Sound Affects

The PopMatters Music Blog

Linearity 

7 April 2008

Apocalypse Meow

Madonna’s “Four Minutes to Save the World”

Madonna: Come on boy, I’ve been waiting for somebody to pick up my stroll.
Timberlake: Well don’t waste time, give me a sign, tell me how you wanna roll.
Madonna: I want somebody to speed it up for me then take it down slow. There’s enough room for both.
Timberlake: Girl, I can handle that, you just gotta show me where it’s at. Are you ready to go, Are you ready to go?

Wow. I mean, really, wow. It’s one thing to watch the insipid video, which has unnerving, tranny vampire visual of Madonna spread eagle on the hood of some luxury brand automobile while the world crumples into a void behind her. There, at least, the viewer is rewarded with a morsel of symbolic truth. When you actually see the lyrics of “Four Minutes” flatly stated, it’s lobotomizing how empty this song is. Even superficially, it’s difficult to press this song for content. Is it simply her Mrs. Robinson pop claptrap, initiating young Timberlake into the Q&A game that is getting her to orgasm? It certainly sounds like she’s the Goldilocks of cradle robbing:  not too fast, Justin, not too slow. That she would connect her sexual gratification to “saving the world” says much about the tired, engulfing narcissism of cobwebbed Mega-Stars. If pop music ever had the kind of urgency suggested by the chorus, Madonna has certainly done her fair share to lesson its cultural impact beyond the fading, cyclical variations of style. But, wait, there’s more:

Madonna: Sometimes I think, what I need is an intervention, yeah.
Timberlake: And you know I can tell that you like it. And that it’s good, by the way that you move, ooh, hey hey/
Madonna: The road to heaven, paved with good intentions, yeah.
Justin: But if I got a night, at least I can say I did what I wanted to do. Tell me, how bout you?

Is this a transcript of their text messages to each other?  Even as traded flirtation, this song sags. It’s actually representative of Madonna in interviews where clichés, or variations of clichés, are supposed to be read with metaphysical weight. “The road to heaven, paved with good intentions” makes absolutely no sense in or out of context in this song, but gives the listener the illusion of wit by inverting a common phrase with a new, but imprecise meaning. Does she mean that Justin’s sexual desire for her will help him achieve everlasting afterlife, even while this song has exactly zero shelf life?  Or does she mean that having good intentions is just as good as doing good works, which would be the first criticism that I would level at her entire contribution to the pop canon. Either way, if the song wanted to be dirty, it would do well to have us not debating heaven’s asphalt. Where is the dirt of this liaison that dallies in abstractions or sideshow references to interventions and theology for dummies?  This entire track seems like an implosion of Madonna’s insecurities about her persona. She wants to be pervasively sexual, but enlightened in a desexualized mother-figure way. She wants to continue to rake in the cash of her image, but wishes to recast herself in this sacralized savior role. In the end, we get a song that’s ostensibly about screwing some young upstart for a handful of seconds in order to save the planet from impending destruction. If only.

Terry Sawyer

Funny the moral majorty would think your an idiot since the single is selling like hotcakes , the video is number one and Madonna looks hot as usual. You must be a bitter old drag queen to waste time making up silly attacks on a legend and an icon.

Comment by Josh from Greensboro USA — April 7, 2008 @ 5:10 pm

Couldn’t agree more Josh! And this jackass may want to get the lyrics correct before blathering on and on about them!! I’m curious, what exactly is YOUR position and contribution to the world “TERRY”, other than mundane incorrect observations on celebrities who have brought so many people happiness for so many years. And what is it that YOU do..."TERRY"???...go stew in your own misery, and leave the rest of us to revel and bask in all that is Madonna...GET A LIFE!!!

Comment by Beth from MA — April 7, 2008 @ 8:23 pm

I think Madonna is trying and has tried to bond a gap between “Former Madonna Fans” and “New Madonna Fans.”
Madonna is our current cultures’ Cleopatra....and if you want to dissect and disassemble all of her words or lyrics, then you are the lost one.
Madonna is just trying, as always, to put out a great and meaningful song to the public where they, ultimately are left as the judges, and the buyers.
As Madonna “Jumps” from Billboards #68 to #3, and as this is her 1st top 10 since 2001 with “Don’t Tell Me” (see Madonna Billboard), which was released from her Album “Music,” which hit the scene in 2000, all “former and new” Madonna Fans
eagarly await her new CD, “Candy Shop.”

Comment by Stephan Harcrow from Little Rock, ar — April 7, 2008 @ 9:51 pm

Thanks for reading, fandroids.  Seriously, I appreciate the comments, but, how about some arguments, please?  Clearly someone can step forward and say that the song is brilliant for an assortment of reasons and has deep, hidden meaning. So far, we have:

1.  “You’re stupid for trying to find meaning in her songs.” - Perhaps, but I have extra time on my hands, so why not?

2. “She’s rich.  She sells lots of records.” - Certainly an argument that she’s popular and that she has sustained an unfathomable level of attention for a long period of time.  George Bush was elected to serve eight years in the Presidency.  I don’t see either argument from majority to be impressive substantiations of quality.

3. “You’re a loser and a drag queen.” - What’s wrong with drag queens?  I guess this is a way of saying that I’m a man who acts like a woman and nothing could be lower than that.  Way to stand up for your girl power icons.  This is perhaps the lowest form of argument available, the equivalent of throwing feces.  Its an attempt to cheaply psyhologize the person arguing by projecting motives, intentions and interiors you couldn’t possibly know.  What have I done for the world in order to write a blog?  Is that a serious question?  What have you done for the world to post in the comments section?  I’m not knocking on Madonna for kicks, I was arguing that her successive reinventions haven’t taken and now her artistic persona is cheap and fractured. So far, no disagreements, but plenty of targetless arrows.

-Terry Sawyer

Comment by Terry Sawyer — April 8, 2008 @ 12:11 am

— PopMatters sponsor —

Come On, Terry!  Do you think your personal ratings of Madonna will extinguish a 25 year old flame?
Haaa!  Tell that to the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame!
Sounds like you are battling personal flames, your self.  Soo sad, and too bad, for you.
Madonna BURST onto the scene in 1982 with “Holiday” and “Borderline”.....most people at that time thought she was an Afro-Amercian Singer....until they viewed her video’s...thanks MTV.
After that, “Like A Virgin” took over, and Madonna made her way through the Amercian Culture and became a staple of Teen-Twenty society in the 80’s and early 90’s....culminating with “Vogue.”
Madonna continued to evolve as an artist and singer, and reached a new audience in 2000 with her Album, “Music”, capturing the late 30’s and 40’s genre, and now, is capturing even a new and younger audience with “Hard Candy.”
Reviewers should at least give Madonna the credit for having the power to reach audiences...and as of late, NEW and YOUNG audiences.
Why must Madonna, after 25 years, still have to answer to people who want to see her music sink after DAY 1? What else does Madonna have to prove to you???
I and others are VERY INTERESTED in knowing what you think Madonna should be doing now, at this time, besides making new records, to satisfy skeptics that she is an ICON of the 20-21 Century.
Stephan in Little Rock, Arkansas

Comment by Stephan from Little Rock, USA — April 8, 2008 @ 3:05 am

Hi Terry

Ok! Well firstly some of the lyrics were a little wrong (Hell not Heaven) But moving on

In response to your request for someone to step forward and say that the song is brilliant for an assortment of reasons and has deep, hidden meaning. Here it is.

Before I dissect the lyrics (which is were the brilliance lives) … Lets get real … Yes!! the song is all sexual and R&B;and clubified and that’s because it’s ….Madonna …She’s got a sexual heritage/is a sexual person ( and has never denied it) ..

From a marketing perspective it’s a memory call to her kiss with Timber’s ex Britney not to mention raises all kinds of superficial internet worthy blogging about whether a 50 year old has any right making advances on a twenty-something year old

But Ok!! why is the song/lyrics brilliant … here goes
Madonna:
Come on boy I’ve been waiting for somebody to pick up my stroll
.........
Come on ( music industry/people) I’ve been waiting for somebody to pick up ( on the direction we should be going/things we should be doing)
...........

Justin: ( As symbol of celebrity/society/ )

Well don’t waste time, give me a sign, tell me how you wanna roll
...........
( Well don’t waste time, ( make it more explicit) tell me how you (want to do this/tackle this problem/project)
.............
Madonna:

I want somebody to speed it up for me then take it down slow - There’s enough room for both
.............

I want somebody to ( kick my ass/motivate me/give me a sense of urgency) then
(also make me stop and consider the issues/check my ego ( why I’m doing it) – It’s important to do both
.............
Madonna:
Sometimes I think what I need is a you intervention – Yeah!!

...............

Sometimes I think what I ( we all) need is for you ( each other) (to intervene ..to motivate me ( each other) ... get me ( each other) to consider the real issues/ do my(our) thing)
........... 

Justin:

And I know I can tell that you like it and that it’s good - By the way that you move
..............

I ( the fans) can tell that you ( Madonna) like it ( can see we’re starting to get the message/ see the big picture etc) and that it’s ( good/approved) by the ( the things you’re doing)

.............

Madonna:

The road to hell is paved with good intentions Yeah
..............
We are heading in the wrong direction even though we think we’re not

................

Justin:

But if I die tonight at least I can say I did what I wanted to do
Tell me how ‘bout you?
.................

But look, why should I ( we) care… even if that’s the case ( and I ( society) are going in the wrong direction) If I die tonight at least I can say I did what I wanted to do? Tell me how about you?

(This line is pure brilliance in that it questions who is really doing what they want to do ... Society??? I DOUBT IT ( read Affluenza, or any other book on the state of Western Psycho/social freedom) ...pitched against Madonna (Tell me how about you?) .. who’s done everything she wanted to do ( inside the trappings of materialism of society) and is NOW really doing ... what she wants to do ( in the message/global task she has set herself)

Anyways that’s why I think it’s brilliant

Jan Wiell
http://www.myspace.com/jan_wiell

Comment by Jan Wiell from Leeds - Uk — April 8, 2008 @ 6:20 am

Wow, it’s astounding how little people consider the very precepts of this site before they go pooing their dribble all over comments pages.

Terry is not denying that Madonna is a cultural icon, in fact, if that is so, all the more reason to study her iconic status and its constitution for what it might tell us about our own cultural situation.

I for one think Terry did this very well, even if it was a bit polemic.

Please consign further comments like this to perezhilton.

Comment by Lawson from Australia — April 8, 2008 @ 6:30 am

Hey Lawson, from Australia:
I agree with you!
Stephan in Little Rock, Arkansas USA

Comment by Stephan Harcrow from Little Rock, US — April 8, 2008 @ 6:54 am

— PopMatters sponsor —

I stand corrected on the lyrics.  It’s not an inversion of a cliche, but just a cliche.  Sometimes you can win by losing.

Comment by Terry Sawyer — April 8, 2008 @ 9:37 am

Lol!! so firstly - are we agreed that the song isn’t that superficial? that one can quite easily find worthwhile content in it ??

M will be delighted I’m sure ;)

Hmmm & If you don’t mind me asking - How exactly do you invert a cliché..??  I’m confused {{:(

not to mention that I’m not entirely sure where you get the ‘ sometimes you can win by losing?’ idea from

Sorry but it’s been a long day and I’m easily confused you know

Comment by Jan Wiell from Leeds - Uk — April 8, 2008 @ 10:17 am

so the only way this can be a good song is if it has some deep philosophical meaning? why can’t it just be a pure pop song for the fun of it?

this is the same stuff that comes out of everywhere whenever Madonna does something new - haters come out of the woodwork and challenge whether or not Madonna is significant or not, talented or not. BORING!

and the fact that you got the lyrics wrong to begin with, renders this entire article to the trash can.

Comment by carlo — April 8, 2008 @ 11:39 am

Hello Terry,

I am a big Madonna fan but I mostly agree with you regarding the lyrics’ merit. The first time I listened closely, I thought the great title was put to waste.

But as with most things Madonna, she seems to take in everything--religion, sexuality, and now even humanitarianism--and then refract it through her art. And by refracting what she has absorbed into her persona, she often creates more conflicts and contradictions rather than straightforward messages.

This song is reflective of that very quality. We are never really sure what the hell Justin and Madonna are singing about, with all the religous and metaphysical references, but it does make us think, does it not?

Madonna has always been like that. As per Camille Paglia: Madonna says that we are all masks. And so we can paint anything we want to paint on Madonna, her songs, videos, anything that has to do with her. That is her very point.

Just look at the interpretation that Jan Wiell has done on the song’s lyrics.

We can all find something to pick up from the song. We can find something in the crevices, cracks, in the not so coherent musical plate that Madonna has always offered.

Comment by Dino from Philippines — April 15, 2008 @ 4:44 am

— PopMatters sponsor —

This song is horrible. Madonna is a brilliant artist and this is pretty shite for a living legend. Justin Timberlake? She’s better than that, or maybe she’s not anymore. Sad, sad, sad.

Comment by Mav from Buffalo, NY — April 20, 2008 @ 11:25 am

Add a comment

Please enter your name and a valid email address. Your email address will not be displayed. It is required only to prevent comment spam.

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the sequence of letters and numbers you see in the image above. Do not include any spaces.

TODAY ON POPMATTERS
Columns | recent
Suffragette City: The Secret Life of Bees
Rabble Without a Cause: The Manitobian Candidate
Events | recent | archive
:. Nick Cave and the Bad Seeds — 28.September.08: Chicago, IL
Books | recent | archive
:. When Will There Be Good News? by Kate Atkinson
:. Electronic Tribes: The Virtual Worlds of Geeks, Gamers, Shamans, and Scammers by Tyrone L. Adams and Stephen A. Smith, Editors