Image from an A+E Theatre production.

Can Tyler Perry’s ‘For Colored Girls’ Resurrect BAM?

Page 1 of 2      Go to:  1 2 >      Next page: Why Not BAM with Some Pigs Feet Thrown in the Mix?

[30 October 2009]

Film adaptations from black masterpieces -- and the Chitlin Circuit -- are rejuvenating America's Black Arts Movement.

By Roland Laird

When it was announced that Tyler Perry would direct the screen version of Ntozake Shange’s seminal black womanist work For Colored Girls Who Have Considered Suicide When the Rainbow Is Enuf, there was a collective moan of pain from black women all over America. Though I feel their pain, some of the sentiment’s expressed over the blogosphere were sadly lacking in any form of analysis that connected the dots between the Black Arts Movement which gave life to Shange’s work, and the so-called Chitlin Circuit which spawned Tyler Perry. Instead, many of these critics chose to be mean-spirited and question Perry’s worthiness of the task. For instance, on TheRoot.com, Thembi Ford had the following to say:

Not only will he produce and direct the upcoming film version, the King of Coonery will also write the adaptation of what may be the most important work about black female identity ever. Ask any black woman, especially the artsy/moodyself-aware type, about For Colored Girls… and she will respond with a wistful look and fond memories. I was Lady in Blue in a high-school production and have told more than one sorry dude, “insteada being sorry all the time, try being yourself,” quoting the Lady in Red (but playing it off like I came up with it on my own). This is classic material, and now we can expect the intentionally stripped-down aesthetic of Shange’s work to be replaced by style choices that only a closeted gay man could make.

Meanwhile, Monica Jackson chimed in with some choice words:

I’m also scared the Tyler Perry is going to fuck up our movie. To this date he has shown no shaded literary nuances in his stereotypical portrayals of traditional and formulaic black women.

But are white folks (the ones who make the decisions and control the purse strings) just trying to give us what we want? We spend tons of money on Tyler Perry. He is undoubtedly what some black folks want. What the people who decide what’s labeled as the black brand of entertainment don’t seem to understand is that some, even most, black folk aren’t all black folk. They only get dollar signs. Don’t get me wrong. I think Tyler Perry has done wonderful things in creating his brand and hiring black actors, but I wish he’d stick to that brand and not mess with stuff that really matters to a certain sort of black woman.

There are many more perspectives similar to those of Jackson and Ford throughout the blogosphere, unfortunately, the problem with these perspectives is that they lack the nuances that they accuse Perry of lacking. Instead of Perry directing the film version, I’ve heard this group of critics throw out names like Spike Lee, Kasi Lemmons, Gina Prince-Bythewood, and Nzinga Stewart(who actually is writing the screenplay). The thought being that these directors have the creative chops to do a classic piece like For Colored Girls justice—while Perry doesn’t.

That’s a fair point. Most of Perry’s work to date has been entertaining but far from memorable. However as my friend, author Scott Poulson-Bryant pointed out to me, some of Hollywood’s finest auteurs worked on some of America’s most dubious television shows. For instance, Bob Rafaelson created The Monkees, James L. Brooks used to write for My Mother the Car, Robert Towne used to write for The Man From U.N.C.L.E., and Robert Altman used to write for Bonanza.

“Do you think Tyler Perry has a Nashville or a Five Easy Pieces or a Terms of Endearment or a Chintaown lurking somewhere inside him? And if so, when do you think we might see it?” Poulson-Bryant mused.

Poulson-Bryant’s humor not withstanding, it’s certainly true that For Colored Girls is a classic and perhaps above Perry’s current output, but it’s equally true that it’s a highly unconventional work that would be challenging for virtually any director to adapt to the big screen. We know coming in that the film version won’t exactly be the stage version, no matter who the director may be.

The black women critics also complain that Perry’s involvement is strictly a money play. Let’s not get it twisted, Hollywood deals in mass audiences. Concessions are made in the hopes that revenues are maximized.

For those that think this is a bad thing, then the day Shange optioned her play to a film producer was the day the work was compromised and that was the day that they should have complained—not now. I’m sure Lemmons, Lee, and Prince-Bythewood could make versions of For Colored Girls worth seeing, but I doubt they would have the marketing muscle of Perry.

Perry’s involvement may give some folks trepidation about the quality of the movie, but it almost guarantees that tens of thousands more copies of Shange’s original script published by Scribner will be sold. Bottom line, more people will be exposed to the original work than Shange could have dreamed, when she wrote it.

Granted there have been complaints about Perry’s work, such as University of Southern California’s race and popular culture professor Todd Boyd’s statement that, “Minstrel shows are probably more progressive than Tyler Perry’s representation”, or thedailyvoice.com’s Clay Cane’s assertion that, “I am not for representation at any costs, especially when Perry relies on the most common denominator of stereotypes”. (“Movie Review: Meet The Browns”, 21 March 2008)

The sad truth is that for all of Perrry’s “stereotypes” his movies are extremely popular with black audiences, yet when so-called “serious” black movies are made, black people don’t exactly show up in droves. I offer Lemmons’ Talk to Me and Lee’s Miracle at St. Anna as exhibits A & B.

Still, I’m hopeful that there is a viable market for the film adaptations of black masterpieces and I find the idea of the most commercially successful playwright of the so-called Chitlin Circuit adapting the most commercially successful playwright of the Black Arts Movement a profound one. These are the two most well known black theatrical “movements” in black cultural history. Their potential pairing deserves serious examination.

Page 1 of 2      Go to:  1 2 >      Next page: Why Not BAM with Some Pigs Feet Thrown in the Mix?
 
Bookmark and Share

Write Black at You

Allen Iverson 101

By Roland Laird

26.Jan.10

Unlike athletes like Tiger Woods and Michael Jordan, Allen Iverson never 'used' the media to project an image of himself as a flawless human being.

Jay-Z: The Journey of an Icon

By Roland Laird

29.Sep.09

We can debate this greatest rapper business from now until the end of time. Let's just say Jay-Z is the greatest hip-hop icon ever, and call it a day.

Maxwell and the Soul of Neo Soul

By Roland Laird

25.Aug.09

If Dr. Martin Luther King composed songs they may very well sound like Maxwell at his best.

 
 
Comments

November 12, 2009
As I said, the video material on Tyler Perry’s involvement with Shange’s project For Colored girls… was an interesting conversation. However, it lacked a comprehensive and astute analysis of the political/economy of the situation concerning the Black Arts Movement.  First, the BAM was not and has never been a universal movement in the black community.  The BAM postured itself loudly. But its bark was more substantive than its bite. It cajoled itself into believing it represented a cohesive approach to black liberation utilizing the creative processes of its adherents.  The majority of black people in America’s urban and rural enclave did not seek “liberation” from white America but rather, civil rights and economic opportunity in American. They were not in favor of destroying the American capitalistic system and replacing it with a facetious proto-Afrikanic/ Black Nationalist power structure.  These were the fantastical dreams of recent college grads that had nowhere to go in the American system during a period of racist hiring policies with the grudging exceptions of universities and colleges. Falling back on a “protest” model of separation and racial pride they generated a “window of opportunity” for themselves in the so-called BAM. Where money poured into organizations and theaters and as a result of fiscal and welfare minded corruption the fat cats of the movement eventually faced leaner days. Witness the near disappearance of many black theaters not supported by their own communities. Even the famed Harlem’s Apollo Theater is no longer the center of the black entertainment world since passing from the hands of white to black producers.
There were two major camps in this debacle. The right wing, constructed of Black Nationalist which included Islamist, Organic/traditionalist Africanist and the left wing, mainly composed of Dialectical Materialist.  However, both camps were pitiably dependent on the “dole” from the dominant white American society.  The right wing on outright fiscal support. The left on small merchants (who sold trinkets in bazaars etc) and local welfare for its patrons.  Though as separate factions they constantly and universally concerned themselves with the issues of self-suffiency. They however never quite made this concern and platform a reality for their intellectual or economical functions. 
Then the major ethnic changes in demographic changes with the advent of Muslims and Africans to the USA highlighted in stark relief, the basic antagonisms between fantasy and reality. These emigrants do not relate to American Blacks who they perceive as wasting their opportunities in the richest nation on the planet.
The awful truth of all these movements was the painful reality that they could never collectively sell the black Bourgeoisie on their programs. This middle class like all historical economic movements were more interested in parity within the existing societal structures.  So in real meaning, the BAM failed to mobilize the masses in any meaningful manner.  They represented a rather mediocre and brief period of existence before limping off the stage as show that bombed.
Tyler Perry implemented a business model for his projects.  He developed an unimpeachable integrity in his dealings with performing artist—they were paid and paid well—-never shafted like the black ego maniacal producers of 501 c organizations, who are notoriously impossible to deal with in a sane manner. 
Tyler Perry whether folk want to admit it not (and to him it probably really doesn’t matter) is a successful artist, impresario and business man. He has built an independent business in the existing capitalistic system based upon a profound understanding of the needs, desires and aspirations of his petty bourgeois (working class) audiences. In contrast, the BAM has floundered on the inane antics of its own myopic paranoia, histrionics and racial phantasmagoria.
While at the same time I must deplore the homophobic remarks (by black women) about Perry being “closeted”—comments I think deplorable and if you weren’t in there with him, libelous.  With respect to Shange’s project. His filming it makes this woman more money than she ever could imagine and ensconces her work in a worldwide venue. That no black non-profit producer could ever match—so there!
—Owa

Comment by Owa from NYC — November 12, 2009 @ 11:26 am

The black arts movement took itself down through internal squabbling and unrealistic assessments of itself. Tyler Perry has proven more successful than the entire BAM. What the general black American audience enjoys is considered stereotypical by various shades of esthetes inside and outside the black community. Our styles of music, dance and song lyrics, when first introduced to a larger audience, were always rejected, ridiculed and condemned by those within and without our ethnicity. Even the early basketball observers swore than blacks could never be even competent at basketball because of our long limbs and protruding buttocks. Tyler does what he does well whether or not you like what he does. I suspect that Perry is headed into greater and greater ventures that may prove more satisfying to his critics, none of whom have achieved anything comparable to his achievements. He is independent, a state which the BAM never achieved in any long sustainable way. And he’ll continue to grow and prosper as long as he avoids the outwardly political in his work. Some whites are permitted to be political, but blacks are immediately censored should they outwardly become political. But what is true about our world today, the entire world that is, is that we are closing in on our self-extinction as a species due to our reckless treatment of the earth, our over population and our greed. As our human condition worsens the political take precedent in everything in our lives and in our arts. Just wait!

OyamO

Comment by Oyamo Oyamo from Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor — November 13, 2009 @ 1:00 pm

OyamO, finally.we agree on something

Comment by Owa from NYC — November 13, 2009 @ 8:57 pm

It depends on who is in it, it has to our greatest black actresses, like Angela Bassett and so on, but if Halle Berry is in it, for get it, she just doesn’t have it, the talent at all.

Comment by regina — November 30, 2009 @ 3:20 pm

Add a comment

Please enter your name and a valid email address. Your email address will not be displayed. It is required only to prevent comment spam.

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?