Crazed by the Music

Exploitation and Theft | By Jason Gross

 

1 October 2007

Radiohead throws down the gauntlet

Even if you’re not a fan of their music, you still have to be impressed and amazed by the bold move that Radiohead made with the release of their new album, In Rainbows, which is coming out in less than two weeks as a download (if you have a jones for a hard copy, the band is also offer the CD/LP/bonus model as of December too).  It’s sure to shake up the industry but it might be in ways that you might not expect and might not take hold for a while too.

With their contract up, instead of signing to a new label, they decided to put out their new record themselves. A lot of bands have done that with their own labels but Radiohead decided that they wanted to put it out online first and ask fans to pay whatever they think is fair. This not only goes against the fixed pricing that Apple has demanded for iTunes but also the flexible model that the labels have been fighting for because in the end, they themselves still set the price. Actually, it goes against the whole orthodoxy of the industry itself.

Granted that Radiohead is a best-selling band and that’s why they could get away with such a gutsy move but give credit where credit is due—lots of best-selling bands could have done the same thing but haven’t so far. After this, they will. The success or failure of this experiment would usually be measured by how well it sells. That means not just how many copies are downloaded but also how much everyone pays for it. But considering that fans will want to support their band, expect them to shell out and show their love with their wallets. Personally, I plan to pay out and support not just a band that I enjoy and admire but also a great experiment like this which deserves to be nurtured.

Even before it happens, you can bet that the majors are in a tizzy over this, wondering what the hell they’re going to do now. They stand to lose some of their biggest cash cow bands if they like what they see as this comes about and if they’re gone, that means that the labels are toast. Remember how EMI was banking on releases by Coldplay and Gorillaz to keep the company solvent?  That’s two acts supporting a major label, which should show you what thin ice they’re on and how much thinner it’s going to get now. The Radiohead model obviously isn’t ideal for smaller bands (though it can be used by them) but if you have a large built-in audience, their model is very attractive and makes a lot of sense. It’s incredibly fan-friendly to say “pay what you like,” which is another reason that they’ll respond well to this. As a wise PR friend pointed out, a major helped to get Radiohead to where they are today (though their music and work ethic certainly helped, right?) but in the last few years, bands like Clap Your Hands and Say Yeah and Arctic Monkeys broke out through Net-roots campaign so that also may be a model for the future (note though that the former still puts out their own albums while the Monkeys signed with indie label Domino).

What’s also interesting about this experiment is the leeway time for it. News broke about this yesterday and now the album is coming out in 10 days later. Usually, albums have months of leeway time to build publicity but in an age when Net leaks get the music out there way before an artist or a label would like, Radiohead decided to be realistic and cut the time down. They’ll still get plenty of publicity and frenzy over this but just in a smaller, more concentrated amount of time. Also, editors and writers who usually have to get their reviews in now for albums that are coming out 1-2 months later are no doubt going crazy over this too. They have to scramble to keep up and schedule this, assign this and make room for it. But even Radiohead’s publicity company Nasty Little Man warned them that they’d have to wait like everyone else to get their own copies on the 10th. Again, it helps to be a major band to have the leverage and chutzpah to do this. Here’s the full announcement:

There will be no advances, promotional copies, digital streams, media sites, etc. of RADIOHEAD’s In Rainbows.

Everyone in the world will be getting the music at the same time: Oct. 10. That includes us. We don’t have anything to play anyone in the nine days until the record is available. Everyone at Nasty has
put his or her order in and just to clarify: you are not being asked to pay for a promo (as some have inquired). you can pay nothing or as much or as little as you want.

There will be no promotional copies of the discbox either, as each discbox is being made to order. Sorry.

Again, wow… I remember when I got mailed the limited edition version of Hail to the Thief as a promo when I was going to review it. It seems like so long ago now.

So then the big question is, what happens next for the biz? It’s not gonna crumble overnight (though was already crumbling anyway) but this is another huge challenge to it now. Other big acts will get the bright idea that they can do this too, no matter how long and how strong a relationship they’ve had with their label (when you see Springsteen or U2 bolt, you know the game’s really over for majors). Plus, they’ll come up with other innovative ideas to get their music out, connect with the fans and by-pass the labels. And all the ill-gotten gains from the RIAA lawsuits ain’t gonna change that. Also, the other ways that the majors are trying to make money with legal downloads, ringtones and even some merchandising deals that they’re trying to work out with artists now aren’t gonna save them either because the tide is turning too quickly. They’ll be forced to cannibalize their back catalogs even more and try to milk more and more money out of it.

And then what? Radiohead and anyone other artist who takes this bold path is still gonna need PR firms and some sort of distribution deal (manufacturing CDs or just placing them as downloads online) but that can be done with outside of the realm of their old labels. It’s a brave new world for artists (and fans) for sure but a frightening black hole for the majors too.

Jason Gross

a lot of bands with no money give away their albums for free as downloads

defiance, ohio: http://defianceohio.terrorware.com/audio.php

leftover crack:
myspace.com/leftover crack

Comment by tao lin — October 2, 2007 @ 8:12 am

OK, tao lin, but you seem to be completely missing the point. Defiance, Ohio and Leftover Crack are two bands that pretty much no one has heard of and Radiohead is one of the most popular, respect bands of our generation.

Comment by Mike — October 2, 2007 @ 8:49 am

Tao Lin and Mike- you both have good points.  Regarding free albums, a lot of up-and-coming bands do indeed give away their music for free now and it’s a good promo strategy- it’s an easy way to get their music out there. 

Mike is right though to make a distinction that RH is a top-selling band who is now doing someway of the same thing but this time with a tip jar- an unprecedented move for band this big. 

Of course, Prince has also toyed with the free model, giving away his last two albums to concert goers (that’s how I got my copy) and to readers of a UK newspaper.  The later move especially angered (and I’m sure scared) not just the labels but also the record shops.  His career hasn’t been hurt by this it seems- in fact, it seems that it’s flourished after a slump that he had for a while. 

When he (and possibly RH) can pull off these kind of marketing coups, it spells trouble for the old way of business for the music industry and is going to make them have to adopt or else perish. 

The majors’ ongoing losing battle with P2P downloaders would seem to mean that “free” is the optimum price for songs (especially as iTunes sales have slackened recently) but the results of the RH experiment is going to show us if voluntary payments might also be a reasonable alternative too.

Comment by Jason Gross — October 2, 2007 @ 10:05 am

Radiohead is actually throwing down a major gauntlet by asking fans the subjective worth of music.  By eliminating the middle man of labels they can finally reach the audience they want - intelligent, smart consumers who will reward the band with their own personal monetary evaluation of the product.  We might be looking at a huge paradigm shift for the industry, perhaps even the eradication of the old model, and only a band that has the critical acclaim and accrued fanbase like Radiohead’s would be able to force the hands of the labels.

What if we see more artists abandoning their labels to pursue these independent means of distribution?  Will we see loyal artists leaving their “Home” labels to deal directly with the record-buying public?  Will they directly finance the promotional and public backing that is common with so many breaking/alternative/"indie" musicians?

I’m really excited for the future now.  And I thought it was going to be a boring week :).

Comment by Andrew — October 2, 2007 @ 10:28 am

— PopMatters sponsor —

The truth is that nothing is gonna drive the wooden stake into the vampire that is the record industry until someone releases an essential, classic, and timeless album in this manner.  Anyone can give away crap (didn’t Smashing Pumpkins give away Machina2 online like 10 years ago?).  The reason why the fanboys and critics are betting on Radiohead is because the quality-level and expectations are there:  will it be a classic though?  I think they gotta ‘knock one out of the park’ to use a baseball term, if they are really expected to alter the game.

Comment by David Garland from californe — October 2, 2007 @ 4:27 pm

The web is saturated with articles and blogs about the death of the music industry & what Madonna, Radiohead and the like in collusion with web 2.0 digital models and P2P sites are doing to the industry ... “killing it”?
But this IS the new industry ... a place where the majority of content is created and consumed for free, where the creativity embodied on your musical content IS the value attributed to it.
True creativity will become a form of money; so you may download my music for free, but that creativity still has value – value enough for me to extract a service from you or your peers in exchange. A system where money becomes less important than trade.
A place where the merit in music conquers all. Or at least in the years to come it will.

It is my absolute belief that “where music leads all else will follow” .. that is the breakdown of the commercial music industry to elements of trade, file sharing, swapping & purchase will one day encompass our whole online commercial structure.
Merit and creative truth will rule, meaningless content (read “pop”) will simply become ignored meaninglessness, and it will struggle for any traction.

The sharing and spread across digital platforms of all online services and products will occur, with value being judged by merit. This will occur whether we are talking about a music track, a new product or a simple day to day service.
Advertisers will no longer be able to saturate our TV screens with useless products and thinly veiled lies about necessity - purchase value & immediacy will be decided by the purchaser.

ok, …. deeper : the human mind is a spark of the almighty consciousness of the creator, imagination and creativity are the doors from which this consciousness emerges.
As human minds develop further and become more fully tuned to the nature of spirit, by stopping thought, abandoning knowledge & trusting intuition, creativity also becomes more fully tuned to this truth. That is, music / knowledge / content / product is freed from the shackles of blind commercialism, prejudice or banality will simply cut through and gain traction by the simple fact of its creative merit.
The deeper the self realization of a person and his/her creativity, the more he/she influences the whole universe by subtle creative vibrations.

Silence is the potent carrier of the present tense. Every sound or action comes from silence & dies back into the ocean of silence.
You choose by your actions how you may disrupt this silence – choose wisely.

Death to the music industry, long live the industry of creativity.

Comment by Gareth Farry from gmuva.blogspot.com — October 17, 2007 @ 4:26 am

Add a comment

Please enter your name and a valid email address. Your email address will not be displayed. It is required only to prevent comment spam.

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the sequence of letters and numbers you see in the image above. Do not include any spaces.

TODAY ON POPMATTERS
Columns | recent
Pop Osmosis: Not “Lovin’ It”
From the Cheap Seats: Why We Hate
Events | recent | archive
:. The Swell Season + Bill Callahan — 24.September.08: Nashville, TN
Multimedia | recent | archive
:. Too Human