Boys on the Bus #3
As the civil war rages on in Iraq, Congress and the Executive Branch seem unable to come to a consensus on the issue. The President has threatened to veto the recent supplemental spending bill, initiating a near stalemate in Washington. Meanwhile the ’08 presidential hopefuls are attempting to mold their own viable strategy for ending the conflict. Unfortunately, their rhetoric does not seem likely the shed any new light on this dire situation.
Last week MoveOn.org hosted a Virtual Town Hall to address this topic. The event was supposed to offer a sobering assessment of the current policy; initiate a conversation that has been missing from our public debate for way too long. Instead, for the most part, we were fed the same empty promises about “bringing the troops home” while no real solutions were offered concerning the endless sectarian violence which will continue after they are gone.
Of the seven candidates who participated, Delaware Senator Joe Biden was the only one to offer anything close to a workable solution. Biden has offered a political plan which attempts to address the unrest which will inevitably arise when our troops withdraw from the country. Biden wants to create a limited central government with regional control given to the Shiite, Sunnis and Kurds. Oil revenues would be divided between the separate regions, so that the Sunnis would get a proportional share. Also, he wants to engage neighbors and world community to help with reconstruction and security.
The rest of the candidates offered some repetitive mantras about withdrawal dates and engaging Iraq’s neighbors; but not a single one addressed how to quell the sectarian violence and attempt to bring the country together. The irony is that Biden’s candidacy has pretty much been written off ever since its infancy. (He spent the first day of his campaign defending a verbal faux pas about Barack Obama.) It is unfortunate that we are not paying more attention to the Senator from Delaware. His foreign policy experience and straight talk on Iraq is sorely needed is this heavily partisan debate.



Comments
Completely agree. I hope with some further exposure, that Biden will gain some momentum. I think he comes across generally well in talks, speech’s etc… and has some great knowledge and spot on thoughts about our foreign affairs challenges.
Comment by Mckinnon from Scottsdale — April 19, 2007 @ 11:39 am
I agree. It is very disheartening to see the media totaling ignoring all but a couple of candidates on both sides. I have been a follower of Senator Biden since his first run for the senate. He is very straight forward and an expert in foreign affairs. He would be a very good president.
Comment by Brum from Delaware — April 20, 2007 @ 10:49 am
I also agree. The other candidates at the MoveOn event seemed to have much less to offer than Senator Biden.
What we really need now is substance of ideas, experience, and leadership. Better than anyone, Joe Biden seems to understand history and has presented a realistic proposal for resolving the conflict in Iraq. He is also working hard to introduce legislation that would address a range of other international and domestic issues that face our country.
I’d very much like to see him as our next President. Thanks for writing this piece.
Comment by Liz — April 20, 2007 @ 11:18 am
I have been a supporter of Senator Biden ever since I read his “Unite Our States” blog. Our country will be poorly served if he is not elected. He has forgotten more about foreign and domestic affairs than the others know!
Comment by Beverly Hamilton from Florida — April 20, 2007 @ 6:17 pm
Dennis Kucinich was the only other candidate with a workable plan. Kucinichs plan includes withdrawl while replacing US troops with the UN and closing our military bases.
Comment by mikeT from Brooklyn — April 23, 2007 @ 9:43 pm