Une Femme Mariee

Director: Jean-Luc Godard

Cast: Macha Méril, Bernard Noël, Philippe Leroy

(1965)

By Emma Simmonds

Captured in beguilingly chic noir et blanc, Jean Luc Godard’s Une Femme Mariée (A Married Woman) is an erudite, somewhat autobiographical, handsome and twisted examination of female infidelity. Although it has been rather overlooked amidst Godard’s formidable body of work, it is one of his most alluring and personal cinematic endeavours and represents a critical juncture in his evolution as a film-maker.

Originally titled La Femme Mariée (The Married Woman), Godard bowed to the French censors, Commission de Contrôle, who were fearful of the film’s potential to be interpreted as an incendiary indictment of womankind. Made after his most commercial offerings Le Mépris (1963) and Bande à Part (1964), Une Femme Mariée marked a clear departure in style with a defiant, lovelorn Godard disenfranchised with the direction of contemporary Hollywood cinema (to whose mores he had never wholly subscribed); rejecting it as a source of both inspiration and provocation.

Untrammelled by pressures of financial returns or star egos, this feature found the Nouvelle Vague’s most prominent exponent alchemising with a meagre budget to create a fractured, more abstract delivery. Despite its playful aesthetics it is achingly tortured, philosophical and intimate. Alternately fascinated and repelled by the subject matter he presents, Godard both conjures and condemns the thrill of clandestine passions.

Godard hastened the film together to placate Luigi Chiarini, the director of the Venice Film Festival who had hoped that Bande à Part would premiere at the festival (instead it opened at Cannes). Produced directly following his irrevocable separation from his wife and muse, the actor Anna Karina—with whom he had shared several smouldering, turbulent years and, thus far, collaborated on four features – it takes as its focus a common preoccupation of Godard’s: the love triangle.

Karina, to Godard’s considerable anguish, had begun a relationship with Maurice Ronet. With his defunct marriage an open wound, Une Femme Mariée featured several uncomfortable parallels between reality and fiction. It was clear that, with this film (as with, for example Le Mépris, Une Femme est Une Femme), Godard had chosen to plunder his personal traumas and tribulations for material.

The trio of leads, for instance, were the same ages as their off-screen counterparts, and the married woman’s onscreen lover Robert, played by Bernard Noël was, like Ronet, an actor. Such parallels would cause anxiety for his cast; like Brigitte Bardot in Le Mépris before her, Macha Méril, as the female lead Charlotte, was uneasy about playing a character which was so flagrantly based on Karina.

The credits foretell the unusual method of execution, informing us that Une Femme Mariée comprises, “fragments d’un film tourné en 1964” Opening with an unseen woman’s hand feeling its way along a crisp white canvas (subsequently revealed as a bed-sheet); turning, flexing, wavering—her wedding ring visible. We hear her cryptic remark, “I don’t know”. A man’s hand slides in to firmly grasp her wrist, his voice responding, “You don’t know if you love me?” She answers, “Why do you talk all the time?” adding, “It’s so nice here”.

This sequence anticipates the more well-known Pierrot le Fou (1965) where Anna Karina’s exasperated Marianne—who favours experience over discussion—famously tells Ferdinand (Jean-Paul Belmondo), “You talk to me with words, and I look at you with feelings”: dialogue which has been taken as a succinct summary of the inherent incompatibility of the characters of Karina and Godard.

The series of images that immediately follow are partial views of Charlotte, the eponymous married woman, and Robert, her lover, which both brutally dissect their bodies and voyeuristically revel in the intimacy of these moments.

cover art

Richard Brody

Everything is Cinema: The Working Life of Jean-Luc Godard

(Henry Holt & Company; US: Jun 2009)

In his excellent book Everything is Cinema: The Working Life of Jean-Luc Godard, Richard Brody describes the effect as, “an anatomy of an affair, as seen through the lens of a coldly repressed jealousy. By isolating the parts of bodies from their characters, Godard suggests that the sexual acts are being performed mechanically and unthinkingly, rather than as the actions of complete, responsible people.”

With this distinctive opening sequence Godard was throwing the gauntlet down to his audience; challenging them from the off with his unabashed, intellectually provocative new approach.

Macha Méril as Charlotte is a serene mistress of duplicity – her implacable elfin exterior barely troubled by ripples of discernable guilt. Her inner turmoil is instead represented by the whispered free-associative phrases that Godard himself recorded for the soundtrack.

By incongruously inserting his own voice; confessing for this representation of his former partner, he undermines the character’s credibility and, as Brody comments “it was as if he were sharing with an intimate stranger the self-lacerating confidences of what he had heard, seen, or imagined from his life together with Anna Karina.”

Méril plays Charlotte as a smiling assassin, her subtle performance holds up impeccably under the intense, almost indecent scrutiny of this most accusatory of directorial gazes. On more than one occasion she gently knocks her fists against her cheeks and dips her head toward the ground ambiguously: are we witnessing nerves, or faux coyness?

Philippe Leroy convincingly portrays her intense, suspicious (albeit with demonstrable good reason), and violent husband Pierre: if he is the primary representation of Godard here, then Godard emphatically does himself no favours. And her lover Robert fares no better; after interrogation to establish his suitability as a partner and father, Charlotte finds him unsatisfactory and the film closes with the end of the affair. The dialogue was skilfully semi-improvised by the actors, and thus the film places realism in tandem with Godard’s sleek modernist visuals.

Godard does not reserve his disdain purely for marital relations. He satirises the vacuous nature of modern wants with the married couple’s glib discussion of their ‘enviable’ abode and lifestyle accoutrements; effortlessly exposing both the ludicrous unimportance of the acquisition of things, and the hollowness of their relationship.

In addition, he exposes the corrupting influence of the prurient world of advertising on young women, with both good humour – Charlotte is wittily framed between the enormous bra cups of a billboard, and acuity – Charlotte listens in on a young girl shyly discussing her tentative steps toward a sexual relationship; footage which is preceded and followed by montages of crude images and text from fashion magazines, thus creating the impression of the innocent reality bewildered and adrift amongst crass fantasy.

Une Femme Mariée is a sophisticated, confessional, dynamic piece of film-making and a pivotal work from the Godard canon. It is highly recommended to both Godard completists and to those interested in the malleability and potential of the cinematic artform; particularly with regards to its ability to convey truth and its relationship to reality.

— 25 June 2009
 
Bookmark and Share

Related Articles

2 or 3 Things I Know About Her

By Shaun Huston

04.Aug.09

Godard conveys that virtually all people are cajoled and channeled into various forms of prostitution so as to achieve a level of petit bourgeoise comfort.

La Chinoise

By Erik Hinton

22.May.08

A group of Mao-influenced French students struggle with ideology, the divide between theory and praxis, and the other myriad conflicts of starry-eyed revolutionaries.

Le Gai savoir

By Erik Hinton

14.May.08

This is the ne plus ultra of intellectual torture tests, dripping with intertextuality and esoteric post-structural philosophy.

 
 
Comments

When watching such a difficult film, it is great to have one’s own impression of the film, confirmed by another.  Having as yet watched it only once, I did miss the 24 hours totally and have to look for it more closely.  I also missed that Nic was her stepson and not her son.

I had assumed that Persona was the first film to use this type of close-up technique.  Though structurally different, it is close enough to have influenced Bergman had he seen it, which maybe he had not considering the circumstances.  However, he must have.

On one viewing I found Charlotte completely self-absorbed and vacuous.  Her comment on the killing of Jews joke led me to feel this way, or confirmed my feeling about her as no more than the sum of her parts.  Her compelling and insightful questioning at the end however contradicts the notion.  However, she certainly is not a complete person.  Only the old man seems to be, fool or not.  Nic, appears a robot until that last look, a brilliant capture by Godard, as no child could act that look.

Comment by Brown from LA, CA — July 5, 2009 @ 1:46 pm

Thoughts on a second viewing.  I think I missed the point after one viewing.  I now think that the poster on a billboard expresses the theme of the film. A picture of de Gaulle with the date Juin 18: “Vanquished today by mechanical force, in the future we will be able to overcome by a superior mechanical force.” And so yes, the characters in this film, devoid of an inner life of any kind, are overcome by a superior mechanical force, playing parts referenced in movies, plays and advertisements. Godard has many creative means to express this, and this causes his audience discomfort in the form of “boredom” in both script and cinematography. Well, this is exactly what he was trying to do, and he accomplished it. Our feelings about this film arise from our emotional disconnect, just as the legs, hands, bras, etc. captured by the camera are; the opposite of Berman’s Persona, where one is placed in the mind of the characters through the lens. Additionally, the theme is further enhanced by “we were, we are, overwhelmed by the mechanical, ground and air forces of the enemy…the tactics of the Germans which are causing us to retreat.” This theme is obvious in the “why the barbers?,” the doctor’s purity of race take on contraception, the Resnais (Night and Fog) clip, etc. “I don’t like to be raped or slapped around. That’s not how to get me to be nice,” says Charlotte. Just what Hitler tried to do to the French with much more success than with some other nations.  The de Gaulle speech shows how disconnected he was from the reality of French society.  What national socialism failed to do by force, capitalism soon succeeded in doing in another way.  Everyone in the film is simply devoid of the humanity (even the robot boy)which had been lost in post war France. I find the film sadly funny, as I believe Godard intended. In the opening credits, Godard informs us “A film in black and white.” Contrary to its comic aspect, I think we should take Godard at his word. As to the critical analysis of the film as an expression of Godard’s own experience, who cares?  It’s a superficial distraction to the resulting denial of French complicity and guilt after WWII and the War with Algeria and the consequence of alienation which soon expressed itself in Paris in the 1968 upheaval, the last gasp of a dying culture to a unified European mediocrity.

Comment by Brown from Los Angeles, CA — October 23, 2009 @ 12:21 pm

Add a comment

Please enter your name and a valid email address. Your email address will not be displayed. It is required only to prevent comment spam.

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?