Wedding Night (partial)

Linden Frederick and the Magic of Realism

Page 1 of 2      Go to:  1 2 >      Next page: Lit from Within

[20 January 2009]

There is a love in Linden Frederick's paintings – a love for, in the broadest sense, civilization and, in the narrowest sense, for the virtues of merely hanging in there.

By Michael Antman

“In every work of genius we recognize our own rejected thoughts: they come back to us with a certain alienated majesty.” – Ralph Waldo Emerson

There are moments at dusk or in darkness when a single light glowing from the window of a store or apartment in an otherwise deserted street evokes the kind of emotion (or so we can imagine) our unimaginably distant ancestors might have experienced when, starved and frightened and cold, they first sighted in the far-off distance the fire at the mouth of a cave.  And yet, because 60,000 years of human history have passed, and because we are now blindingly, blaringly surrounded by light and stimulation in our every waking moment, these solitary illuminations can simultaneously evoke in us the opposite feeling: not of relief, but of unspeakable and unshakeable loneliness. 

This desolated welcome, and the tension it creates in the viewer, is one of the paradoxical “double feelings” that characterize the paintings of a new American realist named Linden Frederick, and that account in part for the eerie power of his work. His work’s effect on the viewer is burnished by his oil technique, but the technique serves as underpinning to, rather than as the point of, his art:  Everything painterly in his paintings is subsumed in fealty to the power of reality – a reality that is uniquely his, but also uniquely American.   

Everyone is Gone
In Frederick’s deeply mysterious oil painting Wedding Night, the deserted street is in an American small town, most probably somewhere on the East Coast, and the solitary source of illumination comes not from a home, but from a bridal shop.  It’s a one-story Mom and Pop operation in a cheaply constructed, part- brick, part-clapboard building fringed by an old-fashioned awning and featuring in its window angular mannequins posed so as to “look” not at each other, nor at the window shopper, nor at the viewer, but at nothing at all. 

The shop is attached to a rambling old house in which, it would appear, nobody is at home, and down the block – where, among the other old-fashioned frame houses that are depicted, one can also imagine a dimly lit tavern, maybe, or an old-fashioned ham-and-egger luncheonette – everyone is gone, as well.  There is only one car on the street that appears to be occupied; its headlights are on, but it seems to be idling at the curb, going nowhere. 

It is right around sunset, and the store could be recently closed for the evening or – because the long window glows with a buttery light—still open.  There’s something melancholy about the latter possibility – the bell that will break the oppressive silence of the street when you open the door, the glaring fluorescence inside (that golden light is likely reserved only for the display window), the single indifferent salesperson, and the distinct possibility that you would be the first, and final, customer of the day. 

But it is a “wedding night”, after all.  And, in the ironic title and the subject of Frederick’s canvas dwells the second doubled feeling: This is a store that exists only for reasons of love and joy, yet whatever wedding and marriage that will follow may have a long road to travel from the straitened circumstances implied by the little shop and the slow-moving, small-town street where it is located. 

Or perhaps that is looking at it from the wrong angle entirely.  The couple getting married this very evening are already done with the little shop; they are about to move on to bigger and better things, while the shop, dependent on a perhaps dwindling pool of customers, may be the entity facing a dreary future.  Somewhere, on the other side of town, there is a joyous wedding party, but this shop and its owners will play no part in it, or in the lives that will follow.

But there is, at the same time, something touching about the scene, in the stubborn way, perhaps, in which this small store holds out against the enveloping night, or in the lovingly rendered, classically American small-town street scene itself, which, in its very ordinariness, is extraordinary.  And yet it wouldn’t seem extraordinary at all if we lived in the neighborhood of the bridal shop. 

Frederick’s painting is not a “meta” work of art—in other words, it doesn’t, as has been the fashion in recent decades, seek to call attention to its status as a painting.  Rather, it attempts to evoke in the viewer the precise emotion he might feel if the scene depicted were actually encountered.  But the likelihood that any of us would have encountered this scene, whether in the present or the past, and think anything at all of it, is rather slim. 

All Souls Day

All Souls Day

And who can blame us?  If we’re not in the market for whatever’s being offered, we quite sensibly just drive past it.

Seen in this way, Frederick’s subject matter would seem to be the preciousness, and fragility, of civilization, that elaborate and imperfect structure that all of us depend on and all of us, as a result, inevitably take for granted.  In another of his paintings, All Souls Day, the theme is reiterated: In a dark wood, the sky a deep indigo so dark that it is even difficult to see the outline of the trees, we can just barely glimpse the outlines of some small houses.  From one of them, a welcoming light is glowing.  All else is encroaching night.

Page 1 of 2      Go to:  1 2 >      Next page: Lit from Within
 
Bookmark and Share

Michael Antman writes on books, movies, the visual arts, and marketing.  He is the author of the novel Cherry Whip (ENC Press) and the recently completed memoir Searching for the Seagull Motel, which is about door-to-door Bible salesmen, sailors, strippers, bar brawls, beached whales, hermits, hurricanes, larcenous preachers, the pirate Jean Lafitte, and an administrative assistant to a pimp.

His website, where most of his writing is collected, is at Michael Antman Author.com and he also blogs frequently at When Falls the Coliseum.com.

Comments

I didn’t think you would ever ask me for a critique again after I mockingly rewrote your dream poem 25 years ago.

This is a beautiful review, and I won’t be writing reckless insensitive paraphrases.  Reading it a second time I realized how much it contributes to my own understanding of realism in photography.  While the processes are different, they emerge as almost identical media dealing with the same subjects and themes. 
I was thinking of Edward Hopper all through your essay, especially his red and white gas station at dusk, which I saw at MOMA.  You, of course, referenced everything except Hopper.  You seemed to be showing restraint, not going for the low hanging fruit.  I tried unsuccessfully to put Hopper out of my mind—the attendant at the pump, the lighted sign, the isolation.  I felt like the dad in the Mad Magazine cartoon about the kids who are watching an educational program about classical music on TV.  The old man walks behind them with a bowl of popcorn and shouts, “Hi Ho Silver.”  I was relieved when you finally got to the Hopper comparison on the second page. 

Nice job articulating the tension of the isolated moment of awareness in the paintings.  I think about this especially when I have people in my photographs.  When I get it right, the viewer is encountering the other and at the same time realizing that the other is unreachable.  The house in the distance welcomes us with its light, but we would be rejected if we walked in (if not arrested).  At some level every work of art entices us to enter, but we cannot.  Instead we admire the qualities of the invitation. 

I loved the “strangely beautiful banality that surrounds us.”  As artists this may be our deepest penetration into experience.  With realism, both the object depicted and the depiction become the “cold pastoral.”  This is what Eliot is demanding when he writes the poet must look beyond the “beautiful world” to the “horror, the boredom, and the glory.”

Outside of art, I suppose that which brings us most into the moment is melancholy.  I recall shoveling a driveway when I was about 16.  A child in the family died at home one night after a lingering illness.  There was a heavy snow, and my uncle and I went out to shovel the driveway for the ambulance.  It was what you might call an “aggressively ordinary” experience. I have few memories as distinct as the porch light, the slow moving feathery snowflakes, and the cement I exposed as I pushed my shovel. Nothing was said.  I couldn’t articulate my feelings, and I hadn’t yet memorized the words we all learn to help escape the exigence of these situations.  Sometimes there is no space for aesthetic contemplation, because you aren’t looking at the man at the red gas pump, you are the man at red the gas pump.

I think one of the attractions of art is that it lets us experience gravity without actually having to fall.  Like a vaccine, it exposes us to death, but we get to walk away and go on with our lives.  Sometimes I think the experience of walking away is more pleasurable than the aesthetic experience.  I still remember leaving the Hillcrest theatre in Joliet after seeing Jaws and how good it felt to be walking on asphalt miles away from water.   

Note my obvious references again.  More than anything else, I appreciate the universe of ideas you bring to bear in your writing and our conversations on art.  This piece on Linden Frederick is inspiring and humbling.  At my best I am a sensitive journalist, but at your best you are a relevant poet.  I have been reading essays by and about artists for years, and I don’t think anyone does it better than you.  I look forward to more like this one.

Comment by Thomas Roach — February 14, 2009 @ 4:01 pm

Add a comment

Please enter your name and a valid email address. Your email address will not be displayed. It is required only to prevent comment spam.

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?