|
Books > Features > Tao Lin | 'Lin, Tao'
Photo from "The Beatbots Interview: Tao Lin" by J. Bowers Literature is Inside of Life Just Like a Tree is Inside of Life[17 October 2007] Tao Lin has developed his own unmistakable and unique style by utilizing a contagiously honest way of writing. Marcelo Ballvé discusses Bed and Eeeee eee eeee with the author.
By Marcelo BallvéIn the complacent, hype-filled, glossy wasteland that is the American literary marketplace, the sound of a genuinely new voice immediately stands out. Especially when that voice is funny, inventive, rigorous and wielded by an author skilled and talented out of all proportion to his years. Tao Lin is a 24-year-old New York University graduate who was raised in Florida by Taiwanese parents. Earlier this year, he had a double-barreled debut: Melville House of New Jersey simultaneously published his first two prose books, a novel titled Eeeee eee eeee, (the title comes from the sound a dolphin makes) and a story collection titled Bed. In both books, Lin shows he’s already attained what some writers never find. He has developed his own unmistakable and unique style. He has a contagiously honest way of writing that strips language of all its fakeries and is as exact as a knife blade without sounding flat. Lin’s work already has earned him imitators and fans all over cyberspace. He has also acquired enemies riled up by the literary feuds and pranks perpetrated via his blog, Reader of Depressing Books. He lives in Brooklyn where he is working on his second novel. I talked to him over Gmail chat one Saturday evening. In correspondence Lin is unfailingly polite and thoughtful. One gets the feeling he doesn’t dash off anything, not a single sentence in his novel or short stories, nor a single line in a Gmail chat. Over the course of three hours we discussed books, music, writing and literary culture. This is an abridged version of the interview; the full version is at the interviewer’s blog . +++
Please give us a plot capsule of your new novel Eeeee eeee eee.
Bed, your new story collection, has nine short stories. Do they have a familial resemblance or are they all different?
But in Bed the stories are all from my point of view— me, Tao Lin. I tried to avoid writing the same story nine times. When I started a new story I would first think, “What is something I can work on for 30 days in a row without feeling dishonest or bored or uninterested? It has to be something I already think about all the time anyway.” Then I would think, “Is this just the same story as another story I already wrote?”
What about the first book you published, which was a poetry collection.
I think the poetry book is very emotional. I recommend it for fans of Sunny Day Real Estate, Mineral, I Hate Myself, Saves the Day, Alkaline Trio, The Get Up Kids, and even like Nirvana or Korn— yes, Korn. I think hipsters would like my poetry book. Anyone who is depressed, physically comfortable, or bored would like it I think.
Are you listening to music right now?
I would like to ask you about music. What sort of role does it play in your creative process?
When I’m severely depressed I’m also able to focus, but I must be completely, hopelessly depressed for that to happen. If I’m just regularly depressed I mostly just sit there clicking things on the Internet.
What is your favorite Nirvana song if any?
Is this a fair analogy: tracks are to an album what short stories are to a collection?
I think about song order and story order a lot. Sometimes I notice that a band always puts my favorite song as the fourth song on all their albums. For my stories I studied Lorrie Moore’s story-collection, Like Life, I wanted to model it on that. I stared at our table of contents and made notes about where each story was set— New York or Florida— and how lonely the characters were, and how long the stories were. I studied Lorrie Moore’s story order, but I don’t really do that for many other writers because I don’t get the feeling they spent much time thinking about it.
You often mention Lorrie Moore, Anne Beattie and Joy Williams as influences. These are all women writers obviously. I’ve never heard you mention a male author as an influence.
Maybe I like those women writers, though, because they are not as focused on having sex with women, on being a dominant badass, or on trying to show people how their loneliness is a result of being better than other people, having deep and extensive knowledge of existentialism, or having a really high IQ. I read some male writers and I get the feeling their plot and dialogue is influenced mostly by questions like, “Will the reader think I’m a weak, insecure, desperate wimp if I have this character cry due to loneliness and then play online video games? Maybe I should have the character get drunk instead and then have reckless sex with women he doesn’t like after doing drugs and beating a homeless person.”
Why do you always narrate from what is essentially your personal point of view?
Some people say it is “narcissistic” to focus on one self so much, and they say it like it’s a bad thing. But this is only what I publish. If I wrote something from the point of view of a Taiwanese janitor with 10 children I think it would be better if I kept it to myself. The function, if any, of writing from another’s perspective, is to humanize another person, so that you will see them as a person, so that you will be nicer to them. But if I publish my narcissistic short stories other people can see that I am a human, and be nicer to me, and others like me. If I publish about a Taiwanese janitor with 10 children it might just cause people to treat “real” Taiwanese janitors based on preconceptions and things that are just wrong— because I would have had to make assumptions, since I am not a Taiwanese janitor.
What is more important in your view, literature or life?
For example I don’t see a difference between a sentence someone types to me in Gmail chat and a sentence I read in Moby Dick or something. And I don’t see a difference, really, from a sentence I read in Moby Dick and a person standing in front of me speaking sentences to me, even if they’re saying, “Spare some change?” Things inside the world, including myself, have an effect on my brain. Everything is “literature” to me. But if I read too many certain literary blogs or book reviews or things like that I forget all this I just typed, and I start thinking things like, “Literature is sacred,” or “Literature is the most important thing.”
Recently you changed the name of your blog from “Reader of Depressing Books”, (though that remains its blogspot domain), to “Serious Literature”. What was the reason?
We know Michael Chabon and whoever, that they write “serious literature.” I don’t know. I think naming my blog “Serious Literature” is an attempt to do something to go against how “sacred” some people view literature. Like it’s more valuable than other things. Video games. Is literature more important than video games? They are both just things. I don’t know. People talk about Noah and I’s writings and sometimes they say we are like angsty teenagers. But we write about existential concerns. We write about death, confusion, having to make choices in an arbitrary universe. “Serious Literature” is used sarcastically but I am also being sincere in a way. I am serious when I write a story. I really want to convey something I’ve felt or try to figure something out, or try to write something to calm myself, to help me accept death, limited-time, etc. I think it has something to do with “maturity.” There’s a sense, from certain people, that some books are more “mature” than others. And what they mean, to me, by “maturity” is “having no sarcasm, masturbation, irony, or anything too extreme in terms of expressing loneliness or depression or confusion.” Somehow sarcasm is viewed as a teenage thing, I think. But I think sarcasm is very true an emotion. |
|
Comments
Unfortunately for this clueless kid, he’s not aware that his career has already peaked. Even now his work is of little interest to anyone over 30 who’s not arrested developmently in adolescence. He has an interesting voice, but he’s a one-trick pony and apparently determined to continue as one. His audience will “age out” as they begin to have adult concerns if he is still stuck in teen angst, which is mostly what his blog is.
The trouble with making yourself the focus of your work is you need to be interesting, and this kid seems, to all accounts, extremely boring, a person who has few friends, no life outside the online world, his own self-promotion, and his own obsessive/narcissistic assumption that everyone is interested in the minutiae of his life.
Unfortunately, publishers, interviewers, and other enablers have allowed this kid to achieve “success” without being allowed to experiment in private for a few years. Now he’s stuck with the Tao Lin character unless he undergoes a radical and quick growing-up.
He seems to know only about half a dozen writers and not be well-read. He has the worst possible combination for a writer: ignorance and arrogance.
Comment by Ulysses from Philadelphia — October 21, 2007 @ 8:50 am