Art by Eric Schiller

Sound Affects

The PopMatters Music Blog

Music / The Biz 

24 September 2009

The End of CDs Is Nowhere in Sight

Music writers have tried to correlate the death of the CD with the release of the remastered albums from the Beatles. But as long as we like having a physical copy of a special album, hard copy formats will not disappear anytime soon.

For music journalists, it would be easy to declare the release of the remastered versions of the Beatles albums as the end of the CD era. Bloggers and music writers, most notably NPR’s “All Songs Considered” host Bob Boilen said the new Beatles remastered CDs will likely be the last CDs many people will buy.

It would be a fitting epitaph for the format: Born: 1984 with Born in the U.S.A the first CD massive produced in the United States. Died: September 9, 2009 with the Beatles boxed set. Where I live, there is even some serious circumstantial evidence to back up this claim: the same month The Beatles released their remastered albums, Homers Music & Gifts, the largest independent music distributor in Nebraska will close two of its four locations.

Unfortunately, the end of CD purchasing just isn’t true. Yes, downloads are eclipsing CDs in terms of how people get their music, but what will keep the CD alive is not lower prices or even the quality of the product, but our insatiable desire to display stuff.

When a new girl or boy comes into your life or you have a group of people who you think are cooler than you come up to your place, you may go through a ritual of relocating certain books, albums and yes, CDs in your place. Your copy of Aretha Franklin’s Spirit in the Dark and the Knife’s Silent Shout may find a more prominent location on your CD tower and Sheryl Crow’s self-titled album and AC/DC’s Black Ice may find a new residence in your t-shirt drawer. Just like how you may find yourself doing a switcheraroo of your sophomore literature’s copy of Franz Kafka’s The Trial for your hard copy of The Ultimate Spiderman. These are not lies, merely a reallocation of your resources.

Not all people are this vain. But it does display an almost universal wanting to possess a physical product of something that genuinely makes an impression. During the Internet’s growing years in the ‘90s, people had no choice but to buy the CD if they liked a song on the radio or read a five-star review from a band they never heard of in their favorite publication. Both actions required a certain amount of risk. Listeners may have found that one song on the radio was either the album’s best track or that one track was unlike anything else on the album. The bigger gamble was blindly taking the critic at their word. Each risk resulted in the potential loss of $15.

Nowadays, thanks to sites like Spinner, LastFM and LaLa, people can freely listen to full albums risk free. The good news is obviously people can go through a full listen before buying a CD and people can escape being duped by artists who release their best single from an album of filler. The bad news is that a lot of times, people listen to these downloads in the most distracting of environments: at work, in cars and during general multitasking habits like updating your Facebook page while studying for a Molecular Biology midterm. Therefore, most people who listen to music this way are going to have the patience to allow an album to sink in with repeated listens.

Even these distractions will not prevent that one album from hitting you at the right moment. It is during these times when a downloaded copy of the Antlers’ Hospice or the Drive-By Truckers’ The Dirty South isn’t enough. The impression is so strong, you want a physical copy to become part of your habitat. It’s the same drive that gets people to pick up an opening act’s CD at their merch booth after an unexpectedly amazing set. It’s a shared experience you want to be a part of and it’s an experience that just cannot be replicated with a simple download.

If this new habit of buying is similar to any other music medium, it’s the LP. In the past few years, record sales have defied the sales trends of other physical media by increasing each year. If bringing another CD into your home is a commitment, then buying a record is a damn marriage. It’s far bulkier, more of a pain to move to a new apartment or house and requires far more interaction. A typical 70-minute CD will most likely take three trips to the turntable to switch sides. As a result, most people usually do more research before buying a record than a CD. Nowadays, people are starting to treat CDs as records: if it’s not worth dusting or hauling in a box, it’ll do just fine on your laptop.

Despite the fact that almost each time you read the weekly Billboard charts you hear news that CD sales have fallen almost ten percent from the previous year, millions are still sold each week. While not as popular, they still bring in the buyers. The best indicator of this came from the biggest shared pop culture event of this year: the death of Michael Jackson. Unlike The Beatles, his music was readily available on iTunes, but that did not stop all of his CDs from selling well into the six figures a week even two months after his death. 

This type of buying behavior is something record executives probably don’t want to rely on for their livelihood. But as downloads become the norm, people will start to treat CDs more as collective items. Some companies have already started to capitalize on this, preying on Gen-X nostalgia by releasing collections from Radiohead, The Beastie Boys and Pavement. It’s cruel, manipulative and it works brilliantly. You like Wowee Zowee? If you were really a fan, you would buy the “true” version, complete with separate b-sides and a snappy display box filled to the gills with liner notes. You already have it, but this one looks so much cooler on your row of awkward-shaped CDs that can’t neatly fit in your CD tower. Plus, that girl you met last week at Urban Outfitters is a huge Pavement fan…

Until another physical form comes out where you can show off your taste, CDs aren’t going anywhere for awhile.

Sean McCarthy

 
Bookmark and Share

Comments

You forgot the most obvious reason to buy a CD over buying the MP3:  quality of sound.  The CD sounds better!  (And, actually, the LP has better sound than the CD, but is highly inconvenient, and there are the scratches, of course).  Frankly, I am shocked you did not include this basic fact about sound quality in your article.  But you are hardly alone in skipping over this aspect of the music revolution:  people have turned to an inferior product and oftentimes pay nearly the same price.  I’ll never understand that.

Comment by li — September 24, 2009 @ 10:06 pm

Various good points in this article. Pundits quick to point out the 14% year-to-year drop in CD sales still manage to ignore the absolute numbers - millions - of CD sales that still happen every week. Although people who live on the internet might not believe it, there’s still a lot of people out there who… don’t live on the internet and don’t want to download music. For them, CDs are much more convenient.

Comment by Ally from Edinburgh — September 25, 2009 @ 5:56 am

1.  It’s not an inferior product.  It has advantages in different areas, and obviously those advantages are more important to non-audiophiles.  Not to say that sound quality isn’t a good point to bring up, but feigning ignorance about the good reasons why people prefer mp3s is a silly thing to do.

2.  The discussion of showing off CDs ignores the 21st-century version that I see more and more - scrolling through a friend’s iPod (or equivalent), and looking at all the music in his collection that way.

Comment by theorrhea — September 25, 2009 @ 6:17 am

It is not “feigning ignorance” to point out how little advantage an MP3 has, with the exception of price (which is certainly true if you only want to buy one or two songs off an album).  But if it costs $10 for a CD and $10 for the album on MP3, and the buyer wants the entire album, why anyone in their right mind would choose the MP3 I have no idea.  The CD can be converted into MP3 format on your computer in under 2 minutes.  Therefore, you can bring your entire collection around with you on an MP3 player if you so choose.  So, I guess what it comes down to is storage of CDs.  And there is something called IKEA that can normally solve that problem.

I buy MP3s on occasion, but only when the price is right, given its inferiority to a CD.  (no liner notes on the MP3 either)

But I suppose I, like the CD, am a dying breed.

Comment by li — September 25, 2009 @ 3:03 pm

My point is that if someone listens to music on their mp3 player and computer, why would they want to go to the record store (or, more likely, amazon.com because the record store doesn’t carry the CD they want), buy the CD at a price that is still normally more expensive than mp3s, go home, spend ten minutes ripping it to the computer, and then putting the CD on a shelf in the corner?

It is silly to pretend that mp3s would have a significant advantage for this type of person.  That is all I am saying.  Other people might prefer CDs for equally good reasons.

Comment by theorrhea — September 25, 2009 @ 7:08 pm

I think kids that download are missing out on the “community” vibe of their local indie stores.  Sure, they get the music and didn’t have to leave their house. But they miss out on meeting music fans like themselves & seeing fylers featuring awesome bands coming to their town.

Comment by BIG BUSINESS from Cleveland, OH — September 26, 2009 @ 10:52 am

Great article. See 8 hidden gems on the remastered set in a funny article http://bit.ly/kSBMn

Comment by Guzelvis from Atlanta — September 26, 2009 @ 12:19 pm

“Until another physical form comes out where you can show off your taste, CDs aren’t going anywhere for awhile.”

Have you heard of “T-shirts” yet?

Granted, in 2008, CD sales still made up 65% of the income the music industry saw, but…these trends, they move fast. 

Andrew Dubber, who runs New Music Strategies, has an excellent post called “You’re Looking at it Wrong” which has got an amazing info-graphic detailing the waxing and waning of music formats from 1973 to 2008.  Each successive format scales up faster, makes more money…but also falls off faster, too. 

I’m actually engaged in an ongoing argument/bet with several other label heads about wether or not the compact disc can make it another 5 years as the #1 format.  I think it will, but barely.

Comment by Justin Boland from Illinois, somehow — September 26, 2009 @ 12:39 pm

Add a comment

Please enter your name and a valid email address. Your email address will not be displayed. It is required only to prevent comment spam.

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?