It goes on and on and on
by Cynthia Fuchs
PopMatters Film amd TV Editor
I'll give you anything you want from me,
Anything you want anything you need,
Anything your soul desires.
Aaliyah, "One in a Million"
News of the sudden, indescribably sad death of Aaliyah Diana Houghton has been everywhere since the plane
crash on 25 August. The coverage has taken various forms, mostly sympathetic portraits and appreciations of her talent and career, or accounts of the "facts" -- the when and where, the names of the eight others on the Cessna 402, the ongoing investigation into causes, the Virgin Records-sponsored commemorative service, Vibe's upcoming memorial issue, and the abrupt increase in sales of her last album, Aaliyah, so that it went on to top the charts.
Some publications have run tabloidy headlines,
speculating on the cause of the crash, suggesting that
the plane carried too much equipment, that the pilot
wasn't okayed to fly this particular plane, or, in
language that could only be dreamed up by the New
York Post: "Obese pair eyed in Aaliyah crash."
Others have opted for a less dramatic but really, just
as enticing approach: Entertainment Weekly went
with its scheduled "Fall TV Preview" cover (featuring
a fan-blown Sarah Michelle Gellar) the week after the
accident, but included a titillating front-corner
banner, "Aaliyah's Last Hours." Unsurprisingly, these
stories tend to be written by entertainment reporters.
Familiar with the industry's excesses, they have
perhaps been willing to overlook or even extol the
grandness of the spectacle. News organizations covered
the New York City funeral, describing the carriage
with white horses, the 22 white doves representing the
singer's age, and those who attended, her family and
friends . . . and Mike Tyson.
The constant coverage -- as typical as it has become
when celebrities die in extraordinary ways -- has
troubled some observers. Rod Dreher's opinion piece in
the New York Post (which originally ran
alongside the paper's 31 August cover story on the
"Funeral to Die For," a headline which is itself
fairly insensitive) has recently been passed along on
a few email lists, as exhibit A for the shallowness of
the mainstream media. Dreher argues that the
"traffic-snarling, horse-drawn cortege for a pop
singer most people have never heard of" is "too much,"
declaring that Aaliyah was neither a "great" enough
artist, nor possessing an exalted enough stature in
"society" (like Princess Diana or JFK Jr.), to warrant
such attention. The person who was sending round the
piece on email included a report on Hot 97 DJ "Star"
(Troi Torain), who was suspended for mocking the crash
on the radio, by playing sounds of a plane crash with
a woman's screams. The sender labeled both stories
with the subject line, "This is horrible!" and invited
readers to write the Post and the radio station, to
demand apologies.
Surely these incidents are disrespectful, but I'm not
sure how much better it is to be counting up the
record sales numbers, or gauging the tragedy in terms
of lost potential as "product." Warner Bros., for
instance, is now saying that her last movie, Queen
of the Damned (for which Aaliyah had yet to
complete dialogue looping), was "always on the
theatrical release schedule," contrary to early rumors
that the film was "unwatchable" and headed straight to
video. However warm or wonderful she was in person,
most of those mourning her only know her as an image,
and so it makes a certain, not-exactly-palatable sense
that most accolades refer to that image. For just one
example, Emil Wilbekin, editor-in-chief of Vibe
magazine, effused that she could have been "the next
Jennifer Lopez, the next Whitney Houston, the next
Madonna, the next Janet Jackson." Yes, I think we get
the idea.
Even aside from ostensible efforts to speak to fans
who never met their idol, industry people might be
expected to render such clumsy praises: as they are so
fond of reminding us, the entertainment business is a
business, where worth is assessed by numbers and
cycles are perpetual. Weeks before Aaliyah's death,
the new album's promotional campaign was in full
swing: at the time of her death, she was still on the
August covers of Vibe and Mixmag, and a
day or two later she was posed with Sugar Ray's Mark
McGrath for the cover of Teen People's "Sexy
List" issue (Oct 2001). Perhaps the most moving image
of the week was one picked up by tv and newspapers: a
Tower Records promotional wall in LA became a
makeshift public memorial, on which fans scribbled
their condolences and declarations of love, almost as
if they meant to take back the commercial site for
some sincere expression of pain, loss, and admiration.
What most of them "meant," of course, was to express
their private grief in a public way, with no interest
in the ceremonies of capitalism.
Consumption, as ever, takes many forms.
The question is, to what end is anyone consuming
Aaliyah? Can the process involve something more than
saleable excess? Many cultural analysts question the
possibility that consumers have real options in what
they do: the videos on TRL are all pre-selected
and paid for by profit-mongering conglomerates, the
difference between Coke and Pepsi is nonexistent, etc.
In the case of Aaliyah, check the television
"specials" by way of illustration. The mighty Viacom
triad of MTV, VH1, and BET worked fast-and-furiously
to get their public lamenting on the air within hours
of the news. John Norris hosted the serious half-hour
bio for MTV and Ananda Lewis hosted a half-hour's
worth of videos. All three channels rehearsed familiar
biographical information in attempts to makes sense of
her passing, to give her life a shape and a meaning:
she lost a Star Search competition as a child;
sang professionally with her aunt Gladys Knight;
released her first album (Age Ain't Nothin but a
Number) at age 15; and was reportedly married to
her mentor/producer R. Kelly that same year (both
Aaliyah and Kelly denied this). And of course, the
stars made appearances, in perfectly staged and lit
"testimonials," clumsier talk-show formats, or public
forums -- famous eulogists at the Soul Train Lady of
Soul Awards and the MTV Music Video Awards recalled
her spirit and her strength.
The basic "tribute" format -- honed to a science by
now, when every celebrity is a Behind the Music
or A&E Biography waiting to happen -- combines
archived interviews, music videos, and interviews with
friends and in which they recalled their Aaliyah.
BET Tonight's night-after-the-crash
remembrances by several friends and collaborators
(including Timbaland) may have been the most moving
homage, though 106th & Park's version, where
audience members came on stage to voice their
feelings, seemed somehow more earnest, precisely
because of hosts AJ and Free's awkward pauses and
stammers. Easily the creepiest show is VH1's Hard
Copy-ish "News-Tribute," which opened with
sensational handheld camera images of the crashed
plane and interviews with investigators in the
Bahamas.
All this testifying and reporting, as chaotic and
bizarre as they can seem in the moment, aim to bring
some pretend-order back to the world: if someone is to
blame, if there's an understandable reason for the
disaster, then maybe viewers can feel better. But do
they feel better? Janelle Brown observes in
Salon, "The age of MTV and VH1 has given us
public deaths, made-for-TV-movie tragedies that are
spun before our very eyes. The making of a pop star
wake is almost as big a production as the creation of
the star itself: the biographies, the reminiscences,
the posthumous releases, the limitless adulation, all
a part of the same machine that created the stars in
the first place." Yes, it's about money. And, as Brown
points out, this kind of "wake is formulaic." Still,
one could say that all wakes are formulaic, rituals
being a most popular and apparently effective means to
deal with death. You might also say, as Brown does,
that Aaliyah, the "pop star," is not Kurt Cobain, "a
truly seminal artist."
And so what? Does this make grieving for her less
important? Or any more obviously a function of crass
media and marketing techniques? For whom do such
measures of "quality" matter? Where do they leave
those who invest (money, emotion, time) in Aaliyah?
Are these mourners to be dismissed as dupes of the
machine and we leave it at that? Or, might we also see
that there is a process involved, a way that their
consuming is significant, understandable, and somehow
worthy?
Consumption, as I say, takes many forms. The folks on
the email list who were outraged by the Post
writer's "horrible" comments may be writing a letter
to the newspaper as I write this. Or they may be
writing to one another. They read about Aaliyah, they
exchange information. They interpret her art and her
status as "role model" (whatever that means to anyone)
as original, important, or provocative, to the extent
that it speaks to them, that it moves them. They are
finding and defining themselves in the process. And
besides, isn't it just as much standard procedure to
dis the "machine" as it is to comply with its "eat-me"
dictates? Criticism is product too, absorbed and deployed by the machine, as a sign of genius and innovation (like Cobain or Biggie Smalls), and also as a product to be sold, to be sucked back into the ever-envelope-pushing machine. Aaliyah is part of it, yes. But if her legacy is not a new art form, a large
body of work, or even huge sales, she does move
people. That much is enough.