+ Interview with Bruce Greenwood
starring in Thirteen Days
How Close We Came
There are lots of men in Thirteen Days. Upstanding,
committed men, wearing somber suits, short haircuts,
and serious looks on their faces. And serious they
should be, given that they're reenacting the Cuban
Missile Crisis, one of the gravest, most
planet-threatening events in recent U.S. history, when
the Kennedy Administration famously stood toe-to-toe
with the Soviets, and -- as everyone knows -- stared
them down.
Starring Kevin Costner as presidential advisor Kenny
O'Donnell, Roger (No Way Out) Donaldson's movie
aspires to be an old-fashioned political thriller,
structured as a series of tense conversations in the
White House (bouncing from one significant close-up to
another) and cuts to those ominous, medium range
ballistic missiles being installed in Cuba or U.S. spy
planes and warships. Thank goodness, none of the
action on screen is so outrageous as the film's
poster, which arranges its montage of images so that
those missiles appear to be launched at the White
House a la Independence Day, alongside the tagline,
"You'll never believe how close we came."
There are, of course, many things that "we" do believe
about what happened back in October 1962, for
instance, that the Kennedys and company did the right
thing, as proved by the fact that there was no nuclear
war. And given such knowledge, the film has to find
another means to create tension, that is, it explores
the personalities involved (this exploration is
limited to men in the U.S. , as the movie makes no
attempt to guess at what the Soviets were thinking).
Thirteen Days goes at this with a kind of fierce
efficiency, showing the essential players -- JFK, RFK,
and O'Donnell -- as brave, intelligent, and dedicated
men who, with the exception of O'Donnell, never go
home. This exception is striking, though it only takes
a few minutes of screen time. The film opens as
O'Donnell's pleasant Leave It To Beaver-style family
breakfast is interrupted by a fateful phone call. And
so you get the point: he's the stand-in for the rest
of us, the regular guy, the non-Kennedy (he is,
however, historically part of the so-called "Irish
Mafia" that went to Washington with the Kennedys -- as
Costner put it on The Today Show, there was a rift
in D, circa 1960s: "They were Irish, they were in an
unfriendly environment").
A bit later in the film, O'Donnell goes home again for
a minute, primarily to hug his pretty wife (Lucinda
Jenney) and suggest that she take the kids out of town
(this isn't exactly a practical suggestion, in the
face of a nuclear missile attack, but thoughtful, in
its way). Even this little bit of attention to
O'Donnell's homefront assigns him an emotional weight
that the other men don't have (which is disappointing
mainly because some of them look like they'd be more
interesting than O'Donnell). It also calls up one of
Costner's previous roles, that of Jim Garrison, who
also brought his work home -- only here, Costner
affects a broad, almost cartoonish Boston accent,
where in Oliver Stone's JFK, he affected a broad,
almost cartoonish Louisiana accent.
Meanwhile, the Kennedys -- the President (Bruce
Greenwood) and Attorney General Robert Kennedy (Steven
Culp) -- are presented as heroic and stoic. Surely,
there's enough available lore on the Kennedys that
it's unnecessary to go digging into their imagined
psyches. Still, the film offers some keen moments
between the brothers, made especially fascinating
because Greenwood and Culp have so clearly nailed
their well-known body language, their shorthand
communication with each other through gestures and
glances. And in that sense, O'Donnell's
sort-of-insider-sort-of-outsider status proves useful,
as in the several shots of the brothers leaning in to
one another, speaking so softly that you can't hear,
and you're left, with O'Donnell, wondering at their
intensity and focus. It's a reverent portrayal,
but/and (depending on how you feel about such
reverence), it comprises the most compelling moments
in the film.
Still, and unfortunately, the actual decision-making
process is increasingly less thrilling as it builds to
its ostensible climax (or perhaps more precisely, the
non-climax). Borrowing its title from Bobby Kennedy's
memoir of the event, based on the book, The Kennedy Tapes: Inside the White House During the Cuban Missile Crisis and other sources, David Self's script feels
caught between a rock and a hard place, wanting to be
true to "history," but needing to package it as
"entertainment." And so it structures the crisis as
something of a personal test of the Kennedys' mettle,
with O'Donnell acting as moral cheerleader, logistical
support, and on-the-ground liaison for the rest of us.
The film lays out the Kennedys' options as ranging
from making an aggressive first strike on Cuba (before
the missiles are ready to shoot, a move that will
likely inspire the Soviets to invade Berlin), to
taking a public stand (the blockade of Cuba), to
making a back channel deal with Khruschev (so no one
loses face). These choices are neatly articulated as
mini-speeches by historical figures, played by actors
who sort of look like them, for example, Robert
McNamara (Dylan Baker), McGeorge Bundy (Frank Wood),
Dean Rusk (Henry Strozier), General Maxwell Taylor
(Bill Smitrovich). So, when one particularly hawkish
advisor asserts, "The big red dog is diggin' in our
backyard," there's a ready (and by comparison,
well-reasoned) counter-argument, that engaging in
nuclear war is a bad idea; it's obvious that the
audience is expected to agree with the latter.
Clearly invested in a nostalgic vision of the Kennedys
-- as they represent all that was once "good" about
political leadership -- Thirteen Days sets itself a
difficult task during our own era, when few people
trust their elected officials to do the right thing
just because it's the right thing. But idealism and
romanticism aren't impossible to convey even in this
"cynical" age; some might even say they're more
welcome (see, for example, The West Wing's great
success). The biggest problem for Thirteen Days
isn't its rudimentary politics or rah-rah reminiscing,
but its execution. Asking O'Donnell to bear the bulk
of its emotional narrative is, frankly, asking too
much, particularly of Costner's limited range. And
this, in turn, seems a problem in conception and
structure. The film can't figure an economy to convey
its story's built-in drama. On the one hand, it's not
a near-war movie, packed with exciting shots of
weapons and recon planes. On the other hand, it's also
not a movie about the Kennedys scheming and conniving
per se -- you remain too distanced from them for that,
and besides, the cutthroat politicking that was
famously part and parcel of their good work is mostly
toned down here. And so, you're left out there with
O'Donnell, not a particularly stimulating place to be.