Pushed: The Painful Truth About Childbirth and Modern Maternity Care

by Jennifer Block

Da Capo

Hardcover, 400 pages, $26.00

By Jodie Janella Keith

On one episode of Friends, Chandler blissfully pops a birthing video into his VCR thinking it’s a porn tape. He describes his viewing experience as, ‘Well, let’s just say it’s ironic how footage of someone being born can make you want to kill yourself.’ That about sums up Jennifer Block’s polemic against obstetric practices, Pushed: The Painful Truth About Childbirth and Modern Maternity Care.

For reasons unfathomable to Block and a growing legion of women, informed consent does not apply to women giving birth in an American hospital. Physiological births (Block eschews the term ‘natural birth’ as being synonymous with vaginal birth, which can be rendered unnatural with excessive medical interference) are not offered to most women, regardless of their risk level. Additionally, many commonplace obstetric procedures, such as electronic fetal monitoring and episiotomy, have not been proven to be advantageous by any credible scientific studies even though they are given routinely and not always with women’s consent.

Malpractice insurers for most hospitals mandate that every laboring woman wear an electronic fetal monitor to allay legal fears (the readouts produced by the monitors are admissible as court evidence). Being strapped to a monitor means that a laboring woman can’t walk around, change positions, or otherwise manage her pain with movement. A woman who can’t manage her pain is more likely to request an epidural, which in turn can result in slowed labor. In order to speed labor up she will be given Pitocin, a synthetic form of oxytocin, ‘the love hormone’ that powers contractions. The accelerated labor doesn’t give her body enough time to stretch and loosen on its own, prompting many physicians to perform an episiotomy.

And so one of the many routes to the ‘cascade of intervention’ goes. Once one procedure is initiated, many more tend to follow until a laboring woman looks more like an electronic science kit than a human undergoing a normal physiological process. Women who get inundated with interventions are relatively lucky. Nearly a third of American births are via cesarean section. Doctors prefer cesareans because they’re quicker, can be scheduled (alleviating those middle of the night calls that The Cosby Show‘s Cliff Huxtable used to get), and are easier to defend in malpractice suits than botched vaginal births.
However, cesareans come with greater maternal risk and result in prolonged separation of mothers and infants, hindering breast-feeding and bonding. Block describes a surgical birth in excruciating detail, perhaps putting too fine of a point on the fact that it is a major abdominal operation. Nevertheless, she is right to ask if it’s true that 30% of American women can’t give birth vaginally.

She includes stories from several angry women who feel that a physician-forced cesarean cast a pall on their birth experiences. While these women stories aren’t to be diminished, Block doesn’t speak with women whose lives, or babies’ lives, were saved by the procedure, which leaves the door open for happy cesarean moms to feel like their birth experience is being slighted by Pushed.

Block spends a great deal of ink addressing the question of ‘cesarean delivery by maternal request,’ as the NIH calls it. Clearly, doctors are happy to scapegoat women for the rise in cesarean deliveries over the last 30 years. Block, in turn, is quick to condemn doctors for allowing women to choose a probably unnecessary surgery—an argument that sits awkwardly with pro-choice rhetoric.

Few doctors will now participate in a vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) because of an alleged increased risk of uterine rupture (it’s as bad as it sounds) on the basis of one hotly debated study. Most malpractice insurers also forbid midwives to attempt VBACs. This leaves women who don’t want a repeat cesarean with a few, ridiculously crappy options: 1) labor in the parking lot of the hospital and don’t check into the maternity ward until ready to birth; or 2) have an unassisted home birth.

Interestingly, the home birth movement intersects abortion activists at both extremes. Joining the lefties that wanted to make birth ‘an emergence, not an emergency,’ are devout women that believe birth to be a private process or otherwise object to a bunch of doctors and nurses shaving and fondling their lady bits.

Block’s arguments are sound, but her sometimes sensationalistic reporting detracts from how plainly terrifying the facts are. A pregnant woman checking into the hospital today cannot be guaranteed that she won’t get unnecessary drugs, incisions, or surgery. That alone, without garnish, should justify a fight for maternity care. Pushed pushes its agenda relentlessly, and sometimes repetitively, but by the end dropping a kid in a newspaper-lined cardboard box like a kitty-cat seems safer than a maternity ward. Point taken.

— 19 June 2007
 
Bookmark and Share

Comments

I have not read this book, but recognize the type. one person with a crappy experience in their eyes presenting it as a universal problem without presenting any other opinions. as an obstetric anesthesiologist, i can say that epidurals do not slow labour, and do not cause cesarean delivery. i know that episiotomies are not performed in canadian hospitals except in rare circumstances or during forceps deliveries. It is true that the information from fetal heart rate traces is not particularly sensitive, but rest assrued we would all have our asses sued off if a baby was born with problems, and the fetal heart rate was not looked at. this type of journalism cannot be viewed as an objective report about north american maternal care.

Comment by bruce from canada — June 19, 2007 @ 10:19 am

Clearly Bruce has not read the book.  At least he’s honest about that.  If he had, he’d find it is not “one person’s crappy experience” but a meticulously researched journalistic expose.  The author hasn’t even given birth and doesn’t have some axe to grind.  She goes into great detail about why cesarean rates continue to climb, and indeed, doctors worried about “having their asses sued off” if babies are “born with problems” is prime among them.  Should doctors be practicing defensive or convenience-based medicine?  Anyone concerned about the continued deterioration of our medical system should read this book.  Doctors most of all, if they can stop being reflexively defensive about some of their practices long enough to really hear what it has to say.

Comment by Susan from Boston — June 24, 2007 @ 7:50 am

Ms. Keith’s comment that there are no positive cesarean experiences in the book, if true, immediately places this book in the Polemic file in my mind.  There are enough well written books out there for me to feel fine skipping the diatribes and fear-mongering pieces.  I do believe the current medical system with it’s CYA practices is a joke, and that it fosters sub-standard care.  Let’s continue to hold medical practitioners accountable, but allow them to earn a living and give good care by stopping punitive damages, or least putting strict caps on it.  Also, massive counter-suits and disbarment for attorneys bringing frivolous lawsuits would help too.

My wife wanted to try her first birth as natural as possible.  After a very long labor, with no anesthesia and little progress, she (we) were told an epidural and Pitocin were needed because the baby needed to come out.  The epidural caused my wife to have a huge spike in blood pressure (I’m told it normally makes pressure lower).  She was then told a cesarean would be necessary.  The surgery was over quickly and she healed without incident.  What made this situation alright was that nobody forced anything.  Questions were asked, and we were given time to think.  The staff was gracious, caring and professional.  My wife had a sense of closure immediately, because she did what she could and was treated as an intelligent capable person.

My daughter’s birth went well.  Things almost didn’t go that way, because less than a month before birth, we were given a list of questions to ask her OB.  Turns out he has an extremely high cesarean rate.  I couldn’t get it out of him, but we both read the conversation as confirming that his cesarean rate was over 50%, and his episiotomy rate for vaginal birth was even higher.  He required an I.V. and fetal monitoring upon entering the hospital, which neither the hospital, our insurance, nor the state we were in required.  He also said he wouldn’t allow any of his patients to go more than a few days past their due date.  We hadn’t known what questions to ask, but after asking them my wife was terrified of the man, and I was frustrated and angry.  We asked around and found a local clinic that was run by a team of OBs, with Nurse Midwives on staff as an alternative.  After wrestling the records from the hyper-interventionist OB (with some insults directed at us), we met with each of the midwives and one of the OBs, and the several days we were in the hospital worked with one of the midwives, until it was decided that intervention was necessary.  At that time the OB we’d met with came in, in addition to the midwife, and finished what needed to be done.

There is a proper place for intervention, but reducing “variables” by funneling the mother through a prescribed regimen, as the first Dr. was intending, would have left my wife traumatized indefinitely, questioning if she’d done her part.

FYI - Ms. Keith, maybe it’s just me, but your use of the word “crappy” and the phrases like “shaving and fondling their lady bits” and “dropping a kid in a newspaper-lined cardboard box like a kitty-cat” might do the job of making your writing more “accessible” or “conversational”, but it also makes for some awkward and unpleasant reading.  Stick with the T.V. show quotes and examples though - they’re effective.

Comment by Chris from U.S. — June 26, 2007 @ 8:37 am

Add a comment

Please enter your name and a valid email address. Your email address will not be displayed. It is required only to prevent comment spam.

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?