The Story of Us
Director: Rob Reiner
Cast: Bruce Willis, Michelle Pfeiffer
by Cynthia Fuchs
PopMatters Film Editor
e-mail this article
Here's a terrifying thought: each of the major turning points in your life is reducible to the hairstyle you're wearing at the time. Your graduation, your first job, your marriage, your dead goldfish, your vacation in Italy: all of it is mucked up when filtered through those misty-water-colored memory glasses. If it sounds awful in theory, it's even worse to see it acted out, on a wide screen with lots of close-ups of teary, badly-coifed movie stars backed by a treacly Eric Clapton guitar score.
This is the experience delivered by Rob Reiner's The Story of Us, a movie that too often feels like an unclever follow-up to When Harry Met Sally... (which, I admit, never seemed very clever to me). This time the couple in perpetual trouble is Ben (Bruce Willis in his just-please-take-me-seriously mode) and Katey (Michelle Pfeiffer). We meet them when they've been married for fifteen years and as they're talking separately to the camera, like those fretful young people do in MTV's The Real World. He writes novels and she writes crossword puzzles. She's unhappy that he's become so irresponsible, he's despondent because she's become so unspontaneous. He says tomato and, well, can this marriage be saved?
While you might intuit that it will be saved Rob Reiner
doesn't traffic in tragedy, after all watching it be saved is
mostly annoying. For one thing, there's those hair-dos. And for
another, she can't possibly leave Ben because her only possible
other suitor is a divorced dentist played by Tim Matheson, whom
you'll remember as the fake Mr. Brady in A Very Brady Sequel.
And then there's the actual plot. You see the moments in
their relationship that matter most to each principal
(thankfully, you only see these from one perspective, sparing you
any potential he said-she said arguments). He remembers when they
met he was a beginning journalist and she was an office temp;
he teased her by tossing paper clips, she put on a pith helmet;
he had long hair, she had frizzy. She remembers when she gave him
a plastic spoon she had saved from their first dinner out at a
Chinese restaurant, then wonders aloud, "When is that moment in a
marriage when a spoon becomes just a spoon?''
(This was the moment when the friend sitting in front of me normally a much more forgiving viewer than I turned around
and made a gagging face, and it wasn't even ten minutes into the
film).
The story of them proceeds as you might expect. Their two
children a Josh (Jake Sandvig) and Erin (Colleen Rennison) are suspicious that things aren't going well, but Katey and Ben
decide to keep what seems to be their imminent break-up a secret
until said children return from summer camp. This means that even
though Ben moves out as soon as the kids get on the bus, the
couple must perform marital okayness when they visit the camp for
Parents' Day. Of course, this makes for some discomfort and the
kind of humor premised on such discomfort (as in, ohmigosh! what
will they do when Erin surprises them with a night visit to their
cabin and notices that the couch is made up?)
Both Ben and Katey have same-gender pals to whom they lament
repeatedly: for her, the super-sympathetic Rachel (played by
perpetual best friend Rita Wilson) and dullsville Liza (Julie
Hagerty), and for him, Rachel's buttinsky husband Stan (Reiner)
and Ben's egocentric agent (Paul Reiser). Because they have these
shoulders to cry on, the solo-confessions seem superfluous:
everyone is annoyingly articulate in that sit-commy way that
characters in contemporary relationship movies tend to be. For
instance, Rachel advises Katey concerning sex during emotional
difficulties: the penis is "a battering ram'' and the vagina,
when nervous, can't "receive" it. Or Ben spends time with Stan,
who asserts, by way of illustrating the "grayness" of life, that
Ben stare at his buttocks while he intones, "In reality, there is
no ass, only the continuation of my legs."
In between whining to their friends, remembering sexual
ecstasies on the kitchen counter, and confessing to the camera,
Ben and Katey do interact, mostly arguing and attempting to make
up. After several weeks apart, they spend an excruciating few
minutes in bed, where they reminisce about the pathetically
ineffective couples' therapists they've consulted, and then think
about having sex. Within seconds they're joined as we get a
glimpse inside their Woody-Allenized heads by their parents
(Betty White, Red Buttons, Jayne Meadows, and Tom Poston, all
looking as horrified by their roles as you feel about them),
instructing them on what to say and how to behave. Needless to
say, Ben and Katey revert to form (sniping and not listening) and
their hopes for the evening are dashed.
The movie's basic formula, for all its hip smugness and 90s-style
egalitarian sorrow, actually seems more like a forties weepie than
anything else. The script by Alan Zweibel and Jessie Nelson (the latter
responsible for Stepmom, i.e., I could rest my case here) would suit
someone like Irene Dunne, because she's tough enough (beneath her
excellent and perfectly calibrated tears) to withstand the pummeling such
generic stories inflict. While Katey does look like a survivor, Ben is
most certainly not: he just gets angrier and sadder (to the point that he
riverdances to entertain his kids), and you start imagining that he'll end
up in the Fight Club down the street if she doesn't step up to rescue him.
That it's Ben who needs the rescuing is not without its
cultural significance and class-related resonance. Katey can
afford to move on, unlike Irene Dunne (who usually moved on
anyway, but without a job where she could work at home on her
computer): you see her taking cooking classes, book shopping,
anticipating what she'll be doing with the kids home. He sits in
his apartment and hates himself and her, stews over her date,
wants it to be "like it was" (he uses that damn pith helmet as
the sign of her lost sense of "fun"). Katey knows it can't like
that, but she's willing, eventually, to work on it.
Unfortunately, the film never addresses the possibility of its
specifically gendered melodrama, never allows that it might be about the
ongoing dislocations of a straight-white-middle-class-male psyche, never
observes either of its protagonists with imaginative or thoughtful,
serious or even comic insight. Instead, it goes glib.
|