and enrages him.
Johnny's a pretty boy, a high school winner grown up,
with a sharp profile and nice shoes. Vince is an
also-ran. Turns out that he's currently a volunteer
fireman back home in Oakland, California, where he
also sells dope to his boss, the fire chief. At first
Johnny lets this go, apparently as an indication that
Vince is the same as he's ever been, not living up to
his "potential." Yeah yeah, Johnny sighs, Vince's ex
was probably right to leave him: "She thinks I'm a
dick," he admits. Well, Johnny soothes, maybe he's not
totally a dick, but only, occasionally, he "has a
tendency to act in a phallic fashion." Oh no, Vince
elaborates, pushing Johnny's language anxiety: "I have
unresolved 'issues' that sometimes manifest themselves
in violent ways." Okay, Johnny agrees, smugly, he does
"sometimes present a threatening appearance."
It's evident in this exchange that Johnny -- the
independent filmmaker who aspires to do "good" in the
world -- thinks Vince is a bit of a Neanderthal,
unambitious and uncreative. It's also evident that
Vince thinks Johnny's a prima donna, out of touch with
his masculine side. Or maybe not: it turns out that
wily Vince has an ulterior motive for their meeting.
He wants Johnny to confess that he raped their old
classmate, Amy, just after she had just broken up with
Vince (the crucial detail eventually slips out that
she never slept with Vince when they were going out).
Johnny's immediately uncomfortable, and wants to move
on, forget all this and focus on his film premiere.
Vince, on the other hand, wants to rehash and judge.
At the very least, he wants Johnny's admission of
guilt, of imperfection, of recklessness and cruelty, a
recognition that he's not so different from Vince --
or Vince's self-image -- as he pretends to be.
The conversation turns increasingly mean, reduced to
actual wrestling when Johnny finds out that Vince has
been taping it -- even the part where Johnny more or
less agrees to Vince's interpretation of long-ago
events. At this point, literally when the boys are on
top of each other, Amy (now an assistant DA in
Lansing) arrives, called ahead of time by Vince as
part of his grand scheme to get the three of them back
in the same room. Because it's one of those airless,
grim, moderately priced motel rooms with lumpy twin
beds and bad art on the walls, the situation is
exceedingly uncomfortable. And because the camera
never leaves this room, you're soon feeling as trapped
as the characters.
Vince's trap has to do with truth: he remains fixed on
the idea that he will expose it and name it, that it's
"caught" on the tape. As soon as Amy walks in and sits
down, Vince signals toward the tape in his pocket,
threatening Johnny to "tell the truth." The problem is
that this truth isn't so neatly identified or told as
Vince assumes, even if he does have the recording,
which he presumes is "proof." Vince, who's been living
with his anger, and his desire for an answer to
justify that anger, for ten years, is hardly able to
contain himself when the breakdown nears. At the same
time, Amy is visibly ill at ease, as the two guys
hover over her, peering at one another every time she
moves slightly in her chair. Johnny stands near the
door, perhaps imagining that he can walk out.
It appears that a lot is riding on what happened that
night, ten years ago. Or more accurately, it appears
that Vince and Johnny believe they have a lot riding
on it, and that Amy inevitably shares their concern.
Amy, however, reads it differently. She sees the
investment they have in her corroboration of their
story, and refuses to give it. Instead, she challenges
the boys' story, their right to tell her story, and
their increasingly idiotic and self-involved posturing
over moral rights and responsibilities. While it's not
entirely clear why she does this -- whether she has a
different story in her head, whether she needs to be
stronger than them, or whether, as she puts it,
"nothing happened that night" -- she's able to wield
words in a way that's quite beyond even Johnny's
smarmy dexterity. She's a lawyer, so she knows
something about moral blustering.
But this boys-versus-girl structure makes Tape
look simpler than it is. Linklater is well-known for
making pictures where characters talk a lot, and this
one's claustrophobic setting and small cast provide a
tighter narrative and formal focus than usual -- no
escape for you by way of cool digital animation
(Waking Life) or a beautifully distracting
tracking camera (Slacker, Before
Sunrise). Moreover, it's possible to become
annoyed at a movie that obscures a rape's truth or
falsity, makes it seem less important than its
dissection by the characters. But if you wrestle with
that concept a bit, you might see that the movie is
not about Amy's body and experience, but about two
men's belief that they have access to, control over,
and a consequential stake in that body and experience.
In other words, it's about their violent tendencies,
however these might be a function of their gender, or
not.
Indeed, for viewers -- who obviously cannot know what
happened ten years ago to fictional characters -- the
rape, as story, as fact or fabrication, is
progressively less crucial than the ways that the
characters are understanding themselves now, at this
moment, in this motel room, in front of this set of
cameras. For as much as the characters are living
fictional lives, they are doing so at this moment in
front of Linklater's probing, provocative cameras, for
viewers' contemplation and agitation.
Tape's staginess is punctuated by painfully
self-conscious dialogue and in-between silences, which
underline the vagaries of truth and performance. In
the end, Tape is not so concerned with what
happened that night, who's guilty or not, or even who
owes whom an apology, if not some kind of legal
redress. Rather, what it gets you thinking about,
while you watch it and for some time afterwards, is
whether anyone can ever know what has "happened," and
more disturbingly, how the tendency to want such
knowledge can be violent.