Cavemen R Us

[1 February 2007]

GEICO's recent ad campaign offers yet another example of the ongoing search for cultural groups we can mock in public.

By Michael E. Ross

Neanderthals walk among us. GEICO, the Maryland-based insurance company known as much for its commercials as for its coverage, has developed for its new ads two cavemen characters, who the company hopes will join its old flack, the gecko, among the most effective brand-associative symbols in advertising. In the shrewdly self-referential spots, the unnamed cavemen try to adapt to the modern world, a rude abrasive place in which they find themselves the object of jokes, ridicule, bias—and advertisements. It’s an ad campaign about an ad campaign, and it’s very much caught on. “The response to the cavemen has exceeded all of our expectations,” says Joe Lawson, copywriter at the Martin Agency, which created the ads. Lawson told Adweek  his firm was “thrilled to share our version of what it’s like to be a caveman in the modern world.”

In one of the earliest ads in the series, a GEICO pitchman, by delivering the company slogan (“So easy, even a caveman could do it”) runs afoul of the sensibilities of two cavemen in his camera crew. He meekly apologizes to the pair later at an upscale restaurant. “Honestly, we didn’t know any of you guys were still around,” the GEICO apologist says. Then, in an ad that first aired in October, one of the two cavemen, a smartly dressed, articulate special pleader for the Neanderthal community, is interviewed on a TV talk show. The caveman has issues with the high-handed tone of the interviewer; the interviewer responds: “Tone aside, historically, you guys have struggled to adapt.”

“Right,” the caveman sarcastically replies, “walking upright, discovering fire, inventing the wheel, laying the foundation for all mankind. Good point. Sorry we couldn’t get that to you sooner.” Another guest on the program is asked to respond. “Sounds like someone woke up on the wrong side of the rock,’’ she says—to the caveman’s obvious distress.

Either by coincidence or (more likely) by design, the GEICO caveman campaign takes some of its fish-out-of-water cues from V.T. Hamlin’s Alley Oop, a comic strip created in 1933 and still syndicated today, about a caveman who travels in a time machine to the 21st century. But symbolically speaking, GEICO’s cavemen join the long history of aggrieved American social classes. Irish, Chinese and Italian immigrants alike were reviled, ostracized and victimized when they came to America, and the tragic history of African Americans run through the fabric of the nation from the beginning. Today, Latinos face the same obstacles to assimilation and acceptance. So why mock this universally American struggle in an ad?

To J. Fred MacDonald, author of Blacks on White TV  and One Nation Under Television and a history professor at Northeastern Illinois University, the caveman are “a minority you can attack with impunity. We’ve seen with Borat what happens when you go after a real country like Kazakhstan,” he says, referring to the real-life protests and lawsuits emerging in the wake of the film. “But cavemen? No one lobbies for Neanderthals. You’ve got a lot of Neanderthals in government, but that’s another story.”

In MacDonald’s view, the need to mock those who are different rests deep in our psyche. “It’s the human condition—differences provoke an uneasiness that is not funny but can be exploited with humor.” Theoretically, the GEICO ads can dispel some of that. “The tension, the differences between us can be pricked with humor, and that’s a positive thing. The cavemen continue the genre of ridiculing the different. It’s in the tradition of humor that tweaks our differences. Whether you get it consciously or subconsciously, it’s there. Usually those differences are ethnic, linguistic or racial, but it’s human, it’s cross-cultural.”

Robert J. Thompson, director of the Center for the Study of Popular Television at Syracuse University, agrees there’s more going on in the GEICO ads than first meets the eye. He sees the GEICO ads as another link in the chain of American humor, from minstrel shows that lampooned blacks to borscht-belt comedy that more recently made Jewish Americans a genial laughingstock. While making no parallels between cavemen and Eastern Europeans, Thompson says society has “made more fun of eastern Europeans—the kind of vague eastern European character—than any other ethnic group,” citing Latka Gravas, Andy Kaufman’s character from Taxi, and the Belky character from Perfect Strangers as examples. They’re safe targets, ready for ridicule without fear of repercussions because their countries don’t seem to exist.

The GEICO ads are an extension of this. “It’s very safe territory,” he said. “These cavemen are quite articulate. They’re really urbane, but with this raging sense of entitlement. They come off as funny; we feel we have permission to laugh about it because it’s aimed at people who never existed—cavemen never spoke in English and ordered in restaurants. But the ads could be perceived as offensive because they’re making fun of people who are sensitive about stereotypes.”  For Thompson, the ads are “the tip of an iceberg of a much larger trend— a backlash against political correctness.” Thompson says that while the ads mock a nonexistent group, their real target is those people who take offense at stereotyping, the politically correct who are often the derisive focus of South Park, a show that pushes the power of free speech in the face of a hypersensitive public. “The show is constantly doing parodies of our sensitivity,” Thompson says, “Its treatment of Jews, people in wheelchairs and gay people systematically shocks us and says things that are outrageous.”

And that seems to be the gist of GEICO’s campaign: Besides their branding value, the GEICO ads represent shock as its own objective, shock for shock’s sake. Outwardly, the ads have nothing to do with car insurance. Cars aren’t even mentioned or depicted in any way. The ads capitalize on the confrontational style of many recent TV ads. Hummer’s recent campaign, with peeved drivers trading in their wimpy old vehicles on a sudden, hyperaggressive whim, is a blatant nod to our more atavistic tendencies and that American appeal for instant gratification. Volkswagen’s latest ads, featuring startling corner-of-your-eye accidents, all but literally crash into our living rooms to make a point about safety.

The GEICO ad’s mission “is getting you to talk about the ads. It speaks to memorability; you do associate it with GEICO,’’ says Shari Anne Brill, vice president and director of programming at media buyer Carat USA. With the caveman ads and the gecko commercials, Brill says, “you’ve got brand recall in both of those strategies. In the end, remembering the brand and the product is all that matters when people are seeking car insurance.” But what does it say that we find insensitivity more memorable than distasteful?

Maybe the overarching takeaway of the GEICO caveman ads is the way their appeal shows how insensitive we’ve apparently become to the most sensitive among us. Maybe our fractious, divided, red-and-blue-dominant nation—exhausted by the arguments and complaints of various minorities – has less tolerance for tolerance than it once had. GEICO’s cavemen reframe the national debate on political correctness in an advertising campaign that’s as much a sign of the times as the cars we drive: Can we all just get along? Sure we can—as long as you look like me.

New Geico Caveman Commercial
 
Bookmark and Share

Michael E. Ross writes frequently on the arts, race matters, politics and American culture. He blogs on various topics at Culchavox. American Bandwidth, a book of essays and blog posts spanning the 2004 presidential election and the dawn of the Obama administration, was published by Authorhouse in October 2008.

Comments

Latka is not the best example. Latka is what most would consider a “lovable character”. My outcasts that expose the failings of bigotry are the wrestler and the “deceased comedian” characters.

Andy Kaufman
Interference Ink
http://www.InterferenceInk.com

Comment by Andy Kaufman from Aruba — February 2, 2007 @ 3:18 am

Only about three sentences away from a brilliant piece of satire. As is…not so much. Of anything. What’s next on the over-analysis block: the social menacing of post 9-11 architecture?

Comment by haywood jay — February 2, 2007 @ 5:45 am

I’m sorry, but these GEICO ads don’t really have anything to do with a legitmate discussion of racial insensitivity or what it means to “take offense” at all. Unfortunately, I think this article is an example of what happens when someone who is not possessed of much actual, native intelligence decides to “be smart” and learns a few words, phrases, and general stances without really being able to think very critically on their own: “...The ads could be perceived as offensive because they’re making fun of people who are sensitive about stereotypes.” That sentence right there makes me think this article actually is a brilliant piece of satire, as mentioned by one of the posters above. The ads COULD perceived as offensive? Well, theoretically, anything COULD be perceived as offensive. But in the same way that making hateful, racist comments actually reveals more about the commentor than about the object of the comment, taking offense at every little thing reveals more about the person taking offense than about the object of the offense. You’re saying that these ads might not be offensive to any actual group at all, but that they MIGHT be offensive to those who are easily offended? Do I even need to point out how logically absurd that is? If the ads aren’t actually offensive to a real group of people, than what is it exactly that lets easily offended people know they should be offended in the first place? This is begging the question.

The “backlash” against being “PC” is no more valid, or no less annoying,” than being “PC” is in the first place; I am not generally a “screw all this wimpy PC bullshit” kind of guy at all. That having been said, if you have to look this deeply for something about which to cry foul, I’m sorry, but you need to get over it. This kind of nitpicky, pseudo-intellectual “critique” will never do anyone anywhere any good whatsoever.

Lastly- these ads are pretty cute, nothing more. If anything, I would say that they are part of a somewhat recent trend- and one for which I think we should be thankful- in comedy on TV. Found in sitcoms such as “The Office” (more so the BBC version, but in the American version as well), “Arrested Development,” “Curb Your Enthusiasm,” etc., it’s a trend away from typical gags, zaniness, and artificially wacky situations and towards the comedy of what I’d call “the silliness of ego”: people being offensive, people getting offended, the mundane awkwardness of everyday life. But I don’t imagine something like the BBC version of “The Office,” with its spot-on and sometimes gruelingly accurate depictions of silly, egotistical folly, would appeal much to someone who could write this kind of article with a straight face.

Comment by Daniel from Baltimore — February 2, 2007 @ 1:00 pm

“Sure we can—as long as you look like me.”

I think if the threshold of “looking like me” contains all of modern humanity (at the exclusion of cave-men, boo-hoo) then we’re off to a good start.

Comment by Brent from San Diego — February 2, 2007 @ 6:15 pm

I think people often become too serious and lose their sense of perspective when they focus so intently on things like this. Although this article wasn’t very well thought out or argued, a much stronger writer would still find it extremely difficult to convince anyone that Geico’s advertisements are offensive.

With all due respect, Mr. Ross, it seriously hurts your position when you’re arguing that people might be offended by an ad campaign that makes fun of cavement by quoting an “expert” (J. Fred MacDonald) who makes fun of cavemen. Huh?

And Balki (not “Belky” - if you’re going to name victims of bigotry, it might be nice if you’d spell their names correctly) might have had a silly accent, but it was his childhood innocence and wide-eyed wonder that provided the humor in “Perfect Strangers”, not some deep-rooted need to laugh at foreigners.

As for the idea that there’s a growing backlash against political correctness, well, of course there is! The backlash began twenty minutes after the word was originally coined. This isn’t some evil, horrifying development, it’s a natural balance. Yes, we need to respect each other as human beings and as individuals with different cultures, dreams, beliefs, etc. There are people who will take that need for respect and use it to justify increasingly ridiculous rules and declarations (at one time, for example, American Express asked married employees to refer to their spouses as “significant others”, for instance, since homosexuals couldn’t legally get married, with the obvious implication that if you slipped up and called your wife your wife, you were homophobic and bigoted). We need people who will fight that impulse at every turn, especially people like the creators of “South Park”. They understand that anything done in excess, even (or especially) when it’s done in the name of goodness, usually ends up making things worse than they were originally.

We have to avoid excess. And dude, trying to build a case of racial insensitivity against Geico because of their cavemen ads really does seem to define the word excess.

Comment by Tommy Marx from Portland OR — February 3, 2007 @ 4:41 pm

This article was an excellent example of critical writing about popular culture.  As a scholar and university professor of Popular Culture and Comparative Cultural Studies, this commercial is, contrary to other views here, a very legitimate examination of stereotyping and racial issues.  The very fact that we are discussing it here, means that the commercials are part of a discourse on the larger issues.

By the way: I laugh out loud every time I see these commercials—love them!

Comment by Traci from Arizona — February 6, 2007 @ 12:10 pm

Great article—sums up pretty much what I’d been thinking from the first commercial.  I was already sick of this PC backlash circle-jerk by the second commercial.  The grievances of marginalized groups in American society are real, even if we rarely hear their unfiltered perspectives in prime time.  Even a well-funded campaign slyly suggesting that those grievances can be better understood through the perspectives of characters inhabiting a counterfactual universe can’t change the reality of their experiences.

Comment by Eric from North Carolina — March 3, 2007 @ 12:49 pm

Add a comment

Please enter your name and a valid email address. Your email address will not be displayed. It is required only to prevent comment spam.

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?