Maxwell and the Soul of Neo Soul

[25 August 2009]

If Dr. Martin Luther King composed songs they may very well sound like Maxwell at his best.

By Roland Laird

Black culture’s creative output in America has always been spurred by something of a triangular point-counterpoint dialogue between artists, the black community, and mainstream culture.  For example, bebop was an answer to the musical mediocrity of “Tin Pan Alley”, while hip-hop was a reaction to the social nightmare of Reaganomics on the one hand, and the monotonous mind numbing sound of Disco on the other.

In that same vein, in the mid- to late ‘90s, a void in black music emerged, and was beginning to be filled by the emergence of a new breed of soul singers. For marketing purposes this sound has been dubbed “neo soul”, and though I prefer to just call it “soul” or even soul 2.0, for ease of understanding, I will continue to call it “neo soul”.

The antecedents of neo soul actually began in the early ‘90s as an assortment of “conscious” hip- hop artists, dubbed the Native Tongues movement, laid down a musical foundation that served as a counterpoint to the “buckshot and bling” mentality that dominated the hip-hop—and to a lesser degree—the R&B music of the time. It was as if the hip-hop artists from the Native Tongues era of the early ‘90s, who were drowned out by the buckshot and bling era (heretofore known as the B&B era), decided to strike back with weapons of mass musicality.

In striking back, the burgeoning soul artists weren’t dismissing the anger and aspirations of the B&B era, instead they were creating a soothing equipoise to the anger and materialism of those artists. Though the sound and the foundation existed, it wasn’t until early 1997 that this sound made its definitive musical statement, stuck its stake in the ground, and proclaimed that it was here to stay. That musical statement was the groundbreaking soundtrack to the movie, Love Jones.

Love Jones was a sweet little love story about Darius Lovehall (played by Larenz Tate) and Nina Mosely (Nia Long). While the movie was enjoyable and has garnered some cult following, the soundtrack was a true work of neo soul art. Now to be fair, Erykah Badu’s classic Baduizm was released a month earlier than Love Jones, and D’Angelol’s Brown Sugar and Maxwell’s Urban Hang Suite had already been released in 1995 and 1996 respectively, but well-crafted and popular as all three of these albums were, they seemed more like individually exceptional debut albums than part of a larger, deeper movement.

On the other hand, by utilizing an array of both well known and obscure artists, the Love Jones album captured the texture and sensibilities of an urbane black America that understood the anger of the B&B era, but refused to subscribe to the cartoonish and ofttimes self-immolating message that permeated so much of that music. On the surface, songs such as Dionne Farris’ “Hopeless” and The Refugee Camp All-Stars’ “The Sweetest Thing” could simply be characterized as catchy love songs for they certainly were. When you factor in that Farris had already recorded with the conscious hip-hop group Arrested Development on their seminal 3 Years 5 Months and 2 days in the Life of… and Refugee Camp All-Stars’ Lauryn Hill had already established herself as a force in hip-hop with the equally “conscious” hip-hop group The Fugees, the question I had when first hearing their Love Jones efforts was why not stick with a purely hip-hop sound? Upon listening to the album a bit more, the depth of what neo soul artists were attempting to accomplish in 1997 became a little clearer. These artists wanted to relate to hip-hop, but didn’t want to be consumed or defined by their relationship to it. Had Farris and Hill made hip-hop recordings, rather than being part of Love Jones’ soothing sound they would have stood out like sore thumbs and possibly diminished the impact of the album.

Though I enjoyed “Hopeless”, I mentioned Farris merely to highlight the close relationship between “conscious” hip-hop and neo soul. The brightest stars of the album were Trina Broussard and the aforementioned Lauryn Hill. Both seemed poised for stardom. To her credit, Broussard has recorded three albums since her remake of Minnie Ripperton’s “Inside My Love” for the Love Jones album.

Unfortunately, her albums have been produced and positioned as standard R&B, and though the recordings have been solid, those production and promotional decisions have prevented her from coming close to the brilliance demonstrated on Love Jones. Nonetheless, she’s extremely talented, and my hope is that like novelist Terry McMillian’s protagonist “Stella”, Broussard will get her groove back.

Lauryn Hill’s story is well chronicled. In 1998 she produced a near masterpiece in The Miseducation of Lauryn Hill. The album was a critically acclaimed, multi-platinum, multi-Grammy winning musical tour de force that not only raised the bar for the neo soul sound, but for all popular music.

The power of Miseducation lay in the fact that the album was equaly parts introspective, soulful, and hip-hop. Prior to Miseducation, no artist had been able to seamlessly combine each of those elements. However, as acclaimed as Hill’s album was, she has yet to come close to equalling that performance, and it may very well be the case that Miseducation is the musical equivalent of Ralph Ellison’s Invisible Man – for like Ellison, Hill created a work of art for the ages, but also like Ellison she has been virtually silent ever since. Irrespective of what becomes of Hill’s recording career, it’s no accident that post-Miseducation there was a proliferation of new artists like Musiq Soulchild, Bilal, Jill Scott, Kindred and Eric Roberson armed with hip-hop sensibilities ready willing and able to throw their hats into the neo soul arena.

It’s also no accident that artists like D’Angelo and Erykah Badu took note of Miseducation. In fact, the year 2000 saw both artists release work that contained the hip-hop, soul and introspection of Miseducation, and much to my pleasure, Badu’s Mama’s Gun was in some ways the equal of Miseducation. Where Miseducation brought sorrow, Mama’s Gun brought a fearlessness and an outspokenness that hadn’t been seen before on a neo soul album. Upon first hearing Mama’s Gun and considering Hill’s work, I was convinced that neo soul’s course was clearly set, and that course contained a heavy dose of hip-hop attitude to go with the mellow-funk jazz musicality and anti-B&B outlook on black life.

Which brings me to Maxwell. I have to admit that I initially overlooked him. Being a one time ‘80s b-boy who sported a flattop hairdo and fat-laced Addidas sneakers, I’m sure his very un-bboyish Thundercat hairdo discouraged me from listening with complete objectivity. So even though his first album showed promise, he was still on a short hook with me and his second album Embrya seemed amorphous and it appeared that instead of delving deeper into soul music, Maxwell was starting a vacuous one man genre that could easily be called neo new age music.

This all changed when I heard Maxwell’s version of Kate Bush’s “This Woman’s Work” while watching the movie Love And Basketball. Maxwell’s rendition had an emotional depth to it that moved me to tears.

By partially judging a book by its cover I had slept on Maxwell and the power of his emotional range. Though I disliked Embrya, as I said earlier, I did like Urban Hang Suite, I just didn’t see or feel any substantial emotional depth in the album. So when I was sitting in the movie theater darn near crying like a newborn as “This Woman’s Work” played in the background, my wife teased me that the song I was crying to was sung by “the Thundercat dude, Maxwell.”

My point here is simply this: though I’m a fan of hip-hop’s aggression, be it the confrontational, political lyrics of a Public Enemy or the intelligent yet hard-edged ghetto-centric vignettes of contemporary artists like Talib Kweli or Lupe Fiasco, having a musical experience that literally brings you to your knees makes you think a bit, while feeling a lot. If Maxwell could do that, then there had to be something deeper to his music than I had first noticed, and by extension, maybe I’d misunderstood the full potential of neo soul.

Earlier I mentioned that neo soul struck an equipoise to the anger and materialism contained in hip-hop, but equipoise suggests a balance, meaning that neo soul at a basic level bought in to some of hip-hop’s anger and materialism—if only to criticize those aspects. This is what appealed to me with Badu, Hill, Jill Scott and others. However, where Maxwell is concerned, that balance simply doesn’t exist.

Instead, it’s as if he’s internalized the words of James Baldwin when Baldwin criticized Richard Wright’s Native Son. Baldwin said, “… Wright’s Bigger Thomas has accepted a theology that denies him life, that he admits the possibility of his being sub-human and feels constrained, therefore, to battle for his humanity according to those brutal criteria bequeathed him at his birth… the failure of the protest novel lies in its ‘rejection of life’.”

Now I’m not indicting all hip-hop, but when some artists in that genre feel comfortable dehumanizing one another with the “n-word”, the “b-word” and s on, one need only substitute “hip-hop” for “protest novel” to get the relevance and urgency of Baldwin’s nearly 60-year-old crticism.

So while other neo soul artists fought the good fight by making conscious and nuanced use of hip-hop attitude and imagery, Maxwell’s music seems to be a total rejection of the bravado and materialism underpinning much of hip hop. This conscious rejection speaks volumes to his actual understanding of hip-hop and its limitations.

cover art

Maxwell

Blacksummer’s Night

(Columbia; US: 6 Jul 2009)

Armed with that understanding, Maxwell’s latest effort Black Summer’s Night uses layers of love, compassion, and affection to combat the sonic assault and faux spirituality that informs not only much of hip-hop, but much of today’s black music. If Dr. Martin Luther King composed songs, they may very well sound like Maxwell at his best.

By saying “may” I’ve hedged my bet slightly, since Maxwell’s music, beautiful as it is, doesn’t contain an iota of social commentary and it’s hard to imagine music created by Dr. King lacking that dimension. Still given his new hairdo (a possible nod to President Obama?), perhaps Maxwell is internalizing Obama’s message of change, and is preparing to add social commentary to his musical repertoire. If he is, then all of us are in for a treat. If he’s not, I’m sure there is somebody out there ready to seize the opportunity and make neo soul the dominant musical soundtrack of black folks during the Obama age.

 
Bookmark and Share

Write Black at You

Can Tyler Perry’s ‘For Colored Girls’ Resurrect BAM?

By Roland Laird

30.Oct.09

Film adaptations from black masterpieces -- and the Chitlin Circuit -- are rejuvenating America's Black Arts Movement.

Jay-Z: The Journey of an Icon

By Roland Laird

29.Sep.09

We can debate this greatest rapper business from now until the end of time. Let's just say Jay-Z is the greatest hip-hop icon ever, and call it a day.

 
 
Comments

King would sound like a whispy, falsetto soul singer? 

Hardly. 

Try the gorgeous, gut-wrenching sound of Otis Redding. 

Now that’s a true soul sound / a true man with soul whom I can believe King would relate to.

King had guts and soul—like Redding.

Comment by Anna Louise from Brussels — August 25, 2009 @ 5:42 am

Yes, you definitely slept on Maxwell. I remember driving in my car in 1996 and “‘Til the Cops Come Knockin’” came on the radio, I damn near killed myself. I called the radio station to find out who the man was and where I could get the album if there was one and of course, the album was “Maxwell’s Urban Hang Suite”. And TTCCK is not my favorite track from the album, that honor goes to “Welcome”, love it.

You didn’t like “Embrya”? Listen to it again. It is pure undiluted desire. After that album I knew brotha Maxwell was on an island ALL by himself.

Though Maxwell’s cover of Kate Bush’s “This Woman’s Work” is vocally elegant and emotionally eloquent. I find his later work on his “Now” album to be much more accessible. The song “Lifetime” is more real and more honest. “I was reborn when I was broken,” a great opening lyric for a great song. Also do you think it also was a prelude to his taking a minute?

The lyrics “ain’t no bottom line in your world” is kinda telling or maybe I am just reading to much into it. But the “Now” album was the musical progression that would eventually lead him to “Blacksummers’night”.

Blacksummers’night is Maxwell stripped, standing emotionally naked with little or no hope of rescue.

Boy meets girl, boy becomes addicted to girl, boy falls in love with girl, girl falls in love with boy, boy loses girl, boy tries to get girl back, girl ain’t having it, boy still wants girl back, boy finds a way to move forward with the loss but still wants girl back, all in the course of nine tracks.

If an artist is willing to be that emotionally raw than all props and respect. You do not need political commentary to MOVE people; to make them FEEL; to make them WANT to be better, if your music has the ability to evoke a feeling of shared emotion or belief. Now that is potent and powerful.

Comment by allheavens from Dallas, Texas — August 30, 2009 @ 9:23 am

How ironic..I was listening to Otis Redding while I was reading the other comments.  Yeah, I totally agree with Anna Louise.  Dr. King would definitely sound like Otis Redding.  Otis had such a raw, unassuming, sexuality about himself.  When I became an adult and watched old footage of Otis, I finally understood why my mother was SO into him!!!

Comment by lovlocs from Trenton, NJ — September 1, 2009 @ 10:40 am

I am enjoying that this discussion exists at all.  I will return and bring friends.  I ‘hear’ King as more akin to Hathaway, who is the foundation of Soul 2.0-neo soul in a vital way. Also the breadth of Legend’s thematic interests make him a better contemporary candidate for the voice you seek.

Where Maxwell IS powerful is as a romantic (in the political and artistic sense of the word) and this he shares with King and is I believe, the source of what inspires you to “hear” an affinity.

Kings visceral sexuality also supports a strenuous comparison.
Another similarity is in their respective “ears.” for the sound of the genuine (Thurman’s term) in the sound of the feminine.  King’s dream speech like Maxwell’s Woman’s Work find their original seminal expression in projects by “under appreciated” women (Prathia Hall and Kate Bush).

Yes, there is much merit in this thoughtful comparison.

Comment by Toby Sanders — September 1, 2009 @ 11:46 am

There is no yin without yang. So you have Otis standing on Kings right representing the “masculine”, King himself and Maxwell on the left representing the “feminine” Kings message, both equally potent.

But why limit Dr. King to one artist? I think the man and the message were powerful enough to encompass a full spectrum. So now you have Sam Cooke standing in the middle representing both the masculine and feminine.

@Toby
While Legend is talented he is so the underachiever. He sometimes lacks nuance and he almost always lacks complexity which is the one elements that is “firmly” rooted in Maxwell’s romanticism. Legend tries to be all things to all people which doesn’t make for a coherent and cohesive sound. Also I don’t think I can forgive Legend for “Evolver”, no authenticity or sincerity to be found on this album.

But I do agree about Hathaway he is the foundation on which the Holy Trinity of Neo-Soul 2.0 (D’Angelo, Badu and Maxwell) built their house.

Comment by allheavens from Dallas, Texas — September 3, 2009 @ 8:22 am

@ Allheavens, (and Laird)

I agree with the underachievement label for “evolver”, which is more syrup and swag than honest masculine viscerality and poetry, thru which Legend laid his artistic foundation on that fertile space between hip hop and soul/(neo-soul).  I believe it was about the money and the pressure to produce something to “capitalize” on his fame (say a sophomore/juniorish effort).  I was disappointed too—so much so I didn’t buy after sampling on line, which I think goes to explain its gold status from a platinum-potential artist. Almost all artist whom we greatly respect succumb to this type of pressure at one point or another. 

If we are honest King too rehashed a lot of his own rhetoric and catch phrases when he was tired or pressed to “raise money for the movement.” Branch, Dyson, and Carson help us see this as an aspect of King’s humanity, and genius against the enormity of the burden that fell on his shoulders. In reality this is also where the comparisons break down, right.

Legend is still young and I think (believe) moving toward the kind of “gravitas”, depth, power so hinted at in his live performances and earlier strivings. Now, I could be wrong, but I sense in the relationship between his lyricism and emotionality, a spirituality really so vital, in “Get Lifted,” the potential for a new/(renewed?) path, that (again) unites the power of story, sensuality, virtuosity, and myth that is the foundation of the blues and the fruit of “Rhythm.”

Finally, I also appreciate your gesture to expand the comparison.  But, I think for the sake of this wonderful discussion it would be good to concentrate on one deep comparison at a time. We are thoughtfully, playfully, spiritually “seeking” a voice that fills a void, to restore hope in this season of musical lack. Here we must fault Maxwell for leaving us so long without the fine company of his falsetto and heart—not anger, just anguish.

I deeply appreciate that he makes his entire corpus available on line, an act of redemptive artistic generosity and (a brilliant I think) marketing move.

Maxwell mines the romantic for ALL it is worth. He is deeply complex and textured here. And maybe the final two installments of the trilogy will provide a type of support for your thoughtful argument. I hope so.

Still, I hear in Legend a promise of a broader range of emotions and tones, which to me reflect interests. What I am trying to say in a thoughtful way is this. Each artist is using “love” as a metaphor for experience and reality. With Legend, I hear/see more breadth and (yes he sometimes sacrifices depth, he is a “fox” here).  I think Maxwell, as great he is, sacrifices breadth for depth (a hedgehog). I am thankful we have them both. it is not a zero sum game. Still, when we are comparing King to an artist, breadth of themes (the great sin and disappointment of evolver, not withstanding) is more important.

I am standing on a ledge here, I know. But the rewards are worth it. And after all, Allheavens, we have taken the path of a narrow, deep, sexuality and individuality inflected r&b tradition (thinking here of Marvin Gaye and his powerful wake). Which I believe in no small way is a big reason for the difficulties buffeting Black relationships today.

But thank you, for correcting me, in such a thoughtful way, making me think deeper about my hopes and spirituality as it is reflected in my listening, my appreciation of this great tradition.

Comment by Toby Sanders — September 4, 2009 @ 10:19 am

“perhaps Maxwell is internalizing Obama’s message of change, and is preparing to add social commentary to his musical repertoire”

Guess you have listened to “Help Somebody”?

This is throw-back to the socially-conscious soul of Marvin Gaye.  Also, Maxwell’s concerts really highlight his commitment to social change. 

And did I mention how sexy he is?  ‘Nuff said.

Comment by NENE from CHICAGO — October 14, 2009 @ 6:18 pm

Add a comment

Please enter your name and a valid email address. Your email address will not be displayed. It is required only to prevent comment spam.

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?