Art by Eric Schiller

Sound Affects

The PopMatters Music Blog

Music 

23 May 2009

See Me, Feel Me, Touch Me…Sell Me

Pete Townshend is selling (his soul), but who's buying? Not I.

There is a reason the Beatles are considered the greatest band ever. It’s simple, really: they are the greatest band ever. After them, it’s a fair fight for second place, and fans of the Rolling Stones, the Who, Led Zeppelin, Black Sabbath and the Kinks can duke it out for eternity. (And that’s just the British bands.) It would not be terribly enjoyable, or edifying, to argue about which band warrants consideration as runners-up, but since the Stones tend to be the ones most often considered just under the Fab Four’s thumbs, how about the Who? Who knows what might have happened if Keith Moon had not kicked off for that great pub in the sky? (Based on what these other bands did, or did not do, after 1980, it’s safe to propose nothing terribly earth shattering was portended.)

But the output from their first decade goes toe-to-toe with any of these other bands’ best work. And if you want to go deep, what tri-fecta can possibly touch Tommy, Who’s Next and Quadrophenia? In terms of albums released in a row, that is a tough list to top. The Stones, of course, came close with Let It Bleed, Sticky Fingers and Exile on Main Street (and in terms of the immediate precursors, I would personally rank The Who Sell Out as every bit as good, if not slightly better, than the somewhat overrated Beggar’s Banquet). What else do you got? I wouldn’t fight to the death arguing that Rubber Soul, Revolver and Sgt. Pepper aren’t the most important (if least perfect) consecutive albums to drop in rock history. Of course there is also the entirety of Hendrix’s studio output (while he lived, that is; the good, the bad and the ugly that still spills out of the vaults is a mostly positive mixed blessing), Are You Experienced?, Axis: Bold As Love and Electric Ladyland. Fans of the underdogs will get plenty of mileage endorsing The Kinks’ Face to Face,  Something Else by the Kinks and The Village Green Preservation Society.

Inspiring? Pete Townshend, arguably, is the ultimate rock hero. He had the Lennon & McCartney songwriting skills, he was no Hendrix but he played the hell of those guitars he ultimately smashed into splinters (still more punk rock than some poser spitting into the crowd); he had Ray Davies’ lyrical chops and he represented the blue collar sensibility of the down-and-out working stiffs many years before the blokes from Birmingham called themselves Black Sabbath and took on the world one sacred cow at a time. And he was always a thinking man’s Keith Richards, content to swim in the scum but never letting it stall his creative engine. He makes those siblings from Oasis seem like the sissies they are: for all their squabbles did either of them ever beat the other into the hospital as Roger Daltrey did after Townshend whacked him with his guitar in the studio? And I love him for kicking Abby Hoffman offstage, literally, during Woodstock when he interrupted the Who’s set to rant at the crowd (nevermind the fact that his whining was well-warranted, since he was calling legitimate attention to John Sinclair’s ludicrous imprisonment, and nevermind that Hoffman later claimed the incident did not go down the way it was portrayed, begging the question of how and why the audio could have possibly been altered or misconstrued).

Influential? This, of course, was the band that made an album entitled The Who Sell Out. Aside from the fact that it was, in many ways, a blueprint for their subsequent masterpiece Tommy, it was an incredible album in its own right. Also important, it displayed the restless sensibility of the band’s principle songwriter, who always had his foot on the pulse and remained a step or two ahead of the crowd. A few years after he sang about hoping he died before he got old on “My Generation” and a few decades before he did get old, and began selling his songs to the highest bidder, he predicted all of it. Of course, he did so tongue very much in cheek, his sardonic wit and impish eye for human foibles firing on all cylinders. The band actually recorded mini commercials in between tunes (cool) that were actually fucking brilliant (cooler). In addition to the one that still scorches, “I Can See for Miles”, the album was brimming with inspired, offbeat slices of life. Consider ”Odorono“ or “Silas Stingy” or the not quite fully baked but enduring “Tattoo”. Or this personal favorite, which manages to hint at all the grandeur just over the horizon, “Someone’s Coming”:

Indeed, if there had been no Tommy, the bet here is that The Who Sell Out would be considered one of the seminal mid-to-late ’60s rock documents. As such, it is easily counted amongst the band’s better work and has been cited, covered and worshipped; it even inspired one of the truly eccentric yet satisfactory experiments of the new century. Petra Haden (daughter of jazz legend Charlie Haden) had the audacity to record an entirely a cappella reimagining of the album, naturally entitled Petra Haden Sings the Who Sell Out. To say this would not be everyone’s cup of chai is understating the obvious, but for those with a more adventurous sonic palette, its joys are bountiful.

The genius of Quadrophenia (an album that manages to get name-checked by all the big names and seems universally admired but still not quite revered as much as it richly deserves) is yet to be fully detailed, at least for my liking. Less flashy than the “rock opera” Tommy and less accessible than the FM-friendly Who’s Next, it is, nonetheless, significantly more impressive (and important) than both of those excellent albums. Everything The Who did, in the studio and onstage, up until 1969 set the stage for Tommy: it was the consummation of Townshend’s obsessions and experimentations; a decade-closing magnum opus that managed to simultaneously celebrate the death and rebirth of the Hippie Dream (see the movie to better understand this apparent dichotomy). Everything Townshend did, in his entire life, up until 1973 set the stage for Quadrophenia. It’s all in there: the pre-teen angst, the teenage agonies and the post-teen despondency. Politicians and parents are gleefully skewered, prigs and clock punchers are mercilessly unmasked, and those who consider themselves less fortunate than everyone else (this, at times, is all of us) are serenaded with equal measures of empathy and exasperation.

And the songs? It’s like being in a shooting gallery, where Townshend picks off hypocrisy after misdeed after miniature tragedy all with a winking self deprecation; this after all is a young misfit’s story, so the bathos and pathos is milked, and articulated, in ways that convey the earth-shattering urgency and comical banality that are part and parcel to the typical coming of age cri de coeur. And the band, certainly no slouch on its previous few efforts, is in top form throughout. Being a double album (quite possibly the best one, and that is opined knowing that Electric Ladyland, Physical Grafitti and London Calling are also on the dance card), it’s difficult to imagine a better song to open side three than the immortal 5:15. Unlike most double albums that tend to drag a bit toward the end, this one gets better as it goes along, and none of the songs feel forced. Some of the songs on Tommy seem shoehorned to fit the storyline but that’s never an issue with Quadrophenia; Townshend had a unified vision and the songs tell a cogent and affecting tale. As great as Who’s Next really is, you can have “Baba O’Riley”, “Bargain” and “Behind Blue Eyes”; give me “Cut My Hair”, “Sea and Sand” and “Bell Boy”. And then there is the song Pete Townshend was born to write (and no, it was not “My Generation”, although only he could have written that one, and all the other great ones), “The Punk and the Godfather”:

Led Zeppelin, to their eternal credit, did what the Who were unable to do when they lost their drummer in the late ’70s: they stopped making music. As such, their legacy is intact, and they can take credit for never making a sub-par album. The Who, on the other hand, plowed ahead (and who could blame them, then or now? Not me) and made some mediocre albums before they pulled the plug. Little did anyone know that the Who were about to sell out (literally and figuratively) in 1989, going on the road once again to celebrate their 25th anniversary (and who could blame them, then or now? Not me). As far as I’m concerned, if bands want to play and people want to pay to see them, rock on. It was, nevertheless, a bit pitiful to see the man who crowed about selling out and dying before he got old turning his “rock opera” into a family-friendly Broadway production in the ’90s. And then there were the commercials. I don’t exactly lose sleep over old rebels letting their back catalogs get pimped out by rapacious PR firms, but I believe Bill Hicks delineates what is at stake better than anyone else could (see him rant here). 

So Pete Townshend wants to allow his songs to be used in order to hawk Hummers or HPs or… high performance headlights? Whatever. No matter how old and opportunistic he becomes, nothing Townshend can do will dampen my enthusiasm for his earlier work; that is the stuff that matters: the rest is between his soul, the devil and the deep blue sea.

Still, it was disconcerting to see Townshend get his knickers in a bunch when Michael Moore asked to use “Won’t Get Fooled Again” for the conclusion of Fahrenheit 9/11. Don’t get me wrong, I often find the oleaginous Moore as nauseating as the next guy does, and I agree with his politics. I ultimately think he’s a cause for good, and many Americans would do well to recall that he was among the first, and loudest, public critics of the Iraq catastrophe long before the supine mainstream media took it upon themselves to connect the obvious dots. A man who makes movies like he does (ham-fisted and disgustingly self-satisfied) warrants a regular and healthy dose of ridicule, but he was targeted for telling the truth and for that alone he has eternal street cred. Plus, his movies contain gems of insight that usually emerge from the gratuitous commentary, too-cute-by-two-thirds editing and distracting presence of a man who should stay behind the camera at all costs.

Townshend made a big fuss about what a hack and a charlatan Moore was, which sounded like he was protesting a tad too much. However, whether he intended it, or whether he likes it, coming as it did in the summer of an election year, he gave the Republicans considerable fodder. That was unconscionable. For a man who was at one time progressive to license his songs to sell SUV’s is lame enough; to take a principled stand against a filmmaker who is trying to expose the lies and crimes that were, at that time, killing hundreds of American soldiers (not to mention the countless innocent Iraq lives) each month, is a large, ugly stain on Townshend’s legacy.

Which brings us back to the future. To see (and hear) “Won’t Get Fooled Again” being used in the latest Will Ferrell production, a remake of ’70s TV show Land of the Lost is…disappointing. Aside from the fact that the film looks predictably terrible, the idea that Townshend is happy to sell it is…revealing. Listen, I could care less if Townshend decided he was a hardcore conservative (though he may not appreciate the way Republicans in this country would have treated his little kiddie porn peccadillo); certainly it would sting a little bit to see him embrace the ultimate intellectual devolution. Again, it would not distract me in the slightest from worshipping the music he made when he still had a brain. But to allow a song that allegedly meant something to him at one time (”Won’t Get Fooled Again”, albeit a precious sort of political song, is still a timeless indictment of the system and our endless capacity for using our illusions) to shill mindless Hollywood dross? It’s more than a little disgusting.

And yet, in the final analysis, there is something quite appropriate about this turn of events. The movie is about dinosaurs and perhaps Townshend recognizes that he too is a dinosaur. He used to roam the earth and lesser creatures trembled at his presence. Now, his integrity is extinct, and he is himself a bit of a cartoon, alive mostly through memories and on TV, via the songs in the commercials that pimp product. And of course he will live forever inside the machines that play music, keeping his former soul safe and enshrined.

Sean Murphy

 
Bookmark and Share

Related Articles

The Who: The Who Sell Out (Deluxe Edition)

By Lana Cooper

28.Aug.09

Long before the Who could be heard on nearly every television and movie soundtrack, they lampooned their "sell out" status on this '67 classic, now remastered and re-released.

The Who at Kilburn: 1977

By Justin Cober-Lake

01.Dec.08

Though the cynic might wonder how many live versions of '69-'70 Who sets one needs, this film provides a fascinating look at the band at a particular moment in time.

 
 
Comments

You seem almost bitter. 

At least he puts the money he makes from the licensing to good use - the man sponsors some amazing charities - it is a huge part of his ‘latter day’ work. 

From what I can tell, WGFA is not used in the Land of the Lost film, just the trailer. 

Pete has written in the past about why he didn’t want Moore to use it in his film.  At the time, Pete thought the war might be the right thing.  He was, in my opinion, drinking some of the KoolAid that many of us were.  It’s easy to look back and second guess, but I though he was acting out of integrity in that moment, even if I did not agree with him.  As it turned out, I thought the Neil Young song worked really well at the end of that film.

You are projecting onto Townshend what you think WGFA again might mean to him.  What is actually true, I think, is that it means something to us, and we are the ones who are uncomfortable with it being used in a way we can’t control, or that somehow demeans the song. 

It’s even possible the Townshend has a sense of humor about what he decides to license, isn’t it?  “Happy Jack” to sell Hummers!  That turned out to be a great little film, actually.

I can’t say whether Townshend should or should not license music to stupid films.  Let me try to write a couple of intelligent hit songs and I’ll let you know what I do in that situation.  Or maybe you could try it.  Wait, if people are willing to give me bunch of money for a song that I wrote, and I can use that money to do something good in the world or pay for my kids education?  Never mind - I know what I would do. 

And even a Who song is not going to save that movie.

Comment by trrish — May 22, 2009 @ 9:33 am

This article is spot-on.

Comment by JL — May 22, 2009 @ 11:49 am

Seems the author is a bit irony challenged.  He criticises the writer of The Who Sell for selling out.

Comment by KE from USA — May 22, 2009 @ 12:56 pm

Michael Moore was targeted for telling the truth? Are you kidding? Michael Moore is not acquainted with the truth. The deceits in his movies are legion. Pete Townshend was right to deny Moore the use of his song. As for the Iraq war, the aftermath was horribly bungled, but deposing that mass murdering thug and tyrant could never be a bad thing. It disgusts me when the ideologies of the left allow the likes of Saddam Hussein to rape an entire nation. I saw the Iraqis voting. I saw them proudly waving their purple-stained fingers, exercising a right we in the West too often take for granted. You saw those things, too. So did Michael Moore. But I suppose you don’t care. You have excellent taste in music. You’re right that Pete Townshend is the ultimate rock star. But your politics are crap. And Led Zeppelin’s In Through the Out Door and Coda are both lousy albums. I’ll take Face Dances and It’s Hard over that crap anytime.

Comment by Tim Eimiller — May 22, 2009 @ 1:24 pm

the beatles can’t touch the who. musically ringo can’t touch moon, mccartney can’t touch entwistle and harrison or lennon can’t play like Townshend. Live was no comparison. you do what the who are doing when you’re 65 and I’ll give you credit, too bad zeppelin quit on life, the who of the 90’s isn’t the who of the 70’s but I’m not the kid I was either when i was in the 70’s or 80’s, but i didn’t give up, neither did the who. Pete Townshend is the greatest musician ever. period. no one has been more influential to his generation and the next 2 that followed.

Comment by pete mangione from baltimore — May 22, 2009 @ 8:00 pm

If your in the music business like Pete, well get look up the defenition of the word business!

What would Henry Fords response have been if someone told him not to sell a car to an ugly guy because some idiot wouldn’t like it?

Evey movie I watch has a sound track, why aren’t the writers of those songs criticised?

It seems that Pete is an easy target for no brain journalists who take movie sound tracks far too seriously for their own inteligence.

And yet another predictable cheap shot at Pete. (YAWN)

Comment by C.K> — May 23, 2009 @ 2:05 am

Pete is rock’s great two faced speaker. Always changing his viewpoints on a whim.
He treats The Who more like an art project than a real band.
Fell from my favorites when I graduated high school decades ago.

Comment by Zimi Ahzrix from Great Lakes — May 23, 2009 @ 5:39 am

Great article, and I agree with most of it, except thhe three album thing—Bringing It All Back Home, Highway 61 Revisited and Blonde and Blonde top anything released by anyone, ever, but its a close battle for second place, I would say. Nice work otherwise.

Comment by jim abbott from Jackson, GA — May 23, 2009 @ 9:16 am

— PopMatters sponsor —

The Who are the greatest rock band ever because they were incredible both live and in the studio. You can’t be the greatest ever when you shun the concert stage as the Beatles did. The Who are the most tremendous live rock band ever - from Monterey Pop to Woodstock to the Met to the Isle of Wight Festival, all the way to Live Aid, the Concert for New York City, Live 8, Glastonbury and more. Their greatness as a performing rock band spans five decades. The Who also excelled in the studio, cranking out a slew of hit singles in addition to fantastic albums of enormous depth and vision. From feedback to instrument destruction, the windmill strum to the Marshall Stack, rock opera to power pop and punk rock, The Who are the greatest rock band ever. In the words of Eddie Vedder, “The one thing that disgusts me about The Who is the way they smashed through every door in the uncharted hallway of rock ‘n’ roll without leaving much more than some debris for the rest of us to lay claim to.” Bono of U2 put it another way, “More than any other band, The Who are our role models. I love them and I hate them for that.” Way back in 1965 Paul McCartney said, “The Who are the most exciting thing around.” Forty-four years later he’s still right.

Comment by Tim Eimiller from Brooklyn — May 23, 2009 @ 1:18 pm

I guess I’m the underdog guy.  Long live the Kinks.

Comment by Louis from Prince George, VA — May 24, 2009 @ 1:24 am

Pete a two faced speaker?

I think it’s more poetic licence… I think it’s to gain a rection. All his lyrics can be interpreted in different ways such as “I hope I die before I get old” Daltery often interpreted the lyrics in a differnt manner to which they were wrote. You take what you want out of any song or statement.

He has also quoted “The Who is a BRAND” (not an art project). a brand that got many of us through high school!!

On the best band in the world? I’m a die hard Who fan but I don’t belive there is such a thing as the best band in the world, we all have differnt taste.

Comment by C.K. from u.k. — May 24, 2009 @ 4:35 am

Sell Out means The Who had four great albums in a row. It is, in terms of production and execution, better than Tommy.

But it is not the equal of Beggar’s Banquet.

More to the thesis: Are you really digging up this dead topic? Really?

Comment by jds — May 24, 2009 @ 11:13 am

I love the Who, I play them a lot on paltalk.
Still enjoy after all this time.
My favorite is See me feel me.
Awesome group.
Keep it up there are people in their sixties still cool!!!
Thanks, Ellen

Comment by Ellen Henderson from Catawba, Virginia 24070 — June 5, 2009 @ 12:29 am

Add a comment

Please enter your name and a valid email address. Your email address will not be displayed. It is required only to prevent comment spam.

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?