The Other: Don (2006)

Don (2006)
Dir: Farhan Akhtar
Poised to open on the biggest holiday weekend of the Indian calendar, (October 20th-21st, the Hindu festival of lights, Diwali) which fortuitously coincides with the Islamic celebration, Eid-al-Fitr, Farhan Akhtar’s Don is perhaps the most highly anticipated Bollywood movie of the year. That means that over a billion people, from Mumbai to Lagos, from Singapore to London - even all the way to Jackson Heights, NY, await its arrival in thrall. The film marks the return of star Shah Rukh Khan, to the screen. It’s been three years since his last picture. To his legion of fans, three years is like an eternity. Shahrukh is a celebrity demi-god: Tom Cruise before he succumbed to “creative suicide,” Leonardo DiCaprio circa Titanic. Mass hysteria hounds him wherever he goes.
Don is a remake of the 1978 gangster movie of the same name, which was then Bollywood’s answer to Shaft. Chandra Barot’s original movie exudes Bombay blaxploitation—mod costumes, violent brawls, harshly erotic love scenes, and an atmosphere that oozes 70s funk. The plot centers around a rakish, good-natured street-performer named Vijay who is the spitting image of a sadistic, Goan mafia kingpin named “Don.” The Indian police quickly put unsuspecting Vijay to work as Don’s decoy, allowing them to penetrate the leader’s seamy underworld. But the mafia is on to the police plot, and they kill the only inspector who knows Vijay’s identity, leaving Vijay fighting for his life to outfox the mob and the police on his own.
Akhtar’s Don does away with some of silliness of the 70s film in favor of plausibility. Here, Vijay is a struggling single parent, trying to make ends meet as he reluctantly agrees to the dangerous assignment. Updated to the 21st century global sensibility, the movie takes us to Malaysia, where international crime bosses evade the grasp of the Indian police to control the Mumbai underworld from afar.
Journalist, Sukhetu Metha, writes that the term “underworld” is really a fallacy in India, and in Asia in general. Crime there exists in an overworld. Dons are pictured in society pages. They manage international narcotics rings and inaugurate hospitals. Lawlessness permeates every aspect of urban life in the business and media, from the small family mom-and-pops to the multinational corporations. It only augments the sense of helplessness of the individual and widens the abyss between the wealthy and the rich.
Elements of John Woo’s Hong Kong films pervade the storyline—the stylish characters spiraling towards destruction in a city controlled by ruthless triads. Woo’s flamboyant American debut, Face/Off, is a strong influence: two men with the same face, the cop posing as a gangster, the gangster posing as cop, two versions of the same anguished man.
The clothes and technology have changed, but the badass sensibility still remains. Don is an unequivocal star vehicle for Shah Rukh Khan precisely because Barot’s original film was also a star vehicle, for the young Amitabh Bachan, India’s biggest and most beloved movie star. Khan is stepping into big shoes here. Yet the show is his and his alone.
Even though Sharukh Khan is, at this moment, in the very epicenter of stardom, his position is precarious. He is Muslim in a predominantly Hindu country where the emotional and political divide between religions is as explosive as the one in Northern Ireland. Market analysts have surmised that Don will do well in secular, urban centers and in the Arab and East Asian market, but not in so well in Bihar, Gujarat, Uttar Pradesh, the heartland of India, the hotbed of Hindu fundamentalism.
In spite of the communal tensions surrounding its release, Don cleverly captures the essence of India: the glitter of the metropolis, the cultural mélange of Muslim and Hindu, the rustic honesty of the Indian worker, and the unyielding power of greed. The movie is set primarily in Kuala Lumpur. The Petronas Twin Towers, Malaysia’s national landmark, standing tall at over a 1, 400 feet, serves as the centerpiece to many of the film’s pivotal action scenes, bathed in green light against the night sky; Through gaze of Akthar’s lens, Kuala Lumpur positively glistens with mystery and menace.
Malaysia is a modern, inclusive Muslim state. Many of the extras are Muslims, the women in headscarves and the men in skullcaps. And yet the song sequences on the street are deeply rooted in Hindu culture and phraseology. Particularly “Khaike paan Banaras-wala” (“Chewing a paan from Banaras really opens up the mind!”), sung after Vijay is stoned on a traditional Indian marijuana-laced milkshake. It is full of the vigor and rustic charm that’s reminiscent of tribal India.
Khan’s song sequences are the high points of the movie, if only for the sake of the sheer amount of energy he pours into them. Like with all musicals, the bulk of characterization in Don plays out in the songs. And the composers, Shankar, Eshaan, and Loy, have created the perfect score to set the film’s mood. They move from Don’s cool menace to Vijay’s earthy playfulness and provide some entertaining respite from the barrage of action. “Main Hoon Don” (“I am Don”), the obligatory villain entrance number, is a P. Diddy style spectacle with Don clad in sunglasses and velvet Shanghai Tang jacket surrounded by glitzy shindig dancers and swirling cigarette smoke. Though lacking in substance, “Main Hoon Don” is dark and atmospheric, bringing us into the mobster’s tantalizing lair.

The same mood is evoked by the better written and staged, “Aaj Ki Raat” (“Night Falls…”), a retro-disco number with an eerie, seductive feel. The real showstopper, is the rousing religious hymn, “Maurya Re” (“O Lord, O Father”), sung by Vijay in devotion to the god Ganesha. The entire sequence is saturated in vibrant colors, full of graceful temple dancers, gleeful extras, and clouds of pink powder. There’s a recurring sprightly melody played out on the electric guitar that’s positively infectious.
But the boldness of Don is the ending, in which the plot unravels to reveal a surprisingly equivocal turn of events. It’s one of those haunting denouements, along the lines of the ending in Bryan Singer’s The Usual Suspects, that lingers in your mind long after the credits roll. Throughout the movie, Akhtar explores the question faced by Vijay: Are we good people pretending to be bad, or are we bad people pretending to be good? In a movie that seems to glamorize the mafia, Akthar fervently condemns them and the men who invariably get away with it all because they’re masters at exploiting our vulnerabilities, our need for justice.



Comments
Excuse me, why was this required
“Even though Sharukh Khan is, at this moment, in the very epicenter of stardom, his position is precarious. He is Muslim in a predominantly Hindu country where the emotional and political divide between religions is as explosive as the one in Northern Ireland.”
SRK in India (as he has himself said) is an INDIAN ICON. HE is recognized and loved as an Indian. If what you said had any relevance then he would not have been such a huge star in the first place.
Please do not create unnecessary controversies. In India (thankfully) the FILM INDUSTRY and CRICKET are the two areas where people are NOT recognized by their religion but because they are INDIANS.
Comment by Ujjwala from Bangalore, India — November 1, 2006 @ 4:44 am
Hi,
Thanks for the detailed review, but i have to dis agree about the religion of SRK affecting his films in Hindu areas. His films doesn’t do well in Bihar simply because they are too Urban for the taste of the people in those areas, Hrithik Roshan, and Abhichik Bachchan face the same problems with those kinds of films and they are Hindu.
also Don is not the return of SRK after 3 years, he had another release only 3 months ago.
but a great review ..thank you
Comment by salma from USA — November 1, 2006 @ 6:14 am
As oer my think this is very good film well try for remake of old don mr. Farhan and well acting of mr. sharuk
Comment by RAHISH AHMAD from Noida — November 1, 2006 @ 6:58 am
i thought main hoon don was one of the best videos of the film, along with khaike. it looked so sleek and sophisticated. plus shah rukh in black velvet is a treat.
Comment by may from singapore — November 1, 2006 @ 10:38 am
Wow! I’m amazed at all these comments. Thank you all for your responses.
My aim with this review was to bring elucidate the movie in terms of its cultural context. I agree wholeheartedly with the comments made about SRK’s status as a beloved Indian icon. My stance on SRK’s religion was simply a springboard into a brief background into some of the prevalent communal tensions that occasionally arise in India even to this day. His achievements should be applauded, and they are.
I also agree that cricket and films are truly secular arenas of Indian cultural life. I’ve discussed them in my reviews of “Lagaan” and Deepa Mehta’s Elements Trilogy also posted on this site.
Karan Johar’s “Kahbie Alvida Ne Kehna” did indeed come out a few months ago. But I consider that an ensemble piece rather than a solo. SRK shared the screen equally with Rani Mukherji, Preity Zinta, Abishek Bachan and Amitabh Bachan, four big names. “Don” is his first lone-star vehicle since Amol Palekar’s “Paheli” (a very underrated movie that I felt didn’t get the recognition it deserved).
I hope this follow-up response resolved any issues anyone might had with the piece.
Comment by Farisa from Atlanta — November 1, 2006 @ 10:33 pm
I am glad you got the heck you desereved over the religoius comment.Like who gives a damn about your religion in India if you don’t do anything wrong.
Of course in Pakistan it is another thing.
Lets us just talk about movies.
SASHI.
Comment by sashi from canada — November 2, 2006 @ 6:45 pm
What is with this unwarranted hostility? I apologized.
And what do you mean precisely about “Of course in Pakistan it is another thing” ?
Are you implying that Pakistani’s are more discriminatory than Indians? Were you intending deliberately to be malicious and petty with your comments rather than instructive? Are you yourself being prejudiced? Because that’s what you sound like.
Comment by Farisa from Atlanta — November 2, 2006 @ 9:49 pm
Of course it is VERY different story in Pakistan.
Does one hear of ANY prominent Hindus from Pakistan,thought I can tell you MANY prominent Muslims in India including one very outstanding President.
Muslims from Pakistan are first ones to scream discrimination and come to think of it as Feroz Khan the famous actor from Bollywood said Muslims in India have it much better in India than in Pakistan.
For that-what the the Pakistani govt do?
They banned the poor guy from Pakistan!
Now the discrimination there is quite manifest,is it not?
Regards.
Sashi.
Comment by sashi from Vancouver. — November 2, 2006 @ 10:46 pm
PopMatters sponsor
Thank you for your comment Sashi. I now have a better understanding of what you’re trying to say. Now that you mention it, I remember the news about Feroz Khan. In fact Javed Akhtar (the lyricist for the songs in “Don” and the screenwriter for the original ‘70s version) wanted to go on a tour to Pakistan to promote the colorized version of “Mughal-E-Azam,” but was denied a visa. He immediately went on NDTV to voice his concerns about how unfair it all was. I thought so too.
It’s interesting also that the NDTV people brought Salman Ahmad, the lead vocalist to the famous Pakistani rock group, Junoon, on the same show, and he said that the cultural misunderstanding was mutual. He and Junoon are seldom, if ever, able to give a concert in India because they are denied visas to enter the country. He said it’s frustrating on both sides.
Feroz Khan’s comment is interesting. The Gandhian ideal of secularism that makes up the cornerstone of the collective Indian identity is not always 100% at work in India on day to day basis. India is still, however, very egalitarian and harmonious compared to many other countries with different religions and minorities.
Journalist Yoginder Sikand has written a compelling essay about this subject, “Being Muslim in India Today” at
http://www.milligazette.com/dailyupdate/2006/20060908_Muslim_india_reality_reflections.htm
Thank you all again for sharing your thoughts and opinions.
Farisa
Comment by Farisa from Atlanta — November 2, 2006 @ 11:34 pm
Don rocks!!!!!!!!!
Comment by Vandana from Mauritius — November 4, 2006 @ 9:33 pm
so much anticipation, as if shah rukh’s future depends on this remake !
since the movie is released now, there are mixed reactions. those who have seen the original, say amitabh is only the real don, those who haven’t, are still not very kind to srk !
i feel, srk is good, and any limitations, if felt, are not his acting, or delivery, but loop holes in the script, editing, or direction !
i didn’t quite accept kareena, as kamini, especially that famous seductive no. could have been done much better, by any item girl !
for that matter, kareena is no match to Helen, who haunted and raised the pulse rate of even women, with those gren contact lenses, that shimmering dress, and her oozing seduction !
and also about priyanka, and zeenat !
Zeenat was too good, as a clandestine revenge-inspired, martial arts expert, and danced merrily, with amitabh, in khaike paan !
Priyanka and Sha rukh have given a very beautifully filmed, and enacted dance number,during the celebration dance, she in her pink evening gown !
isha is good, but the coverage is limited .
all in all, the question remains, whether it was worth making this extravagent remake in the first place ?
It just remains an eye candy, no stunning experience or any thing, except for those dizzy heights !
Comment by shobhana from India — November 6, 2006 @ 4:25 am
The great thing in the Movie DON IS Shahrukh Khan,
the don of bollywood box office and also FARHAN AKTHAR’s style of presenting the DON, its GREAT
Comment by Mohammed Jahangir from East Africa, Uganda — November 6, 2006 @ 11:57 pm
There is no comparison between India and Pakistan regarding relegious discrimination. Although no one can claim about “no descrimination”. In Pakistan there is descrimination, but not so much that had been told. Pakistan never claimed of a secular state because the ratio of a signle relegion is very high opposed to that in india where no single relegion is big enough. So they have to claim secularism, that infact not the case.
In Pakistan no temple has been destroyed so far like that in india “BABRI MOSQUE”, in Pakistan no anti-hindu clashes occured like these “anti-muslim” clashes normlly occur in india. More that 2000 muslims were burnt alive, for a single reason that they were muslims.
Pakistan’s Star leg spinner “DANISH KENARIA” is a Hindu. My objective is not to open a religious discussion, but to point out that one must see his side first before putting blames on others.
Comment by FIRZANA from Istambul, Turkey — November 21, 2006 @ 12:50 am
Thanks for updating me about the Hindu player in the Pakistani team,not that that one Hindu will make a difference as far as Hindus and Muslims in Pakistan and India will make a difference.I am glad I wasn’t born in a country like Pakistan that openly supports terrorism.
Let alone the situation in the country,it’s these same people in Canada and the UK that are involved in these nefaroius activities so let us not talk about Hindus and Muslims and what they define.
Sashi.
Comment by sashi from Vancouver. — November 21, 2006 @ 9:12 am
By the way how do we define terrorism. if terrorism is just to kill inocent people then
WHAT IS INDIA IS DOING IN KASHMIR?
WHAT THE INDIAN AGENCY RAW IS DOING IN THE REGION?
That’s what can be called as terrorism supported on state level (the indian state). See a your state is involved in killing innocent people.
OR If you term the reactions to above state terrorism by the victims as “terrrorism” then of course you are right we support terrorism and we love it….
The same philosiphy applies to US, UK e.t.c What they doing in Iraq, Afghanistan. Have you ever dare to call it as terrorism? “I hope never”
Comment by FIRZANA from Istambul, Turkey — November 21, 2006 @ 9:59 pm
Please give your head a shake.
This Indian “agency” RAW you speak about existed only in the imagination of filmaker Kunal Kohli for the film FANAH.
No,I am not an apologist for the Indian govt so I don’t really know what they are doing in Kashmir.
I suspect they are there to contain the terrorist element there much like what the Americans are doing in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Can you imagine if Bush wasn’t doing what he’s doing in Iraq?
No,I donot hold any brief for anyone killing innocents so by that argument,I donot support the insurgents in Iraq.There should decimated.
There would be explosions all over North America and Europe everytime you turned around.
No,I don’t condone killing innocents but perhaps that is the cost of doing the right thing.
One only has to have a look at the history of these Islamic groups like Black Sptember and Abu Nidal to se how many innocents they have killed.Islamic depradations(now this is different than Islam(the religion thereof))have been the curse of modern civilization as I know it.
It takes just a few men to be quiet for evil to flourish.
Farzana,go and educate yourself about the affairs of the world before you shoot yourself in the foot again!
Sashi.
Comment by sashi from Vancouver,Canada — November 22, 2006 @ 9:13 am
PopMatters sponsor
What I can perceive from your long lasting speech “you are just living in the fantasy world of movies”.
Please come out of that. Movies and stories are merely of entertainment.
You said you don’t know what’s going on in Kashmir. But you put a lot of your information about the history of Islamic groups. It means you have target studies against Islam and Pakistan.
That’s very fine, nothing wrong with that ... But again I will emphasis on my point that t “one must also see his/her own side before blaming others”. You have a serious lack of that thing. Isn’t that?
I can help you and will give you few topics to study. And, what I hope you will study these from some neutral sources.
1) RAW (Research and Analysis Wing)
http://www.fas.org/irp/world/india/raw/index.html
(Please don’t even try to deny the existence of RAW)
2) The history of Kashmir
3) “Oil” The motive behind the War on Terror
When you have studies these only then you can join such a discussion. For now you are too immature.
What you spoke out about Islam, is your own perception based on some biased knowledge. Don’t worry I am not going to speak out against Hinduism in return.
Take care of your emotions
Bye
Comment by FIRZANA from Istambul, Turkey — November 22, 2006 @ 11:45 pm
I am sorry for all those may have been hurt of such hostile comments.
Both of you are strongly suggested to abandon such hostilities. In a war between you
two, other people are hurting.
Sashi, please don’t attack religions. You know in India there are a number of religions, if all of us start behaving with hostality like this(blamming and attacking each other religions) then Bey Bey to India. India is a big country and we must do every effort to keep it unite…
Comment by Rajesh from Kolkata — November 23, 2006 @ 4:55 am
hi i m rahul from hyderabad and i m the biggest fan of hritik.i saw his all the movies and he is awesome actor.even i m also coming to join him after completing my b.com. i know 2 days to go for his birthday but i will be there in the year 2009.keep doing acting hritik.wish u good luck for more movies.catah u on jan 10th 2007.
Comment by rahul srivastava from hyderabad — January 8, 2007 @ 2:42 am
Farisa Khalid, either ur a Paki or u r a person who does not have any knowledge of India. Sharuk is respected and loved more than ur son or ur mother loves you. Secondly, India has more muslims than musims in any Islamic State. Think of ur own country.
Comment by Raja from Kolkata — July 10, 2007 @ 8:32 am
Religious bigotry is a sad thing. Whether it is a car bomb that goes off in a crowded marketplace, discrimination at schools, or rude comments in an online blog.
Comment by Farisa from Atlanta — September 3, 2007 @ 2:53 pm
The meeting of two personalities is like the contact of two chemical substances: if there is any reaction, both are transformed.
Comment by generic celexa from USA, Los Angeles — October 3, 2007 @ 7:55 am
An idealist is one who, on noticing that a rose smells better than a cabbage, concludes that it will also make better soup.
Comment by fluconazole from USA, Phoenix — October 4, 2007 @ 5:26 am
Insanity in individuals is something rare - but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule.
Comment by generic lexapro enrobe corrode from USA, Phoenix — October 4, 2007 @ 12:57 pm
PopMatters sponsor
Every moment of one’s existence one is growing into more or retreating into less.
Comment by order soma from USA, Portland — October 4, 2007 @ 4:01 pm
You can only cure retail but you can prevent wholesale.
Comment by sonata from USA, El Paso — October 4, 2007 @ 4:04 pm
The great thing in the Movie DON IS Shahrukh Khan,
the don of bollywood box office and also FARHAN AKTHAR’s style of presenting the DON, its GREAT.
Comment by Rakhi Gifts from Ahmedabad, India — July 9, 2008 @ 7:24 am
Really Good Remake of Don Film, Farhan Akhtar Don release on Diwali festival is a great business sense of Farhan Akhtar. Because Diwali is a major festival of India and all Indians celebrated this festival with great joy and happiness. So, simple think that this film got great business on Diwali festival. Happy Diwali to all
Comment by Diwali Gifts from India — September 13, 2008 @ 5:44 am