|
Books > Reviews > Russell Brand My Booky Wook: A Memoir of Sex, Drugs, and Stand-Upby Russell BrandHarperCollins Hardcover, 368 pages, $24.99 By Evan SawdeyPopMatters Interviews Editor
In the United States, Russell Brand is primarily known for two things. First off, there’s his scene-stealing turn as rocker Aldous Snow in the movie Forgetting Sarah Marshall (where he fronted the band Infant Sorrow, responsible for the song “We’ve Got to Do Something”), which was a star-making turn if there ever was one. Shortly following that, he hosted the 2008 MTV Music Video Awards, where he called President Bush “that retarded cowboy fella” and made numerous cracks about sleeping with the Jonas Brothers. Humorous? Yes. Boundary-pushing? A bit. The makings of a lasting Stateside career? Not likely. Yet American audiences are only getting half of Brand’s story. In the UK, Brand is one of the most notorious bad-boy comics around, his short-lived cult TV show RE:Brand featuring the young comedian doing outrageous things like taking a bath with a homeless man who has an ulcerating leg and jerking off an older gay man in a club restroom. During an appearance on a TRL-type show with Kylie Minogue, he showed up dressed as Osama Bin Laden. The day? September 12th, 2001. Most recently, Brand got noted UK talk show host Jonathan Ross in serious trouble after the two left a series of lewd phone messages on Fawlty Towers actor Andrew Sachs’ answering machine, claming that Brand slept with his daughter and going into great detail over the alleged affair. The result? Brand quit his radio show, Ross got suspended from his job, and the BBC was slapped with its biggest fine in its history. Enter My Booky Wook. Published prior to Brand’s breakthrough with Forgetting Sarah Marshall, his self-penned My Booky Wook is an unconventional biography, to say the least. Though, yes, he does detail his numerous sexual exploits, his gratuitous experiences with drugs, and some of his more controversial moments on RE:Brand, he never once takes pity on himself, and goes as far as to make sure the reader doesn’t feel any sort of sympathy for him either. His boozing, his drug use, his perpetual womanizing—these are all character faults of his, and by all means he should know better. But he doesn’t. Some of his incidents—like refusing to take his feet down from the seat in front of him on an airplane, or getting on top of a film crew’s van and staying there—stem not from a desire to garner attention, but simply to see exactly how people would react in such a scenario. This curious impulse of his is ultimately what made him who he is, and, more critically, it’s made him experience both the highest highs and lowest lows of the human experience. One story in particular highlights not only his impulses, but some of his admittedly stupid behavior. Following the cancellation of the short-lived RE:Brand, Brand meets a new agent who is determined to finally put a proper leash on his wildman antics, starting with getting Brand to fess up to his long-running drug problem:
During one of Brand’s rehab stints, he is asked to write in a journal about his experiences. A staff member, reviewing his writing, calls Brand out for not actually adhering to the notion of addressing his personal experiences, instead writing down anecdotes for future stand-up routines. Brand agrees, going as far as to say that life is nothing more than collecting material for his comedy—only on stage is when he’s truly living. In describing his childhood, Brand admits that he was the kind of child to act out for attention—a lot. That curious urge to do something just to see how authority figures would react was apparent even then, and, yes, it got him into a lot of trouble—at least until Bugsy Malone. As a young teen, he wound up auditioning for that play, getting cast as the bit part of Fat Sam, but mainly relishing the experience just to see girls getting undressed. Upon performance night, however, he stepped out on stage for the first time, and got struck with that adrenalized frenzy that happens to all performers at one point or another:
And with that, Brand’s career began, starting with a series of small school productions, eventually getting into standup, then small television and film works. He became addicted to the spotlight, and, shortly thereafter, drugs and sex as well. Though his fame and talent would eventually lead him to encounter the likes of Ricky Gervais and Little Britain‘s David Walliams, he often gets starstruck and overcompensates his “cool factor” by going a bit too far, particularly with Walliams, who he unsuccessfully tries to convince to go with him to a seedy European strip joint that doesn’t have a “no touching” rule. Yet those looking for dirt on other UK notables are best advised to look elsewhere: this is Brand’s story through and through. For those who might look at Brand’s life as nothing more than a glut of empty sex and offensive jokes, perhaps no story best emphasizes his views on sex than during the filming of a particular episode of RE:Brand. During it, he asks simply “would anyone sleep with prostitutes if they weren’t able to dehumanize them? If they understood that prostitutes were women with lives and families and problems and hopes and dreams, would they still be able to empty themselves soullessly and leave fifty quid on the table?” During this experiment, he befriends a “somewhat scatterbrained” prostitute named Ali, and spends a week getting to know not only her, but also Pete, her dad. Him and Brand struck up a great relationship, sharing stories of addiction, and becoming friendly with each other and also Ali. Shortly thereafter, Brand explained the premise of the episode to Pete, and that he was going to have sex with his daughter. Pete then got visably upset, began crying, and caused Brand great personal anguish. He didn’t go through with it, ultimately. He showed his producers the footage—the same producers who he had to convince to show him wanking off a man in a public toilet on television—and they were moved by the display, showing that when streetwalkers aren’t dehumanized, the emotional experience becomes overwhelming—too much, even. We do sometimes place ourselves above certain groups of people, which is ultimately a selfish thing to do: we all have our own scenarios, circumstances, and problems. Perhaps its too much to think that our own anguish is above that of another. Heady stuff for a biography whose subtitle is “A Memoir of Sex, Drugs, and Stand-Up”. None of this would be as interesting, however, if Brand wasn’t so damn funny. He writes in a self-deprecating, sarcastic style that is instantly relatable and remarkably digestible (“I couldn’t even distract myself with a wank over that gorgeous slag Venus de Milo; well, she’s asking for it, going out all nude, not even wearing any arms.”). He does drugs ‘cos he’s an idiot, has sex simply because it provides him “a breathing space, when you’re outside of yourself and your own head”, and pushes other people’s buttons just ‘cos he’s curious as to how they’ll react. He’s witty, intelligent, and—through all his debauchery and self-inflicted torment—a remarkably likable chap, charismatic even through his writing. My Booky Wook is a biography of the best kind: 100 percent quotable, and almost completely re-readable. For a tome that so succinctly and smartly details every single embarrassing moment and temporary triumph in his life, one might ask as to why he would go through making these tales public. Perhaps the reason lies in the last paragraph of the first chapter, in which he is forced to re-evaluate his life while stuck in a sex addict recovery center:
In reading My Booky Wook, few things hurt so good. 22 May 2009 |
|
Comments
Funny how I read the book and got an EXACT OPPOSITE impression. I came to the conclusion that Brand was/is a pretentious, pathetic, damaged clown with no real talent who probably didn’t even write his own book; when would he have time to practice writing if he was as wasted all the time as he presents himself here?
‘His’ little-boy-cum-rebel-‘man’ ‘writing’ style was extremely contrived (I mean, look at the ridiculous 5-year-old boy name of this tome) and annoying. He is a narcissist and a sociopath who is basically the crass class clown in a wider arena, a pseudo-intellectual whose belief in his own practically non-existent talent has lulled and gulled others into believing the same of him. Through the whole book he shows absolutely no feeling whatsoever towards other people (telling people he has AIDS when he doesn’t show up for work for a job, for a ‘laugh’? Gimme a BREAK!) and is a spoiled, soiled wee shitebag of a boy (not a man by any means) whom you’d probably slap or punch (or both) if you were in his company for more than thirty seconds and he tried to pull some ‘hilarious’ stunt on you. his button-pushing is simply the act of a young boy pushing boundaries and trying to see what he can get away with; nothing more, nothing less. And the things he says and does to his mother are unforgivable.
For fuck’s sake let’s not perpetuate the Brand myth on this side of the Atlantic. He’s a fucking damaged idiot, and anybody who reads this book (with its self-mutilation, drug and alcohol abuse, misogyny, mouse living in his hair,constant mockery of other people, etc) would agree. Everybody except the reviewer here. Funny how that ‘manic depressive’ diagnosis at the end of the book is like a rebirth, a ‘get out of past life jail free’ card, isn’t it? Very, VERY convenient for his career. Hilarious how a sociopath with no feelings would claim to be a Morrissey fan and to be ‘shy’ and ‘sensitive’. There are very few people I have been so cynical about as to wonder whether they were even telling the truth when diagnosed with a major disease, but Brand is one of them. Boy who cried ‘cor blimey poo-poo pee pee’ (his juvenile boy ramblings were INCREDIBLY annoying) one too many times.
This man is scum, a pisshole in the snow of humanity. Anybody planning reading this book after this erroneous (in my view) book please be aware of this.
G.
Comment by Graham from Cyberspace — May 23, 2009 @ 7:24 am
Evan Sawdey’s is one of the most intelligent reviews I have read of Russell Brand’s book. Graham from Cyberspace sounds like he is in hysterical denial about something, a case of “protesteth too much..” As for “He’s a f*cking damaged idiot….and anybody who reads this book would agree” - that is simply wide off the mark. It sold like hot cakes in Britain, 100s of 1000s of people enjoyed it - it won a Biography of the Year award. Don’t maintain we’re all wrong, Graham from Cyberspace. We’re all entitled to our own opinions. If it’s not to your taste, just don’t bother reading the next one. Just aim your vitreolic bile somewhere else.
Comment by Louise — May 29, 2009 @ 9:36 am
Graham from Cyberspace has made an completely barmy assessment.
One needs to detach druggy-brand from non druggy-brand. They are two separate points in his life.
I’m a different person now to when I was 16.
Everyone is damaged in some way. Perhaps even more so if you’re in public view because you are open to criticism at every moment.
This book, as is written above, is about how one deals with the way in which one is damaged.
It’s a truly biting self assessment.
I highly recommend.
Rodney Goblin.
Comment by Rob from London, UK — August 14, 2009 @ 7:33 am