Call for Papers: Return to the 36 Chambers: Enter The Wu-Tang, 20 Years Later

Wednesday, May 22, 2013
Welcome to our weekly field guide to 1950s horror and sci-fi movies and the creatures that inhabit them. This week: little tiny critters grow up to be great big monsters in THEM!

Alernative titles: Get the Raid; Ants in My Pants


POSITIVES:


Terrific opening scene, with nicely understated cops and little girl.


Atmospheric sequences in New Mexico—spooky Joshua Tree landscape.


Sense of impending doom throughout.


Claustrophobic underground scenes in New Mexico and L.A.


Nice performances by James Whitmore and a fine ensemble cast.


A rare film that manages to effectively use child actors (!)


Monday, May 20, 2013
Just a reminder that revamping the Star Wars universe won't be as simple as tackling the once tired Star Trek franchise. One's for thinkers. The other's for doers.

Dear J.J. (I hope I can be so informal…):


Just wanted to let you know that I have really enjoyed your revamp of the whole Star Trek thing. Yeah, I’m one of the geeks. One of the nerds. One of the Trekkers, or Trekkies, or Trek-heads, whatever they want to call us. I was a bit too young to enjoy the original series the first time around (I was five when it premiered on NBC) but I do remember seeing bumper stickers on cars suggesting that the network “save” the show. By the time the crew of the Enterprise went cartoon, I was 12 and a huge sci-fi fan. I enjoyed these animated adventures, but it made me hungry to go back and see what came before.


Friday, May 17, 2013
You have to give Hating Breitbart credit. No other film on the subject would be as slavishly non-objective as this one.

There’s a fine line between genius and insanity. There’s an even finer one between revolutionary and terrorist. Sitting somewhere in between these various definitions is the late political pundit and media crusader Andrew Breitbart. Adopted by the so-called “Tea Party” as their primary advocate against big, intrusive government, the former firebrand and current source of sacrosanct documentary treatment by Andrew Marcus sure knew how to stir things up. His goal? Bring more transparency and accuracy - and as a result, truth - to the clearly left-leaning liberal press machine that kept conservatives down for decades. Sadly, like the film featuring his often insightful diatribes, his ‘assertion equals fact’ foundation grows tiresome and very one sided.


Friday, May 17, 2013
Chinese orphan Mei-Mei and her Australian sponsor, Dean Randall, have communicated throughout postcards for years. When Mei-Mei visits Australia with the children's choir she helps direct, she discovers the truth about her sponsor and even more about herself.

Orphan Mei-Mei (Zhu Lin) thinks she’s found the opportunity of a lifetime when she travels to Sydney for a concert with the children’s choir from her orphanage. For Mei-Mei, Australia is more than just a foreign country that offers a chance to see something new and learn a little about the wider world. It’s also the home of her long-time sponsor, Dean Randall (Guy Pearce). Though Mei-Mei and Dean have never met, they’ve exchanged dozens of postcards and letters over the course of a decade. Mei-Mei writes to Mr. Randall and tells him that she’s eager to see him while visiting from China.


But Mr. Randall doesn’t write back. Mei-Mei and her schoolmates arrive in Sydney, excited by the sights of the exotic city. Despite the joy of traveling with the children, Mei-Mei is eager to find Mr. Randall even if Miss Chen (Elaine Jin) expressly forbids her from leaving the hotel to find him. The 16-year-old girl’s journey to find her sponsor—and the truth about him—will forever alter the lives of the pair. By contrasting the postcards that Dean Randall wrote Mei-Mei with his actual life, we come to see something about how we construct ourselves in text and how powerfully we dream to be something other than ourselves. While director Pauline Chan’s 33 Postcards is predictable at times, it’s still a worthwhile movie and great coming-of-age tale.


Friday, May 17, 2013
In this spoiler heavy overview of the new Star Trek film, we discuss how the fanboy nation is gnashing its teeth over what J.J. Abrams and company have wrought.

Right now, it’s just a disgruntled din, but by the end of the weekend, one assumes it will be an outright Trek geek uproar. Fans of the famed Gene Roddenberry space opera have already expressed a degree of difficulty with J. J. Abrams’ update/ reimagining/ commercialization of their beloved ‘60s sci-fi staple, and with the money mandated sequel, Into Darkness, ready to invade theaters this week, the problems are only going to multiply. You see, the filmmaker has decided to tread on some very sacred ground, soil so cinematically adored that to mess with it at all requires all kinds of reprimands and repercussions. If you haven’t already guessed by the title, let this SPOILER WARNING be your final caveat. You see, Abrams has decided to do a literal second helping of motion picture Star Trek, taking on that most heralded of holy grails, Khan.


Now on PopMatters
PM Picks
Announcements

© 1999-2013 PopMatters.com. All rights reserved.
PopMatters.com™ and PopMatters™ are trademarks
of PopMatters Media, Inc.

PopMatters is wholly independently owned and operated.
PopMatters is a member of Spin Music, a division of SpinMedia, an advertising network.