|
DVDs > Reviews > Mennan Yapo > Premonition PremonitionDirector: Mennan YapoCast: Sandra Bullock, Julian McMahon, Nia Long, Amber Valletta, Shyann McClure, Courtney Taylor Burness, Peter Stormare(TriStar Pictures, 2007) Rated: PG-13 US DVD release date: 17 July 2007 (Sony) By Brett ParkerPremonition a cinematic puzzle with a very satisfying final piece put in place. It’s one of those Hollywood twist-ending thrillers in which you know every scene is leading towards a revelation that will turn the storyline on its ear. While Premonition is not on the same level as The Sixth Sense, it is nonetheless the first thriller in a while to provoke comparable discussion. Perhaps his death was all just a nightmare. Yet when Linda wakes up the day after that, she finds Jim is dead again and her family members are awaiting the funeral. This is a horrid pattern that begins to form as Linda realizes she is somehow occupying a distorted timeline. This leaves her scrambling to find out the chronology of this event, and when-and how-Jim can be saved. Premonition on DVD is a fun and worth the money. It’s thoroughly compelling, well acted, and doesn’t disappoint in the end. It’s always nice when you walk into a film with rather low expectations and leave having experienced something worthwhile. I wasn’t just surprised by the ending, but also by how wrapped up in the story I became, well before the end. As for the extras, this is one of the few DVDs I can think of in which a Special Feature is more intriguing than the actual film itself. “Real-life premonitions” tells of average people, like Joe McMoneagle, who believe they can glimpse into the future. Apparently, he worked for a department in the CIA that specialized in E.S.P. information, a la John Nash in A Beautiful Mind. We’d expect someone with this kind of story to tell to be a blowhard eccentric, yet what is fascinating about McMoneagle is how nonchalant and convincing he is when explaining himself. Perhaps the filmmakers should’ve focused on McMoneagle’s life for their story. The disc also contains a gag reel, some of which are quite funny (especially ones containing a crow and a human head), yet I’m not so sure that a gag and blooper reel belongs on a DVD for a brooding thriller. That to me is a blooper in itself. Also interesting is a feature that reveals the distorted events of the film in chronological order—a feature sure to please fans that really end up enjoying this film. 17 July 2007Premonition - trailer Related Articles
Premonition (2007)By Cynthia Fuchs16.Mar.07 Sandra Bullock's new thriller takes a tedious turn by suggesting the woman in trouble is "crazy".
Soundless (2004)By Neal Hayes30.Aug.06 Despite a few flaws, this stylish German film delivers thrills, spills, and a heavy dose of fun. |
|
Comments
With all due respect, did you actually watch this movie? While I will give points for the ending, which wasn’t much of a twist but did finally avoid the cliches that cluttered up the rest of the movie, the logic of the movie has enormous gaps in it. For instance, the movie begins with Sandra Bullock greeting her beautiful children. But the chronology of the movie reveals later on that her oldest daughter’s face was lacerated in an accident earlier that week. Even more bizarrely, no one tells Sandra’s mother that the girl ran through a glass door and had her face badly cut? This is only one of many problems the movie had regarding the sequence of events. This doesn’t deserve to be compared to the repugnant “Village,” let alone the “Sixth Sense” masterpiece.
Comment by Tommy Marx from Portland OR — July 17, 2007 @ 5:02 pm
A lot of “twist ending films” have considerable gaps in them, some more so than others. Yet if one of these movies is absorbing enough, tedious observations can get overlooked. I admit that PREMONITION is not a top notch example of the genre and it does have its flaws, but it was effective enough in direction and acting that I was able to overlook cliches and gaps to be entertained by it. Of course it isn’t on the same level as THE SIXTH SENSE (as I clearly stated in my review). But think about it, this film motivated you to create a post on this webpage discussing the plot, hence proving my point that this is the first twist-ending film in a while to evoke discussion.
Comment by Brett Parker — July 18, 2007 @ 2:29 pm
I think that’s where we’ll have to agree to disagree. I understand what you’re saying. Sometimes movies draw you in strong enough - for whatever reason - that you’re willing to overlook or never even notice holes in logic. I have no idea why I can buy the story of “Total Recall” without questioning anything, yet I’ll never be able to stomach “Minority Report” (I could’t get past the idea that people would be convicted of crimes they never committed and no one cared).
“Premonition” really messed it up for me because of the glaring mistake regarding the daughter’s face and the bizarre melodrama of the grandmother saying, “How did she hurt her face?” - as if her granddaughters wouldn’t have told her, her daughter and son-in-law wouldn’t have told her, and she wouldn’t have known herself that her daughter would never have done anything to hurt her granddaughter. It was cheap and unnecessary and made no logical sense.
Still, I’ll freely admit that what might bother me might not be a factor at all to someone else.
However, if I’m motivated to discuss this film, it’s not because of the twists or logic. It’s because it bothers me that Sandra Bullock, who might not be the world’s greatest actress but is far better than she is usually given credit for, gives such a great and understated performance in a movie that wasn’t worth her talent.
Then again, she did “The Net” once upon a time, so I guess I shouldn’t be surprised, LOL.
Comment by Tommy Marx from Portland OR — July 18, 2007 @ 5:18 pm
Yeah, I agree that the daughter’s damaged-face subplot should’ve been dropped altogether, it distracts from the focus of the main narrative. I understand what you’re saying about Bullock’s talent perhaps being too good for a film like this, but I feel sometimes that’s the point. Think of all the countless Hollywood films that have been redeemed by the prescence of a very talented actor. Johnny Depp has practically built a career out of it. I take pleasure in watching talented actors tear through formulaic material. Think of how much more fun it is to watch Bullock in this material than some random television actress called up to big screen duty. As a filmgoer, I say if you have to watch jazzed-up cliches anyways, isnt fun to have a compelling actor to guide you through it?
Comment by Brett Parker — July 18, 2007 @ 9:30 pm