
|
|
Broads Don’t Blog, Especially in HaikuVox Pop[29 April 2008] Broads can only thrive under certain social conditions, and those conditions, alas, no longer exist. But a new species has emerged... by Meta WagnerWhat ever happened to broads? You know, those larger-than-life women who swore like sailors, threw back shots of whiskey, sounded like they’d swallowed whole packs of cigarettes, and aged without apology. Mae West was a pioneer broad back in the 1930s, tossing out double entendres in a saucy tone that left no mistake as to her meaning. Some of the most famous and infamous women over the next several decades followed her lead, surprising and delighting men and women alike with their in-your-face attitude, among them the actress Rosalind Russell (Auntie Mame), the Broadway “belter” Ethel Merman, the controversial playwright Lillian Hellman, the feminist leader Bella Abzug (the one with the ubiquitous hat), and the former governor of Texas Ann Richards and her pal the columnist Molly Ivins. Sadly, they are no longer with us. But their legacy remains. It’s amazing to me how the quips Mae West famously uttered still serve as quotable quotes today: “Is that a gun in your pocket, or are you just happy to see me?” “When I’m good, I’m very good, but when I’m bad, I’m better.” “A man in the house is worth two in the street.” Now, that’s a broad! Half a century later, at the 1988 Democratic National Convention, Ann Richards delivered one of the best lines in all of American politics when she said of then-Republican presidential nominee George H. W. Bush, “Poor George. He can’t help it. He was born with a silver foot in his mouth.” Only a broad could pull off a line like that—and make it seem unrehearsed and natural. I hate the term ‘bitch’ (unless Tina Fey’s using it), but I really like the term broad. I don’t know what the official definition is in the Oxford Dictionary of Offensive and Non-Offensive Terms Describing Women, but here’s what I have in mind. Today’s broad:
Does anyone today fit the definition? I can think of a few women who were once broads but have since forfeited the title. Back in the late ‘70s when Bette Midler was performing bawdy routines in gay bathhouses, she certainly acted the part. But a real broad doesn’t sign multi-picture deals with Disney or, worse, slim down and dye her hair blonde or, even worse, straighten it. Etta James, the great and gritty rock and blues singer, fit the bill…until she underwent gastric bypass surgery around five years ago and lost 200 pounds. Now, I know it was probably lifesaving and I’m happy for her, but a broad simply doesn’t do things that are good for her health. Roseanne once qualified, but a broad can’t have multiple personalities; one alone is more than sufficient. Rosie O’Donnell could still be one but for a serious drawback: broads don’t blog, especially in haiku. So, who’s going to follow in the footsteps of the great broads? Or, are we seeing the last of a breed? I fear we may be. Broads can only thrive under certain social conditions, and those conditions, alas, no longer exist. For this species of woman to flourish, society must have an appreciation for: a zaftig figure, not just supermodel skinniness; age and the attitude it brings, not only youthful naïveté; hard-won lines and a range of expressions on a woman’s face, not a Botoxed-into-submission look; unabashed ethnicity, not homogeneity; men that can stand toe-to-toe with a strong woman, not be cowed by her; the truth, not political correctness. It’s sad to think that a certain female archetype is simply disappearing, perhaps never to return. But, maybe yesterday’s broads, and the modern climate change, have given rise to a new female form: the kick-ass woman. That would be: Helen Mirren, Christiane Amanpour, Tina Fey, Melissa Etheridge, Sarah Silverman, and not least Queen Latifah, who comes closer to the broads of yesteryear than just about anyone. Sure, kick-ass women may avoid trans fats and teeter around on ridiculously high heels at red carpet events, but they know who they are, and so no one would (or at least should) think of asking them to be something they’re not. I bet they’d make Mae West proud.
![]() Vox Pop
I Miss When Artists Were Artists Instead of Marketing MachinesMeta Wagner08.Sep.08 Art has always had an uneasy relationship with commercialism. But that’s the point: it’s supposed to be uneasy.
Anywhere, USAMeta Wagner18.Jun.08 It seems to me that people in the US are actually craving not change, as we're hearing in current campaign rhetoric, but rather sameness -- and more than ever.
Obama, Clinton, and CantaloupesMeta Wagner02.Apr.08 The media will keep playing YouTube videos and speculating about politicians’ intentions rather than doing the hard investigative work -- simply because they can.
|
|