Saturnine are no strangers to business or pleasure. For years, the band
has been entertaining crowds on the indie circuit. Recently, they released
their latest long player, Pleasure of Ruins, with producer Steve
Albini sitting in the cockpit. PopMatters spoke with Saturnine's
vocalist and guitarist Matt Gallaway about the new album, having a good day
job, and driving through tornadoes to get the music played and the job
done.
PopMatters: Firstly, thanks for taking some time off to speak to us at
PopMatters. In your opinion, are there any big differences musically
between Pleasure of Ruins, and your last album, American
Kestrel?
Matt Gallaway: Thanks for giving us the opportunity to speak. I think the
big musical difference between American Kestreland Pleasure of
Ruins is that the songs on American Kestrel were written during a
time period when some of us had fallen under the spell of a number of
sixties bands-the Byrds, the Zombies, etc., and there was an attempt to
infuse some of the elements of those bands -- backing vocals, catchy
melodies, Rickenbacker guitars, tons of overdubs, and orchestration, into
our own sound. Most of the songs on Pleasure of Ruins, by contrast,
were written in a much more organic -- if you'll excuse the use of the
word -- way, i.e., more spontaneous and collaborative, and therefore reflect
a truer sense of who we are, as opposed to who we were trying to be.
Musically, this manifests itself in songs, I think, that are more direct --
let's call it "rockin" -- and intense.
PM: You do seem to have a distinct sound that harkens back to the college
rock of the '80s and '90s. Do you personally draw any influence from any
groups from that time, or are you just creating what you consider a
personal, current sound that you enjoy?
MG: Except for John Pisani, our keyboard player, who is I think 26 or 27,
the rest of us are more in the 32-33 year old range, so we definitely grew
up loving the music of the Eighties and early Nineties, and I think it would
be ridiculous to deny the influence of these bands on our music. One thing I
will say, though, is that while there have been times earlier in our
existence when we have tried to emulate certain bands, I feel pretty
comfortable saying that at this point we are making music that we can
comfortably claim as our own. Which is not to say it's revolutionary or
anything. I like being able to locate us within a certain lineage of rock
traditions, even if we are just a tiny little offshoot.
PM: How, if any, has the band's attitudes or outlooks changed through the
years, considering the different personnel shifts that have gone on within
Saturnine?
MG: Up until American Kestrel, there was what we could loosely
call a lot of "psychological warfare" in the band, the details of which are
described in such excruciating detail in the liner notes to Pleasure of
Ruins. Obviously, a lot of this was a result of personality conflicts
between ex-guitarist Jennifer Baron and ourselves. Honestly, I don't know
why any of us, including her, tortured ourselves for so long, but as a
formerly closeted gay man, this is an area in which I have a lot of
expertise. I think there is a romantic idea that tension can be the root of
great music, and while this may be true for others, in our case we have been
a thousand times happier since Jennifer left the band. Again, not to lay
blame on any particular person, and I think this emotional turnaround is a
strength in Pleasure of Ruins.
PM: I read that you have your "day jobs" outside of the group, and in
turn aren't so reliant on needing the music make the ends meet. I would
suppose that attitude would give you the freedom to write and record pretty
much whatever you like. Has there ever been a point in your musical career
where you were a little more reliant on the music, or has it always been
more or less just something fun to do on the side?
MG: There was a period of perhaps an hour or two when we thought about
making real money off of music, but we are all fairly rational people, and
it was pretty obvious that the necessary demand was not there. Money aside,
there was certainly a time when music was more critical to my sense of
self-identity, which made me crave success in a rather pathetic way, i.e., I
thought it would solve certain other problems in my life. Now that we have
"matured" and have been unleashed from these types of expectations, I think
we all feel a lot freer to make the kind of music we enjoy the most, and it
certainly helps when you don't have to worry about temping at some crappy
job to pay the bills. We have recently caught wind of a debate on this
subject, and for the record, we would like to say that it is our opinion
that anybody who thinks you have to be poor to make great art (which is not
to say we have succeeded in making anything but a great series of mistakes)
is sadly mistaken, and will eventually be a bitter little person who will
look back on their life around the age of 36 with a sense of regret and
humiliation.
PM: Do you have any favorite current bands that are popular these days?
Whom have you had enough of? Do you think the time will come around again
for indie label artists to gain greater exposure like they did during the
early '90s when alternative and college rock kind of took off?
MG: I know they're not popular in a Britney Spears kind of way, but my
all-time favorite band is the Cannanes, because I respect their honesty,
their sense of humor, and their ability to rock out. They are nice people,
too, and that counts. I've totally had enough of what has come to be termed
as "twee" and its corresponding and superficial intersection with the
suburban styles of the mid-Sixties (incidentally, why the Cannanes are ever
associated with this particular genre is beyond me). As for the long-term, I
think it's unlikely that there will ever be another crop of bands -- the
Pixies, My Bloody Valentine, Mudhoney, Pavement -- the sort of large-scale
indie bands that resonated on a wide scale, but under the radar screen of
mainstream entertainment, and which ultimately led to Nirvana. Music today,
for better or worse, is increasingly fragmented and commodified into smaller
and smaller units, so as a practical matter, I don't see how any indie rock
band can expect to cross-over in any sort of sustainable way. Obviously
certain bands, like the Strokes, will pop up for a few seconds, but, and
this could just be that I'm now in my mid-thirties, I'm not optimistic with
regard to any band's long-term viability, unless they are completely
prefabricated and reinvented every few months by the entertainment industry,
which in the interest of maximizing profits, would rather have changing
tastes and new commodities to offer accordingly (if only Marxism wasn't so
boring).
PM: Who came up with the Pleasure of Ruins' sleeve design? I saw
on the website that there were alternate covers as well. Were those also
considered for the release?
MG: The concept of an extended section of liner notes was my own, but
Ryan McGinness, a friend of ours who is a kick-ass graphic designer and
artist (www.iheartego.com), came up with and executed the design, as well as
the alternate covers. We were all really happy with the text-driven design,
though, so once we saw it, the alternates were not seriously considered.
PM: Have you been touring in support of Pleasure of Ruins, or have
you just laid low and let the album work its own way around?
MG: Does Albany, New York count? We played there last Friday. Actually,
we've been laying low for the most part, but we're planning on doing a week
or so in the Midwest in early summer.
PM: What, to you, is the most difficult part of the recording process?
Was Pleasure of Ruins fairly easy to lay down, or were there any
rough spots along the way?
MG: Pleasure of Ruins was by far the easiest album we've ever
recorded. We did the whole thing in four days, and there were no fights,
broken equipment, last-minute restructurings, panic attacks, etc. that have
delayed some of our other recording sessions. Basically, we just sat around
and listened to [producer] Steve Albini and our bass player Mike Donofrio
talk about baseball and a prospective army of litigants/defendants (which
provided some of the inspiration for the mock-legal form of the liner
notes), given the fact that Mike and I are both lawyers.
PM: Do you have a personal favorite recording in the Saturnine catalog,
or do you ever bother to even listen to your own work after it's been
recorded and released?
MG: I personally find that I have a couple songs I really like from each
record, and the rest generally elicits a reaction anywhere from embarrassing
humiliation to pleasant indifference. On Pleasure of Ruins, for
example, I think that I will always love "When We Were Anchors for the Sun,"
and "Apples". From our older stuff, my all-time favorite song is probably
"The Raven" on Mid the Green Fields.
PM: Lastly, what are the future plans for Saturnine? Will you be back in
the studio anytime soon, or will you be taking a break for a bit in support
of the new album?
MG: We have about five new songs written, so perhaps we'll be ready to
record in the Spring of 2003. In the meantime, we'd love to play anywhere
that will have us. We're the least picky band I've ever heard of. Did we
play at a grade school once, or is that my imagination? I know we've played
at weddings and driven through tornadoes to play at back porch barbeques. I
don't know what we were thinking, but it's mostly been a lot of fun, and I
hope we can keep doing it for a long time.