Channel Surfing

The PopMatters TV Blog

Music / TV / Remembering... 

28 September 2009

Michael Jackson, King of Pain

Death, where is thy drop off the radar screen? The industry, phenomenon and force of artistry known as Michael Jackson is very much alive, if not its namesake. Columbia Pictures is readying release of Michael Jackson’s This Is It, a film of Jackson in rehearsals for the tour that will never be. The film is set for theatrical release Oct. 28, but advance tickets are available as of Sept. 27 (a smart marketing approach on Columbia’s part, one that seeks to extend the frenzy of a live Jackson show into the multiplexes for what will be nothing less than a cinematic wake).

But the Michael behind Michael, the mystery of the man behind the machine, was the subject of an often-moving segment of “Dateline”, aired on NBC Friday night. “The Michael Jackson Tapes” explores Jackson’s inner hells and private joys, all chillingly documented in his own voice. Programmes consisting largely of crawl lines of words transcribed from audiotape have rarely been this emotionally compelling. Ironically, in its reach for the mysteries of this incandescent figure, the hour-long programme only deepens those mysteries; by the show’s end we’re more familiar with the how; the why of Michael Jackson remains as elusive as ever.

The tapes belong to Rabbi Shmuely Boteach, a longtime friend and advisor Jackson met in 1999, a man who saw the singer through some of his most turbulent times, including the troubling years after his lacerating child molestation trial. Boteach got Jackson to open up, to some degree, on any number of the behaviors that made Jackson a target of opportunity for comedians, bad tabloid newspapers and, let’s be honest, all of us.

Boteach, interviewed by NBC’s Meredith Vieira, offers his own interpretations of what provoked Jackson’s chameleon physiognomy; his bipolar relationship with women; his fear of the physical attributes of aging; his profound desire for fatherhood; and a relationship with his father that, to go by the obvious pain in Jackson’s voice, veered from a challenge to an unyielding horror.

We hear Jackson document physical abuse at the hands of a domineering, unemotional father whose arrival home at night literally made Michael sick; we can detect the infectious joy he feels describing the first throes of love with Brooke Shields, and the heartbreak when he reveals Lisa Marie Presley’s change of mind about having his children.

And throughout, we’re witness to Jackson’s reaction to a lifelong dance with fame and a fickle public as eager to impugn Michael’s racial identity and sexual preference as to make him, in record sales and adulation, the most popular entertainer in history. It’s little wonder that Jackson finally comes clean on his legendary status and its consequences: “I would like some kind of way to disappear where people don’t see me any more”.

Vieira is a game interviewer and Boteach a willing subject able to illuminate some of Michael’s dark corners. But it’s the tapes that give the program its emotional heft. There’s a curious documentary power in hearing Jackson without seeing him; we’re audible witnesses to the first steps of an intervention or a 911 call from one lonely man to the world at large.

The rabbi tells Vieira: “Michael said to me constantly, ‘if I can’t help kids, then I will find a way to terminate my life’ … He lost the will to live”.

Add this “Dateline” programme to the inevitable catalog of Jackson arcana. But unlike the unreleased music to be unearthed, and other facts and artifacts of his life and career that will emerge, “The Michael Jackson Tapes” (sure to be aired again on his August birthday or the day he died in June, ad infinitum) will stand as a testament to the grim side of celebrity, a transcript of how a Croesus of the culture became a Sisyphus at the hands of that culture, and the personal demons he could not defeat.

Michael Jackson ruled more than one realm. The King of Pop was also the King of Pain.

Michael E. Ross

 
Bookmark and Share

Comments

Claiming Boteach was a “longtime friend and advisor” to Jackson is so far from the truth that I had to speak up. I’m pretty sure their paths only crossed for a couple of years around 1999.  And Boteach was definitely NOT there during 1993, so not sure how this article can claim he saw Jackson through those turbulent years.  Who is claiming this?? Boteach?  Or this author? If the former, then he’s lying; if latter, then the author should have done better research.

Comment by Stacy — September 28, 2009 @ 11:28 am

I agree with Stacy, Boteach was not near Michael in 1993. If he said that, he is lying. If the author said this, he didnīt do enough research.
And the only one who is STILL taking all the garbage is Jackson.

Comment by Florencia from Argentina — September 28, 2009 @ 12:48 pm

Stacy and Florencia: Thanks for commenting. I of course meant the period after that molestation trial, since the rabbi and Michael didn’t meet until 1999. I’m working to have that error corrected. Shouldn’t have happened. Thanks for your sharp eyes. MER

Comment by Michael E. Ross from Seattle — September 28, 2009 @ 1:42 pm

The Rabbi was not around during the 2005 trial either.  He was out of the picture long before that (I’m pretty sure he claims that he cut relations in 2002) and nowhere to support Michael during his terrible public ordeal.  Boteach is reprehensible.

Comment by SF from Canada — September 28, 2009 @ 7:21 pm

This article seems to speak of facts but instead refers to things said by other people and they are no truths.
I know the absolute truth: Michael Jackson is a great artist is unique in the world and a person of great intelligence and human feeling. Has experienced the joys and sorrows of life in the measure as big as he was and is the most loved man in the world. the rest is not shown!

Comment by lolly — September 29, 2009 @ 3:09 am

For a man of faith (today that doesn’t mean what it used to) Boteach is a f*cking demonic snake. I never felt that self-serving demon needed to be around Michael when he was living, and i surely don’t like that demon speaking about Mike after he’s passed on.

For someone who’s supposed to be Mike’s friend he certainly speaks harshly of Mike in interviews. What kind of “friend” would do that? I only hope that one day someone exposes this forked-tongued snake for what he is

Comment by Oh Please from United States — October 1, 2009 @ 1:58 pm

Add a comment

Please enter your name and a valid email address. Your email address will not be displayed. It is required only to prevent comment spam.

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?