In some ways, it’s a natural subject for cinema. It has scope. It packs inherent drama. It has all the swagger, the allure, and the blood-spattered spectacle that makes the visual medium so viable. Yet the war film—an indirect derivation of the thriller, action effort, and (sometimes) critical commentary—is often foiled by the very elements it has to cater to. Offer up too much realism and the audience looks away in dismay. Play up the arrogance or the attraction and your motives are questioned. Human conflict is a tricky concept to completely nail down. Some want nothing but the immoral aftermath, never once addressing the equally depraved aspects that brought us to this point. Many crave a helping of clear-cut heroics and villainy, the better to secure their hegemonic/sovereign/patriotic stance.
So coming up with a list of the Greatest War Movies of All Time is tough, especially in light of the divergent approaches taken. Want nothing more than flag waving and enemy annihilation? Go for the ‘50s combat conceit, a time when John Wayne, Clark Gable, and Burt Lancaster would steer the stars and stripes course. Or maybe your prefer the ‘70s, with its stark cynicism and attempt to grapple with the bigger issues involved. From something as sobering as Schindler’s List to the over the top casting that carries The Longest Day, one’s decision has to balance the message with the media. In that regard—and in recognition of the 24 May release of Platoon on Blu-ray—SE&L offers up its list of the 10 Best looks at human conflict through the ages. Most are decided on the field of battle. But as you can see, not even war’s impact is singular. Sometime, the reach can be very long indeed.
For decades, there were few films made from what could best be referred to as the “enemy’s” perspective. If they were, they didn’t get wide distribution outside their country of origin. So when Wolfgang Peterson’s old school thriller about a German U-boat broke out in 1981, it signaled a trend toward viewing conflict from all sides of the stratagem. Even in its various director’s cut permutations, it remains a singular vision of the everyday/everyman toll of confinement and armed conflict.
Hollywood renegade Samuel Fuller had seen a great deal of action in WWII as part of the title unit, otherwise known as US First Infantry. From frontline firefights to the liberation of the concentration camp at Falkenau, the filmmaker poured all of his experiences into this hard-nosed slice of Golden Era aggrandizement. Severely cut before making little impact in theaters, it would be several decades—and seven years after his death—before Fuller’s full version was released, to well deserved critical acclaim.
Along with Flag of Our Fathers, Clint Eastwood set out to supply a complementary companion piece to pal Stephen Spielberg’s D-Day spectacle. Tackling the bloody Pacific theater, this view from the Japanese front remains a definitive, defiant statement. Arguing for the honor and duty of the Asian fighter, as well as the utter hopelessness of their ultimate cause, Eastwood managed to make death and destruction seem almost poetic. Drawn from the actual title source, it’s a moving and maddening experience.
Not all wars are fought on vast international battlefields. Some occur within remote regions struggling to survive decades of oppression and persecution. Focusing on the freedom fighters looking to liberate themselves from French Colonization, director Gillo Pontecorvo took the battle to the streets of the Algerian capital, illustrating the often futile approach to eventual liberation. Looking like a documentary and feeling like a shot in the gut, it expertly illustrates the lengths people will go for/against power.
At its core, Jean Renoir’s first major masterpiece highlights the class struggles and distinctions among French POWs in World War I. Like his later work of genius, The Rules of the Game, it also exposes the senseless and often ideologically similar politics that drive men to destroy each other. Clearly, Renoir was successful in making his various points. The film was eventually banned in France, and when the Nazis came to power and invaded, they seized all prints and negatives.
// Moving Pixels
"It's easy to dismiss blood and violence as salacious without considering why it is there, what its context is, and what it might communicate.READ the article