![]() Weeds: Season ThreeCast: Mary-Louise Parker, Kevin Nealon, Elizabeth PerkinsRated: N/A By Stuart HendersonShowtime’s Weeds, a comedy about a likeable suburban widow trying to raise her two oddball sons by selling marijuana, never made all that much sense. For all of its inspired writing, impressive acting, and witty skewering of middle class conventionality (and hypocrisy), it was always already based on a premise that didn’t work. Why would this intelligent, capable, and reasonably well-adjusted mother in her mid-40s dive headlong into something dangerous, illegal, and unnecessary? While the show tried to offer need as an excuse – her husband had died suddenly, leaving her saddled with both debt and heartache – it still forced the audience to make a rather lofty leap into Imaginationland. Still, many of us went along with glee, if only for the opportunity to visit with these quirky characters for a while, and to have a laugh at the expense of those poor fools inhabiting the cookie-cutter “little boxes” from the show’s theme song. But, as (the luminous and milky and doe-eyed and, let’s face it, all-around dreamy) Mary-Louise Parker’s character Nancy Botwin drifted further into the criminal underworld that feeds America’s insatiable hunger for narcotics, the careful satiric focus of the early episodes slipped into the background, and a kind of absurdist inanity began to take hold. For viewers to follow along, Nancy needed to remain desperate, yes, but also at least nominally virtuous – the reason the satire made sense was the very fact of the innocuousness of her crime. Marijuana, we were all expected to agree, is no big deal. She was servicing bored housewives, bored officeworkers, bored college kids, bored public officials. The suburbs were the show’s metaphor for the emptiness and existential longing of the contemporary big box world – and marijuana was a metaphor for our societal desire for escape, however illusory (and fleeting, and, ultimately, unhelpful). By the end of the second season, however, Nancy had fallen in with gun-toting gangsters, had become accessory to the murder of a Drug Enforcement Agency agent, had inadvertently pushed her eldest son into the crimeworld, and had lost whatever moral sway she might have had with her audience. She was in over her head, and the walls around her were crumbling and tumbling and caving, and as we began season three, there looked to be no way out. It was a hell of a cliffhanger, but it was also a fatal writers’ pool mistake – there was no way out, period. Sure, she would escape this immediate situation (however zanily and improbably), but in order to not die she had now become, completely and fully, a criminal and a gangster. Can anyone explain to me why I should continue to cheer for her now? She allows her teenage son to deal drugs (and to get beaten to a pulp by some bikers whom she crosses, brazenly, because they sell an inferior product), she neglects her youngest child who is still clearly reeling with grief over his father’s death, she manages to justify to herself the murders and other horrific crimes that are perpetrated in the support of her endeavors, and she fails to get out of the business at least once per episode – when there is now no possible reason for us to agree that she should just stick it out. More frustrating by a longshot is this season’s unaccountable lack of imagination in the writing department. The episodes are shorter than they had been in previous seasons (down to less than 20 minutes sometimes, not including the bloated “last time on Weeds” intros), and what happens in them tends to be one-note plot developments rather than anything more compellingly complex. Nancy’s ne’er-do-well brother-in-law, everyone’s favourite comedic foil, spends virtually the entire season doing what amount to skits that we cut to for an aside from the main Nancy storylines. He joins the army (which is painted to be murderous, homophobic, evil, hateful, ignorant, pathetic, and, well, you name the unsubtle adjective and they’ll try to push it on you – I mean, really, how juvenile?), he is chased by government agents, and he becomes a porn star who – wait for it – sticks his foot in women’s vaginas. In almost every way, all of the main action this season could have taken place without him, a major writing problem to say the very least. While earlier seasons had fun with myriad racial, gender, sexual, and class issues stemming from white, middle class Nancy’s need to associate with working class minority groups, what had been mostly incisive before has become merely cliché. Her gay associate goes around telling everyone that he is GAY, and wearing ridiculous GAY outfits. A poor black woman gets pregnant by a suburban man so that she can get at his money. Black gangsters abound, Hispanic gangs rear their heads, Eastern European immigrants appear as murderous Mafioso-types, and poor white bikers show up only to be violent and surly. All four groups make jokes (jokes!) about raping Nancy. L-O-L? While a scene from early in the first season (where Nancy is lying in bed, trying to masturbate to the memory of her dead husband amid all of the horrific stress she has taken on herself) could bring me to empathetic tears, little in these recent episodes even pretends to approach such emotional depth. When, late in the season, Nancy’s youngest son begins to hallucinate conversations with his dead father, her response is to beg him to stop because “it makes Mommy very sad”. And there’s the problem – it’s all about her for some reason, when everyone else around her is falling apart. This isn’t clever satire anymore, but something like an unintentionally Bergmanesque study of moral self-destruction. However, since this horror is punctuated by scenes in which Kevin Nealon makes fart jokes and says “cunt” over and over again, Elizabeth Perkins vamps around being a one-note bitch, and guest star Mary-Kate Olsen tries (and fails resoundingly) to not look like a Hobbit, it’s pretty tough to think this stuff is very deeply considered. Why does this happen to good shows? 27 June 2008Related Articles
Weeds: Season 4By Andrew Winistorfer21.Jun.09 This show is like a bad habit that just won't go away.
Weeds: Season Five PremiereBy Daynah Burnett08.Jun.09 I want to laugh at Weeds, but its constant oscillation between vilification and victimization of its female characters leaves me frustrated. WeedsBy Cynthia Fuchs25.Jun.08 The fourth season of Weeds began with Agrestic burned down and Nancy (Mary-Louise Parker) on the U.S.-Mexican border, aptly liminal. |
|
Comments
i just happened to watch the first disc of this season last night and was disenchanted from episode one. i couldn’t agree with your insights more—the show has gone from being clever (albeit arch), to pithy and plot-driven. with generally unlikeable characters (imagine how much we’d like nancy if she looked like, say, an actual human being and not a celestial being?) doing generally unlikable things, i also found myself unmoved by the series attempts at sympathy-tugging. (i’m thinking of the scene where nancy sits on the stairs as shane tells her he’s proud of her…it wasn’t a sad inversion of their roles as much as pathetic evidence of nancy’s neediness and general selfishness as a mother).
why does this happen to good shows? because good shows shouldn’t run longer than two seasons. evidently on american tv, it’s impossible to construct an indefinite narrative arc that relies on character and tone rather than guns and nonsense. for all of their attempts at being HBO, this series and californication have proved that showtime is merely engaged in a souless pantomime with good-looking people. jenji kohan handed them a diamond and they scrubbed it until it turned into a turd.
Comment by d.burnett from California — June 27, 2008 @ 10:20 am
While I wouldn’t agree with everything you said - I still find the show enjoyable enough that I’ll buy the fourth season when it comes out - I have to agree with a lot of it. I actually told my friend after watching the third season that it didn’t qualify as a comedy anymore. Instead it’s become darker and more ridiculous simultaneously. Seriously, a military that would send two recruits to the middle of nowhere to aim missiles at them? A man almost murdered by a group of bikers who only survives because animals kept pissing on him? An overweight lesbian model who has to be one of the most obnoxious and unlikeable characters ever created? No wonder Elizabeth Perkins character is such a bitch - if I was her, I’d buy her ex-husband and daughter a house in Amityville and lock them in.
Season two was great - the idea of everyone working together to grow a cash crop was perfect. Season three revolved around the main character trying to escape slavery (always good for a laugh or two) while her family went straight to hell.
Still, I can’t help but hope that season four bounces back. Yes, American television runs far too long, d.burnett, but sometimes shows can bounce back (in its fourth season, Desperate Housewives finally returned the show to the level it lost in the second and third seasons).
Comment by Tommy Marx from Portland OR — June 28, 2008 @ 4:45 pm