Sunday, Jul 19, 2009
by PopMatters Staff
by Linda Hutcheon
Literary Review of Canada (1 July 2009)

As book review sections of newspapers diminish daily in size and significance, and as those same newspapers publish dirges to their own demise, online reviewing sites (of just about anything) proliferate. This paradox makes our moment in history a particularly appropriate time to examine the ethics, economics and politics of reviewing. In the great democratization of reviewing that we are witnessing, anybody and everybody can become a reviewer, or what some would call an “empowered consumer.” Buy a book and you can review it on Amazon.com. In fact, you might be able to do so without even reading the book. Who would check? You do not have to be an expert or a professional, or even honest. And this applies not only to books, of course, but to anything that can be evaluated, from Toronto restaurants to Paris hotels, from DVDs to video games.

Latest in Criticism

Critical Theory: Useful Distinction or Unconscious Smugness?
— PJ Rey (The Society Pages, 20 September 2011)
The FP Top 100 Global Thinkers
— Foreign Policy (Foreign Policy, December 2011)
Defy the Elite! Wait, Which Elite?
— A. O. Scott (The New York Times, 13 January 2011)
The Social Role of the Critic
— Roland Greene (ARCADE: Literature, the Humanities, and the World, 18 March 2011)
National Public Radio Music Critics Have the Power of Persuasion
— Kathleen M. Silva and Francisco J. Silva (Media Psychology Review, 2010)
Everyone's a Critic Now
— Neal Gabler (The Observer, 30 January 2011)
The Intellectual at Play in the Wider World
— Pankaj Mishra (The New York Times, 31 December 2010)
Beyond the Critic as Cultural Arbiter
— Stephen Burn (The New York Times, 31 December 2010)
Bugger the Bloggers: Old-world Critics Still Count
— Georgie Williamson (The Australian, 1 September 2010)
What Is the Crisis in the Humanities?
— Daniel Born (The Common Review, September 2010)

//Mixed media


Authenticity Issues and the New Intimacies

// Marginal Utility

"The social-media companies have largely succeeded in persuading users of their platforms' neutrality. What we fail to see is that these new identities are no less contingent and dictated to us then the ones circumscribed by tradition; only now the constraints are imposed by for-profit companies in explicit service of gain.

READ the article