Knowing Nolan

With only a half dozen films in his little over a decade old canon, Christopher Nolan stands at the crossroads of artform greatness. Not just being the best of his kind, but as an auteur worthy of names like Kubrick, Hitchcock, and Lumet. He’s no “next Spielberg” Shyamalan or foot draggingly difficult David O. Russell. Instead, he’s the bellwether for a new kind of filmmaker, one that successfully merges Hollywood classicism with the best of the post-modern revision. Looking at the six films he’s made since emerging in 1996, one can witness the development and growth of an innovative icon, someone schooled in the old ways of working while finding novel means of making his far reaching, philosophical points. With The Dark Knight about to signal his ascension into undeniable importance, let’s look back over his oeuvre to see just where it all started - and how he earned his new illustrious rank.

Following (1996)
Offering an initial glimpse into what would soon be a full blown motion picture aesthetic, Nolan’s no-budget debut is a celebratory shape of good things to come. Few have seen this minor monochrome masterwork, a combination of the best that noir and the post-modern approach to film has to offer. Intercutting between a writer’s unusual obsession (he follows people inconspicuously as they go about their daily life) and a pseudo crime caper involving a burglar and a babe, Nolan acknowledges his limits while simultaneously using every deception he knows in the language of film. Filming with amateurs over a year of weekends, the resulting 69 minutes stand as a blueprint for what would soon be a career to be reckoned with.

Memento (2000)
With its eccentric cast - Carrie-Anne Moss, Joe Pantoliano, Guy Pearce - and equally unusual premise and presentation, Christopher Nolan declared his artistic worth with this wildly successful indie effort. Built out of his brother Jonathan’s short story Memento Mori, and applying a backwards story structure that bested Pulp Fiction for narrative ingenuity, the filmmaking novice vaulted past many other outside amateurs to step front and center into the critical limelight. While some argued that the movie was more gimmick than engaging, others find the mystery in reverse tactic more satisfying than the standard whodunit. Even today, eight years later, many marvel at its unique structure and cinematic daring.
Even more telling, Memento suggests the specific elements that would come to make Nolan a true directorial talent. The painstaking attention to details, the unbridled character depth, the desire that everything onscreen, from the smallest moment to the biggest big picture pronouncements, make sense are literally encased in his creation. Many miss the fact that Nolan is a brilliant writer as well. He has had a hand in every screenplay he’s ever filmed, and you can see the connection and consistency up onscreen. A movie like Memento could easily go perplexing and pear-shaped, especially in the hands of one of Hollywood’s journeymen. This is one time where high concept met even larger ability - and the result was magical.

Insomnia (2002)
It’s never easy adapting a popular foreign film for Western tastes, especially when said movie is this laconic, spellbinding thriller from Sweden. The original starred
Stellan Skarsgård as a sleep-deprived detective on the case of a murdered girl. It exposed director Erik Skjoldbjærg to audiences worldwide, and was so well considered that the Criterion Collection gave the film one of its well-deserved Special Edition DVD treatments. So Nolan definitely had an uphill battle, especially with this being his first studio feature. Saddled with a cast that included a peak Al Pacino, a rising Hilary Swank, and a misplaced Robin Williams, the filmmaker fashioned a kind of sunlit noir, a world where the darkest elements exist within the never-ending Alaskan days.
It’s not just that the former stand-up turned middling actor is horribly wrong for the role of a sleazoid killer. Nor is it the oddball juxtaposition of European angst coming out of the mouth of high profile Hollywood faces. No, the true issue with Insomnia is one of “why bother”. Sure, Nolan seamlessly weaves the worlds of memory and immediacy, effortlessly swinging between flashback and fact, and he makes the most of his frozen tundra location. But Skjoldbjærg’s version was just as good, and Skarsgård gave a heartbreaking performance. So a remake was merely a matter of foreign film snobbery. No matter the genius of the man behind the lens, this version of Insomnia still seems unnecessary.

Batman Begins (2005)
It was a monumental task that any director would find daunting. Warner Brothers, desperate to revamp the Caped Crusader after Joel Schumacher and his day-glo frightmares more or less killed him off, was looking for some fresh new talent to take over the franchise. While names like Tarantino and Aronofsky were tossed about, Nolan got the nod. From the very beginning, he put his stamp on the project. He hired Christian Bale to play a decidedly tormented Bruce Wayne. He focused on less famous villains like Scarecrow and Ra’s al Ghul. He wiped away the cartoon sheen suggested by the material and set all the action within a dire, depressively realistic Gotham City. This new approach clicked. Audiences adored Nolan’s aggressive update, and critics applauded his originality and artistry.
This is definitely not Tim Burton’s Batman. Gone are the Goth tinged tricks and A-list anarchy. In their place are real performances from actors doing everything to make this material feel fully realized and totally authentic. Bale is especially good, though his breathy ‘Bat whisper’ gets the occasional fanboy in a lather. Yet Nolan wisely surrounded him with a supporting cast including old world wonders like Michael Caine (great as Alfred), new school sages like Liam Neeson, and up and comers like Cillian Murphy (hauntingly creepy as Scarecrow/ Dr. Crane). With a clockwork narrative allowing all plot points to neatly fall into place, Batman Begins represented a new era for the comic book movie - one that Nolan would again redefine five years later.

The Prestige (2006)
In the year that passed after Begins broke through both critically and commercially, everyone wondered what Nolan would do next. While many wanted to see another installment of Gotham in chaos, they would have to wait for a future opening day. Instead, the director and his gifted screenwriter brother created a remarkable adaptation of the Christopher Priest novel. Oddly enough, of the two films centering on old world magicians to arrive that year (along with The Illusionist), Nolan’s was the lesser mainstream hit. But what it lacked in financial windfalls it made up for in motion picture artistry. In a year that celebrated Martin Scorsese’s Departed with an Oscar, and saw stellar work arrive from Darren Aronofsky in the form of The Fountain, The Prestige was the year’s best film.
At its core, The Prestige plays with notions of fascination, dedication and deception. It starts out as a professional battle of wills between two talented men, and ends up a sad comment on how low mere men will go to best each other. Bale is back, becoming a seasoned member of the Nolan creative company with his turn here, and Hugh Jackman delivers yet another insanely good performance as the showman who’s more flash than onstage substance. While both parts offer their fair share of nuance, the Aussie bests his British rival, reveling in a snarky kind of smarm that makes your skin crawl as your heart breaks. A few years from now, when Nolan has settled into his multiple award winning career, The Prestige will be seen as his strong creative breakthrough. It stands as one of cinema’s strongest statements.

The Dark Knight (2008)
With his last film underperforming and the studio anxious for more Batmania, Nolan began the process of revisiting Gotham by looking for his next supervillian. At the end of Begins, Gary Oldman’s Sgt. Gordon (soon to be Commissioner) shows the Caped Crusader a piece of evidence - a playing/calling card for someone known as the Joker. With this dynamic already set up, the director started casting. Several people suggested Michael Keaton as the character, a nice bit of symmetry to the previous run of films. Others suggested Crispin Glover, Mark Hammill (who voiced the character in the cartoon update), and even an aging Jack Nicholson. Nolan went with Heath Ledger, the Australian actor best known for his work in Monster’s Ball, Brokeback Mountain, and I’m Not There. It turned out to be an inspired choice…and a tragic one. After filming was completed, Ledger would die of an accidental drug overdose.
A combination of menace and melancholy looms over The Dark Knight, painting its masterful crime epic sweep in uncomfortable shades of interpersonal doom. Nolan’s latest is indeed a masterpiece, albeit one that avoids all the pitfalls that come with being yet another Summer box office draw. Blockbusters don’t get much darker and demanding than this, a 150 minute descent into the fractured psyche of four unflappable men. Along with Bale and Ledger, Oldman returns for more Gordon drama, and just when you thought we’d found a hero to save Gotham, Aaron Eckhart’s Harvey Dent goes from conqueror to conquered in a literal blaze of g(l)ory. His Two-Face is just one of many amazing features in this Oscar worthy effort, a true indication that Christopher Nolan is the best director working in films today.



Comments
You are wildly overpraising The Prestige and really missing the brilliance of Insomnia 9where Robin Williams is quite good).
The Prestige is an enjoyable one time movie but it’s joking around stuff and too clever for its own good. There’s no bite to it.
Insomnia on the other hand is different enough from the original to justify its existence. It takes the framework of the original and applies it within a story that twists in ways that are uniquely its own. The examination of the corruptive nature of police work and its consequences are able to be explored far deeper in the Nolan version (the original has other virtues).
It is an infinitely better film than The Prestige although I will say I’ve enjoyed all of Nolan’s films to date and consider Memento to be a masterpiece.
Comment by stan from Pittsburgh — July 16, 2008 @ 6:50 am
Batman Begins came out in 2005. Not 2003.
Comment by Brad — July 16, 2008 @ 8:13 am
I would disagree with the previous comment about the “brilliance” of Insomnia. Had it maybe stuck more to the plot structure of the original, perhaps it would have been a stronger film, but as it stands I’d say it’s merely average. Pacino is his usual scene-chewing self, and I agree with the writer that Williams seems very misplaced - he just looks uncomfortable in the role. Maybe he was trying to play it that way as part of the character, but if that was the case he also should have looked to the original for inspiration.
Comment by Ben from Reno — July 16, 2008 @ 9:33 am
Nolan is my favorite director of all time and has been for quite some time. His trajectory to fame has been remarkable simple (as laid out here). Every film is a first for him:
The First Film
The Major Indie Film
The Remake
The Blockbuster (what a strong and daring leap this was)
The Book
The Sequel
The man’s working with a unique touchstone of cinema out the gate every time. Nolan is a god damn genius and I’m so happy he’s finally going to get all the money he deserves with The dark Knight, giving him cart blanche to do whatveer he wants. This can only mean greater things in the future. God bless him. Thanks for the article.
Comment by Joe H from Michigan — July 16, 2008 @ 9:59 am
You’re pretty clearly wrong on a lot of facts you stated. And you can’t consider Cillian Murphy an up and comer, considering he’s been acting for a very long time.
Comment by Megan from Ireland — July 16, 2008 @ 12:35 pm
Ben - Respectfully, if it had stuck more to the plot structure of the original then it would merely have failed in comparison. It’s the changes they made that make it special - There was no way to improve on the original. What is so brilliant about Nolan’s “Insomnia” is it uses the first film as the basis for something else - an examination of the corrosive nature of guilt, which is clearly missing in the original.
Pacino’s performance is hardly chewing the scenery - he’s quite low key. Again, if he had merely mimicked Skarsgaard’s performance he’d have failed. The genius of his acting in “Insomnia” is he suggests his iconic police roles of the past (Heat, Serpico) but through the refracted nature of the role - the bravado of Heat is now out of fear; the integrity of Serpico now merely a memory.
Great film, great performance.
Comment by stan from pittsburgh — July 16, 2008 @ 1:23 pm
Prestige was a good film, but 2006 a year that saw the release of The Departed, Pan’s Labyrinth, The Lives of Others (although arguably a 2007 release in America), The Queen and Children of Men, it was not the best of 2006.
Comment by Jacob from Ohio — July 16, 2008 @ 2:13 pm
I Love Jesus
for everyone
I’m going to heaven.
No, I don’t deserve it.
And there is nothing I can ever do to buy it.
No amount of money I can donate,
no deed righteous enough to save myself alone.
I’m not worthy enough, on my own, to claim eternal life…
But I don’t have to do anything—
no incense to offer, no prayer schedules, not even going to church every sattarday—
Because it has already been done for me.
That’s how much Jesus loves me.
He loves me more than my mom does.
More than any girlfriend I could ever have.
More than someone…
And I love him too…
Not as perfectly.
But I do…
I REALLY DO…
<a href=“http://pinayspeak.com”>Busby Seo Challenge</a>
Comment by Busby Seo Challenge from alaminos — August 26, 2008 @ 3:27 pm
PopMatters sponsor