|
Music > Features > Let’s Go Crazy: Celebrating 25 Years of Purple Rain > Prince
Let’s Go Crazy: Celebrating 25 Years of Purple RainPrince’s Anxiety of Influence and ‘Purple Rain’ in the Context of ‘80s Pop Music
Page 1 of 2
Go to: 1 2 >
Next page: "When Doves Cry" as a strong thematic deforming and recasting of "Synchronicity II"
[4 June 2009] Harold Bloom's The Anxiety of Influence notes how that we often attribute artistic success to being able to reconstruct our influences to create something unique, yet, as we all know, it's much more complex than that. Analyzing similar conceptual ground covered by the Police and Michael Jackson prior to Purple Rain, James Fleming dissects Prince's reaction to these other artists landmark songs, and how he was able to manifest these other pop monoliths into his own, reactionary style.
By James FlemingDuring the summer of 1984, Prince accomplished a fete only one other musical act—The Beatles—had accomplished before: he was at the top of the charts with an album (Purple Rain), a film (Purple Rain) and a single (“When Doves Cry”). Prince’s success during the last half of 1984, however, was hardly the result of mere chance, shifting popular musical taste, or a calculated corporate market scheme. Instead, the sudden popular and critical success of Purple Rain was owed to a conscious and, perhaps, subconscious desire on Prince’s part to firmly establish himself as a canonical popular musical artist who could rival and even surpass the popular and critical success of the two most prominent popular musical acts of the time: Michael Jackson and The Police. Over the course of the last half of 1983 and the first half of 1984, Prince had undergone a process of radical self-reinvention, transforming himself from an experimental R &B musician standing on the verge of relative fame to one of the most popular personas in popular culture, with a sound that was both familiar and unique, leading Prince to appear and sound like someone from an alternate reality: strangely familiar yet remarkably new. As with all particularly strong and original artists, Prince did not construct himself or his work out of thin air. While Prince’s most direct musical influences are clear—Jimi Hendrix, Little Richard, Sly Stone and David Bowie to name a few—a close “reading” of Prince’s Purple Rain reveals the extent to which the creation of Prince’s sound and persona at the time was deeply indebted to both Michael Jackson and The Police. However, that’s not to say that Prince modeled himself or his music directly upon either that of Jackson or The Police. Prince’s invention of his Purple Rain persona and sound, rather, was the result of a powerful desire on Prince’s part to not simply emulate these artists but to overshadow and, in essence, rewrite them in order to carve out his own unique position in popular consciousness. While Michael Jackson and The Police were not the only popular musical acts at the time—this was, after all, the era of The Footloose soundtrack, the Go-Gos, Devo and Van Halen—Jackson and The Police were the acts held in the highest critical and popular esteem. In order to properly conceptualize the process by which Prince developed his persona and sound both with and against Michael Jackson and The Police, I will adopt Harold Bloom’s notion of the anxiety of influence in order to speculate as to how Prince both consciously and subconsciously attempted to resist the burden of both acts by a process of artistic rejection, deformation and recasting. While Prince’s musical influences are countless, my claim is that Prince—over the course of developing, recording and then filming Purple Rain—was resisting the influence of Michael Jackson and The Police, both of who had released two highly popular albums (Thriller and Synchronicity, respectively) over the previous year and a half and established themselves, firmly, in popular consciousness and the music charts. While Jackson and The Police were, indeed, Prince’s main rivals at the time, it is possible, also, to conclude that Prince was resisting and countering the influence of his earlier self as well, a point I’ll examine toward the end of this piece. My focus here will be in particular on two songs from Purple Rain: “When Doves Cry” and “Darling Nikki,” which when paired, respectively, with The Police’s “Synchronicity II” and Michael Jackson’s “Billie Jean,” reveals the extent to which Prince attempted, whether consciously or not, to overcome the influence of The Police and Jackson by radically re-casting and reformulating two of their strongest songs in order to overcome their burdensome influence and set a firm position for himself in popular and critical musical consciousness. In his book The Anxiety of Influence, literary critic Harold Bloom proposes a theory of how artists are influenced by other earlier, highly influential artists. According to Bloom, artistic influence is a psychological and artistic struggle, and often a relatively violent one at that. In Bloom’s theory, a “strong poet” (which can be understood as a strong artist of virtually any sort) seeks to clear a space for him or herself and his or her creations through a process of what Bloom refers to as “misprision,” which can be understood as a way by the new, strong poet of “misreading” certain earlier, canonical predecessors. For Bloom, every strong piece of art is itself a misreading of another earlier, powerful work. Through this process of misprision, the new “strong poet” seeks to overcome his or her influences in order to present new and original works. Bloom conceptualizes this process in decidedly Freudian terms. He views the “canonical” poet as a Freudian father figure who must be psychologically overcome by being, in effect, rewritten by the new, strong poet. In essence, the earlier artist is considered a father figure by the younger artist who must be surpassed. According to Bloom’s theory, a strong poet subconsciously misreads his or her rivals in order to invent his or her own work against such. However, the influence of the earlier artist can’t be entirely purged by the younger, new poet. Through this process, the predecessor’s influences isn’t dismissed but is instead curtailed and reformulated into a fragmented and chaotic understanding of the predecessor’s work. The disorder of the new, strong poet’s view of his or her sources of influence render his or her attempts to create new and original work an attempt to structure his or her own work, at least in part, by piecing together the fragments of what remains of his or her own predecessors. Artistic mastery, then, is achieved only when the poet is able to produce a work which radically restructures the sources of influence through a process of deformation and recasting, in effect allowing the new, strong poet to present a piece of art that is for all purposes original and new. In terms of his public persona, Prince rejected Michael Jackson’s clean-cut, sanitized, and decidedly non-sexualized and boyish weirdness and, instead, cultivated a decidedly sexualized self image that was itself deconstructive. Unlike Jackson, Prince’s self-image was packed full of pronounced gender ambiguity. His style was relatively feminine, yet his self-presentation was also decidedly heterosexual. Furthermore, Prince did not present himself in the same manner that Sting did, namely as a politically aware, tortured intellectual composing music of social relevance. In fact, Prince rarely displayed any sort of overt political or social stance in terms of Purple Rain, and instead offered himself as being rather divorced from the contemporary world, with a sound that harkened more to the future than the present or past. However, the ultimate battleground for Prince’s battle of resistance against Michael Jackson and Sting was in the music itself. In many respects, Purple Rain, as an album, can be understood as a strong act of resistance against the mutually strong forces of Thriller and Synchronicity. Thriller came out of Michael Jackson’s desire not to offer a thematic album, but to instead offer an album that sounded like it consisted entirely of hit singles. In essence, the concept of Thriller was decidedly capitalistic at heart: to create a record that would be a guaranteed mainstream hit. As inventive as Thriller is in terms of its sounds, the album’s tracks lack much in the way of emotional weight. The Police’s Synchronicity marked something of a departure for the band. The heavy reggae and new wave influence of the band’s earlier work was mostly gone. While there’s certainly a world-music influence on the album, the band’s sound was now rather synthesizer heavy, lending much of the album something of a perfectly polished and effectively manufactured sound. Synchronicity is also a decidedly intellectual album, though also with a few exceptions, a relatively unemotional one. With the exception of “Synchronicity II” and “Every Breath You Take”, most of the tracks have a decidedly cold tone that is short on emotional depth yet heavy on intellectual exploration. The same, however, cannot be said of Purple Rain, given its raw emotional weight and mix of studio and live recordings, as well as its thematic focus on personal passion, loss and desire and relative disconnect from more worldly and cultural contexts. While Purple Rain was structured and recorded in a much different fashion than either Thriller or Synchronicity, Prince’s strongest engagement with both albums occurs within the songs themselves. In many respects, “When Doves Cry” can be understood as a strong Bloomian misreading of The Police’s “Synchronicity II”. While “Synchronicity II” is sonically layered, with blaring synthesizes, an aggressive drum beat, tearing guitar and strong bass line, “When Doves Cry” is sonically quite stark and simple (unlike a majority of the other tracks on Purple Rain). The song features no bass line, simple keyboards and an electronic, echoing drum beat. Thematically, however, both songs are focused on personal turmoil though each explores such from a radically different perspective. “Synchronicity II” tells the story of a harried man caught in suburban misery, harassed at home by his family and at work by his superiors, all the while knowing that “somewhere something has to break” within his own psyche. At the same time, something monstrous yet unrelated is described as emerging “many miles away” from the bottom of a Scottish lake. The song serves to illustrate the concept of synchronicity itself, in particular the occurrence of two synchronic events that are connected symbolically but not causally or logically. While “Every Breath You Take” is the most popular song off the album, “Synchronicity II” is certainly the strongest track, and the one in which Sting reaches his deepest and darkest emotional depths as a lyricist. The song is one of turmoil and misery, telling the story of a man at his breaking point, living in a world of frustration and humiliation that offers no hope or possibility for release or redemption. The song concludes with Sting singing of the man driving home “with a pain upstairs that makes his eyeballs ache” while at the same time, “many, many miles away,” a monstrous form emerges from a lake and approaches the door of a cottage. And with those final images, the song fades out. There’s no sudden intersection of these events and nothing is presented that could possibly save anyone from the horror that his arisen, both from the lake (which seems symbolic of the man’s subconscious) or within the world itself. God or any other spiritual force is entirely absent from the narrative. All that’s presented is hopeless, personal torment and ultimately meaningless coincidences. No knowledge is gained and no resolution is offered within the narrative. At the end, all that remains is frustration and the sense of looming apocalypse.
Page 1 of 2
Go to: 1 2 >
Next page: "When Doves Cry" as a strong thematic deforming and recasting of "Synchronicity II"
Let’s Go Crazy: Celebrating 25 Years of Purple Rain
Related ArticlesLet’s Go Crazy: Celebrating 25 Years of Purple RainBy PopMatters Staff05.Jun.09 Some 25 years after it was released, PopMatters proudly celebrates Purple Rain in its entirety, looking at the album and film from every angle. Inside the RevolutionBy Evan Sawdey05.Jun.09 Hundreds have books have been written about Prince and the Revolution, looking for hints and clues about his life and motivations within his lyrics, his images, and film scripts. Yet there are two people who know Prince better than anyone else, and those are the people who were there when it all happened. Speaking exclusively to PopMatters, longtime prince manager Alan Leeds and Revolution keyboardist Matt Fink speak candidly about their experiences recording, filming, and making Purple Rain, and what it was truly like being inside the Revolution. “The Minneapolis Sound”By Jeremy Ohmes03.Jun.09 Purple Rain showed "The Kid" and Morris Day fighting for control of the same club in Minneapolis, with artists like Dez Dickerson and Apollonia 6 trying to get their own share of stage time as well. The film perpetuated the notion of "the Minneapolis sound", synth-based funk workouts that featured artists like Vanity 6, The Family, The Time, and several more -- the irony, of course, being that all of their songs were written, performed, and produced by Prince.
|
|
Comments
Really awesome piece, a few typos notwithstanding. Hopefully, we will see pieces like this in the future, not only on PopMatters.com, but also in other popular culture publications.
Comment by Tomás from Canada — June 4, 2009 @ 9:20 am
While I agree that Harold Bloom’s theory of influence is useful for understanding Prince’s drive for originality coupled with his allegiance to certain musical traditions, this author’s argument suffers from one glaring and fatal flaw. Bloom’s theory rests on the parallel between the Freudian struggle to assert ones self within and against the structures defined by “the father” and the artist’s struggle to make art that says something NEW while at the same time paying homage to the tradition of artworks that influenced the particular artist. This means that Prince’s music needs to be compared to the music that truly influenced him - James Brown, Hendrix, Santana, Sly Stone, Miles Davis and Duke Ellington - rather than the music of his CONTEMPORARIES, such as Michael Jackson and the Police.
Just because Thriller and Synchronicity came out prior to Purple Rain, you cannot consider those albums the true “influences” against which Prince was struggling to define himself - they were his contemporaries and his competition. And as a side-note, where did the author even get the idea that the Police’s “Synchronicity” was something that Prince had even listened to prior to working on his own music? The assertion that Purple Rain was somehow a reaction to “Synchronicity” is weak and un-supportable.
This author clearly has no understanding of Harold Bloom, and even less understanding of Prince’s music. Go back to grad school.
Comment by Griffin from Los Angeles, CA — June 6, 2009 @ 4:17 pm
Griffin,
You are correct in that Bloom’s theory really refers to the “father” figures of the artist rather than his contemporaries (from what I remember when I read it, but that was more than ten years ago). James Fleming would agree with you since he states in his article that Prince’s real musical influences are the ones you mentioned in your own response.
The author is talking about his Purple Rain persona specifically, and not what formed him as an artist. One could say that a ‘new’ Prince was born on Purple Rain and, if we follow Fleming, this re-birth was made possible by what was around him at the time, the same way artists (or any other person) evolve through the changes in their lives. The point of the article is about how one artist responds to what is around him. Therefore, and following your post, it’s possible that instead of using the anxiety of influence theory, it might have been more correct to see Purple Rain as a parody of both Billie Jean and Synchronicity.
I have to add that I don’t understand the need to be aggressive in one’s response…
Comment by Toms — June 7, 2009 @ 8:57 am
Griffin,
You are correct in that Bloom’s theory really refers to the “father” figures of the artist rather than his contemporaries (from what I remember when I read it, but that was more than ten years ago…). James Fleming would agree with you since he states in his article that Prince’s real musical influences are the ones you mentioned in your own response.
The author is talking about his Purple Rain persona specifically, and not what formed him as an artist. One could say that a “new” Prince was born on Purple Rain and, if we follow Fleming, this re-birth was made possible by what was around him at the time, the same way artists (or any other person) evolve through the changes in their lives. The point of the article is about how one artist responds to what is around him. Therefore, and following your post, it’s possible that instead of using the anxiety of influence theory, it might have been more correct to see Purple Rain as a parody of both Billie Jean and Synchronicity.
I have to add that I don’t understand the need to be aggressive in one’s response…
Comment by Tomás — June 7, 2009 @ 10:00 am
Toms-
You make several good points, and I will work to temper my tone in future postings. I think that the author’s argument would have been better served had he used a different theorist - as you suggest, Jameson’s blank-parody or perhaps even Levi-Strauss’s concept of bricolage would have been logical choices - rather than Bloom’s influence theory, which has a much more specific application than what the author has done here.
The author may have been better off not delving into theory - if the main point of the article was simply to compare and contrast Purple Rain with other music on the market at the time, one can do that quite well without any cultural theory at all.
I hear what you’re saying about the author speaking more about Prince’s movie persona than his music, but I found that argument a kind of apples-or-oranges mishmash. If Prince was forming his fictional persona in response to the music around him, then we need to judge that music against the other fictional music within the framework of the movie, which means the Kid’s father (in which case Bloom’s influence theory would seem very appropriate) or the Kid’s rivals in the Time. If we’re discussing the formation of Prince’s ACTUAL musical sensibility and persona (which I think is a much more interesting and rich discussion), then we can bring into the discussion the larger musical influences of father figures like James Brown, and the market pressures brought to bear by the success of Prince’s actual contemporaries and rivals, such as Michael Jackson. To discuss “The Kid’s” fictional development is, I think, to mistake the artwork for the artist, and with Prince, there’s much more to be gleaned from examining this artist’s rich and varied musical influences and output. (As I side note, I still don’t think that the Police are a relevant point of comparison, and I feel that the author simply plucked that one out of the air, or out of his own musical tastes. A more relevant data-point in terms of mainstream musical popularity at the time would have been Bruce Springsteen, or Bob Seger, both of whom are mentioned in Per Nilsen’s definitive biography Prince as “mainstream” rock artists that Prince may have had in mind when he wrote the song “Purple Rain.”)
Anyway, thanks for an enjoyable discussion, Toms!
Comment by Griffin from Los Angeles — June 7, 2009 @ 11:52 am
However relevant literary theory might be, actually reading the texts carefully would seem an obvious necessity. But Fleming misquotes Prince not once but twice. First, he misquotes a line from “When Doves Cry” as “Why do you leave me standing alone in a world that’s so called?” The actual line is “How [not why] can [not do] you just leave me standing alone in a world that’s so cold [not called].” Second, he misquotes “Darling Nikki,” saying that the speaker “couldn’t believe [his] mind,” when the actual text is “couldn’t believe my eyes [not mind].” As with much of academic literary criticism, Fleming is less concerned with illuminating the texts themselves than with what some theoretical concept can allow him to claim, in this case a nonexistent connection (or perhaps “intertextuality” for Fleming’s crowd) among Michael Jackson, The Police, & Prince.
The argument that the dove in “When Doves Cry” is the Holy Spirit is not persuasive—this is an obvious allusion to sorrow, made more poignant by the fact that a dove—a symbol of peace—is crying. The speaker has no such peace, not with himself, his lover, nor his parents.
Finally, it is both absurd & ignorant for Fleming to argue that including “Darling Nikki” on the album is “surprising” given Prince’s desire to appeal to a mainstream audience. Anyone remotely familiar with Prince’s work before Purple Rain knows that his music had always been highly sexualized, & there is no reason to think he would change this when he tried to have a huge hit—precisely the opposite, what he needed to do (& succeeded in doing) was not to remove sexuality from his music but rather reformulate it in a way designed for wide appeal. Furthermore, the history of rock & roll is filled with (& indeed premised on) musical/lyrical references to sexuality & sexual intercourse—hence the fact that a song like “Darling Nikki” appears on one of the most successful albums of the 1980s.
One has to wonder why this unfortunate essay is included along with the other very revealing pieces on Purple Rain & Prince.
Comment by Clint from Illinois — June 13, 2009 @ 6:19 pm