Call for Essays About Any Aspect of Popular Culture, Present or Past

cover art

Project Nim

Director: James Marsh
Cast: Nim Chimpsky

(Red Box Films, Passion Pictures, BBC Films; US DVD: 7 Feb 2012)

I want to get this out of the way right off the bat because the guilt is killing me – I have not seen Man on Wire, James Marsh’s Oscar-winning documentary. I know. I’m a horrible critic, art enthusiast, and human being. I have no excuse. It’s available on DVD, iTunes, and Netflix Instant. The best reasoning I can provide is I’m intimidated by its greatness. For a good chunk of time, it was thee movie everyone agreed was phenomenal. Then it won the Oscar. Then it didn’t go away. Four years later and I still haven’t taken the time to appreciate it.

If you’re looking for a comparison of Marsh’s masterpiece with his latest retrospective documentary, the best I can do is speculate. And if I do that, I would say Project Nim is a minor work of compelling storytelling—comparatively speaking. Marsh combines present-day interviews with archived footage to tell the tale of Nim Chimpsky, a chimpanzee raised by human scientists in New York during the ‘70s.

Giving away any more of the story would be criminal to the film. Project Nim works almost solely as a personal tale of one chimp’s life and the lives he affected. There are (voiced and unspoken) allusions to nature vs. nurture, what makes us human, and animal cruelty, but these all feel secondary to Nim’s journey. We watch him from infancy to adulthood and every step in between. He talks to us through his human observers. We come as close as possible to knowing Nim without, you know, actually knowing him.

Therein lies the true brilliance of Marsh’s work: because of our own, slowly built attachment to Nim, it’s easy for us as an audience to identify with each and every one of Nim’s human friends (and a few enemies). There’s the professor who founded the experiment at Columbia University in New York whose relationship with Nim may or may not be as genuine as he wants it depicted. There’s Nim’s first mother figure who didn’t care whether or not any scientific records were kept on his development. There’s the graduate student who may have been closer to Nim than anyone else, but has mixed feelings about the project.

There are many more individuals who are surprisingly open about their experiences with the chimp. Marsh captures and presents their stories with an impressive degree of neutrality – just when you think his picture might lean one way or the other, he introduces a new opinion that steers the last in a new direction (or just flat out contradicts it). His presentation of the information is bold, unbiased, and all encompassing. No side goes unheard in the same manner as the best journalistic endeavors. TV reporters take note – this is how it’s done.

That said, the issues present in Nim’s story aren’t as fleshed out as Nim himself. Some of their diminishment is explained by third act revelations from the conflicted scientists’ theories. The rest seems left out intentionally, a gamble made by Marsh I think works. Project Nim is powerful because of its duality; some will leave the film seriously discussing the subtly conferred issues while others will simply be left wondering how Nim Chimpsky felt about the experiment in which he unwillingly participated.

Others may not be similarly affected, and my own feelings aren’t as strong as other, more potent docs like Who Killed the Electric Car? and Hoop Dreams. Yet Project Nim is expertly crafted and undeniably endearing. The DVD’s special features follow a similar trajectory. Marsh provides feature commentary and a “Making Of” featurette, two bonus mainstays that are always appreciated.

The third and last extra, though, makes the section worth checking out. “Bob’s Journey” follows one of the film’s human subjects as he travels with the film to various festivals and screenings. He believes in the movie, but more importantly, he really loves chimps. In the ten minute mini-doc, Bob visits Nim’s son and spends time just playing with the young monkey. It’s a touching scene that works as a relevant epilogue to the feature film. It also parallels the film’s irreproachable intentions; love, common sense, and scientific pursuits can coexist. We just have to find the happy medium for all three.


Extras rating:

Ben Travers is an awards season analyst and prognosticator with a devout interest in all things film & TV. Mr. Travers lives in Los Angeles as an experienced writer and filmmaker with an extensive portfolio of coverage, including thorough reporting on the Academy Awards, weekly box office reports, and more reviews written than will ever be read. He is a graduate of the University of Iowa with degrees in both journalism and cinema.

Related Articles
16 Feb 2015
Felicity Jones' remarkable performance can't save The Theory of Everything, in large part because the film doesn't fully commit to her own point of view.
5 Jan 2015
Life-spanning biopics are still the ultimate Oscar bait in 2014. Here’s hoping that no one will be biting in the future.
By PopMatters Staff
28 Dec 2014
The world of cinema in 2014 is blessed with a host of performances by female actors at the top of their game. From zany sci-fi to lamentations on aging, the performances on these list will follow the viewer long after she leaves the theater.
By Kenneth Turan
14 Nov 2014
The Theory of Everything is emotionally effective as an examination of Stephen Hawking's life and thought comes down to chemistry, the interconnected performances of Eddie Redmayne and Felicity Jones.
Now on PopMatters
PM Picks

© 1999-2015 All rights reserved.™ and PopMatters™ are trademarks
of PopMatters Media, Inc.

PopMatters is wholly independently owned and operated.