Art by Eric Schiller

Moving Pixels

The PopMatters Multimedia Blog

Multimedia / Banana Pepper Martinis 

8 September 2009

Misconceptions About the Female Avatar

A closer look at a study on men and their relationship with hypersexualized female avatars.
From Mass Effect

From Mass Effect

Several surveys over the past year have pointed out the glaring discrepancy between the treatment of men and women in video games. Although most games show men that have bodies that are just as physically absurd as women, the difference is that women are almost all sexualized and objectified in video games. This often does not vary even if I am actually playing as the character myself. Considering that this a video game, one has to wonder if a player is relating to their avatar in the game the same way that they do an NPC.

The logic behind having me play as a woman in a skimpy outfit with large breasts goes back to a fairly simple discovery in advertising: heterosexual men will pay attention to you if you have one in your commercial. There are basic rules for how to maximize this effect. Skimpy clothing is obviously a factor, but it’s a bit more complicated than just getting naked. A pursed, open mouth indicates submission. Shoulders wide, arms to the side and hanging also arouse attention. Characterizing this sexuality in terms of dialog usually involves the female asking lots of questions or needing the male figure to do something for them. As a consequence of these classic Hollywood and advertising formulas, video games are overflowing with them. Why do you think so many games have a woman, typically very attractive, constantly portrayed as the one giving you orders and asking you to do things? In a medium that targets men with empowerment fantasies, the objectified women in them are often just another part of that formula. And yet when you change the hypersexualized female from a person I’m observing into one that I’m playing as my avatar, none of these concepts work anymore. You are not sexualizing an object for the player’s desire, you are sexualizing the player.

From Tomb Raider

From Tomb Raider

This is the same issue that a study raised a while back, and they were kind enough to post the results on the internet. They applied a two part test to a group of men and women. First, a picture of a hypersexualized female game character was shown to them and they were asked what role they thought she played in the game. The second test presented the subject with two types of games: an FPS where you play a woman and a third person game where you play as either a hypersexualized avatar or a curvy, more reasonably proportioned avatar. Players would randomly start on one kind of game and could switch to the other whenever they chose. They had a set amount of time to play either game. Afterwards the subject filled out a lengthy questionnaire asking how well they identified with the avatar and which game they preferred. The results are not what you’d expect.

For the first part of the study, both men and women immediately noticed the hypersexualized state of the avatar. Although there was a portion of men who thought she might be the damsel in distress, for both genders the overall reaction was to assume that the avatar was the villain or a secondary character. That is, men did not rate the character any more positively than women in terms of liking her.

To summarize the study’s brief description of the sexualized versus curvy avatar, a hypersexual body is a comic book style figure, Curvy is a more normalized ratio of breasts to waist. That is, something that’s physically reasonable. Men both preferred playing as and rated more highly the curvy avatar. Women preferred playing as the hypersexualized avatar. The questionnaire asked men if they would recommend the game to a friend along with their sense of immersion or presence. The study explains, “Men had higher responses on presence and recommending to a male friend when playing as the Curvy figure, whereas women were higher at the Hypersexual figure. In fact, both of these interactions were strengthened. In addition to these two variables, two other engagement variables became significant in the control groups…Men said they would recommend the game to a female friend more often when they played as the Curvy character, while women again indicated higher recommendation when playing the hypersexual avatar.”

From SuicideGirls.com

From SuicideGirls.com

The reasons behind this radical departure from expectation are guessed at in the survey. It explains, “The men may be rejecting the hypersexual’s abnormal stature as ridiculous, as one male participant relayed how they often laugh at such portrayals when they play games featuring such characters. A more realistic body type, while still somewhat idealized in terms of voluptuousness, may provide a better draw for male gamers.” Given the inherently empowering nature of a video game, they further speculated that the discovery that women preferred playing the hypersexual avatar says more about the media’s message to women more than anything else. The study notes, “It cannot be simply concluded that women want to play as such characters, as they did not indicate enjoying playing as these characters, nor were they overtly supportive of them in their appraisals. While they might have had some negative perceptions of the character, this did not prevent them engaging with the game more when playing as that character.” That is, they didn’t particularly like the avatar, but they were more engaged and felt more powerful playing as the hypersexualized one. The study theorizes, “A woman may see such a body type as desirable due to the positioning it has in society as the form required to achieve success, particularly in regards to heterosexual romantic relationships. If women perceive this is what men want, and there is an importance ascribed to being attractive to men, then they may be more likely to accept at some level the hypersexual portrayal as the goal.”

A film critic named Laura Mulvey outlined the distinction between when a film is sexualizing a woman and when she is shown as ‘possessed’ by the male character in her essay “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema”. The male audience is first shown the character as voluptuous and beautiful. Every character in the film is in awe of her beauty. But as the hero wins her over and she becomes his romantic interest, her sexuality is played down. The male hero, the male viewer is supposed to be empathizing with, asserts his dominance and this dominance then should not be contested by having other people interested in his objectified female. The problem with video games is that the player is both the hero and audience. The avatar who is sexualized is also the person that we are identifying with anytime we are playing the game. As Mulvey points out most men, “cannot bear the burden of sexual objectification. Man is reluctant to gaze at his exhibitionist image.”

From X-Blades

From X-Blades

The issue of objectified and hypersexualized women in video games is often glibly dismissed because the target demographic for games is still 18 to 35 year old heterosexual men. That’s why the study is really interesting, it disputes the entire notion that this demographic enjoys playing as these hypersexualized avatars. Mulvey’s explanation for this discrepancy obviously comes with caveats: a great deal of this comes from Western Culture instead of any universal rule for men. Still, it’s important to realize that appreciating the trailer and images from Bayonetta engages this group with the usual formulas taken from film and advertising, but playing the game is another deal entirely. Perhaps the reason a game like X-Blades bombed was not just the shoddy gameplay, it’s that no one in the primary demographic that is targeted by it wants to play as a woman in a thong.

L.B. Jeffries

 
Bookmark and Share

Comments

Thanks for this article, it is a really good read. I find your use of Mulvey to be very interesting however Visual Pleasure whilst being an important text in Feminist Film theory has since 1975 been poked at and critiqued with the development of the cinematic form. Arguments that the male cannot bear the gaze of the camera break down if you look at the example of someone like Gene Kelly who always wanted to emphasize the male form in motion and could at times be the object of the gaze but not made powerless by it (or Daniel Craig walking on the beach in Casino Royale). This line of inquiry also presumes the camera to be a masculine gaze (taken from the essays roots in psychoanalysis and the male dominance of the film industry). This has changed as well with figures of empowered women being not as uncommon as they once were on the cinema screen (Kill Bill possibly?) and the emergence of the possibility of a non-gendered gaze.

Because the avatar control and interaction in games is the player and therefore cannot be so strictly constrained to a gendered gaze (I believe), we might see a reason for the female identification with hypersexualized figure. As Gene Kelly was showing the male body as spectacle whilst still being in control, Female players might also take up a powerful female body and retain the control over gaze as well. The male dominated developer might create an avatar for the sake of balance and thus feeding each gender a figure which they can observe whilst still being in control. The situation becomes problematic when the avatar is a gender not of the player. I would be interested to see the situation reversed with a hypersexualised male body.

I’ve got plenty of reading that arose around Mulvey if you want some further reading around this topic ;) Good old leftovers from undergraduate study :)

Comment by Gerard Delaney — September 8, 2009 @ 6:47 am

I find the juxtaposition of Mass Effect’s female character with the heroines in the article itself striking. This female avatar is just the opposite of the hypersexualized character: a tight closed mouth, abundant clothing, imperfect skin, defensive body language, usually carrying a bulky weapon, with a curvy but reasonable figure. So how does this game relate to the study, or your larger point?

Comment by Rob Marney — September 8, 2009 @ 9:13 am

“Why do you think so many games have a woman, typically very attractive, constantly portrayed as the one giving you orders and asking you to do things? In a medium that targets men with empowerment fantasies, the objectified women in them are often just another part of that formula.”

How is it empowering to be told what to do?

Marney: It would be interesting—but not problematic—if Shephards look would correlate to the actions ze made in mass effect; if ze was mostly paragon or mostly renegade for example.

Grabbing someone by the balls takes someone who in some sense knows what it feels like to have balls, metaphorically speaking. The female Shephard is a man in more ways though, simply because bioware probably started out with a male character and forgot to change some dialogues to mirror this add-on. They modulated the experience after the default male, and so felt it would be easier to make a pretty manly female character too.

Comment by Ava Avane Dawn — September 8, 2009 @ 2:57 pm

@ Delaney

Yeah, Mulvey isn’t a perfect fit but her breakdowns of male empowerment fantasy are very useful at select moments. A lot of it breaks down, like the camera point you made and moments where you can assert gender through gaze, but when she was describing the basic mechanics of scopophilia I thought it summed up games nicely.

@ Marney

Just wanted to show female avatars in non-submissive poses to counter-point the rest of the photos.

@ Ava Avane Dawn

My understanding of the principle is that it makes men feel useful. The female character cannot do it for herself, she must get the man’s help. That sort of thing.

Comment by L.B. Jeffries — September 8, 2009 @ 4:03 pm

Add a comment

Please enter your name and a valid email address. Your email address will not be displayed. It is required only to prevent comment spam.

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?