
|
|
They Were on a Break: An Interview With the Feelies[7 October 2008] The Feelies, the most plaintive and modest of the 1980s indie-breakout bands, wrung total pastoral bliss from a North Haledon garage for over a decade. Glenn Mercer reflects on the close of the band's initial run and looks at the promise of its reunion. by Dan WeissThe Feelies, the most plaintive and modest of the 1980s indie-breakout bands, wrung total pastoral bliss from a North Haledon garage for over a decade, creating beauty that ricocheted off waves of jangling guitar parts. Most of their big decisions felt like a shrug; when asked about the band’s unofficial split seventeen years ago, after A&M’s wrongfully doomed Time for a Witness, singer/guitarist Glenn Mercer says, “Everyone else we knew was breaking up.” The band’s reunited, though, playing the River to River Festival this summer and scheduling a few dates for this fall. R.E.M., whose Peter Buck produced their second full-length, and the Velvet Underground, who they’ve covered, are most frequently mentioned in the same sentence as the band, and free of the postmodern burden of denying musical comparisons, the Feelies don’t appear to mind and I won’t either. They knew their D to G changes and clean jangle riffs, glued to tight, frantic drumming unlike anyone else. With this basic template, the group made four very tonally different records from it in ten years. The nervy, percussive Crazy Rhythms is the most well known, but the gorgeous, dewy The Good Earth and the well-rocking Time for a Witness are even better. When these go back in print, seek out those first. Only Life was sandwiched between those last two, with its cleanly funky title tune and the hooky “Deep Fascination” driving the group toward their poppiest avenues yet. Mercer and his wife still reside in North Haledon, NJ, a college town that shouldn’t be one, with a Dunkin’ Donuts and not much else warning of the supposed horrors of Paterson laying just beyond the tire on the sidewalk. This guy deserves a well-touted reunion gig for enduring that alone; he can apparently see the beauty in everything.
You rounded up nearly everyone who’s ever been in Feelies for your solo album last year [Wheels in Motion], is that right? Had everyone been still playing all this time or were some picking up their instruments again for the first time in years?
And, uh, what was he doing during the--
Was the key to the reunion getting him back in?
Tell me about the state of the band, after Time for a Witness, right before the hiatus.
So that was a big factor, I think. Us wanting to take some time off. We never really disbanded, we basically just uh, (laughs) took a really long hiatus. We never ... no one ever said, “That’s it, I’m never playing again.” More like, “I’m taking a break.”
How quickly did the albums go out of print, do you know?
There was so much label bullshit going on...
When you signed to A&M, and they were fans, did they see a commercial crossover? What was the mentality of the band at the time, were you expecting to just keep doing what you were doing or sort of expand on a greater commercial level? What were your expectations?
Was there any pressure the label gave you or any ridiculous ideas they had? I know with Hüsker Dü, the label wanted to replace Grant Hart with a drum machine.
Do you listen to a lot of current music or pay attention to the band’s legacy or influence in pop culture?
At least two bands that have gotten a lot of buzz in the last few years, Clap Your Hands Say Yeah and Vampire Weekend, bear a resemblance to the Feelies rhythm-wise.
And the cover of Weezer’s first album is said to be an homage to Crazy Rhythms.
Their first big hit was called “Buddy Holly,” actually!
Some of the best-known Feelies material are actually covers. Is there still anything to be said for making cover songs your own at this time? Because I don’t know if, in 2008, people would be willing to put faith in another version of “Paint It, Black.” [which the Feelies recorded as a bonus track for the 1990 CD issue of Crazy Rhythms]
Your choices were generally pretty bold, well-known stuff, though: Neil Young, the Beatles, the Velvet Underground. And they were pretty well-received. Which is rare, I think. Are you a big classic rock person?
How will you guys be dividing up the setlist for the reunion shows?
Is there a good portion from Time for a Witness? I always felt it was really underrated/
Do you think that if the band had stuck it out another five years or so, that the band could’ve seen more success, with alternative as a format on the radio, with Nirvana and all the other breakthroughs.
At the same time, Kurt Cobain celebrated so much ‘80s stuff and a select few of the bands, like the Meat Puppets stuck it out.
True. Well, for a few minutes. Have you seen any other of the ‘80s bands that reunited recently, like Dinosaur Jr or Mission of Burma?
They’ve been pretty well-received ... I think the Pixies are making more money than they ever did in their heyday, and I think there’s more hope than there ever was for an underrated band to have a second life now.
And is there talk about a new album coming together after the shows?
You don’t want to feel like Journey playing on a cruise ship.
What do the new songs sound like?
The Feelies - Raised Eyebrows
|
|