Hot Fuzz

Director: Edgar Wright

Cast: Simon Pegg, Nick Frost, Jim Broadbent, Paddy Considine, Steve Coogan, Timothy Dalton, Martin Freeman, Paul Freeman, Bill Nighy

(Rogue Pictures, 2007) Rated: R

US theatrical release date: 20 April 2007 (Limited release)

UK theatrical release date: 17 February 2007 (General release)

By Daynah Burnett

Say Something Smart

Hot Fuzz is all about the guys. Chief among them is hot-shot police officer Nicolas Angel (co-writer Simon Pegg), loving the things a guy in an action movie is supposed to love: big guns, fast cars, and the companionship of other guys. Who needs girls when you have guns?

Take Angel’s forensics investigator ex-fiancee Janine (an uncredited Cate Blanchett), who wears her protective goggles and surgical mask throughout her single scene. Indeed, her anonymity is underscored by all the other generic females in the film. Ranging from old to cranky to busty, their triteness makes the weapons even more interesting by comparison. All the straight men’s eyes light up at the sight of an arsenal, as if they’re ogling a nice arse. True, most action pictures of the sort satirized by Hot FuzzBad Boys II and Point Break are name-checked repeatedly -– marginalize women in just this fashion. But Edgar Wright’s action-packed hyper-masculine display ends up looking quite flaccid anyway. 

And that surprised me, as I am an unrepentant fan of Wright and Pegg’s previous collaboration, Shaun of the Dead. It’s the total package: a zany zombie film-meets-bildungsroman that also makes astute, very funny observations on Britishness. When I discovered the TV series Spaced, another Pegg-and-Wright delight, I was hooked. These guys could do no wrong.

And now, Hot Fuzz. The first half is quite excellent: we are introduced to the exemplary Constable Angel through a montage showing his remarkable crime-busting and do-gooding, set to Adam and the Ants’ snappy “Goody Two Shoes.” But his brilliance makes the rest of his London precinct “look bad,” explains the chief inspector (always wonderful Bill Nighy), and so Angel is packed off to bucolic Sandford (“The safest town in Britain”). Here his effort to crack down on underage drinking meets with immediate disapproval from local pub owners; worse, he unwittingly incarcerates his new partner Sgt. Danny Butterman (Nick Frost) for drunk driving, a crime for which Danny’s punishment is to supply the precinct with a morning’s supply of cake and ice cream. The tensions conjure up a capable fish-out-of-water comedy (replete with cameos that include Peter Jackson), as Angel barely cracks a smile at all the hijinks. Neither does he warm to the new home he feels bound to protect and serve.

Of course, not everything in the perennial winner of “Most Picturesque Town” is as pretty as it seems. Soon Angel begins to piece together clues of a sinister plot bubbling beneath Sandford’s placid surface. But his fellow cops scoff at his suggestions, believing him to be too uptight and probably trying to show them up. At the same time, the audience is almost immediately privy to information confirming Angel’s position, which means the film loses anything resembling narrative tension. And with that, the second hour consists of the decidedly boring Angel’s efforts to make his case. It’s a long way to go for a Hollywood-style shoot-out on a rural British High Street.

It’s worth asking why Shaun of the Dead works and Hot Fuzz does not. In the first film, Pegg and Wright chose a genre that was smart already, one with lots of room for social satire and formal unpacking. But with Jerry Bruckheimer-style action flicks, the unpacking extends only as far as homoerotic undertones, already satirized repeatedly, including the ongoing targeting by Reno 911! (And while you could say that both genres are self-satirical at a basic level, they do operate in different spheres of what we might call “intelligence.”) Even the Brit-specific jokes seem tired: the city-country split, for one, is surely done to death, as is the bright detective tracking obscure clues. Though Wright pulls off some impressively stylized action sequences and makes clever use of sound effects, the movie’s premise is a bit stale and the plot often muddled. When—after much spectacular and gratuitous violence—Angel turns to Danny and says, “I feel like I should say something smart,” I found myself really wishing that he would.

— 24 April 2007
Hot Fuzz - Trailer
 
Bookmark and Share

Related Articles

Digital Dynamite: The 30 Best DVDs of 2007

By PopMatters Staff

25.Jan.08

It was the year of the behemoth box set, the multi-disc triumph that tried to give long suffering fans everything their demanding little digital hearts ever desired. Here are PopMatters' 30 picks for the best DVDs of the year.

A Gallery of Good Works: The Best Films of 2007

By PopMatters Staff

11.Jan.08

From Julian Schnabel's artsy The Diving Bell and the Butterfly to the legendary Coen Brothers splendid adaptation of Cormac McCarthy's No Country for Old Men, PopMatters counts down the 30 best films of 2007.

Performance Art: The Best Acting of 2007 - Male

By PopMatters Staff

09.Jan.08

From the tender and eerie precision of Sam Riley's depiction of Joy Division singer Ian Curtis in Control to yet another superlative performance by Daniel Day-Lewis in There Will Be Blood, PopMatters highlights the best male actors of 2007.

 
 
Comments

My My, what a poor review.  First of all Hot Fuzz is set in the fictional village of Sandford, which is in reality Wells.  Somerfield is a supermarket which features quite heavily throughout the film.

And to say the film doesn’t work when compared with Shaun of the dead because it isn’t based on a genre that is smart is absolutely ludicrous.  Shaun of the Dead pays homage to and spoofs zombie films, Hot Fuzz cop/buddy action films (as well as countless others).  I find it difficult to comprehend how you can judge a film by the intelligence of one film genre over another.

Where is the quality control on the net these days?  Perhaps you should concentrate less on trying to “say something smart” and more time paying attention to and analyzing the film that you are choosing to review.

Comment by Simon from Bristol, UK — April 24, 2007 @ 4:23 am

Boo! 

Seriously, I am just going to go ahead and be a smarty pants here and not give this lame review an intelligent rebuttal.  Simply put:  This movie is awesome and your snobby, self-indulgent review “sucks arse” as they would say in jolly ol’ england.  You are smart enough to catch the satire, but you’re trying to be too smart to just enjoy it. 

And, I agree with the previous commenter.  If you truly “got” the jokes in Shaun of the Dead, why get your knickers all in a bunch now?

Comment by the joe from CA — April 24, 2007 @ 3:32 pm

ha ha. mixing up sandford with somerfield is quite hilarious

Comment by frank from CA — April 24, 2007 @ 11:30 pm

wow, 100 words to say “I didn’t get it”.  No wonder I scarcely bother with Popmatters any more.

Comment by Dave — April 25, 2007 @ 5:26 pm

Add a comment

Please enter your name and a valid email address. Your email address will not be displayed. It is required only to prevent comment spam.

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?