|
Music > Columns > Jazz Today > Jeff Lorber
Jeff Lorber Jazz TodayR.I.P. Smooth Jazz, Round Two[6 November 2008] Smooth Jazz truly is the music of the gesture. It is music of the pose. It is music -- maybe particularly when it is made by a skillful musician -- that hints at real music without being real music.
By Will LaymanThis past April, I wrote an obituary for “smooth jazz” (R.I.P. Smooth Jazz, 1985-2008?). There was some pushback. Alan Kurtz at jazz.com called it “premature” and was put-off by what he called my “smugness”. He also claimed that listening to Coltrane’s “My Favorite Things” was “like undergoing root canal minus anesthetic while enduring bagpipes on headphones”, and he celebrated “the virtues of background music”. Hmmm. Keith Goetzman at utne.com was kinder to my analysis and more rational as a jazz listener. However, he ominously noted: “I suspect it will take more than a presumptuous obituary to draw a death rattle from Kenny G’s horn. After all, the Yellowjackets have a CD coming out next week, and elevators and hotel lobbies everywhere have dead air to fill.” And so, perhaps it’s true that Smooth Jazz is not a corpse yet. I like to think, however, that I stand over the grave, holding a heavy shovel in hand. Which brings me to Jeff Lorber.
Not Shooting Fish in a Barrel
But the real indictment of Smooth Jazz is that even the good stuff is exhausted. As I have previously detailed (perhaps to death), Smooth Jazz traveled a long and interesting itinerary on its way to the mood music marketplace. Jeff Lorber—a Berklee student born in Philly in 1952—came along with a band called Jeff Lorber Fusion in 1977, releasing two albums on the highly credible independent jazz label, Inner City. This was hardly first-generation fusion, the acidic and aggressive stuff that arrived in the early ‘70s in the wake Miles’ Bitches Brew. But it had some snap to it, or at least enough so that Chick Corea himself and former Return to Forever-ite Joe Farrell appeared on the band’s sophomore release, Soft Space in 1978. What I’m saying is that Lorber, despite the longish perm he sports on his old album covers, is no mere whetstone upon which a jazz journalist might sharpen his rhetorical tools of resentment. However, even in his early period, Lorber plainly had a taste for the smooth stuff. Only two years after Soft Space, he picked up a saxophonist for his band named Kenny Gorelick. You know, that Kenny. Lorber had moved over to Arista Records, and his song titles included the evocative “Sweet”, the self-explanatory “Fusion Juice”, the futuristic “Wizard Island”, and the banal “Reflections”. Fast forward 27 years and through much music being used on the Weather Channel. And where do we find the now middle-aged Mr. Lorber? On Blue Note Records. That’s right. Blue Note. He Had a Hat came out in 2007 and it was nominated for a Grammy. My point being only this: Smooth/Fusion Keyboardist Jeff Lorber is not a terrible hack or any kind of untalented poseur. But his most recent recording, Heard That (Peak Records), remains a full-on indictment of Lorber’s genre. It is precisely because it is not terrible or wholly bankrupt that this disc demonstrates that Smooth Jazz is an empty gesture that has, finally, run its course. In short, this is the pretty-good stuff, and it’s still a nightmare.
Packaging
(Note: If this were some other kind of music, I might not put as much emphasis on the CD packaging, as more and more music is not sold in disc-form but is downloaded, legally or otherwise, by savvy less-than-middle-aged music consumers. Smooth Jazz, however, is a particularly CD-centric form of music with a demographic between 30 and 65 according to Arbitron, the company that pretty much knows when the average music consumer takes a dump every day, not to mention what he/she buys and why. That makes the average Smooth Jazz-ophile, Wow!, almost exactly my age, which is 47.5 and counting. These folks still buy CDs, even if not in the quantity they used to.) On the cover of Heard That is a color photograph of a dog that I believe to be a Boston Terrier. This dog is staring up at the camera against a white background, and he/she can only be classified as, like, heart-numbingly cute and adorable. This is the kind of dog that, say, a person in the 30-65 demographic might see at the pound or in a PetSmart and think, “I’m kind of missing my kids about now, off at their fancy colleges, and wouldn’t it be great to have a new friend?” Presto-Buyo. Am I being cynical about why Lorber (or, more likely, the good people at Peak Records) would put a hyperbolically cute Boston Terrier on this CD cover? Well, what other reason could there be? Arguably the little poochie has his/her ear cocked, thus relating the dog back to the album title. Maybe. The title itself is hard to pass over if you’re feeling cynical. “Heard That” is articulated here without the question mark that would make it a provocative question, presumably to be answered in the negative. As a statement, “Heard That” is—you betcha—a perfect description of the contents of this CD. Inside there will be (1) lite funk rhythms, (2) shimmering keyboards, (3) pentatonic melodies that sound exactly like a million other pentatonic melodies, including the improvised pentatonic melodies that will pass for “solos” on these very songs, (4) a handful of innocuous horn solos on trumpet and saxophone that either are actually played by Rick Braun and Gerald Albright or, in the alterative, sound exactly like they were played by Mssrs. Braun and Albright, (5) and you get the idea. “Heard That” indeed—and don’t say you weren’t warned. (Another Note: The average 47.5 year-old Smooth Jazz Fan might point out that “Heard That” is not a warning at all but rather an advertisement or product promise. “This recording,” the title suggests, “is just what you are expecting. It’s what you want.” It’s like a photo of a Big Mac outside a McDonalds. “Tasted THAT”! Exactly right.)
![]() Lorber dropping some keytar science. Also in the booklet, we learn that six of the ten tracks were co-written with the album’s co-producer, another keyboard guy and Smooth Jazz regular named “Rex Rideout”. Promotional material for Heard This states plainly that Lorber considers it a huge honor and genuine opportunity to work with Mr. Rideout on this recording, as RR has apparently produced Luther Vandross as well as Gerald Albright, Will Downing, the Smoothified George Benson, and Richard Elliot. I would note here only that I would be willing to gamble much of my kids’ college funds that no one unassociated with the production of this disc could possibly tell the Rideout-co-written tunes from the non-Rideout tunes in a blind listening test. Finally, the booklet tells us that Amy Winehouse’s middle name is “Jade”, which I did not know.
Karaoke
Lorber’s version sands every edge on the original to a satiny polish. The percussion track erases all traces of hip-hop and of Memphis. The horns are genericized to the point where they could be synths. The only bass is from Lorber’s keys. The melody is played by piano—or maybe by a keyboard pad that combines piano with organ?—and by a Wurlitzer electric piano on the bridge. Eventually, Lorber improvises on acoustic piano, leading to more melody and then a fade-out. The out-chorus is pretty exciting, with Lorber getting in some Richard Tee-style two-handed gospel playing. Because, as I’ve said, Lorber can really play. But the best stuff is faded out. What this cover of “Rehab” really amounts to is a backing track. You might sing the tune on top of it, karaoke-style. The only problem is, everyone at the party would wonder why the track behind you was so soft and mushy.
“Rehab” is not alone in seeming like karaoke. “Come on Up” starts the album with a driving drum track and quickly lays out a pseudo-melody on Fender Rhodes electric piano. This melody—and very nearly every instrumental melody on Heard This—is a generic pentatonic lick. It could be almost any set of notes in the blues scale over the song’s harmonies. And this is clear because when Lorber solos on that same pentatonic scale, the improvisation is just a subtle variant of the generic melody. As a result, these tunes have no distinctive melody. The track sounds like it needs someone to sing over it. And when the track’s brief bit of vocalizing arrives ("Uuhh! “Don’t Stop” has the same feeling of being a plate without an entrée. Chelsea Nicole sings, “Don’t you stop the music”, and the easy soul groove begins, then Lorber plays some more pentatonic stuff, and eventually there is a background-ish horn line, with that one line of singing repeating again after some eight bars. So...where is the lead vocal?
Glimpses of Life, But Mere Gestures
![]() The point being: even these brief glimpses of “real jazz” are not much more than Lorber’s other splashes of color—a quick organ line, a dash of reggae guitar, a single line of soul singing, a hint of gospel. All these things, including the moments of seeming authenticity, are just gestures. Smooth Jazz truly is the music of the gesture. It is music of the pose. It is music—maybe particularly when it is made by a skillful musician—that hints at real music without being real music. It is a kind of simulacrum of music, a hollow suggestion rather than something truly filled up. It sounds great, kind of, in the same way that a beauty queen looks great coming toward the audience in Atlantic City. The music on Heard That no doubt took plenty of work to arrange and perform, and the skill of the performers is manifest. But, ultimately, the music adds up to little more than a set of gestures put together for effect. Behind it all, there’s just air.
The Paradox
But, given that Lorber is, in fact, about the best that Smooth Jazz has to offer, the desperate state of the music is that much clearer. Even the relatively good stuff is being check-out-the-cute-dog marketed to a specific demographic. Even a talented player has his solos faded down after four minutes. Even a guy with taste for vintage keyboards conceives of taking a cool retro-hip song like “Rehab” and bleaching it of everything that gives it soul. Smooth Jazz must be dead when its best stuff smells of the worst kind of generic Wal-Mart marketing and shorthand imitation. Maybe this stuff will garner Lorber another Grammy nomination. And that will only serve to remind us that something here is very, very wrong. Still. Smooth Jazz, I rest my case. You’re down—now stay down. Good riddance. Jazz Today
Great Vibrations: An Interview with Gary BurtonBy Will Layman11.Jun.09 Our jazz critic talks to Gary Burton about his reunion with Pat Metheny, about starting a "gentle" jazz-rock group, and that no one seems to know what a "vibraphone" really is.
Some Sing with SwingBy Will Layman15.May.09 With spring comes a rush of jazz vocalists and some of them can actually sing. Others ... not so much.
Long Live Blossom DearieBy Will Layman10.Apr.09 Blossom's music exuded a sparkling kind of elegance and quick wit. Hers was the kind of jazz you could imagine in the really good Woody Allen movies. She was the Dorothy Parker of jazz. |
|
Comments
‘It is music—maybe particularly when it is made by a skillful musician—that hints at real music without being real music.’
The author makes a bold statement here but unfortunately offers no answers to the question he poses. (pun intended)
What is real music?
If gesture and pose are to be avoided then we shouldn’t listen to Miles Davis, Jimi Hendrix, James Brown, Prince and many others anymore.
‘Smooth jazz’ is a label that seems to contradict itself, how can real jazz be smooth? But it is no more a misleading term than ‘hard rock’ or ‘funk’ is. A lot of today’s funk is on the smooth side so how about that?
‘Classical music’ might include Stockhausen though musically there certainly is nothing ‘classical’ about Stockhausen. But we can’t call it ‘contemporary’ because it is almost has become a…classic?
My point is that these labels are mostly created by journalists. Wes Montgomery was a jazz artist that crossd over into ‘pop’ in the 60ies. Today it would be called ‘smooth jazz’ and a song like Montgomery’s great but light ‘Bumpin’ on Sunset’ HAS actually become a smooth jazz standard as far as I know.
The only thing you can do is to take the msuic for what it is. I might like Jeff Lorber or I might not. And if the attached ‘YouTube’ clip should be a reimforcement of the author’s thesis then it doesn’t work for me: The perfromance may have some musical and sonical elements that I don’t particularily care for but it is an improvised perfromance that sounds ‘real’ to me.
Comment by Andi Gisler from Basel, Switzerland — February 19, 2009 @ 6:38 am