|
Columns > Sub Rosa > Colin Bennett | Caitlin R. Kiernan
Sub RosaAbandoning the Fort[11 May 2007] It seems that teleportation, spontaneous human combustion, poltergeists, UFO sightings, alien abductions, and other such phenomena has fallen out of fashion, these days.
By Mikita BrottmanFor a private researcher of anomalous phenomena, the author and metaphysician Charles Fort (1874-1932) remains uncannily popular. A new biography of Fort, Colin Bennett’s Politics of the Imagination, was issued in 2002 from London-based publisher Critical Vision, and gothic scribe Caitlin Kiernan’s most recent book of short stories was named in his honor (To Charles Fort, With Love). In 2006, two of Fort’s best-known works were reissued, Lo! by Cosimo Classics, and The Book of the Damned by Book Tree. In these and other works—all, incidentally, in the public domain—Fort analyzes such unexplained phenomena as teleportation, spontaneous human combustion, poltergeist events; rainfalls of frogs and fishes; unaccountable noises and explosions; strange animal sightings, as well as more everyday events like UFO sightings and alien abductions. In the UK, admittedly well-known for its fostering of eccentrics, Fort has a strong following. The Fortean Times, a monthly magazine devoted to anomalous phenomena, currently boasts a circulation of 27,000 copies a month—not bad for a print journal, a medium supposedly relegated to the scrap heap of history. There was even a short-lived television series on Channel 4 called Fortean TV hosted by a bearded, motorcycle-riding paranormalist, Fortean and ordained priest, Father Lionel Fanthorpe. For many years now, The Fortean Times has sponsored a yearly UnConvention, a meeting held in London to celebrate the world of strange phenomena. At this popular event, well-known guest speakers like metaphysician Colin Wilson, consciousness expert Susan Blackmore, and alien abductee Whitley Streiber get together to talk about poltergeists, strange manifestations, conspiracy theories, and other weird phenomena. Last year’s UnConvention even included a guest lecture by Rat Scabies, long-time drummer from the rock group The Damned, and hero of the Fortean-themed childrens’ adventure story, Rat Scabies and the Holy Grail. So it was with cheery memories of UnConventions past that I happily coughed up $85 for my ticket to this year’s FortFest, organized by INFO, the International Fortean Association, and held on March 17-18, at the American Visionary Art Museum, Baltimore. Imagine my dismay, then, to discover the conference hall empty of all but a handful of Fortean folk, and the mood redolent less of the carnival than the bridge party. Fair enough, there’d been a flurry of freezing snow the night before, but still, I was surprised to find no more than 30-something Forteans in attendance. And let me make it clear: 30-something was the head count, not the average age. That was more like 70-something, at least if the pool of graying pates was anything to go by. The day’s activities were kicked off by FortFest’s reigning president, a plump, cheerful pagan named Phyllis Meadow, who welcomed everyone back, and mentioned the great success of the society’s recent venture, “Fortean Seminars-at-Sea” (séances and shuffleboard, anyone?). She then asked any newcomers to raise their hand (that would be me, my boyfriend, and Gadi Dechter from the Baltimore Sun), and warned us against confusing Forteans with UFO buffs. Not that a lot of them weren’t interested in UFOs, she added, hastily. As any Fortean will tell you, Charles Fort was one of the first people to explain strange human appearances and disappearances by the hypothesis of alien abduction, and was an early proponent of the extraterrestrial theory, specifically suggesting that strange lights or object sighted in the skies might be alien spacecraft. Still, Ms. Meadow wanted to make it clear that there was far more to the Fortean Society than flying saucers. “In fact,” she added, “you are, this morning, in the company of one of the most interesting group of people you’re ever going to meet.” ![]() Hard evidence of the attendance level at the recent INFO (the International Fortean Convention) (corrected) I looked around me warily. The gentleman to my left had slumped down comfortably in his seat, and was already starting to snore gently. Another old geezer was leafing through a worn copy of Fate magazine. A number of the ladies had brought their knitting. Since FortFest apparently invited the same speakers every year, they’d obviously come prepared. The first presenter was philosopher Michael Gross, whose talk, entitled “Art as Materialization: Studies in Creative Dissociation”, sounded fascinating on paper. Uncannily, however, it turned out to be a mumbling ramble of disconnected thoughts about painting, writing, table-rappings, unexplained phenomena, the narrow-mindedness of scientists, the texture of ectoplasm (in which he professed to be a great believer), and – surprisingly, for a Fortean—the timeless and unchangeable nature of facts. “I’m not a monotheist of the imagination”, he told us, describing his quest for the “metaphysical shudder”, by which time a number of audience members had dissociated in their own way, by nodding off. As a result, they missed the professor’s astonishing proclamation that he’d recently made a decision to abandon the field of paranormal research, only to be jolted back into unreality by a startling precognitive dream, in which he foresaw, in explicit detail, the death of Anna Nicole Smith. ![]() Charles Fort The philosopher declined to give any further details of his disturbing dream; which was unfortunate, because the possibilities are tantalizing. Did he witness a botched tummy tuck, perhaps confusing ectoplasm with extracted stomach fat? Or was an alien intelligence involved? Was it a C.I.A cover-up? Will we ever know the full story? If any more information was given, however, it will remain strictly sub rosa, since by the time Dr. Grosso’s talk was finally winding to a close, I’d decided the time had come to make a spontaneous disappearance of my own. Sub Rosa
The Curse of Monkey-Eared PeopleBy Mikita Brottman07.Jul.09 Nothing like a new iPhone to make one feel self-conscious about one’s ears.
The Special BusBy Mikita Brottman21.Apr.09 Esotouric offers the connoisseur of crime a selection of tours round the infamous hot-spots of L.A’s darkest neighborhoods.
Surton GirlsBy Mikita Brottman28.May.08 The girls collected in Surton's photographs evoke butterflies pinned to a board in the dusty attic of a lonely lepidopterist. |
|
Comments
As a life long skeptic and agnostic, I enjoyed this article very much. Unfortunately, The Fortean Times may have lost some followers, but its crazy topics continue to be as popular as ever among a large segment of the population. Ignorance and lack of critical thinking continue to be a serious problem in our country. To see people who actually defend creationism and intelligent design instead of evolution, which is a solid scientific theory that offers tons of evidence, is truly sickening.
Comment by Oliver Bean from Virginia — May 11, 2007 @ 8:35 am
Charles Fort (one of the men who perfectly defines the term ‘Agnostic’ as in “one who believes nothing out of faith”) never had ANYTHING to do with creationism (or any other ‘ism’, for that matter) He was a collector of anomalous data, one who claimed “no product of the human mind is worthy of belief, including my own” to paraphrase him.
I’ve never met a real ‘Fortean’ myself, unfortunately, and his fans certainly do contain some real wingnuts and oddballs, but to tarnish Fort’s reputation with unwarranted slander is uncalled for.
Comment by J.M. from Oregon — May 11, 2007 @ 6:38 pm
I thought Mikita Brottman’s article was brilliant and very insightful.
I’ve been a Fortean since 1959. How on target Brottman did captured the death and dying that is occurring within the American branch of the Fortean movement? Unfortunately, she got it totally correct. Thank goodness some of us still want to keep trying to get something going, however.
FT’s UnCons are lively, full of healthy skepticism, good Forteanism, new topics, and young, middle-aged and elder people. The guest speakers, from year to year, are a changing body of individuals reflective of the need for diversity and flexibility in the field.
INFO in the DC area has grown sadly inflexible. I was very involved with INFO when it was founded, but the current version has rejected “outsiders” for a long time. By “outsiders,” I merely mean those who live outside the Beltway who wish the INFO leadership would get over some of its need to keep such rigid control of everything.
INFO has refused to self-examine how a small group of people (the leaders) feel it is more important to invite the same people every year . They appear blind to the fact their audiences are graying and grow smaller at each FortFest or FortNight or FortWhatever. They fail to realize they are ignoring the Fortean foundation it once courted. Too bad.
I meet many punk, tatooed, tribal Forteans who would rather save their money to go to one Fortean Times’ UnCon every five years instead of one INFO FortFest annually.
Great essay.
Loren Coleman
Author of the Fortean classic, <i>Mysterious America</i>, in a new Paraview Pocket Simon and Schuster edition for 2007.
Comment by Loren Coleman from Portland, Maine — May 12, 2007 @ 7:34 am
Just requesting a little correction: the caption under the photo of the poorly attended FortFest reads “Hard evidence of the attendance level at the recent UnConvention”. This suggests it was related to Fortean Times’ UnCon, which it wasn’t. Could you fix please?
Comment by Alistair Strachan from London, UK — May 15, 2007 @ 4:45 am
Mikita Brottman’s article is a sad, yet accurate, portrait of the moribund body that is INFO. As a former INFO Board Member (1990-1993), I witnessed the destruction of a once vital organization. Soon after joining the board it became apparent to me that there was a struggle in progress for control of the organization. In short, a band of control-freak mutineers (led by Phyllis “Meadow” Benjamin) and some weak-kneed accomplices thought that they could do a better job running INFO than President Ray Manners who had presided over INFO’s best years. Skipping the sordid details brings us to June 1993 when three Board Members resigned from INFO (the President, the Vice-President and myself) rather than staying on to work at the mutineer’s direction. Our predictions for INFO’s future at the time were prescient, though hardly surprising given what we knew about the remaining Board Members. In relatively short order, INFO Journal subscriptions dropped precipitously (eventually publication ceased altogether), the organization burned up all its surplus capital built up under Ray Manners, and the mutineers fought amongst themselves until only a few remained. Phyllis “Meadow” Benjamin, INFO President-for-Life since 1993, can proudly look back on her one true accomplishment—she oversaw and guided the destruction of organized Forteanism in the U.S. One day I am sure that there will be a plaque in her honor at the CSICOP building in Buffalo, NY.
Comment by James Pontolillo from Virginia — June 27, 2007 @ 4:33 am